For work, I often have to log on to several different servers which are generally structured in the following:
ssh [username]#[clientName]-[product].[domainName]
The username and domain name are always the same, but the client and the product vary. On my previous computer, I was given a script which allowed me to log on to these servers by typing [product] [clientName], but I lost it when I switched PCs and now I don't know how to do that again.
Though I no doubt have been using the wrong search terms or something, I can't seem to find an answer to this question. All my searches lead me to aliases, which work but only for specific commands, not a general one where I can change the variable. I have over 100 clients and many have multiple different products, so an alias for each is impractical.
Could anyone explain how I implement this?
Bonus: It would also be useful for the command to also take me to a specific sub-directory on the server.
In the script, $0 is the name of the script, and $1 is the first argument. So the script should do:
ssh username#"$1"-"$0".domainName
Create the script once with a generic name, then use symbolic links to that for all the product names.
Put the script and all the links in a directory, and add that directory to your $PATH.
Related
I have a conundrum and I am not necessarily trying to cheat or anything I am just simply stuck. I am trying to complete an assignment for my intro to Linux class and I was hoping someone would be able to help me find the right solution. I have to:
In the same directory (where the last file was found) list all files
starting with "host" --
Use the long listing format Use a command to
find the file that shows the name of your computer
now the directory in question is /etc and I have tried several commands to no avail for both of these but especially the first one. I have tried find and locate and even attempted a grep and it just is not working as intended. I can't get files that start with "host" at most I keep getting a list of permission denied or files that end in .host and so I am not sure what I am doing wrong but I really need help so I can turn in my assignment. You don't have to tell me what the exact command should be I am just looking for some guidance again I am not trying to cheat just need help to figure it out.
and welcome to Stack Overflow! Here are some pointers.
See globbing in Linux and the * symbol.
"long listing" is an option for ls command, see ls --help. The name of your computer (or, more accurately, the name of your host) is a file in /etc/. You should see it when doing #1.
Can I force BASH to see certain folder (let's call it main_folder) as the root of my file-system? I need BASH to behave this way at least during auto-completion of parameter names and command names, while inside the folder.
Let's say that I have directory tree that looks like this:
/z/y/main_folder/a.txt
/z/y/main_folder/bin/b.txt
/z/y/main_folder/bin/c.txt
/z/y/main_folder/bin/d.sh
Now that I call this custom version of bash, I could simply type:
/> /bi(TAB)/(TAB) /a(TAB)
What would expand to:
/> /bin/d.sh /a.txt
Where d.sh is command to be run and a.txt is it's first parameter. If I was CDed into /bin/ I could do:
/bin/> ./(TAB) (TAB)(TAB)
What would expand the command d.sh, and would give three options for the first parameter (namely: b.txt, c.txt, d.sh).
Few brief additional points:
I do not care if the original root of the file-system is inaccessible or is accessible via hard/soft link.
I do not care if I am able to run any commands that are out of scope for main_folder (I will change the $PATH variable anyway) or any shell builtins.
I do not care what the $PS#, $PWD, etc. variables actually hold.
I do not want to make my own version of BASH (changing source-code). My application should (probably) be started via some script (sh) or program (C/C++/C#) that setups the environment and either continues in interactive mode or runs interactive shell on one of it's last lines.
I want to run this as an unprivileged user. I do not want to allow the user to chroot.
I am not concerned with security, and I am not intending to jail anyone. I simply need BASH to auto-complete.
I would not mind to 'trap' BASH during directory lookups.
I have a feeling that set, compgen, complete and compopt builtins are what I need to utilize, but I do not know how. It does not seem that the examples I have found about these commands show all the features, and man pages are quite chaotic.
Thanks, Kupto :)
Hi I'm sure there is some way of doing what I want, but maybe I'm just attacking it the wrong way. Hope someone can help.
I have a dev box that I SSH in to from several other machines. In order to debug remotely I need to configure my debugger with my client machine's IP, which changes when I log in from different machines. I'm getting bored of doing this manually all the time so thought I'd try and automate it.
I'm creating a script that is automatically run upon SSH connection that will modify a configuration setting in a PHP ini file. The problem is the PHP ini files are all owned by root so I'm not sure how to modify those files if I'm just logging in as a normal user.
There's not really a security concern with my dev box so I could just change the owner of the ini file, but I wanted it to be more automated than that.
My current attempt is a python script located in my home dir, which is called from .bashrc when I connect via SSH. I don't see how I can gain root privileges from there, I am pretty new to linux though. I thought maybe there would be some other method I'm not aware of.
You have a file that is owned by root. You clearly need to either find a way to mark the file as modifiable by you; or a way for you to elevate your privileges so that you are allowed to modify it.
This leads to the two traditional unix approachs to doing this. They are:
To create a group with which to mark the file, ie. initdebug; chgrp/chmod the file so it has the initdebug group and is group writable; and, add yourself to the initdebug group so you can use the group write permission to modify the file.
To create a very small, audited binary executable (this won't work with a script) that will perform the specific modifications you desire (for simplicity I would suggest copying one of a selection of root owned PHP ini files into the right place). Then chown'ing the file so it is owned by root, and setting the suid bit on the executable so it will execute as root.
You can also combine the two approaches, either:
Not making yourself a member of the initdebug group or suid on the executable, but rather setting group of the executable to initdebug and setting its sgid bit; or,
Keeping the executable suid root but making it only executable by initdebug and therefore only executable by users added to that group.
The security trade off is in the ease/risk of privilege escalation should someone hack your account. If there is a stack/heap overflow or similar vulnerability in the executable and it is executing as root, then you are gone. If the PHP ini file can be modified to open a remote-vulnerability then if they can directly access the ini file you are gone.
As I suspect the latter is possible, you are probably best off with a small executable.
Note: As I alluded to above, unix does not acknowledge the s[ug]id bits on scripts (defined as anything using the #!... interpreter syntax). Hence, you will have to use something you can compile down to a binary. So that probably means either C, C++, Java(using gcj), ML, Scheme(mit), Haskell(ghc).
If you haven't done any C or C++ programming before, I would recommend one of the others as a suid binary is not a project with which to learn C/C++. If you don't know any of the other languages, I would recommend either ML or Java as the easiest to to write something small and simple.
(btw, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_compilers includes a list of alternative compilers you can use. Just make sure it compiles to native, not bytecode. As far as the OS is concerned a bytecode vm is just another interpreter).
you can do it with insert your user to sudoers file on mechine that you want to remote,
for the example you can see my blog.
this is the url : http://nanamo3lyana.blogspot.com/2012/06/give-priviledge-normal-user-as-root.html
and then on your automaticly script add sudo on your command.
i'm sorry my english not good.
I often find myself taking a lot of time to navigate through my filesystem when using the linux shell. This generally occurs because the autocompletion of bash only works if you provide the start of the file/dirname. What I often end up in is a lot of 'ls' with 'grep' commands, finally doing a 'cd'.
When you use a GUI based filebrowser (like Nautilus) you can type any part of a file/dirname and it will have matches that it jumps to directly. This makes it a lot easier and faster to navigate.
I wonder if anybody knows any great tools that helps with this problem. I know of the existence of Midnight Commander, though I never really used it for real and I couldn't figure out a direct solution for my problem the first couple of times I tried it. Also it seems not suitable because I want to have my shell's current working directory to be changed so I can do stuff there, instead of being stuck in an external program like Midnight Commander.
Try autojmp
https://github.com/joelthelion/autojump
And following article provides another solution
http://jeroenjanssens.com/2013/08/16/quickly-navigate-your-filesystem-from-the-command-line.html
You can first use the autocd or autopushd in zsh. You would just have to type the directory you want to go to, without the hassle of typing cd or pushd everytime.
You also have the globing possibility. For example, if I got those file in a directory:
1-a.tar
1-b.tar
c.tar
I can just type
*a.tar
without caring about the beginning of the file.
As a last solution you can always use an alias to the find command with a personalized option.
I am trying to write a bash script to do a task, I have done pretty well so far, and have it working to an extent, but I want to set it up so it's distributable to other people, and will be opening it up as open source, so I want to start doing things the "conventional" way. Unfortunately I'm not all that sure what the conventional way is.
Ideally I want a link to an in depth online resource that discusses this and surrounding topics in depth, but I'm having difficulty finding keywords that will locate this on google.
At the start of my script I set a bunch of global variables that store the names of the dirs that it will be accessing, this means that I can modify the dir's quickly, but this is programming shortcuts, not user shortcuts, I can't tell the users that they have to fiddle with this stuff. Also, I need for individual users' settings not to get wiped out on every upgrade.
Questions:
Name of settings folder: ~/.foo/ -- this is well and good, but how do I keep my working copy and my development copy separate? tweek the reference in the source of the dev version?
If my program needs to maintain and update library of data (gps tracklog data in this case) where should this directory be? the user will need to access some of this data, but it's mostly for internal use. I personally work in cygwin, and I like to keep this data on separate drive, so the path is wierd, I suspect many users could find this. for a default however I'm thinking ~/gpsdata/ -- would this be normal, or should I hard code a system that ask the user at first run where to put it, and stores this in the settings folder? whatever happens I'm going ot have to store the directory reference in a file in the settings folder.
The program needs a data "inbox" that is a folder that the user can dump files, then run the script to process these files. I was thinking ~/gpsdata/in/ ?? though there will always be an option to add a file or folder to the command line to use that as well (it processed files all locations listed, including the "inbox")
Where should the script its self go? it's already smart enough that it can create all of it's ancillary/settings files (once I figure out the "correct" directory) if run with "./foo --setup" I could shove it in /usr/bin/ or /bin or ~/.foo/bin (and add that to the path) what's normal?
I need to store login details for a web service that it will connect to (using curl -u if it matters) plan on including a setting whereby it asks for a username and password every execution, but it currently stores it plane text in a file in ~/.foo/ -- I know, this is not good. The webservice (osm.org) does support oauth, but I have no idea how to get curl to use it -- getting curl to speak to the service in the first place was a hack. Is there a simple way to do a really basic encryption on a file like this to deter idiots armed with notepad?
Sorry for the list of questions, I believe they are closely related enough for a single post. This is all stuff that stabbing at, but would like clarification/confirmation over.
Name of settings folder: ~/.foo/ -- this is well and good, but how do I keep my working copy and my development copy separate?
Have a default of ~/.foo, and an option (for example --config-directory) that you can use to override the default while developing.
If my program needs to maintain and update library of data (gps tracklog data in this case) where should this directory be?
If your script is running under a normal user account, this will have to be somewhere in the user's home directory; elsewhere, you'll have no write permissions. Perhaps ~/.foo/tracklog or something? Again, add a command line option, and also an option in the configuration file, to override this.
I'm not a fan of your ~/gpsdata default; I don't want my home directory cluttered with all sorts of directories that programs created without my consent. You see this happen on Windows a lot, and it's really annoying. (Saved games in My Documents? Get out of here!)
The program needs a data "inbox" that is a folder that the user can dump files, then run the script to process these files. I was thinking ~/gpsdata/in/ ?
As stated above, I'd prefer ~/.foo/inbox. Also with command-line option and configuration file option to change this.
But do you really need an inbox? If the user needs to run the script manually over some files, it might be better just to accept those file names on the command line. They could just be processed wherever, without having to move them to a "magic" location.
Where should the script its self go?
This is usually up to the packaging system of the particular OS you're running on. When installing from source, /usr/local/bin is a sensible default that won't interfere with package managers.
Is there a simple way to do a really basic encryption on a file like this to deter idiots armed with notepad?
Yes, there is. But it's better not to, because it creates a false sense of security. Without a master password or something, secure storage is not possible! Pidgin, for example, explicitly stores passwords in plain text, so that users won't make any false assumptions about their passwords being stored "securely". So it's best just to store them in plain text, complain if the file is world-readable, and add a clear note to the manual to warn the user what's going on.
Bottom line: don't try to reinvent the wheel. There have been thousands of scripts and programs that faced the same issues; most of them ended up adopting the same conventions, and for good reasons. Look at what they do, and mimic them instead of reinventing the wheel.
You can start with the Filesystem Hierarchy Standard. I'm not sure how well followed it is, but it does provide some guidance. In general, I try to use the following:
$HOME/.foo/ is used for user-specific settings - it is hidden
$PREFIX/etc/foo/ is for system-wide configuration
$PREFIX/foo/bin/ is for system-wide binaries
sym-links from $PREFIX/foo/bin are added to $PREFIX/bin/ for ease of use
$PREFIX/foo/var/ is where variable data would live - this is where your input spools and log files would live
$PREFIX should default to /opt/foo even though almost everyone seems to plop stuff in /usr/local by default (thanks GNU!). If someone wants to install the package in their home directory, then substitute $HOME for $PREFIX. At least that is my take on how this should all work.