There are a whole suit of tools available to monitor networks in Azure. Of these, I am trying to understand the difference between Connection Monitor, Connection Troubleshoot and IP Flow Verify. The last two are part of Network Watcher.
To me, it seems like these are meant for the same purpose: to check if communication is allowed between a source and a destination.
What exactly are the differences between these services and in what are use cases for each?
Related
I’m looking for a framework/platform that would allow me to execute remote commands on a Windows machine and report back the results.
These machines would be public outside our company network, probably behind firewalls, proxies, etc. We have complete access over them and can configure them in any way we want. Think ATMs with 3G network.
I guess what i’m looking is something like SaltStack remote execution. But that enterprise plan has a hight cost per minion, and I need to install it on the thousands.
Another possible solution would be something like Octopus Deploy, Azure DevOps or any CD tool for that matter but without the need for environments.
I’ve looked also at ansible, but without an agent to overcome the target being behind firewalls, routers, proxies, I’m not sure how the reverse connection would work.
I would like to avoid Puppet or Chef for now. Ideally a cloud based solution would be wonderful, especially in azure.
Any recommends, directions?
Octopus Deploy is currently working on "Ops Processes" which sounds like it might fit what you are looking for. It's on our roadmap if you are interested, and we are planning to have the first round of features from this ready to ship in the next 8 weeks or so.
Caveat: I work at Octopus so read into that what you will
Problem:
I have an AWS EC2 instance running FreeBSD. In there, I'm running a NodeJS TLS/TCP server. I'd like to create a set of rules (in my NodeJS application) to be able to individually block IP addresses programmatically based on a few logical conditions.
I'd like to run an external (not on the same machine/instance) firewall or load-balancer, that I can control from NodeJS programmatically, such that when certain conditions are given, I can block a specific remote-address(IP) before it reaches the NodeJS instance.
Things I've tried:
I have initially looked into nginx as an option, running it on a second instance, and placing my NodeJS server behind it, but after skimming through the NGINX
Cookbook
Advanced Recipes for High Performance
Load Balancing I've learned that only the NGINX Plus (the paid version) allows for remote/API control & customization. While I believe that paying $3500/license is not too much (considering all NGINX Plus' features), I simply can not afford to buy it at this point in time; in addition the only feature I'd be using (at this point) would be the remote API control and the IP address blocking.
My second thought was to go with the AWS/ELB (elastic-load-balancer) by integrating AWS' SDK into my project. That sounded feasible, unfortunately, after reading a few forum threads and part of their documentation (unless I'm mistaken) it seems these two features I need are not available on the AWS/ELB. AWS seems to offer an entire different service called WAF that I honestly don't understand very well (both as a service and from a feature-stand-point).
I have also (briefly) looked into CloudFlare, as it was recommended in one of the posts, here on Sackoverflow, though I can't really tell if their firewall would allow this level of (remote) control.
Question:
What are my options? What would you guys recommend I did?
I think Nginx provide such kind of functionality please refer to link
If you want to block an IP with Node TCP you can just edit a nginx config file and deny IP address.
Frankly speaking, If I were you, I would use AWS WAF but if you don’t want to use it, you can simply use Node JS
In Node JS You should have a global array variable where you will store all blocked IP addresses and upon connection, you will check whether connected host IP is in blocked IP variable. However there occurs a problem when machine or application is restarted, you will lose all information about blocked IP-s. So as a solution to that you can just setup Redis (It is key-value database but there are also other datatypes) DB and store blocked IP-s there. Inasmuch as Redis DB is in RAM all interaction with DB will be instantly and as long as machine or node is restarted, Redis makes a backup on hard drive and it syncs from it and continue to work in RAM with old databases.
We are trying to get Test Controller and Test Agent to communicate with each other and get Coded UI Test Scripts executed remotely. Given that both Test Agent and Test Controller are on machines on two different networks.
Can anyone suggest what needs to be done inorder to get it going, we have tried alot but were not able to get Test Agent Registered with Test Controller outside hetwork.
The Troubleshooting Guide from Microsoft states
The technology used to connect remote test execution components is .Net Remoting over Tcp ports.
The network diagrams indicate that the two components need to be network reachable of each other. If they are not on the same network, you would need some sort of VPN or port forwarding solution. See also the guide on configuring ports.
I'm looking into wide area service discovery and bonjur / avahi seem to be really good.
However, I'm a bit confused about how all this works?
So:
I have a bunch of services running in a cloud.
I have clients which can be located anywhere in the world.
I want the clients to automatically discover the services in the cloud.
I need the clients to be absolutely zero conf, so they don't know IPs, ports, nothing.
If I understand it correctly, this can be done using the above mentioned dns-sd libs. I have full access to a DNS server, so I suppose, the services can register themselves on startup using these libs and then the data can be spread through DNS servers world wide.
The clients can obtain the advertised info by querying the DNS record of my domain using bonjur / avahi tech, right?
All I need to do is to link the client with bonjur / avahi libs, and tell it which domain it should use (query).
Is this correct?
Am I missing something here or is it how this works?
Thanks in advance!
Avahi does not currently support publishing to a wide-area server, though it can browse wide-area. So if you can dynamically update a DNS server somewhere with the appropriate records Avahi would be able to see it.
You do however potentially have more problems to solve here including port mapping/nat traversal which Avahi does not address at all.
I have a slight problem bit of the back story. recently ive been trying to test out univention which is a linux distribution with the goal of being able to replace Microsoft active directory.
I tested it locally and all went reasonably well after a few minor issues i then decided to test it remotely as the company wants to allow remote users to access this so i used myhyve.com to host it and its now been setup successfully and works reasonably well.
however
my main problem is DNS based as when trying to connect to the domain the only way windows will recognize it is by editing the network adapter and setting ip v4 dns server address to the ip address of the server hosting the univention active directory replacement. although this does allow every thing to work its not ideal and dns look up on the internet are considerably longer. i was wondering if any one had any ideas or have done something similar and encountered this problems before and know a work around. i want to avoid setting up a vpn if possible.
after initially registering the computer on the domain i am able to remove the dns server address and just use a couple of amendments to the HOST file to keep it running but this still leads to having issues connecting to the domain controller sometimes and is not ideal. any ideas and suggestions would be greatly received.
.Michael
For the HOST entries, the most likely issue is, that there are several service records a computer in the domain needs. I'm not sure, whether these can be provided via the HOST file or not but you'll definitely have authentication issues if they are missing. To see the records your domain is using issue the following commands on the UCS system.
/usr/share/univention-samba4/scripts/check_essential_samba4_dns_records.sh
For the slow resolution of the DNS records there are several points where you could start looking. My first test would be whether or not you are using a forwarder for the web DNS requests and whether or not the forwarder is having a decent speed. To check if you are using one, type
ucr search dns/forwarder
If you get a valid IP for either of the UCR Variables, dns/forwarder1, dns/forwarder2 or dns/forwarder3, you are forwarding your DNS requests to a different Server. If all of them are empty or not valid IPs then your server is doing the resolution itself.
Not using a forwarder is often slow, as the DNS servers caching is optimized for the AD operations, like the round robin load balancing. Likewise a number of ISPs require you to use a forwarder to minimize the DNS traffic. You can simply define a forwarder using ucr, I use Google on IPv4 for the example
ucr set dns/forwarder1='8.8.8.8'
The other scenario might be a slow forwarder. To check it try to query the forwarder directly using the following command
dig univention.com #(ucr get dns/forwarder1)
If it takes long, then there is nothing the UCS server can do, you'll simply have to choose a different forwarder from the ucr command above.
If neither of the above helps, the next step would be to check whether there are error messages for the named daemon in the syslog file. Normally these come when you are trying to manually remove software or if the firewall configuration got changed.
Kevin
Sponsored post, as I work for Univention North America, Inc.