I have a spreadsheet-like application where a column may be a GEOGRAPPHY type, for example something like POINT(1 1). I haven't used GIS too much personally, and so was curious what is the most common filter that someone might apply to a GEO column. Giving a basic comparison, in Excel on a TEXT column, I would most commonly do something like =value, displaying the available values in a list of checkboxes:
My thought having zero experience other than using things like Google Maps or Kayak is that a user may want to see something like:
Value within [Distance] [units] of [Place]
For example, "Point is within 10 miles of Chicago, Illinois". And the reverse would be "outside of". Is this the most popular filter type, or are there others that are used frequently?
Related
Assume that I have a list of bonds for various deals. However, I only know, e.g., the ISIN (alternatively security name or deal name) of a particular bond (that is part of a given deal). However, I do not know how many securities belong to a given deal. For example, the "HERME 12 Mtge" deal includes 5 different securities (i.e., ISINs), but I only know one particular ISIN (e.g., XS0271028838) within that deal.
My idea is to use the information (e.g., ISIN or deal name) from that specific bond to get all ISINs or security names within a specific deal. I end up with a list of multiple deals (orange) and should have an additional list of securities within each deal (blue) as shown in the figure below.
I know that in the Bloomberg terminal I can see how many securities are covered within each deal using the Collateral and Structure and VAC View All Classes functions. Since this is very tedious for a large number of deals, I would like to automate this process using the Bloomberg Excel add-in.
In fact, it would be enough to achieve this for one deal, because then I could use a VBA procedure.
One way to achieve this is to use the BQL function, and search the debt universe for any securities that have the MTG_DEAL_NAME matching the deal you are after.
So, a 2-step process,
Take the ISIN you have, and get the MTG_DEAL_NAME field via BDP(): =BDP(C2 & " Mtge","MTG_DEAL_NAME")
Use BQL to search for any securities that have that deal name: =BQL.Query("get(id_isin()) for(filter(debtUniv('ALL'), mtg_deal_name == '" & C4 & "'))", "showids=false", "showheaders=false","array=true")
NB. I've used the dynamic array version of BQL (array=true), so you can simply pass this list to another function.
I have a huge table with data structured like this:
And I would like to display them in Spotfire Analyst 7.11 as follows:
Basically I need to display the columns that contain "ANTE" below the others in order to make a comparison. Values that have variations for the same ID must be highlighted.
I also have the fields "START_DATE_ANTE" and "END_DATE_ANTE" which have been omitted in the example image.
Amusingly, if you were limited to just what the title asks, this would be a very simple answer.
If you wanted this in a table where the rows are displayed as usual, and the cells are highlighted, you can do this by going to properties, adding a newGrouping where you select VAL_1 and VAL_1_ANTE and add a Rule, Rule type "Boolean expression", where the value is:
[VAL_1] - [VAL_1_ANTE] <> 0
This will highlight the affected cells, which you can place next to each other. You can even throw in a calculated column showing the difference between the two columns, and slap it on right next to it. This gives you the further option to filter down to only showing rows with discrepancies, or sorting by these values.
However, if you actually need it to display the POSTs on different lines from the ANTEs, as formatted above, things get a little tricky.
My personal preference would be to pivot (split/union/etc) the data before pulling it in to Spotfire, with an indicator flag on "is this different", yes/no. However, I know a lot of Spotfire users either aren't using a database or don't have leeway to perform the SQL themselves.
In fact, if you try to do it in Spotfire using custom expressions alone, it becomes so tricky, I'm not sure how to answer it right off. I'm inclined to think you should be able to do it in a cross table, using Subsets, but I haven't figured out a way to identify which subset you're in while inside the custom expressions.
Other options include generating a table using IronPython, if you're up to that.
I tried to search but didn't find anything that was exact to what I was looking for. Let's say that I have the Investment$$ and I want to allocate that amount to only Items = to Toy Story and where Character begins with TS. The Investment $$ should only be applied to "Toy Story" and where character begins with "TS".
Apologies on not being able to embed the pictorial example to this message.
I need to write this in VBA. My questions is, is the best way to do this through a vlookup (programmed via VBA)? I want to avoid having the $1000 applied to the wrong movie title and even when it is applied to the right one (Toy Story) I want to make sure it's applied to the right ("TS") ones.
I'll also experiment on my end as well.
Pixar Movie Example
No need for VBA here. You can go with a plain vanilla Excel formula.
What you need in this situation is a key/ID item for your VLOOKUP - how you make that key is up to you, but with it you can easily utilize VLOOKUP. See my below example:
Hello i'm having problems with getting this to work. What i'm trying to do is when you insert a set of measurements i want excel to show the ( In this case products) which are closest to those measurements.
here is a picture:
The result i'm trying to reach is when you type in the measurements you get product(s) and the manufacturer which are closest to those measurements.
Any help is greatly appreciated.
In essence, what you are after is an index+match function. It will allow you to find a value in one list, given a corresponding variable. In this case, given a measurement, it will find a manufacturer and product combo in your list.
Your problem is that you will need to adapt your data to allow for this. For example, you need to decide whether you only want the closest match for measurements or if you need the closest match that is greater than the measurement you provide.
It is also possible that you'll need to split your measurement column into two different columns (unless all you need is the total area irrespective of individual lengths).
You could potentially avoid the index+match by using conditional formatting, but that would still require the data manipulation.
Given the information you provided, the answer will never be much more informative than this. But this should get you started and the following steps can be made easier with help from google.
Ok so, twice a month I receive a large file of about 100 rows, which contains 4 columns:
Building name - value - county - state
I´ve to complete 2 other columns based on a master list that have thousands of entries.
I want to produce something very similar to this fabulous add-in (http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=15011), but a bit simpler and that I could use at work without problems.
What I need to do is the following:
In order to match my input with the master file, I know the county and state must match, but then, the building names can change a bit in each file for the same building (ie "John Miller #34" can be "Miller, John 34 A"), and that the values may vary but not too much.
Based on that, I want to bring from the master to my file, all the entries that may match each of my rows, filtering by County and State first, and then by similarity in name and value.
Could you please share your thoughts on how you´d approach this?
I know this is not a simple thing, but anything may help!
You could also use wildcards to try and match on the primary identifier within the name. from your example, that might be "Miller", for example.
Unfortunately for you, the vlookup "fuzzy logic" is nowhere near reliable for your purpose (see the comment on my answer below for details), and you won't have any indicator as to whether the returned result is accurate or not.
It's possible to get 100% of what you want through some heavy coding in a user-defined function, but this is probably well beyond your comfort zone.
A clunky solution, although somewhat easy to explain and adopt, is to create an "identity column" for every unique scenario that can occur. So, for example:
Then you can import your master sheet and add the same identity column to the left, and perform your vlookup. When a new configuration is added you can just add that to the master list and it will populate in your imported file in future instances.
That said, if you are interested in learning, there have been many people who have walked in your shows and felt your pain. You may want to indulge in this:
http://www.mrexcel.com/forum/excel-questions/195635-fuzzy-matching-new-version-plus-explanation.html
Because what you are truly requesting is an algorithm. It's not a simple thing, but it's very possible. And if you take the time to learn you not only solve your immediate problem, but make yourself marketable as an Excel wiz. Good luck!