Is there a way for a VSCode extension to access the timeline tab? I searched the docs but I couldn't find anything?
To be more specific, I'd like to watch for changes in certain files and get the diff of that change. I managed to register a listener on file changes, but I also want the actual change. This is what I have so far:
const vscode = require("vscode");
function activate(context) {
const workspacePath = vscode.workspace.workspaceFolders[0];
const watcher = vscode.workspace.createFileSystemWatcher(
new vscode.RelativePattern(workspacePath, "**/package.json")
);
watcher.onDidChange((e) => {
console.log(e); # this only prints the file path, not the content.
}
}
module.exports = {activate};
There is no Timeline API available yet. There is however, a proposed API being discussed for a while (https://github.com/microsoft/vscode/issues/84297), but the last comment is one year old.
But, if you need to detect file changes (not necessarily the file being edited by the user, but any file in the workspace) and compare its content, you need not only the FileSystemWatcher but also some lib that provides you text differencing algorithm, like jsdiff.
Hope this helps
Related
Tech stack - Node.js, MongoDB for the database, Strapi CMS for editing and API, React - my application.
I have a database with a long list of entries and a ready-to-use application that allows users to read data from the database. I need to be able to generate a simple website with a single entity from my database as a source to fill the template.
Mockup
Here is a mock-up. Hopefully, it will make things a bit clearer.
Clarification
After a day of thinking about the task, I believe I need something like a simplest static website generator - an application that will allow me to select a single bit of data from the list and generate a small website filled with it. The end goal is to get a website in some subfolder of my application where I can get it and use it however I need.
A bit more about specifics:
It will be used locally
Security can be neglected
Running always in development is not a problem (just in case, thinking about additional question #2)
Few additional questions:
Is it possible to run NPM scripts from the application (like npm build)
Is there any way to show one component in development mode, but replace it with another during building for production?
App.js
//...
function App() {
if() {
return <AdminUI /> // This one is to be shown in development mode
} else {
return <Website /> // This one is to be used instead of AdminUI in the build
}
UPDATE
Well, I'm digging a path to create a site generator and so far I come up with the following basic plan:
Get my template ready
Create a new directory for my website
Copy a template to the new folder
Get an HTML file, parse it to a string to modify
Swap some bits with my data
Save to a file from the modified string
repeat if needed for other files.
If that works as expected, the whole process probably might be improved by moving from a fixed template to a component, that will be prepared with a JavaScript bundler and started with the help of something like node-cmd (to run shell commands from my application)...
What you want could be achievable, but if it's just a string and little else, I'd say it's much simpler to fetch the data at startup from a given file, and populate from there. You can put a JSON file under the public folder (together with other static data, like images) and have the file being your configuration.
In the App.js file, write an async componentDidMount() and you can do an await axios.get("") with your configuration.
So App.js would look like (code written on the fly, didn't check in an IDE):
export class App extends React.App {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.state = { loading: true, };
}
async componentDidMount() {
const response = await axios.get("your/data.json");
this.setState({ loading: false, ... whatever})
}
render = () => (
<>
(this.state.loading && <div>Still loading...</div>)
(this.state.adminData && <AdminUI data={this.state.admingData} />)
(this.state.devData && <Website data={this.state.devData} />)
</>
)
}
If you don't care about security, wouldn't be much simpler like this? And if you use TypeScript you'll have a much much simpler life in handling the data too.
Maybe it's worth doing an AdminUI to generate the JSON, and the another UI which reads the JSON, so you end up doing two UIs. The template-generated UI could even ask for a JSON file to bootstrap directly to the user, if it simplifies... In general, an approach based on simple JSON sounds a lost simpler than going for a CI/CD pipeline.
I am trying to build a logging mechanism, to log changes done to a record. I am currently logging previous and new record. However, as the site is very busy, I expect the logfile to grow seriously huge. To avoid this, I plan to only capture the modified fields only.
Is there a way to capture only the modifications done to a record (in REACT), so my {request.body} will have fewer fields?
My Server-side is build with NODE.JS and the client-side is REACT.
One approach you might want to consider is to add an onChange(universal) or onTextChanged(native) listener to the text field and store the form update in a local state/variables.
Finally, when a user makes an action (submit, etc.) you can send the updated data to the logging module.
The best way I found and works for me is …
on the api server-side, where I handle the update request, before hitting the database, I do a difference between the previous record and {request.body} using lodash and use the result to send to my update database function
var _ = require('lodash');
const difference = (object, base) => {
function changes(object, base) {
return _.transform(object, function (result, value, key) {
if (!_.isEqual(value, base[key])) {
result[key] = (_.isObject(value) && _.isObject(base[key])) ? changes(value, base[key]) : value;
}
});
}
return changes(object, base);
}
module.exports = difference
I saved the above code in a file named diff.js and included it in my server-side file.
It worked good.
Thanks for giving the idea...
I am developing a phone gap application and we've recently added support for the windows 8.1 platform. The application downloads/creates files which are saved to the device using the Cordova FileSystem API.
I have successfully saved a file to the device using a URL which looks like this
ms-appdata:///local/file.png
I have checked on my PC and the file is viewable inside the LocalState folder under the app's root folder. However, when I try to open this file using inAppBrowser nothing happens; no error message is being reported and none of the inAppBrowser default events fire.
function empty() { alert('here'); } //never fires
var absoluteUrl = "ms-appdata:///local/file.png";
cordova.InAppBrowser.open(absoluteURL, "_blank", "location=no", { loadstart: empty, loadstop: empty, loaderror: empty });
I have verified that the url is valid by calling the following built-in javascript on the url
Windows.Storage.StorageFile.getFileFromApplicationUriAsync(uri).done(function (file) {
debugger; //the file object contains the correct path to the file; C:\...etc.
});
Also, adding the url as the src for an img tag works as expected.
I have also tried attaching the inAppBrowser handlers using addEventListener("loadstart") etc. but none of them are firing either. However, when I try to open "http://www.google.com" the events do fire and the inAppBrowser pops up on the screen.
After inspecting the dom I can see that the inAppBrowser element has been added, but it doesn't appear to have a source attribute set
<div class="inAppBrowserWrap">
<x-ms-webview style="border-width: 0px; width: 100%; height: 100%;"></x-ms-webview>
</div>
I have looked at other questions such as this one but to no avail. I have verified that
a) InAppBrowser is installed
b) deviceReady has fired
I have also tried changing the target to "_self" (same issue) and "_system" (popup saying you need a new app to open a file of type msappdata://) and I'm running out of ideas. Has anybody come across similar issues?
I had a similar problem. My cordova app downloads a file and then opens it with native browser (so that images, PDF files and so on are properly handled).
In the end I had to modify InAppBrowserProxy.js class (part of InAppBrowser plugin for Windows platform).
This is the code that opens the file (plain JavaScript):
// This value comes from somewhere, I write it here as an example
var path = 'ms-appdata:///local//myfile.jpg';
// Open file in InAppBrowser
window.open(path, '_system', 'location=no');
Then, I updated InAppBrowserProxy.js file (under platforms\windows\www\plugins\cordova-plugin-inappbrowser\src\windows). I replaced this code fragment:
if (target === "_system") {
url = new Windows.Foundation.Uri(strUrl);
Windows.System.Launcher.launchUriAsync(url);
}
By this:
if (target === "_system") {
if (strUrl.indexOf('ms-appdata:///local//') == 0) {
var fileName = decodeURI(strUrl.substr(String(strUrl).lastIndexOf("/") + 1));
var localFolder = Windows.Storage.ApplicationData.current.localFolder;
localFolder.getFileAsync(fileName).then(function (file) {
Windows.System.Launcher.launchFileAsync(file);
}, function (error) {
console.log("Error getting file '" + fileName + "': " + error);
});
} else {
url = new Windows.Foundation.Uri(strUrl);
Windows.System.Launcher.launchUriAsync(url);
}
}
This is a very ad-hoc hack, but it did the trick for me, and it could be improved, extended, and even standarized.
Anyway, there may be other ways to achieve this, it's just that this worked for me...
After more searching, it seems that the x-ms-webview, which is the underlying component used by PhoneGap for Windows only supports loading HTML content. This Microsoft blog post on the web view control states that
UnviewableContentIdentified – Is fired when a user navigates to
content other than a webpage. The WebView control is only capable of
displaying HTML content. It doesn’t support displaying standalone
images, downloading files, viewing Office documents, etc. This event
is fired so the app can decide how to handle the situation.
This article suggests looking at the Windows.Data.Pdf namespace for providing in-app support for reading PDFs.
I was wondering what's the best practice and if I should create:
a directory in which declare statically all the errors my application uses, like api/errors/custom1Error
declare them directly inside the files
or put the files directly inside the dir that needs that error, like api/controller/error/formInvalidError
other options!?
A neat way of going about this would be to simply add the errors as custom responses under api/responses. This way even the invocation becomes pretty neat. Although the doc says you should add them directly in the responses directory, I'm sure there must be a way to nest them under, say, responses/errors. I'll try that out and post an update in a bit.
Alright, off a quick search, I couldn't find any way to nest the responses, but you can use a small workaround that's not quite as neat:
Create the responses/errors directory with all the custom error response handlers. Create a custom response and name it something like custom.js. Then specify the response name while calling res.custom().
I'm adding a short snippet just for illustration:
api/responses/custom.js:
var customErrors = {
customError1: require('./errors/customError1'),
customError2: require('./errors/customError2')
};
module.exports = function custom (errorName, data) {
var req = this.req;
var res = this.res;
if (customErrors[errorName]) return customErrors[errorName](req, res, data);
else return res.negotiate();
}
From the controller:
res.custom('authError', data);
If you don't need logical processing for different errors, you can do away with the whole errors/ directory and directly invoke the respective views from custom.js:
module.exports = function custom (viewName, data) {
var req = this.req;
var res = this.res;
return res.view('errors/' + viewName, data);//assuming you have error views in views/errors
}
(You should first check if the view exists. Find out how on the linked page.)
Although I'm using something like this for certain purposes (dividing routes and so on), there definitely should be a way to include response handlers defined in different directories. (Perhaps by reconfiguring some grunt task?) I'll try to find that out and update if I find any success.
Good luck!
Update
Okay, so I found that the responses hook adds all files to res without checking if they are directories. So adding a directory under responses results in a TypeError from lodash. I may be reading this wrong but I guess it's reasonable to conclude that currently it's not possible to add a directory there, so I guess you'll have to stick to one of the above solutions.
I am using Web activity to launch default Firefox camera from my web app in Firefox OS. Able to launch default Firefox camera and took picture. Got this.result as return value inside pick success.
Now I need to get file path, where image get saved and also image file name.
Tried to parse the this.result.blob, but couldn't find the path or file related parameter .
Below is the code I'm using
var activity = new MozActivity({
// Ask for the "pick" activity
name: "pick",
// Provide the data required by the filters of the activity
data: {
type: "image/jpeg"
}
});
activity.onsuccess = function() {
var picture = this.result;
console.log("A picture has been retrieved");
};
The image file name is not returned, as you can see from the code. If you would need the file name (I can't really think of a very good use case to be honest) you can iterate over the pictures storage in the DeviceStorageAPI and get the last saved file. It's probably the one from the camera (compare blobs to be totally sure).
In your success handler, you will get the file name if you use:
this.result.blob.name
And, you can get the path to the file as:
window.URL.createObjectURL(this.result.blob);
Source