What is the difference between interactive and non-interactive SSH commands? [duplicate] - linux

Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed 10 years ago.
Improve this question
I have a command that runs fine if I ssh to a machine and run it, but fails when I try to run it using a remote ssh command like :
ssh user#IP <command>
Comparing the output of "env" using both methods resutls in different environments. When I manually login to the machine and run env, I get much more environment variables then when I run :
ssh user#IP "env"
Any idea why ?

There are different types of shells. The SSH command execution shell is a non-interactive shell, whereas your normal shell is either a login shell or an interactive shell. Description follows, from man bash:
A login shell is one whose first character of argument
zero is a -, or one started with the --login option.
An interactive shell is one started without non-option
arguments and without the -c option whose standard input
and error are both connected to terminals (as determined
by isatty(3)), or one started with the -i option. PS1 is
set and $- includes i if bash is interactive, allowing a
shell script or a startup file to test this state.
The following paragraphs describe how bash executes its
startup files. If any of the files exist but cannot be
read, bash reports an error. Tildes are expanded in file
names as described below under Tilde Expansion in the
EXPANSION section.
When bash is invoked as an interactive login shell, or as
a non-interactive shell with the --login option, it first
reads and executes commands from the file /etc/profile, if
that file exists. After reading that file, it looks for
~/.bash_profile, ~/.bash_login, and ~/.profile, in that
order, and reads and executes commands from the first one
that exists and is readable. The --noprofile option may
be used when the shell is started to inhibit this behav­
ior.
When a login shell exits, bash reads and executes commands
from the file ~/.bash_logout, if it exists.
When an interactive shell that is not a login shell is
started, bash reads and executes commands from ~/.bashrc,
if that file exists. This may be inhibited by using the
--norc option. The --rcfile file option will force bash
to read and execute commands from file instead of
~/.bashrc.
When bash is started non-interactively, to run a shell
script, for example, it looks for the variable BASH_ENV in
the environment, expands its value if it appears there,
and uses the expanded value as the name of a file to read
and execute. Bash behaves as if the following command
were executed:
if [ -n "$BASH_ENV" ]; then . "$BASH_ENV"; fi
but the value of the PATH variable is not used to search
for the file name.

How about sourcing the profile before running the command?
ssh user#host "source /etc/profile; /path/script.sh"
You might find it best to change that to ~/.bash_profile, ~/.bashrc, or whatever.
(As here (linuxquestions.org))

Shell environment does not load when running remote ssh command. You can edit ssh environment file:
vi ~/.ssh/environment
Its format is:
VAR1=VALUE1
VAR2=VALUE2
Also, check sshd configuration for PermitUserEnvironment=yes option.

I had similar issue, but in the end I found out that ~/.bashrc was all I needed.
However, in Ubuntu, I had to comment the line that stops processing ~/.bashrc :
#If not running interactively, don't do anything
[ -z "$PS1" ] && return

I found an easy resolution for this issue was to add
source /etc/profile
to the top of the script.sh file I was trying to run on the target system.
On the systems here, this caused the environmental variables which were needed by script.sh to be configured as if running from a login shell.
In one of the prior responses it was suggested that ~/.bashr_profile etc... be used.
I didn't spend much time on this but, the problem with this is if you ssh to a different user on the target system than the shell on the source system from which you log in it appeared to me that this causes the source system user name to be used for the ~.

Just export the environment variables you want above the check for a non-interactive shell in ~/.bashrc.

Related

My alias name is referring to old alias not a new one [duplicate]

This question already has answers here:
Closed 10 years ago.
Possible Duplicate:
What's the difference between .bashrc, .bash_profile, and .environment?
It seems that if I use
alias ls='ls -F'
inside of .bashrc on Mac OS X, then the newly created shell will not have that alias. I need to type bash again and that alias will be in effect.
And if I log into Linux on the hosting company, the .bashrc file has a comment line that says:
For non-login shell
and the .bash_profile file has a comment that says
for login shell
So where should aliases be written in? How come we separate the login shell and non-login shell?
Some webpage say use .bash_aliases, but it doesn't work on Mac OS X, it seems.
The reason you separate the login and non-login shell is because the .bashrc file is reloaded every time you start a new copy of Bash. The .profile file is loaded only when you either log in or use the appropriate flag to tell Bash to act as a login shell.
Personally,
I put my PATH setup into a .profile file (because I sometimes use other shells);
I put my Bash aliases and functions into my .bashrc file;
I put this
#!/bin/bash
#
# CRM .bash_profile Time-stamp: "2008-12-07 19:42"
#
# echo "Loading ${HOME}/.bash_profile"
source ~/.profile # get my PATH setup
source ~/.bashrc # get my Bash aliases
in my .bash_profile file.
Oh, and the reason you need to type bash again to get the new alias is that Bash loads your .bashrc file when it starts but it doesn't reload it unless you tell it to. You can reload the .bashrc file (and not need a second shell) by typing
source ~/.bashrc
which loads the .bashrc file as if you had typed the commands directly to Bash.
Check out http://mywiki.wooledge.org/DotFiles for an excellent resource on the topic aside from man bash.
Summary:
You only log in once, and that's when ~/.bash_profile or ~/.profile is read and executed. Since everything you run from your login shell inherits the login shell's environment, you should put all your environment variables in there. Like LESS, PATH, MANPATH, LC_*, ... For an example, see: My .profile
Once you log in, you can run several more shells. Imagine logging in, running X, and in X starting a few terminals with bash shells. That means your login shell started X, which inherited your login shell's environment variables, which started your terminals, which started your non-login bash shells. Your environment variables were passed along in the whole chain, so your non-login shells don't need to load them anymore. Non-login shells only execute ~/.bashrc, not /.profile or ~/.bash_profile, for this exact reason, so in there define everything that only applies to bash. That's functions, aliases, bash-only variables like HISTSIZE (this is not an environment variable, don't export it!), shell options with set and shopt, etc. For an example, see: My .bashrc
Now, as part of UNIX peculiarity, a login-shell does NOT execute ~/.bashrc but only ~/.profile or ~/.bash_profile, so you should source that one manually from the latter. You'll see me do that in my ~/.profile too: source ~/.bashrc.
From the bash manpage:
When bash is invoked as an
interactive login shell, or as a
non-interactive shell with the
--login option, it first reads and executes commands from the file
/etc/profile, if that file exists.
After reading that file, it looks for
~/.bash_profile, ~/.bash_login, and
~/.profile, in that order, and reads
and executes commands from the first
one that exists and is readable. The
--noprofile option may be used when the shell is started to inhibit this
behavior.
When a login shell exits, bash
reads and executes commands from the
file ~/.bash_logout, if it exists.
When an interactive shell that is not a login shell is started, bash
reads and executes commands from ~/.bashrc, if that file exists. This
may be inhibited by using the --norc option. The --rcfile file option
will force bash to read and execute commands from file instead of
~/.bashrc.
Thus, if you want to get the same behavior for both login shells and interactive non-login shells, you should put all of your commands in either .bashrc or .bash_profile, and then have the other file source the first one.
.bash_profile is loaded for a "login shell". I am not sure what that would be on OS X, but on Linux that is either X11 or a virtual terminal.
.bashrc is loaded every time you run Bash. That is where you should put stuff you want loaded whenever you open a new Terminal.app window.
I personally put everything in .bashrc so that I don't have to restart the application for changes to take effect.

How to know the default shell process for my terminal? [duplicate]

This question already has answers here:
How to get the default shell
(5 answers)
Closed 6 years ago.
I am composing a bash script to serve as a utility tools.
The challenges I am facing now is:
- user using my tool will be running in bash environment
- however, some of them might default using krcsh or tcsh. they might have aliases or configurations set in there.
So, I need to prompt/guide user to resolve this during installation. My first challenge: How am I suppose to know the user's default shell within my install.sh?
Knowing the "default" shell, I can prompt and guide the user to do necessary transfer to bash.
my testing code:
my result:
1/ is fault obviously. It return the current shell which is my install.sh (bash)
2/ I am doubtful. It seems to be the history of what I have run before. It does not show me my default configured shell. My case, my terminal default shell is bash, and I run tsch for testing purpose. So the script parsed wrong information and will though my default shell is tcsh. It will then assist me to port configurations from tcsh to bash during the installation process.
If you want to check the shell you are using, you can use the following methods:
echo $0 in terminal will show you the program running if you want to check the shell you are currently using.
echo $SHELL - with this command you can read the user's default shell in the terminal you are running.
If you want to prompt, easily you can put the echo $SHELL in the part of your script where you need to show the current shell you are using.
Don't forget to put #!/bin/bash if your script is designed to run in a bash shell!

Store frequently used commands in Linux [closed]

Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
I use some Linux commands more frequently like going to a specific directory, grep for some text etc. I assigned a variable for each command and kept them in a script file and I run the script file every time when I login to my Linux box so that I can use the variables instead of typing lengthy commands.
Is it possible that I can make sure that my script file runs everytime when I login to my Linux box so that I need not run it everytime?
Is there an alternate way of storing my frequently used commands so that they will be available when I open my Linux box?
If you are using bash (probably are), add it to your .bashrc. You will find it in your home directory.
Other shells have corresponding startup scripts.
Adding commands to .bashrc for a non-login shell, or to .bash_profile for login shells (assuming, of course, that you're using bash).
From the bash manual entry:
When bash is invoked as an interactive login shell, or as a
non-interactive shell with the --login option, it first reads and
executes commands from the file /etc/profile, if that file exists.
After reading that file, it looks for ~/.bash_profile, ~/.bash_login,
and ~/.profile, in that order, and reads and executes commands from
the first one that exists and is readable. The --noprofile option may
be used when the shell is started to inhibit this behavior.
When a login shell exits, bash reads and executes commands from the
file ~/.bash_logout, if it exists.
When an interactive shell that is not a login shell is started, bash
reads and executes commands from ~/.bashrc, if that file exists. This
may be inhibited by using the --norc option. The --rcfile file option
will force bash to read and execute commands from file instead of
~/.bashrc.
You have to put your script into your .bashrc file, it is in your home directory
nano ~/.bashrc
It only works when you are using bash.
What is about alias?
You can store them in the ~/.bashrc, when I am right.
You can use a .bashrc file but this script is executed when you open an interactive Bash shell. That is every time you connect to a server with a terminal (if Bash is your default shell) or open another shell that opens an interactive shell (like su - $USER).
If you work locally with X-Window GUI on Linux (Unix) the script will be executed every time you open a terminal program (like Konsole in KDE or gnome-terminal). It maybe not what you expected. In this case you can hack a .xinit script or use your display manager or desktop environment way to execute a script upon start. It is hard to tell how because it is specific to your environment (Linux/ Unix distribution or desktop environment (KDE, GNOME, ...) ) .

How can I debug the bash prompt?

I've been editing .bashrc files and other init files, and it seems that I've left behind a few code snippets or two that are causing a few errors at the prompt (e.g. file missing), but I can't find them.
How do I debug the prompt to find out what init scripts I've carelessly hacked?
Most of the shells have debug flags that show the commands being executed. Bash may even have one that shows a command before expansion of variables and after. Have you tried checking (I believe) -c -x or -X flags and see if they show the information you are looking for.
You can set them as first thing in the rc files (most global one) or just pass it down into bash command by invoking it from another shell.
In fact, if you invoke bash from another shell, you can also use script command to record everything you see and do into the file, which makes postmortem analysis so much easier.
Try invoking bash with the -x flag, then sourcing your .bashrc or .bash_profile or whatever you're using. That ought to be prolix enough to find your problem
ie:
bash -x
source .bashrc
The easiest way to get a clean initial state is to SSH into your current host, but instead of letting SSH launch your shell with default settings, you provide an explicit command which prevents .bashrc from being read.
ssh -tt localhost /bin/bash --norc
The -tt forces SSH to allocate a TTY, which is what would normally happen when you open a shell connection, but is not default when running an explicit command.
The --norc prevents bash from reading your settings file (since we want to do that ourselves).
You should now be at a bash prompt, in a clean environment. This is useful for examining what variable are set to before your .bashrc runs etc. Enable tracing and source your .bashrc:
set -x # Enable tracing
source .bashrc
Try to see where you've defined prompt - probably it in some dot file in your home directory:
grep PS1 ~/.*
You can see current value of prompt by just printing it:
echo $PS1
HTH
Check the .bash_history file in your home directory to find out what commands you have been running. If you used commands like vi filename to open the init scripts, it will find them in the command history.

Setting Enviroment Variables Dynamically on Linux

I am currently looking for a way to set enviroment variables in Linux via a simple shell script. Within the script I am currently using the 'export' command, however this only has scope within the script where system-wide scope is needed.
Is there anyway I can do this via a shell script, or will another method need to be used?
When you run a shell script, it executes in a sub-shell. What you need is to execute it in the context of the current shell, by sourcing it with:
source myshell.sh
or:
. myshell.sh
The latter is my preferred approach since I'm inherently lazy.
If you're talking about system-wide scope inasmuch as you want to affect everybody, you'll need to put your commands in a place where they're sourced at login time (or shell creation time), /etc/profile for example. Where you put your commands depends on the shell being used.
You can find out what scripts get executed by examining the man page for your shell:
man bash
The bash shell, when invoked as a login shell (including as a non-login shell but with the --login parameter), will use /etc/profile and the first of ~/.bash_profile, ~/.bash_login or ~/.profile.
Non-login bash shells will use. unless invoked with --norc or --rcfile <filename>, the files /etc/bash.bashrc and ~/.bashrc.
I'm pretty certain it's even more convoluted than that depending on how the shell is run, but that's as far as my memory stretches. The man page should detail it all.
You could have your script check for the existence of something like /var/myprog/env-vars-to-load and 'source' it then unlink it if it exists, perhaps using trap and a signal. Its hard to say, I'm not familiar with your program.
There is no way to 'inject' environmental variables into another process' address space, so you'll have to find some method of IPC which will can instruct the process on what to set.
A fundamental aspect of environment variables is that you cannot affect the environment for any process but your own and child processes that you spawn. You can't create a script that sets "system wide" environment variables that somehow become usable by other processes.
On the shell prompt:
$ source script.sh
And set the env vars in script.sh
test.sh
#!/bin/bash
echo "export MY_VAR=STACK_OVERFLOW" >> $HOME/.bashrc
. $HOME/.bashrc
sh task.sh
task.sh
#!/bin/sh
echo $MY_VAR
Add executable rights:
chmod +x test.sh task.sh
And lauch test.sh
./test.sh
Result:
STACK_OVERFLOW

Resources