I want to calculate the difference from present to previous week in Spotfire cross table. Difference I want to calculate is the cumulative difference between present to previous week (Newly Added in week).
Here is my example data
and the expected output table is
Please help me to solve to create this in Spotfire cross table
I cannot find the exact solution you want using a cross table, but there are possible alternatives.
1 - use your existing Cross Table (Horizontal: Week, Vertical: ID and Status) to show the Totals (Grand total for columns) and then you get your Newly Added in week row (although I don't understand why your first cell is null, as judging from the Cumulative Sum I thought it would be 4).
2 - add a Waterfall Chart with [Week] on the X axis. You can colour by [ID] or [Status] or both.
This reacts to filtering.
You could go via calculated columns instead, but they would not react to filters:
1 - first calculate [Weekly Count] as
Count() over ([Week])
2 - then calculate [Cumulative Sum] as
Sum(case when Rank(rowid(),[Week])=1 then [Weekly count] end) OVER (AllPrevious([Week]))
Related
I have data in below format. It shows starting and end time of an activity and calculates duration accordingly. The activity is performed through out the day at different times.
I have added a pivot. I want to find out the average duration in a workday or a holiday(Day category). When I am trying to apply average in the current pivot, it is dividing the total duration by the number of sessions in a day.For example in week 1, an activity was done on 4 work days and the total duration for the activity in workdays was 04.19, I want to divide this number by 4 and find out the average time spent on each day but the pivot divides it by 11 which is the total number of sessions in the four days.
Link for data
Steps:
Add a helper column to identify how many unique pairs of Dates/Day Categories there are:
=IF(SUMPRODUCT(($A$2:$A2=A2)*($B$2:$B2=B2))>1,0,1)
You can add extra products to this formula to force extra fields to be unique to be counted as well.
SRC:Simple Pivot Table to Count Unique Values
Add a Calculated Field in the PivotTable that is:
SUM(Duration)/SUM([Helper Column Name]) and include it in the 'Values' section of the PivotTable. Due to the new column being added, you might have to re-create the PivotTable.
This should produce the average in the manner that you want.
In PowerBI, I need to create a Performance Indicator (KPI) measure which evaluates dataset values in a scale from 0 to 1, with target (1) being the MAX value in a 20 years history. It's a national airport trip records open database. The formula is basically [value]/[max value].
My dataset has a lot of fields and I wish I could filter it by any of these fields, with a line chart showing the 0-1 indicator for each month based on the filters.
This is my workaround test solution:
Table 1 - Original dataset: if I filter something here, below tables also update (there are more fields to the left, including YEAR and MONTH
Table 2 - Reference to original dataset, aggregating YEAR-MONTH by the sum of "take-offs" (decolagens)
Table 3 - Reference to above (sum) table, aggregating MONTH by the max of "take-offs" (decolagens)
Table 4 - 'Sum table' merged to 'Max table' by MONTH as new table: then do [Value]/[Max] and we've got the indicator
So if i filter the original dataset by any fields, all other tables update accordingly and the indicators always stays between 0-1, works like a charm.
TL;DR
The problem is: I need to create a dashboard of this on Power Bi. So I need this calculation to be in a measure or another workaround.
My possible solution: by pure DAX code in the measure field, to produce Tables 2 and 3 so I'll divide the month sum values by their month max value (which will both be produced according to PowerBi dashboard slicers) and get the indicator dinamically produced.
I'm stuck at: I don't understand how can I reference a sum/max aggregate table in dax code. Something like = SUM (dataset[take-offs]) / MAX (SUM (dataset[take-offs])). Of course these functions do not work like that, but I hope I made my point clear: how can I produce this four table effect with a single measure?
Other solutions are welcome.
Link to the original dataset: https://www.anac.gov.br/assuntos/dados-e-estatisticas/dados-estatisticos/arquivos/DadosEstatsticos.csv
It's an open dataset, so I guess there's no problem sharing it. Please help! :)
EDIT: please download the dataset and try to solve this. Personally I think it's a quality statistics doubt that will eventually help others. The calculation works, it only needs a Power Bi Measure port.
Add the ALL formula:
Measure = SUMX(ALL('Table'),[Valor])/SUM('Table'[Max])
Example
Let me first say I am very new to Cognos and have mainly learned by just manipulating items within active reports. I am having an issue with creating a graph that acts like a time series. I want it to display every month (with multiple values in some months and none in others). I want to visually see gaps between data points (ex: we order products every 3 months starting in January, so we should see gaps in the months we do not order products - like February and March).
I have tried changing the label control to manual and setting display frequency to 1. However, I think my issue is that there is not any data within certain months.
You are correct in that your problem is lack of data. A standard inner join will drop rows where there is not a corresponding row in both tables, resulting in gaps.
There are two solutions available:
Use a union to create "dummy" records for each date
Manually specify an outer join between the date table and the table containing the rest of information
Since the first technique is the most common, I'll outline the basic steps for it here.
Create a new query
Add your month data item to the query
Create a 'dummy' data item for your measure. Use 0 for its expression.
If there is a date range filter in the main query apply it here
Create a union
Drag over your new query into the union
Drag over your original query into the union
Pull in the date and measure data items into the union query
Set the Aggregate Function property of the measure to Total
Use the union query as the source for your chart
For every month with measure data you will have two rows, one with the measure amount and one with 0. The two rows will be combined by the auto-group and summarize function. The measures will be added together. Anything added to 0 will end up as the original amount.
For months with no measure data, there will only be the 'dummy' row with 0 for the measure and it will be represented in your chart.
I am trying to create a measure which will display the percentage of Grand total for each row.
Below images might give an overview about the progress I have made and the actual requirement.
Note: Below is the dummy data which I have pasted in excel to describe the problem. Actual solution needs to be given using power-pivot.
Progress:
Current Report
Report gives an overview for the learning curve of each employee in the organization. If the employee has completed the particular course, say Subject 1 then value will be 1 else blank.
I have created a measure 'Course Completed' to populate the field. Using the pivot table options, got the grandtotal for rows.
I also need a column in the report which will give the '% of grandtotal'. For which I have created a new measure as '% of Course Completed', formula of this measure is same as 'Course Completed' but I used the 'show value as '% of Grandtotal
Actual requirement:
Actual Requirement
I do not need '% of Grandtotal' for individual course. Course is a filter for the reports. So, No of courses may change based on the filter.
Manually hiding the column is not a solution.
Any Help?
Solution :
Create a Calculated Column (and not Calculated Field OR Member) as follows.
Total % of Course Completed =
([Subject 1 Course Completed] + [Subject 2 Course Completed]) * 100 / 2
Where left hand side is name of the newly created Calculated Column and right side is the formula for calculated column. You need to update columns names as per your data model.
Also, I have assumed number of course as fixed to be 2, change this accordingly.
Calculated Column vs Measure (Calculated Field) :
Calculated columns are suitable when you operate on individual row, it is as if you are adding column to your existing table. Measures are far more powerful and work on Current Context.
I am having an issue that I am hoping some more experienced DAX programmers may be able to help me with. I have been trying to develop a dashboard in Excel 2013 / PowerPivot / PowerView and one of the graphics I would like to display is a line chart of median performance by hour of day. I would then like to filter the data set with my performance metrics based on a separate column, and link that to a slicer. The medians should be calculated relative to the filtered data set. For the median calculation I am trying to adapt the formula proposed by Marco Russo here (http://sqlblog.com/blogs/marco_russo/archive/2010/07/20/median-calculation-in-dax.aspx).
To illustrate the problem, suppose that I have two tables - main_table and other_table. Main_table has 4 columns- RowID, hour_of_day, performance_metric, and category. Other_table has two columns- hour_of_day and median_column. My goal is to find a formula for median_column such that it shows the median performance metric by hour of day, but can still be sliced by category. The formula I tried to use for the medians was
=CALCULATE(
MINX(
FILTER(
VALUES(main_table[performance_metric]),
CALCULATE(
COUNTA(main_table[performance_metric]),
main_table[performance_metric] <= EARLIER(main_table[performance_metric]))
> COUNTA(main_table[performance_metric]/2),
main_table[performance_metric]),
FILTER(
main_table,
main_table[hour_of_day] = EARLIER(other_table[hour_of_day])))
Or without formatting:
=CALCULATE(MINX(FILTER(VALUES(main_table[performance_metric]), CALCULATE(COUNTA(main_table[performance_metric]), main_table[performance_metric] <= EARLIER(main_table[performance_metric])) > COUNTA(main_table[performance_metric]/2), main_table[performance_metric]), FILTER(main_table, main_table[hour_of_day] = EARLIER(other_table[hour_of_day])))
However, when I create a slicer based on category in main_table, my chart does not seem affected by the slicer. My understanding was that by putting main_table as opposed to ALL(main_table) as the first argument in the last FILTER call, my median calculations would be subject to slices and filters applied to main_table. Am I missing something obvious here?
Calculated columns are apparently computed before queries are executed, therefore anything that needs to be affected by slicers must be entered as a measure, not a calculated column.
Answered in more detail here (http://www.mrexcel.com/forum/powerpivot-questions/741071-medians-context-issues-dax.html#post3641780)