Wanted to iterate the list of objects/Tables and exclusively for one object which is not getting picked up as there is Underscore between the words "Admin_process" Expectation is to get as "Adminprocess" in the adf/synapse by removing the underscore,such that all objects will be passed to the copy operation.
Objects/Tables list
AdminUser
Admin_process
TempUser
Currently it is above, However is not reading the object "Admin_Process" as there is underscore.
Could you someone please tell me how to handle this case.
Thank you,
You can use replace function in ADF dynamic content.
please follow the demonstration below.
Here I am using an array parameter with keys and the above list of tables as values.
[
{
"Objectname": "AdminUser"
},
{
"Objectname": "Admin_process"
},
{
"Objectname": "TempUser"
}
]
Parameter array to ForEach activity:
To use replace function, create a set variable activity and give the below expression.
#replace(item().Objectname, '_','' )
Output with required result(Underscore removed):
Now you can pass this value to a copy activity inside the same ForEach activity.
Related
I'm trying to send a LookUp activity output values as part of a body parameter in a POST request using LogicApp, which uses three parameters: "to", "email_body", "subject".
The LookUp activity depends on a query, and it may return from 2 rows up to 10 rows.
According to Azure, the output of the activity should look like this:
{
"count": 2,
"value": [
{
"column1":value1,
"column2":value2,
"column3":value3
},
{
"column1":value4,
"column2":value5,
"column3":value6
}
]
}
In this case, the query returned 2 rows, but how can I attach every output value to the POST body without having to use #activity('lookup_act').output.value[0].column1 and so on for every value?
The POST body is the following:
{
"email_body": "Hi, the following tables have been updated:
#{activity('lookup_act').output.value[0].column1}
#{activity('lookup_act').output.value[1].column1}",
"subject": "Update on tables",
"to": "email#domain.com"
}
I've tried using #activity('lookup_act').output.value to bring every value but it won't work.
Is there a way to call every single output value? If so, how can it be done and paste into a table?
Thanks beforehand.
There are two ways to get all values in mail:
1. Get whole lookup output array in mail.
First get the results from Lookup activity and then pass the output of this activity by converting it into a string otherwise you will get error regarding deserialization.
{"message":"#string(activity('Lookup1').output.value)",
"dataFactoryName":"#{pipeline().DataFactory}",
"pipelineName":"#{pipeline().Pipeline}",
"receiver":"#{pipeline().parameters.receiver}"}
OUTPUT
2. Get all the respective values column wise.
First get the results from Lookup activity then take a foreach loop and create append variable for every column to store every column value in single array.
ForEach activity setting:
Took append variable activity and created Idarray variable. and gave item().id as value to store all id values in a single array.
Then in web activity passed below body for getting all arrays.
{"message":"#{string(variables('Idarray'))} as Id, #{string(variables('Namearray'))} as Name, #{string(variables('ProfessionArray'))} as Profession",
"dataFactoryName":"#{pipeline().DataFactory}",
"pipelineName":"#{pipeline().Pipeline}",
"receiver":"#{pipeline().parameters.receiver}"}
OUTPUT
Background:
I wish to update a nested field within my JSON document. I want to query for all of the "state" that equal "new"
{
"id": "123"
"feedback" : {
"Features" : [
{
"state":"new"
}
]
}
This is what I have tried to do:
Since this is a nested document. My query looks like this:
SELECT * FROM c WHERE c.feedback.Features.state = "new"
However, I keep ending up with zero results when I know that this exists within the database. What am I doing wrong? Maybe I am getting 0 results because the Features is an array?
Any help is appreciated
For arrays, you'll need to use ARRAY_CONTAINS(). For example, in your case:
SELECT *
FROM c
WHERE ARRAY_CONTAINS(c.feedback.Features,{'state': 'new'}, true)
The 3rd parameter specifies that you're searching within documents within the array, not scalar values.
I'm trying to set some new fields in a nested dict within a Firestore document, which results in the data being overwritten.
Here's where I write the first part of the info I need:
upd = {
"idOffer": {
<offerId> : {
"ref" : <ref>,
"value" : <value>
}
}
}
<documentRef>.update(upd)
So output here is something like:
<documentid>:{idOffer:{<offerId>:{ref:<ref>, value:<value>}}}
Then I use this code to add some fields to the current <offerId> nested data:
approval = {
"isApproved" : <bool>,
"dateApproved" : <date>,
"fullApproval" : <bool>
}
<documentRef>.update({
"idOffer.<offerId>" : approval
})
From which I expect to get:
<documentid>:{idOffer:{<offerId>:{ref:<ref>, value:<value>, isApproved:<bool>,dateApproved:<date>,fullApproval:<bool>}}}
But I end up with:
<documentid>:{idOffer:{<offerId>:{isApproved:<bool>,dateApproved:<date>,fullApproval:<bool>}}}
Note: I use <> to refer to dynamic data, like document Ids or References.
When you call update with a dictionary (or map, or object, or whatever key/value pair structure used in other languages), the entire set of data behind the given top-level keys are going to be replaced. So, if you call update with a key of idOffer.<offerId>, then everything under that key is going to be replaced, while every other child key of the idOffer level will remain unchanged.
If you don't want to replace the entire object behind the key, then be more specific about which children you'd like to update. In your example, instead of updating a single idOffer.<offerId> key, specify three keys for the nested children:
idOffer.<offerId>.isApproved
idOffer.<offerId>.dateApproved
idOffer.<offerId>.fullApproval
That is to say, the dictionary you pass should have three keyed entries like this at the top level, rather than a single key of idOffer.<offerId>.
I have following json array input -
"results": [
{ "tableName" : "ABC","id":"11"},
{ "tableName" : "ZX","id":"11"},
{ "tableName" : "ABC","id":"11"}
]}
In logic app i have used `` in For_each I'm able to append string successfuly but how to avoid adding already present string ? like above example my current output is -
ABC,ZX,ABC
i want - ABC,ZX
You could use the Array to implement, there is a union function to return a collection that has all the items from the specified collections. It will return a collection without duplicate string. Then use join action to return the string.
Cause the union function must contain two collection at least, so I used two same collections. The expression is like this: union(variables('tablename'),variables('tablename'))
The below is the result.
Hope this could help you.
I struck to pass multiple arguments in define.
The following is my code. I would like to pass two array inside the define, But I'm able to pass only one as like the following.
class test {
$path = [$path1,$path2]
$filename = [$name1,$name2]
define testscript { $filename: } // Can able to pass one value.
}
define testscript () {
file {"/etc/init.d/${title}": //Can able to receive the file name.
ensure => file,
content => template('test/test.conf.erb'),
}
From my above code, I could retrieve the filename inside the define resource. I also need path to set the value in the template. I`m not able to send / retrieve second argument in template.
Is there any way to improve my code to pass two values ( $path and $filename ) inside define resource ?
Any help is much appreciated.
Is there any way to improve my code to pass the two values ( $path and $filename ) inside define resource ?
Puppet has good documentation, which covers this area well.
To begin, you need to appreciate that a defined type is a resource type, in almost every way analogous to any built-in or extension type. If your defined type accepts parameters, then you bind values to those parameters just as you would in any other resource declaration. For example:
class mymodule::test {
mymodule::testscript { $name1: path => $path1 }
mymodule::testscript { $name2: path => $path2 }
}
define mymodule::testscript ($path) {
file {"${path}/${title}":
ensure => 'file',
content => template('test/test.conf.erb')
}
}
Additionally, because defined types are resource types, you should discard the concept of "passing" values as to them as if they were instead functions. That mental model is likely to betray you. In particular, it will certainly give you the wrong expectation about what would happen if you specify an array or a hash as your resource title.
In particular, you need to understand that in any resource declaration, if you give the resource title as an array, then that means a separate resource for each array member, with the array member as that resource's title. In that case, every one of those resources receives the same parameter values, as declared in the body of the declaration. Moreover, resource titles are always strings. Except for one level of arrays, as described above, if you give anything else as a resource title then it will be converted to a string.