Subnet Delegation and Service Endpoints for Azure SQL Database in a vnet? - azure-web-app-service

If I am setting up an Azure SQL Database in a vnet which Azure App Service and Azure Function will access. Is using both Subnet Delegation and Service Endpoints the right way to go? I didn't fully understand the documentation.
Regarding subnet delegation, I read this Microsoft article and this stackoverflow post, which stated:
When you delegate a subnet to an Azure service, you allow that service to establish some basic network configuration rules for that subnet, which help the Azure service operate their instances in a stable manner.
That sounds like a good thing but makes me wonder how it worked efficiently w/o subnet delegation.
As for Service Endpoints, I read this Microsoft article, which states:
Virtual Network (VNet) service endpoint provides secure and direct connectivity to Azure services over an optimized route over the Azure backbone network. Endpoints allow you to secure your critical Azure service resources to only your virtual networks. Service Endpoints enables private IP addresses in the VNet to reach the endpoint of an Azure service without needing a public IP address on the VNet.
Does that mean I cannot reach the Azure SQL Database from my home machine w/a firewall rule?
They both sound like they have the same benefits and I'm struggling to understand the difference. I suppose the larger question is should I enable both for the simple architecture outlined above.
In the Microsoft service endpoints documentation they also mention:
Microsoft recommends use of Azure Private Link for secure and private access to services hosted on Azure platform. For more information, see Azure Private Link.
For some reason that seems like an Azure to on-premise thing.

• You cannot use a ‘Subnet Delegation’ along with a ‘Private endpoint’ since that subnet is delegated for the said service, in your case, the Azure SQL Database. Through a subnet delegation, you can define the NSG association for it, as well as associate multiple delegated subnets to a common NSG. You can also define the IP Address space for the delegated subnet, the route table association with it, the custom DNS entry configuration in Azure DNS as well as define the minimum number of IP Addresses available for that delegated subnet. Similarly, with regards to service endpoint, these stated functions are not available.
• In service endpoint, you do not have control over the routing mechanism as well as the IP address related allotment, reservation, or configuration. Also, managing DNS entries for the resources managed through them and controlling them through a firewall or NAT gateway isn’t required unlike a subnet delegation because all these things are managed by Microsoft Azure’s backbone network on your behalf.
Thus, both have their own features and specifications for enabling you to configure according to your own requirements.
Does that mean I cannot reach the Azure SQL Database from my home machine w/a firewall rule?
Yes, you will have to create a firewall rule to allow the access from on-premises system to Azure SQL Server/Database and configure the service endpoint accordingly to allow the VPN client IP Addresses for accessing the same over public internet.
Also, through Azure private link, you won’t be able to connect from on-premises to Azure as it uses a private IP address and a private DNS zone entry related to it to connect to Azure resources in the same virtual network.
To know more regarding the configuration of Azure service access from on-premises network, kindly refer to the below given link: -
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/virtual-network/virtual-network-service-endpoints-overview#secure-azure-service-access-from-on-premises
Also, refer to the below snapshots regarding the configuration and selection of service endpoint for a particular subnet: -

Related

Azure Networking - Application GW, Virtual Network GW, VWAN, ExpressRotue, PrivateLink, Arc

can anyone explain difference between Azure Application Gateway, Virtual Network Gateway, Virtual WAN, ExpressRoute, Arc and Private Link, please?
It seems to me all services are pretty similar helping with connecting either on-prem to Azure, in-Azure to in-Azure or public to Azure.
They're similar in that they all involve network traffic, but that's pretty much where the similarities end.
Application Gateway is a Layer 7 load balancing service with advanced features like SSL termination. It's used to route client requests to your applications.
Virtual Network Gateway is a VPN gateway for point-to-site (user) and site-to-site (office/datacenter) VPN connections to your own Azure VNETs. This would, for example, allow you to RDP into Azure VMs from your on-prem office using their private IPs.
ExpressRoute is similar to site-to-site, however it doesn't use IpSec tunnels, it's a dedicated, unencrypted connection from your location directly into Microsoft's backbone. (i.e. you don't traverse the public internet). There's no encryption and the connection is faster. This is a service you need to work with a 3rd party internet provider to implement.
Virtual WAN is more like a networking hub where there would be many site-to-site, point-to-site, ExpressRoute, etc... connections spanning a wide area (as the name implies). This would be for large enterpise organizations with many on-prem locations.
Arc is a means of adding your on-prem resources into Azure for management. e.g. you have a physical server somewhere and you want to manage it though ARM/portal.
Azure Private Link is a feature of many Azure services (storage, SQL PaaS, etc..) which allows you to create a private DNS record and assign a private IP address on your internal VNETs. This is used when you want to disable all public network access to a resource and only allow access from within your own VNET.
I have barely scratched the surface of the differences here, but suffice it to say, there are many differences. From this page, you can type the service name into the search and get more specific details on the offering. Hope this helps.
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/search/?terms=networking%20in%20azure

Connecting two App Services within the same VNet

I have two NodeJS App Services.
They can connect to each other with no problem using the URL which is created for App Services by default. (That is through the public internet.)
Then I successfully enabled VNet Integration for both App Services, and assigned the same VNet and also subnet two both of them.
How should I modify the connection URL now to connect to appservice2 from appservice1 (without using the URLs which are publicly available on the internet)?
I could not find any host name or IP address information in Azure Portal using which I could have successfully established the connection.
Thanks for any suggestions!
When you want two app services to connect to each other over a private network, there are generally two steps you have to take to set this up correctly. Note that the app service URL will always stay the same, it is only the networking part that changes.
Both app services should have vnet integration enabled, which allows the app service to route its traffic through the vnet.
If you want others (e.g. another app service) to connect to an app service via a vnet you can choose between:
a) Service endpoints
b) Private endpoints
Reading your question, I assume you completed the first step correctly. But you have to complete either step 2a or 2b to get this to work properly. I would recommend you choose service endpoints because they are more straightforward than working with private endpoints. Below you'll find a detailed description and considerations for every step.
1. Vnet Integration
The subnet you use as an integration subnet has to be a dedicated subnet. This means it is only used for vnet integration.
Only one app service plan can be used with this dedicated subnet, this one app service plan may include multiple app services.
If there is a network security group attached to that subnet, it needs to allow outbound traffic.
If there is an azure firewall attached to your vnet and you want to make a call to a public endpoint, it should allow outbound traffic.
Vnet route all should be enabled if you want all the outbound traffic to travel over the vnet.
If you want to read more, I would recommend reading this documentation.
Here is a simple example of how you would create vnet integration by selecting the dedicated subnet:
Service Endpoints
Service endpoints allow you to lock down inbound access to your app so that the source address must come from a set of subnets that you select.
Service endpoints are automatically provisioned by azure when you enable access restrictions to the app service.
This is a much simpler alternative to private endpoints.
Does not work in large-scale networks where you want to connect from an on-prem network to an azure vnet.
You may turn to this documentation to read about all the features and limitations of service endpoints.
Here is an example of how you would enable services endpoints for your app service by creating an access restriction:
Private Endpoints
Private endpoints also need a subnet, but you can connect as many private endpoints to the subnet as there are IP addresses available.
When you use private endpoints, you also need to have a private DNS zone. Otherwise, the app service URL does not resolve correctly to an IP address.
Private endpoints are more complex than service endpoints because of the extra subnet and DNS requirements.
Here is a nice tutorial that let's you set up an app service with private endpoint.
The following example shows you how to create a private endpoint for your app service. You have the option to let azure create a private DNS zone automatically, or you can do this manually:
If you want to access app services without public internet, then enabling VNET integration in those services alone won't be enough. You need to create a private endpoint that provides the IP from the virtual network to access the app service internally within the VNET and it also disables public access to the app service over the internet. Also please be aware that the private endpoint implementation will have some cost implications as well.
If your requirement is just to establish a secure connection between your virtual network & app service and to avoid access over the public internet, a service endpoint is the simplest solution. If you also need to access the app service from on-premises through an express route or Azure Gateway, a regionally peered virtual network, or a globally peered virtual network, Private Endpoint is the solution.
Steps to set up a service endpoint are detailed in the provisioning service endpoint link
Steps to set up a private endpoint are detailed in the connect to the web app using private endpoint link
Also if you want to deep dive into private endpoint configuration for app service, I would recommend you to read through the following tutorial

Why we have a lot of connections between app services from same resource group?

We have three App Services in Azure (API1, API2, API3).
API2 is getting data from CosmosDB.
API3 is getting data from other CosmosDB.
Main API1 calls API2 to get some data. Then using this data calls API3.
We have poor performance of API1 and we are trying to figure out why. We noticed that there are too many connections in metrics. Also we have issue with SNAT ports.
We tried to setup these APIs to the same VNet but it doesn't help and we are not sure how to set up it correctly.
Do you have any idea what we should setup?
UPDATE:
Seems like VNet helped us with SNAT ports issue but performance of API was still very poor.
What really helped us was change from Windows to Linux. When all APIs runs on the Linux servers we don't see any connections anymore.
Not sure what's specific configurations about three APIs on your side. If you want to use IP from Vnet instead of an external one, you can use a separate environment ASE.
Alternatively, you can use a private link to the app service. By using Private Endpoint, you can connect privately to your web app. Read Connect privately to a web app by using Azure Private Endpoint (Preview).
Today, you can secure this connection using VNet service endpoints
which keep the traffic within the Microsoft backbone network and allow
the PaaS resource to be locked down to just your VNet. However, the
PaaS endpoint is still served over a public IP address and therefore
not reachable from on-premises through Azure ExpressRoute private
peering or VPN gateway. With today’s announcement of Azure Private
Link, you can simply create a private endpoint in your VNet and map it
to your PaaS resource (Your Azure Storage account blob or SQL Database
server). These resources are then accessible over a private IP address
in your VNet, enabling connectivity from on-premises through Azure
ExpressRoute private peering and/or VPN gateway and keep the network
configuration simple by not opening it up to public IP addresses.
For more information, you could read here.

Is a service Endpoint always the securest way to access a resource on Azure?

I build an architecture, where you can trigger an Azure Function to push data into a Cosmos DB, which lies behind my DMZ. Some implementation guidelines state, that a service endpoint should be always enabled if possible. However, if I do so, the Cosmos DB is potentially exposed to the Internet (although I would not allow any IPs in the Cosmos DB firewall). With exposure I mean the order of handling services in Azure (https://msdnshared.blob.core.windows.net/media/2016/05/1.bmp). Thus, the Cosmos DB would have by default a public endpoint.
Can I restrict any public access from the internet, except blocking all IP addresses?
Can I restrict any public access from the internet, except blocking
all IP addresses?
Actually, By enabling service endpoint, you have limited that only requests originating from that subnet could access the Azure Cosmos DB. Traffic from your VNet to the Azure service always remains on the Microsoft Azure backbone network. So, it's a secure way to access resources in Azure.
After enabling a service endpoint, the source IP addresses of virtual machines in the subnet switch from using public IPv4 addresses to using their private IPv4 address, when communicating with the service from that subnet. Also, the default NSG associated with that subnet continues to work with service endpoints, read here. If you want to deny all outbound internet traffic and only allow access to cosmos DB from that subnet, you could add service tag as the destination in the outbound rules in NSG.
edit
You could have a look at this Azure private link(preview), but it seems it's not available for Azure Cosmos DB Account yet.
Azure Private Link enables you to access Azure PaaS Services (for
example, Azure Storage and SQL Database) and Azure hosted
customer/partner services over a Private Endpoint in your virtual
network. Traffic between your virtual network and the service
traverses over the Microsoft backbone network, eliminating exposure
from the public Internet.

Adding Vnet to Azure SQLDB

I heard about the new update on Azure SQLDB that it can be connected to vnet but can't find any blogs on this new information.
Can someone throw some light on this information?
Now, it is supported. Please refer to this blog.
Azure SQL Database will allow you to set firewall rules for specific
public IPs, and will give you the option of allowing all Azure
Services’ IPs to connect to your Servers. If you're looking for finer
grained connectivity limitations, you would have to provision a Static
Public IP, which can be hard to manage and costly when done at scale.
Virtual Network service endpoints will allow you to limit connectivity
to your Azure SQL Database Servers from given subnets within a Virtual
Network.
You could do it on Azure Portal. Please refer to this link.

Resources