For my project, I need to deploy from the pipeline by creating an incremental package with only modified files.
Is there any way to create an incremental package
Related
I imported the SmartHotel360 project from azuredevopsdemogenerator.azurewebsites.net and would like to build and release the project however I have certain warnings. I successfully ran the build pipeline but when I want to release it I see this warning: The version provided for the build artifact source is invalid. I do not know from where to take this version. There is no option in the dropdown.
Using the Azure DevOps Services Demo Generator, we can create same SmartHotel360 project as below.
And it will automatically create a build pipeline and release pipeline in SmartHotel360 project. By reviewing the generated release pipeline: SmartHotel360_Website-Deploy, we can see below default primary artifact: Build - _SmartHotel_Petchecker-Web.
Clicking this artifact we will be redirected to a build pipeline which doesn’t exist, so we need to manually delete this artifact and then re-add our own artifact, as below.
Therefore, after successfully running the build pipeline and publishing the artifacts, we can create a new release, as below.
For the source alias you just need to set the Build Name, also on the version it will be automatically picked if you already have a successful build
So I have a project set up as a polyrepo, meaning all services and libraries are in different repos.
Now, I've updated the service projects to reference the library project directly when using Debug as the build config in visual studio, and the package on NuGet when building in Release, on Azure DevOps.
The problem I am trying to solve is that my service builds sometimes fail when I've updated the library because the Library build hasn't completed and update NuGet yet.
What are my options here? Is there a way to ensure that the Library build completes first before the service builds start, or something similar?
Since you are using the Release feature in Azure Devops, I suggest that you could split the whole process into two stages (Library Build Stage and Service Build Stage).
For example:
These two stages are connected by After Stage relationship.
Then when the Library Stage completes , the Service Build stage will start.
If the two stages need to specify different files in the build, you could select the target files in the Visual Studio Build task -> Solution.
By the way, if Service Build stage needs to use the build results of Library Build stage, I suggest that you can use the same Self-hosted agents to run the release.
You can define it in Tasks -> Agent Job -> Demands.
Updates:
Since the Service Build and Library Build are two pipelines, you could try the following steps to order the Build running Step.
Step1: Set the CI trigger(continuous integration) in Library Build. This could make sure the commits could trigger the Library Build.
Step2: Disable the CI trigger in Service Build. Then Set the Pipeline trigger in Service Build. You could set the Library Build trigger the Service Build.
In this case, you could make sure that the Service Build will run after the Library Build.
I have a release pipeline which i use to deploy my resources to other environments. All works fine but the problem is that every time i deploy, all the resources even if no modification is made, are deployed. Is there a way through which i can do selective deployment; i.e. I deploy only those resources which have been modified. Any help would do. Thanks.
That`s a broad question. There is no out-of-box feature to select units to deploy. But you can use variables in the release pipeline:
Define a variable for each resource/unit and set some default value and "Settable at release time" property.
For each resource, define a separate task to deploy and define the custom condition, like: and(succeeded(), eq(variables['Custom.DeployUnit1'], 'YES'))
You can update these variables at the release creation time:
Is there any way to do selective deployment in azure devops?
There is no such out of box way to selective deployment in azure devops.
That because Azure devops release does not support release only changed files since only release changed files not always meaningful and could not archive what the project intend to release (such as the config file only changed in a commit).
But you could create a PowerShell script to compare timestamp for all files:
Create XML file that stores the last upload/publish information of
each files (e.g. file name, date time, changeset/commit version).
Create a PowerShell script file that included the logical to compare
files (get files metadata and compare with that XML file) and copy
updated files to specific folder
Publish the files in that folder
Check the similar thread for some more details.
Besides, if deploying via the deploy.cmd or MSDeploy.exe, you could also use the the -useChecksum WebDeploy flag:
WebDeploy/MSDeploy Quick Tip: Only Deploy Changed Files
Hope this helps.
I'm trying to deploy an artifact from VSTS to an Azure App Service, using Deploy an Azure Web App step template in Octopus Deploy. The VSTS zip package will have a structure like the following:
\Content\C_C\a\1\s\Api{ProjectName\obj\Release\Package\PackageTmp
When I publish the zip file using MsDeploy.exe. It automatically only copy the folders & files inside the PackageTmp folder into the wwwroot folder. However, when I use the Octopus deploy, It copies all of the folder from Content\. Is there any way to make the Octopus deploy work like using MsDeploy.exe? I'd like to use the zip as is, so adding a Copy Files step or changing the PackageLocation in the VSTS build is not really an option.
Any help/suggestion is really appreciated.
Thank you.
To achieve the layout of the files as you describe, you will have to modify your build step. In the MSBuild arguments section on the build step, ensure you have the following parameters defined:
/p:WebPublishMethod=FileSystem /p:PackageLocation="$(build.artifactstagingdirectory)\\"
These two parameters will create the package in the directory specified by the PackageLocation parameter, and it should be in the format you expect.
In the step where you push the package to Octopus specify this directory as the Package Source.
There isn’t such setting to do it.
You can publish the web app with File System mode , then package the files through Package Application task.
I am currently in the process of architecting a CI/CD pipeline using VSTS. Whenever a developer commits his changes to the solution in his local visual studio and syncs the changes with remote repository, it triggers the build and release process automatically. How do I release only the files modified by the developer to Azure platform? Is there a feature in VSTS to handle delta deployment?
VSTS build/release does not support build/release only changed files since only build/release changed files not always meaningful and can’t archeive what the project intend to release (such as the config file only changed in a commit).
But you can change your build definition to meet your requirement. Use a file to record each time upload/publish files -> compare with the new committed information -> publish only changed files. More details, you can refer this post.