I imported the SmartHotel360 project from azuredevopsdemogenerator.azurewebsites.net and would like to build and release the project however I have certain warnings. I successfully ran the build pipeline but when I want to release it I see this warning: The version provided for the build artifact source is invalid. I do not know from where to take this version. There is no option in the dropdown.
Using the Azure DevOps Services Demo Generator, we can create same SmartHotel360 project as below.
And it will automatically create a build pipeline and release pipeline in SmartHotel360 project. By reviewing the generated release pipeline: SmartHotel360_Website-Deploy, we can see below default primary artifact: Build - _SmartHotel_Petchecker-Web.
Clicking this artifact we will be redirected to a build pipeline which doesn’t exist, so we need to manually delete this artifact and then re-add our own artifact, as below.
Therefore, after successfully running the build pipeline and publishing the artifacts, we can create a new release, as below.
For the source alias you just need to set the Build Name, also on the version it will be automatically picked if you already have a successful build
Related
I am working for a company that develops a lot of apps and we use Azure devops portal for all of our pipeline releases etc.
So, the general flow is that a developer will create a branch to do the development on and change the code on that branch. They would like to deploy that branch before it is merged back into the development line from a pipeline, rather than from visual studio, which they currently do. So, it's about giving the developer to the option to choose which branch to deploy from.
Has anyone done something similar or point me in the right direction to how I could go about this?
When creating the release, currently there is no build-in feature to choose which branch to deploy from, the release pipeline works with the corresponding source Artifacts configuration.
A good approach for your scenario is referring to the build id on your build pipeline (instead of release pipeline).
When running the build pipeline, you could choose the target branch and record the build id for this run.
In your release pipeline, you could check whether the source Artifacts is from your target branch by checking the build id.
So I'm currently trying to proceed through the release pipeline portion of an Azure DevOps Fundamentals for beginners course on Udemy, and the goal is to deploy the code for a small webapp game called "Flatris" for the purpose of showing how Azure works.
I've been following along with all the steps as per the course, but when I run the release pipeline build, it consistently fails with the message:
"Error: No package found with specified pattern: D:\a\r1\a***.zipCheck if the package mentioned in the task is published as an artifact in the build or a previous stage and downloaded in the current job."
So far, I've double checked the function of the Web App resource provided through Azure, it's showing traffic when I try and run the pipelines, so it's not the problem(i think), I've double checked the repositories, and they seem to be functioning well(i think), I'm unsure about the artifacts and whether that may be the source of the problem, but theres not enough specificity in the error logs for me to accurately isolate where the problem is.
I don't know if anyone else has managed to get pat this problem, or if it's unique to me with something I'm doing, but any help would be greatly appreciated.
Error: No package found with specified pattern: D:\a\r1\a***.zip
Check if the package mentioned in the task is published as an artifact in the build or a previous stage and downloaded in the current job."
When we use release pipeline for our application, we have to specify the artifacts that make up the application. And the artifact is a deployable component of your application. It is typically produced through a Continuous Integration or a build pipeline. Azure Pipelines releases can deploy artifacts that are produced by a wide range of artifact sources such as Azure Pipelines build, Jenkins, or Team City.
According to the error message, it seems you are using the build pipeline as artifact resource in the release pipeline.
To resolve this issue, we need make sure we have use the Publish build artifacts task to publish the artifacts to the Azure Pipelines in the build pipeline.
Then select the above build pipeline when we select the artifact source type:
In this case, Azure release pipeline will download the artifact automatically when we execute the release pipeline, the artifact will be save in the default folder D:\a\r1\a. That will resolve your issue.
So I have a project set up as a polyrepo, meaning all services and libraries are in different repos.
Now, I've updated the service projects to reference the library project directly when using Debug as the build config in visual studio, and the package on NuGet when building in Release, on Azure DevOps.
The problem I am trying to solve is that my service builds sometimes fail when I've updated the library because the Library build hasn't completed and update NuGet yet.
What are my options here? Is there a way to ensure that the Library build completes first before the service builds start, or something similar?
Since you are using the Release feature in Azure Devops, I suggest that you could split the whole process into two stages (Library Build Stage and Service Build Stage).
For example:
These two stages are connected by After Stage relationship.
Then when the Library Stage completes , the Service Build stage will start.
If the two stages need to specify different files in the build, you could select the target files in the Visual Studio Build task -> Solution.
By the way, if Service Build stage needs to use the build results of Library Build stage, I suggest that you can use the same Self-hosted agents to run the release.
You can define it in Tasks -> Agent Job -> Demands.
Updates:
Since the Service Build and Library Build are two pipelines, you could try the following steps to order the Build running Step.
Step1: Set the CI trigger(continuous integration) in Library Build. This could make sure the commits could trigger the Library Build.
Step2: Disable the CI trigger in Service Build. Then Set the Pipeline trigger in Service Build. You could set the Library Build trigger the Service Build.
In this case, you could make sure that the Service Build will run after the Library Build.
I have 7 projects in one .sln. I am using azure devops. There is 4 api and 3 web. I have created two different pipeline for api and web. When commit then both pipeline is triggered.
What I want....
I want only changes project will trigger, build and release. If project 1 is changes then only build and release project 1. Others no.
How do I manage this?
Currently for one change all projects are building and releasing.
Firts of all, if you want only the project you change to trigger the pipeline, you have to create one "pipeline->release" for each project.
When I want something like this normally I create a pipeline whith my build template and then change the trigger option:
Go to edit your pipeline:
And then add the path of the project you want to trigger this pipeline.
So with this you will have a diferent artifact for each project and you will be able to have release only the project you push your changes.
I hope this work for you too!
Update your includes path in the pipeline.
paths:
include:
- /Project1FolderName/*
- /Project2FolderName/*
A release can be triggered when the build artifact is available as shown in screenshot below.
So does this necessitate that for the release pipeline (configured for build artifact) to get triggered, the build pipeline must have the "publish artifact" task?
Agree with Shayki Abramczyk, the answer is No. But I think maybe you need more descriptions to help you understand ~
In your situation, you set build pipeline as release pipeline's artifact. If you've checked this document you would find these statements:
1.When authoring a release pipeline, you link the appropriate artifact sources to your release pipeline. For example, you might link an Azure Pipelines build pipeline or a Jenkins project to your release pipeline.
2.Note from here:
You must include a Publish Artifacts task in your build pipeline. For XAML build pipelines, an artifact with the name drop is published implicitly.
3.Auto-trigger releases feature(CD trigger in artifact): New releases can be created automatically when new builds (including XAML builds) are produced. See Continuous Deployment for details. You do not need to configure anything within the build pipeline. See the notes above for differences between version of TFS.
To sum up, the artifact source here represents a build pipeline instead of the outputs of a build pipeline. So when you enabled the CD trigger in artifact(in your situation a build pipeline), the release is triggered whenever a new build finishes. And this behavior won't be affected by whether the build pipeline has Publish Artifact task to publish the outputs from it.
For the 2.Note: It can be considered as we must include a Publish Artifacts task in build pipeline so that the release pipeline can access the outputs of build pipeline. And then we can deploy the outputs(.dll/.exe or what) to target machines/environments. (Actually we think the must in document should be replaced with It's recommended to/should)
Publish Artifacts task make the build+release process meaningful. Cause if our release pipeline can't access outputs of build pipeline, what should we use to deploy? But whether this task exists or not won't actually affect the CD trigger. (Just like the third statement:You do not need to configure anything within the build pipeline)
The answer is No, the release will be triggered when the build finished even he doesn't have Publish Artifacts step.