i have an data for biology but it only know predicate in it's example.
eg:
<example src="PERMUTATE" no="3">
<text>Both RAP1 and 2 are important vaccine candidates because it has been shown that Alanine can block the action of a postulated repressor (Schofield et al., 1986; Harnyuttanakorn et al., 1992; Howard et al., 1998a).</text>
<arg n="0">Alanine</arg>
<arg n="1">the action of a postulated repressor</arg>
</example>
with
<roles>
<role n="0" descr="causer agent
" />
<role n="1" descr="theme (process or entity being stopped)
" />
</roles>
as i know CoNll09 have many role in trainning dataset. Online semantic role labeling model on the internet only support for CoNll format and... which have more info in it's sentence trainning. how can i convert my data to it?
thank you so much.
Related
I would like to give cross-links in the below XML using XSLT 3.0.
My Input XML is:
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<book id="bk1">
<p>The heterogeneity of patients, various clinical manifestations and the dynamics of CS development cause problems with identifying its unified definition. However, CS can be usually diagnosed on the basis of clinical criteria which are easy to assess without the need for advanced hemodynamic monitoring Thiele et al., 2015. Increasing knowledge about (Perkins-Porras et al., 2009) patient characteristics and better understanding of the CS pathophysiology encourages researchers and clinicians to revise the classic definition. (Thiele et al., 2015; Werdan et al., 2012; Nadziakiewicz et al., 2007; Sobanski et al., 2010; Goldberg et al., 2009; Harjola et al., 2015; Holmes et al., 1995).</p>
</book>
Expected Output XML is:
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<book id="bk1">
<p>The heterogeneity of patients, various clinical manifestations and the dynamics of CS development cause problems with identifying its unified definition. However, CS can be usually diagnosed on the basis of clinical criteria which are easy to assess without the need for advanced hemodynamic monitoring Thiele et al., 2015. Increasing knowledge about (Perkins-Porras et al., 2009) patient Perkins-Porras, 2019 characteristics and better understanding of the CS pathophysiology encourages researchers and clinicians to revise the classic definition. (Thiele et al., 2015; Werdan et al., 2012; Nadziakiewicz et al., 2007; Sobanski et al., 2010; Goldberg et al., 2009; Harjola et al., 2015).</p>
</book>
If author name with et al or author name without et al also need to check and give tag. How to achieve this?
Matching on "names" is always difficult so the following might work for some examples but not for others:
<xsl:stylesheet xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform"
xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
xmlns:fn="http://www.w3.org/2005/xpath-functions"
exclude-result-prefixes="#all"
version="3.0">
<xsl:param name="author-pattern" as="xs:string">(\p{Lu}[\p{L}-]+)( et al.)?, ([0-9]{4})</xsl:param>
<xsl:mode on-no-match="shallow-copy"/>
<xsl:template match="p//text()">
<xsl:apply-templates select="analyze-string(., $author-pattern)" mode="wrap-authors"/>
</xsl:template>
<xsl:template match="fn:match" mode="wrap-authors">
<a href="#bib{fn:group[#nr = 1]}{fn:group[#nr = 3]}">
<xsl:apply-templates mode="#current"/>
</a>
</xsl:template>
</xsl:stylesheet>
Is the "Category" attribute in a request to TranslateArray a pre-defined list or open to specify during the request?
<TranslateArrayRequest xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
<AppId xsi:nil="true" />
<From>en</From>
<Options>
<Category xmlns="http://schemas.datacontract.org/2004/07/Microsoft.MT.Web.Service.V2">pets</Category>
<State>0</State>
</Options>
<Texts>
<string xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/2003/10/Serialization/Arrays">dog</string>
<string xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/2003/10/Serialization/Arrays">cat</string>
<string xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/2003/10/Serialization/Arrays">fish</string>
</Texts>
<To>fr</To>
</TranslateArrayRequest>
Yields the following response:
<html>
<body>
<h1>Argument Exception</h1>
<p>Method: TranslateArray()</p>
<p>Parameter: category</p>
<p>Message: Invalid category
Parameter name: category</p>
<code></code>
<p>message id=0243.V2_Rest.TranslateArray.148495FA</p>
</body>
</html>
Definition in API documentation:
Category: A string containing the category (domain) of the
translation. Defaults to general
but it is unclear what other categories there are if this is not a custom field?
Duplicate but reposting response from one in comments incase search shows up for someone:
Agriculture
Animals
Arts & Entertainment
Automotive
Beauty
Business
Chemicals
Clothing
Custom
Education
Electronics
Energy, Water and Utilities
Financials
Fine Arts
Food
Geography, Anthropology
Government
Healthcare
History
Home & Garden
Internet
Language
Law
Literature
Medicine
Military Science
Music
Philosophy
Political Science
Reference
Religion
Science
Shopping
Social Sciences
Society & Culture
Sports
Technology
Telecommunications
My team and I are using the SolutionPackager tool from the CRM SDK to being able to version CRM 2011 solutions.
We’ve come through many problems; for example the order in which the languages are exported depends on each organization, another problem was the entity type code of each entity also depends on each organization, etc., etc.
In my team we also use the same kind of organizations UR (Update Rollup) 6, each develop have its Virtual Machine to develop, all VMs have the same configuration, the same languages packs installed, I mean, we also work in the same environments.
But now we are facing another problem that we cannot figure out. From one organization, let’s say OrgA, I export a solution, apply the solution packager and then from one of our entities I get an XML like:
<attribute PhysicalName="OrganizationId">
<Type>lookup</Type>
<Name>organizationid</Name>
<LogicalName>organizationid</LogicalName>
<RequiredLevel>none</RequiredLevel>
<ImeMode>auto</ImeMode>
<ValidForReadApi>1</ValidForReadApi>
<IsCustomField>0</IsCustomField>
<IsAuditEnabled>1</IsAuditEnabled>
<IsSecured>0</IsSecured>
<IsCustomizable>1</IsCustomizable>
<IsRenameable>1</IsRenameable>
<CanModifySearchSettings>1</CanModifySearchSettings>
<CanModifyRequirementLevelSettings>1</CanModifyRequirementLevelSettings>
<CanModifyAdditionalSettings>1</CanModifyAdditionalSettings>
<ReferencedEntityObjectTypeCode>1019</ReferencedEntityObjectTypeCode>
<LookupStyle>single</LookupStyle>
<LookupTypes />
<displaynames>
<displayname description="Organisations-ID" languagecode="1031" />
<displayname description="Organization Id" languagecode="1033" />
<displayname description="ID d'organisation " languagecode="1036" />
<displayname description="ID da Organização" languagecode="1046" />
<displayname description="Id. de la organización" languagecode="3082" />
</displaynames>
<Descriptions>
<Description description="Eindeutiger Bezeichner für die Organisation." languagecode="1031" />
<Description description="Unique identifier for the organization" languagecode="1033" />
<Description description="Identificateur unique de l'organisation" languagecode="1036" />
<Description description="Identificador exclusivo da organização" languagecode="1046" />
<Description description="Identificador único de la organización." languagecode="3082" />
</Descriptions>
</attribute>
The problem is, that from another organization, let’s say OrgB, I export THE SAME solution and when I go to the XML for same entity as before, that file does NOT contain the line
<LookupStyle>single</LookupStyle>
The solution from both organization IS THE SAME, the configuration is also the same, so my question is why when I export the solution each VM/Organization generate a different XML file?
We've experienced the same glitch in our project. I think the problem is that single is a default value of <LookupStyle> (in other words <LookupStyle/> == <LookupStyle>single</LookupStyle>. So it might appear from the UI that the configuration of both organization is the same (in fact it is) but the data stored in the database are different. Unfortunately export of a solution takes into account only what is stored in the DB.
I'm quite sure that exporting/importing solution with a given entity won't help. What might help is resaving the entity.
Btw - I found this approach of comparing packages very useful. Only I use BeyondCompare...
My XML file looks something like this:
<Fields>
<Humanities>
<Performing_Arts>
<Dance />
<Music />
</Performing_Arts>
<Visual_Arts>
<Painting />
<Sculptue />
</Visual_Arts>
</Humanities>
<Social_Sciences>
<Psychology>
<Cultural_Psychology />
<Social_Psychology />
</Psychology>
</Social_Sciences>
</Fields>
I want to write an XML Schema, for this file, so that no two nodes, irrespective of location in the file can have duplicate names.
Any node in this file should be allowed to have unlimited child nodes, to any sub-level.
How might I achieve this goal?
skaffman is quite right, you needto enclose your values as either attributes or elements, if you are unsure, w3 schools hasa great tutorial on this;
http://www.w3schools.com/xml/xml_elements.asp
http://www.w3schools.com/xml/xml_attributes.asp
An example of a possible xml representation of your data might be:
<fields>
<department name="Humanities">
<subject name="Peforming Arts">
<topic name="Dance"/>
<topic name="Music"/>
</subject>
<subject name="Visual Arts">
<topic name="Painting"/>
<topic name="Sculpture"/>
</subject>
</department>
<department name="Social Sciences">
<subject name="Psychology">
<topic name="Cultural Psychology"/>
<topic name="Social Psychology"/>
</subject>
</department>
</fields>
Notes:
You can see that this is roughly equivalent to a database with three tables: department, subject and topic, with FK relationships between the parent and children. This is really what XML encapsulates, but in text form, and is the sort of thing to bear in mind while you design your layout.
I've used all lower-case names for elements and attributes. This is a personal thing as xsl/xpath as case sensitive, so making everything lowercase avoids the opporyunity for horrid bugs later
Info: C# , VS2010 Beta 2 , DSL ToolKit Beta 2
I am trying to create the following generated XML in my DSL Diagram when used
<Method>
...
<FilterDescriptors>
<FilterDescriptor Type="Comparison" Name="EmployeeKey" />
</FilterDescriptors>
...
</Method>
This is how the Method and Filter Descriptor Domain Classes look
I believe I have set the multiplicity correct:
Method should only have 1 Filter Descriptor
A Filter Descriptor can have many Filter Descriptors i.e
<FilterDescriptors>
<FilterDescriptor Type="Comparison" Name="EmployeeKey" />
<FilterDescriptor Type="Wildcard" Name="EmployeeName" />
</FilterDescriptors>
The issue is that the output XML is like this:
<FilterDescriptors>
<FilterDescriptor>
<FilterDescriptors>
<FilterDescriptor Type="Comparison" Name="EmployeeKey" />
</FilterDescriptors>
</FilterDescriptor>
</FilterDescriptors>
We have this same pattern is several locations in our DSL Diagram and was hoping there is a something simple to resolve this rather than overriding the ReadElements and WriteElements of each domain class
Have you posted this in the DSL Tools forum at http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/dslvsarchx/threads? I don't see a thread there for it.