I am new here. I wanted to ask a question on using REGEX for an entity in DialogFlow
I wanted the entity to accept all text and spaces except for the symbol *
I have tried to use [A-Za-z0-9 ][^*], but it is not working. Any advice. thanks!
In your Regex expression, [^*] means "capture any character at the start of the line." To refer to a literal asterisk rather than matching any character, you need to use \*
If you want to match a line of letters or numbers as in the [A-Za-z0-9] example you give, but only if that string does not include an asterisk, then this expression should work for you:
^[a-zA-Z0-9]+$
This means "match a whole line of text if it only contains one or more of the characters a-z, A-Z, or 0-9".
If you want to match any character or group of characters in a line except for the asterisk, then you could use something like this:
(?!\*)([a-zA-Z0-9]+)(?<!\*)
The first part is called a "negative lookahead," and it looks forward to ensure we're not matching the asterisk. The last part is called a "negative lookbehind," and it looks backwards to make sure we're not matching the asterisk. The middle part is your "capture group," and confirms that you're matching any letters or numbers in a given string, but excluding the * character.
If this Regex gets input like *abc, it will capture abc. If it encounters abc*, it will still capture abc. If it encounters abc*def, it will capture abc and def separately in two capture groups, because it will break around the asterisk.
This link explains the concept of lookarounds in Regex. You can also use this Regex tester to get started practicing your Regular Expressions with explanations of what each block of characters does.
EDITED TO ADD If you're just interested in matching single characters rather than groups of characters, you can use [A-Za-z0-9] and match any upper or lowercase letter and any single digit. You don't need to exclude the * character, because the character group is already exclusive.
This is a slight duplicate of the question below, so responses here may also help you. Hope this helps!
How can I exclude asterisk in a regex expression
[A-Za-z0-9 ][^*]
What you regex will do is match 2 consecutive characters. First, it will look for anything A-Za-z0-9 . Then, it will look at the negated set that includes *, and will match ANY character except *.
You can type your regex into https://regexr.com/ to see a breakdown of how it matches and test some strings.
For example, your regex would match these:
Aa
AA
a&
A1
0_
But would not match these:
A*
a*
1*
And WOULD NOT match anything longer than 2 characters. If you really want to match any string with any characters except *, this should work:
[^\*]+
What that will do is match any number of consecutive characters that are not *. (The + means match 1 or more characters in the set). It is also a good idea to escape * because it is also a reserved character in regex. Even though most regex parsers are smart enough to know that inside a group you probably mean the literal char *, it is still a best practice to escape it. (And by that same token, you would want to use \s instead of the blank space in your original regex.)
I am tired of always trying to guess, if I should escape special characters like '()[]{}|' etc. when using many implementations of regexps.
It is different with, for example, Python, sed, grep, awk, Perl, rename, Apache, find and so on.
Is there any rule set which tells when I should, and when I should not, escape special characters? Does it depend on the regexp type, like PCRE, POSIX or extended regexps?
Which characters you must and which you mustn't escape indeed depends on the regex flavor you're working with.
For PCRE, and most other so-called Perl-compatible flavors, escape these outside character classes:
.^$*+?()[{\|
and these inside character classes:
^-]\
For POSIX extended regexes (ERE), escape these outside character classes (same as PCRE):
.^$*+?()[{\|
Escaping any other characters is an error with POSIX ERE.
Inside character classes, the backslash is a literal character in POSIX regular expressions. You cannot use it to escape anything. You have to use "clever placement" if you want to include character class metacharacters as literals. Put the ^ anywhere except at the start, the ] at the start, and the - at the start or the end of the character class to match these literally, e.g.:
[]^-]
In POSIX basic regular expressions (BRE), these are metacharacters that you need to escape to suppress their meaning:
.^$*[\
Escaping parentheses and curly brackets in BREs gives them the special meaning their unescaped versions have in EREs. Some implementations (e.g. GNU) also give special meaning to other characters when escaped, such as \? and +. Escaping a character other than .^$*(){} is normally an error with BREs.
Inside character classes, BREs follow the same rule as EREs.
If all this makes your head spin, grab a copy of RegexBuddy. On the Create tab, click Insert Token, and then Literal. RegexBuddy will add escapes as needed.
Modern RegEx Flavors (PCRE)
Includes C, C++, Delphi, EditPad, Java, JavaScript, Perl, PHP (preg), PostgreSQL, PowerGREP, PowerShell, Python, REALbasic, Real Studio, Ruby, TCL, VB.Net, VBScript, wxWidgets, XML Schema, Xojo, XRegExp.PCRE compatibility may vary
Anywhere: . ^ $ * + - ? ( ) [ ] { } \ |
Legacy RegEx Flavors (BRE/ERE)
Includes awk, ed, egrep, emacs, GNUlib, grep, PHP (ereg), MySQL, Oracle, R, sed.PCRE support may be enabled in later versions or by using extensions
ERE/awk/egrep/emacs
Outside a character class: . ^ $ * + ? ( ) [ { } \ |
Inside a character class: ^ - [ ]
BRE/ed/grep/sed
Outside a character class: . ^ $ * [ \
Inside a character class: ^ - [ ]
For literals, don't escape: + ? ( ) { } |
For standard regex behavior, escape: \+ \? \( \) \{ \} \|
Notes
If unsure about a specific character, it can be escaped like \xFF
Alphanumeric characters cannot be escaped with a backslash
Arbitrary symbols can be escaped with a backslash in PCRE, but not BRE/ERE (they must only be escaped when required). For PCRE ] - only need escaping within a character class, but I kept them in a single list for simplicity
Quoted expression strings must also have the surrounding quote characters escaped, and often with backslashes doubled-up (like "(\")(/)(\\.)" versus /(")(\/)(\.)/ in JavaScript)
Aside from escapes, different regex implementations may support different modifiers, character classes, anchors, quantifiers, and other features. For more details, check out regular-expressions.info, or use regex101.com to test your expressions live
Unfortunately there really isn't a set set of escape codes since it varies based on the language you are using.
However, keeping a page like the Regular Expression Tools Page or this Regular Expression Cheatsheet can go a long way to help you quickly filter things out.
POSIX recognizes multiple variations on regular expressions - basic regular expressions (BRE) and extended regular expressions (ERE). And even then, there are quirks because of the historical implementations of the utilities standardized by POSIX.
There isn't a simple rule for when to use which notation, or even which notation a given command uses.
Check out Jeff Friedl's Mastering Regular Expressions book.
Unfortunately, the meaning of things like ( and \( are swapped between Emacs style regular expressions and most other styles. So if you try to escape these you may be doing the opposite of what you want.
So you really have to know what style you are trying to quote.
Really, there isn't. there are about a half-zillion different regex syntaxes; they seem to come down to Perl, EMACS/GNU, and AT&T in general, but I'm always getting surprised too.
Sometimes simple escaping is not possible with the characters you've listed. For example, using a backslash to escape a bracket isn't going to work in the left hand side of a substitution string in sed, namely
sed -e 's/foo\(bar/something_else/'
I tend to just use a simple character class definition instead, so the above expression becomes
sed -e 's/foo[(]bar/something_else/'
which I find works for most regexp implementations.
BTW Character classes are pretty vanilla regexp components so they tend to work in most situations where you need escaped characters in regexps.
Edit: After the comment below, just thought I'd mention the fact that you also have to consider the difference between finite state automata and non-finite state automata when looking at the behaviour of regexp evaluation.
You might like to look at "the shiny ball book" aka Effective Perl (sanitised Amazon link), specifically the chapter on regular expressions, to get a feel for then difference in regexp engine evaluation types.
Not all the world's a PCRE!
Anyway, regexp's are so clunky compared to SNOBOL! Now that was an interesting programming course! Along with the one on Simula.
Ah the joys of studying at UNSW in the late '70's! (-:
https://perldoc.perl.org/perlre.html#Quoting-metacharacters and https://perldoc.perl.org/functions/quotemeta.html
In the official documentation, such characters are called metacharacters. Example of quoting:
my $regex = quotemeta($string)
s/$regex/something/
For PHP, "it is always safe to precede a non-alphanumeric with "\" to specify that it stands for itself." - http://php.net/manual/en/regexp.reference.escape.php.
Except if it's a " or '. :/
To escape regex pattern variables (or partial variables) in PHP use preg_quote()
To know when and what to escape without attempts is necessary to understand precisely the chain of contexts the string pass through. You will specify the string from the farthest side to its final destination which is the memory handled by the regexp parsing code.
Be aware how the string in memory is processed: if can be a plain string inside the code, or a string entered to the command line, but a could be either an interactive command line or a command line stated inside a shell script file, or inside a variable in memory mentioned by the code, or an (string)argument through further evaluation, or a string containing code generated dynamically with any sort of encapsulation...
Each of this context assigned some characters with special functionality.
When you want to pass the character literally without using its special function (local to the context), than that's the case you have to escape it, for the next context... which might need some other escape characters which might additionally need to be escaped in the preceding context(s).
Furthermore there can be things like character encoding (the most insidious is utf-8 because it look like ASCII for common characters, but might be optionally interpreted even by the terminal depending on its settings so it might behave differently, then the encoding attribute of HTML/XML, it's necessary to understand the process precisely right.
E.g. A regexp in the command line starting with perl -npe, needs to be transferred to a set of exec system calls connecting as pipe the file handles, each of this exec system calls just has a list of arguments that were separated by (non escaped)spaces, and possibly pipes(|) and redirection (> N> N>&M), parenthesis, interactive expansion of * and ?, $(()) ... (all this are special characters used by the *sh which might appear to interfere with the character of the regular expression in the next context, but they are evaluated in order: before the command line. The command line is read by a program as bash/sh/csh/tcsh/zsh, essentially inside double quote or single quote the escape is simpler but it is not necessary to quote a string in the command line because mostly the space has to be prefixed with backslash and the quote are not necessary leaving available the expand functionality for characters * and ?, but this parse as different context as within quote. Then when the command line is evaluated the regexp obtained in memory (not as written in the command line) receives the same treatment as it would be in a source file.
For regexp there is character-set context within square brackets [ ], perl regular expression can be quoted by a large set of non alfa-numeric characters (E.g. m// or m:/better/for/path: ...).
You have more details about characters in other answer, which are very specific to the final regexp context. As I noted you mention that you find the regexp escape with attempts, that's probably because different context has different set of character that confused your memory of attempts (often backslash is the character used in those different context to escape a literal character instead of its function).
For Ionic (Typescript) you have to double slash in order to scape the characters.
For example (this is to match some special characters):
"^(?=.*[\\]\\[!¡\'=ªº\\-\\_ç##$%^&*(),;\\.?\":{}|<>\+\\/])"
Pay attention to this ] [ - _ . / characters. They have to be double slashed. If you don't do that, you are going to have a type error in your code.
to avoid having to worry about which regex variant and all the bespoke peculiarties, just use this generic function that covers every regex variant other than BRE (unless they have unicode multi-byte chars that are meta) :
jot -s '' -c - 32 126 |
mawk '
function ___(__,_) {
return substr(_="",
gsub("[][!-/_\140:-#{-~]","[&]",__),
gsub("["(_="\\\\")"^]",_ "&",__))__
} ($++NF = ___($!_))^_'
!"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?
#ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_
`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~
[!]["][#][$][%][&]['][(][)][*][+][,][-][.][/]
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [:][;][<][=][>][?]
[#] ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ [[]\\ []]\^ [_]
[`] abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz [{][|][}][~]
square-brackets are much easier to deal with, since there's no risk of triggering warning messages about "escaping too much", e.g. :
function ____(_) {
return substr("", gsub("[[:punct:]]","\\\\&",_))_
}
\!\"\#\$\%\&\'\(\)\*\+\,\-\.\/ 0123456789\:\;\<\=\>\?
\#ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ\[\\\]\^\_\`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz \{\|\}\~
gawk: cmd. line:1: warning: regexp escape sequence `\!' is not a known regexp operator
gawk: cmd. line:1: warning: regexp escape sequence `\"' is not a known regexp operator
gawk: cmd. line:1: warning: regexp escape sequence `\#' is not a known regexp operator
gawk: cmd. line:1: warning: regexp escape sequence `\%' is not a known regexp operator
gawk: cmd. line:1: warning: regexp escape sequence `\&' is not a known regexp operator
gawk: cmd. line:1: warning: regexp escape sequence `\,' is not a known regexp operator
gawk: cmd. line:1: warning: regexp escape sequence `\:' is not a known regexp operator
gawk: cmd. line:1: warning: regexp escape sequence `\;' is not a known regexp operator
gawk: cmd. line:1: warning: regexp escape sequence `\=' is not a known regexp operator
gawk: cmd. line:1: warning: regexp escape sequence `\#' is not a known regexp operator
gawk: cmd. line:1: warning: regexp escape sequence `\_' is not a known regexp operator
gawk: cmd. line:1: warning: regexp escape sequence `\~' is not a known regexp operator
Using Raku (formerly known as Perl_6)
Works (backslash or quote all non-alphanumeric characters except underscore):
~$ raku -e 'say $/ if "#.*?" ~~ m/ \# \. \* \? /; #works fine'
｢#.*?｣
There exist six flavors of Regular Expression languages, according to Damian Conway's pdf/talk "Everything You Know About Regexes Is Wrong". Raku represents a significant (~15 year) re-working of standard Perl(5)/PCRE Regular Expressions.
In those 15 years the Perl_6 / Raku language experts decided that all non-alphanumeric characters (except underscore) shall be reserved as Regex metacharacters even if no present usage exists. To denote non-alphanumeric characters (except underscore) as literals, backslash or escape them.
So the above example prints the $/ match variable if a match to a literal #.*? character sequence is found. Below is what happens if you don't: # is interpreted as the start of a comment, . dot is interpreted as any character (including whitespace), * asterisk is interpreted as a zero-or-more quantifier, and ? question mark is interpreted as either a zero-or-one quantifier or a frugal (i.e. non-greedy) quantifier-modifier (depending on context):
Errors:
~$ ~$ raku -e 'say $/ if "#.*?" ~~ m/ # . * ? /; #ERROR!'
===SORRY!===
Regex not terminated.
at -e:1
------> y $/ if "#.*?" ~~ m/ # . * ? /; #ERROR!⏏<EOL>
Regex not terminated.
at -e:1
------> y $/ if "#.*?" ~~ m/ # . * ? /; #ERROR!⏏<EOL>
Couldn't find terminator / (corresponding / was at line 1)
at -e:1
------> y $/ if "#.*?" ~~ m/ # . * ? /; #ERROR!⏏<EOL>
expecting any of:
/
https://docs.raku.org/language/regexes
https://raku.org/
I want to replace a line, that represents a part of mathematical equation:
f(x,z,time,temp)=-(2.0)/(exp(128*((x-2.5*time)*(x-2.5*time)+(z-0.2)*(z-0.2))))+(
with a new one similar to the above. Both new and old lines are saved in bash variables.
Main problem is that mathematical equation is full with special characters that do not allow proper search and replace in bash mode, even when I used as delimiter special character that is not used in equation.
I used
sed -n "s|$OLD|$NEW|g" restart.k
and
sed -i "s|$OLD|$NEW|g" restart.k
but all times I get wrong results.
Any idea to solve this?
There is only * in your pattern here that is special for sed, so escape it and do replacement as usual:
sed "s:$(sed 's:[*]:\\&:g' <<<"$old"):$new:" infile
if there are more special characters in your real sample, then you will need to add them inside bracket []; there are some exceptions like:
if ^ character: it can be place anywhere in [] but not first character, because ^ character at first negates the characters within its bracket expression.
if ] character: it should be the first character, because this character is also used to end the bracket expression.
if - character: it should be the first or last character, because this character is also can be used for defining the range of characters too.
From the book "The Definitive ANTLR 4 Reference":
Our STRING rule isn’t quite good enough yet because it doesn’t allow
double quotes inside strings. To support that, most languages define
escape sequences starting with a backslash. To get a double quote
inside a double-quoted string, we use \". To support the common escape
characters, we need something like the following:
STRING : '"' ( ESC |.)*? '"' ;
fragment
ESC : '\\"' | '\\\\' ; // 2-char sequences \" and \\
ANTLR itself needs to escape the escape character, so that’s why we need \\ to
specify the backslash character. The loop in STRING now matches either
an escape character sequence, by calling fragment rule ESC, or any
single character via the dot wildcard. The *? subrule operator
terminates the (ESC |.)*?
That sounds fine, but when I read that I noticed a certain ambiguity in the choice between ESC and .. As far as STRING is concerned, it is possible to match an input "Hi\"" by matching the escape character \ to the ., and to consider the following escaped double-quote as closing the string. This would even be less greedy and so would conform better to the use of ?.
The problem, of course, is that if we do that, then we have an extra double-quote at the end that does not get matched to anything.
So I wrote the following grammar:
grammar String;
anything: STRING '"'? '\r\n';
STRING: '"' (ESC|.)*? '"';
fragment
ESC: '\\"' | '\\\\';
which accepts an optional lonely double-quote character right after the string. This grammar still parses "Orange\"" as a full string:
So my question is: why is this the accepted parse, as opposed to the one taking "Orange\" as the STRING, followed by an isolated double-quote "? Note that the latter would be less greedy, which would seem to conform better to the use of ?, so one could think it would be preferable.
After some more experimentation, I realize the explanation is that the choice operator | is order-dependent (but only under non-greedy operator ?): ESC is tried before .. If I invert the two and write (.|ESC)*?, I do get
This is not really surprising, but an interesting reminder that ANTLR is not as declarative as we may sometimes expect (in the sense that logic-or is order-independent but | is not). It is also a good reminder that the non-greedy operator ? does not extend its minimization capabilities to all choices, but just to the first one that matches the input (#sepp2k adds that order dependency only applies to the non-greedy case).
The problem
I have multiple property lines in a single string separated by \n like this:
LINES2="Abc1.def=$SOME_VAR\nAbc2.def=SOMETHING_ELSE\n"$LINES
The LINES variable
might contain an undefined set of characters
may be empty. If it is empty, I want to avoid the trailing \n.
I am open for any command line utility (sed, tr, awk, ... you name it).
Tryings
I tried this to no avail
sed -z 's/\\n$//g' <<< $LINES2
I also had no luck with tr, since it does not accept regex.
Idea
There might be an approach to convert the \n to something else. But since $LINES can contain arbitrary characters, this might be dangerous.
Sources
I skim read through the following questions
How can I replace a newline (\n) using sed?
sed with literal string--not input file
Here's one solution:
LINES2="Abc1.def=$SOME_VAR"$'\n'"Abc2.def=SOMETHING_ELSE${LINES:+$'\n'$LINES}"
The syntax ${name:+value} means "insert value if the variable name exists and is not empty." So in this case, it inserts a newline followed by $LINES if $LINES is not empty, which seems to be precisely what you want.
I use $'\n' because "\n" is not a newline character. A more readable solution would be to define a shell variable whose value is a single newline.
It is not necessary to quote strings in shell assignment statements, since the right-hand side of an assignment does not undergo word-splitting nor glob expansion. Not quoting would make it easier to interpolate a $'\n'.
It is not usually advisable to use UPPER-CASE for shell variables because the shell and the OS use upper-case names for their own purposes. Your local variables should normally be lower case names.
So if I were not basing the answer on the command in the question, I would have written:
lines2=Abc1.def=$someVar$'\n'Abc2.def=SOMETHING_ELSE${lines:+$'\n'$lines}