I'm fairly new to Node.js and I am having some issues.
I received error in sonarqube as define a constant instead of duplicating 5 times for "-deleteFlag". how can i resolved this issue.
export class CCGuid {
"-deleteFlag": string;
"#text": string;
constructor(obj: any) {
if (typeof obj === "string") {
this["#text"] = obj;
this["-deleteFlag"] = "N";
} else {
try {
this["-deleteFlag"] = obj["-deleteFlag"];
} catch {
this["-deleteFlag"] = undefined;
}
try {
this["#text"] = obj["#text"];
} catch {
this["#text"] = undefined;
}
}
}
}
export class CCGuid {
"-deleteFlag": string;
"#text": string;
constructor(obj: any) {
const deleteFlag = "-deleteFlag";
if (typeof obj === "string") {
this["#text"] = obj;
this[deleteFlag] = "N";
} else {
try {
this[deleteFlag] = obj[deleteFlag];
} catch {
this[deleteFlag] = undefined;
}
try {
this["#text"] = obj["#text"];
} catch {
this["#text"] = undefined;
}
}
}
}
I think this should do the trick with SQ, at least when it comes to that particular variable. You can do the same with "#text" of course.
After edit: sorry my first answer was broken, I was in a rush and didn't realize what I was really writing down.
Given my updated snippet, you can do the following:
this[deleteFlag']: This will work.
this['-deleteFlag']: This will of course work but Sonar Qube will complain because your use of duplicated string literals.
this.deleteFlag: This won't work because would be looking for a deleteFlag key on the object. Such key doesn't exist, it's '-deleteFlag'.
this['deleteFlag']: this is functionally the same as the line above. Would look for a 'deletFlag' key on the object, which doesn't exist.
Sorry for the confusion! Hope this helps now
Related
I have NodeJS program.
In one class, I have various utility methods. One function, safeGithubPush, calls safeString, another func in the same class
module.exports = {
safeString(stringToCheck) {
console.log(validator.isAscii(stringToCheck), validator.matches(stringToCheck, /^((\w)*[-.]?(\w)*)*$/))
return (
validator.isAscii(stringToCheck) &&
validator.matches(stringToCheck, /^((\w)*[-.]?(\w)*)*$/)
);
},
safeGithubPush(currentJob) {
if (
!currentJob ||
!currentJob.payload ||
!currentJob.payload.repoName ||
!currentJob.payload.repoOwner ||
!currentJob.payload.branchName
) {
this.logIn(
currentJob,
`${' (sanitize)'.padEnd(15)}failed due to insufficient job definition`
);
throw invalidJobDef;
}
if (
this.safeString(currentJob.payload.repoName) &&
this.safeString(currentJob.payload.repoOwner) &&
this.safeString(currentJob.payload.branchName)
) {
return true;
}
throw invalidJobDef;
},
}
While this.logIn(), another func in the utility class, works just fine, I get the error for safeString:
Error caught by first catch: TypeError: this.safeString is not a function
I followed a solution offer by another SO post:
safeString: function(stringToCheck){
...
}
safeGithubPush(currentJob) {
...
if (
this.safeString(currentJob.payload.repoName) &&
this.safeString(currentJob.payload.repoOwner) &&
this.safeString(currentJob.payload.branchName)
) {
return true;
}
}
But this also gets a, TypeError: this.safeString is not a function.
I'm not using arrow functions, which is the explanation for this error on a different SO post
I don't think the reason is determinable with the code you are currently presenting. It likely has something to do with how you are calling safeGithubPush. If you do something that would change the this binding the this.safeString is going to fail.
const foo = {
fizz() {
console.log("fizz");
},
buzz() {
this.fizz();
}
};
// "this" is correct
foo.buzz();
// "this" has no fizz to call
const myFizz = foo.buzz;
myFizz();
Considering you are attaching these to module.exports I am going to guess that you pull these functions off in a require call and then try to use them bare which makes the problem obvious after looking at my example above:
// Ignore these 2 lines, they let this look like node
const module = {};
const require = () => module.exports;
// Ignore above 2 lines, they let this look like node
// Your module "some.js"
module.exports = {
safeString(str) {
return true;
},
safeGithubPush(currentJob) {
if (!this.safeString("some")) {
throw new Error("Not safe");
}
return true;
}
};
try {
// Some consumer module that doesn't work
const {safeGithubPush} = require("./some.js");
const isItSafe = safeGithubPush();
console.log(`Safe? ${isItSafe}`);
} catch (err) {
console.error("Didn't bind right \"this\"");
}
try {
// Some consumer module that DOES work
const someModule = require("./some.js");
const isItSafe = someModule.safeGithubPush();
console.log(`Safe? ${isItSafe}`);
} catch (err) {
console.error(err);
}
I would restructure this code. You say these are utility functions which makes me think you don't really want to have to structure them with this in mind.
Instead of attaching them all to module.exports at their definition, define them outside and directly reference the functions you want to use, then attach them to exports so other modules can use the functions:
function safeString(stringToCheck) {
return true;
}
function safeGithubPush(currentJob) {
if (!safeString("some")) {
throw new Error("Not safe");
}
return true;
}
module.exports = {
safeString,
safeGithubPush
};
I am developing a small page/router component on a website using Angular 7 and its CLI. At one point I need to check if the user has allowed flash, I do this by doing so:
checkFlash() {
var hasFlash = false;
try {
hasFlash = Boolean(new ActiveXObject("ShockwaveFlash.ShockwaveFlash"));
} catch (exception) {
hasFlash = "undefined" != typeof navigator.mimeTypes["application/x-shockwave-flash"];
}
return hasFlash;
}
I found this off here, and it works great, but now as I am cleaning up my application I am noticing that Angular doesn't seem to like this, in fact, it says that ActiveXObject isn't defined, yet it still works.
Super confused...
I tried linking an actual flash object like so $('embed[type="application/x-shockwave-flash"]') or $('embed[type="application/x-shockwave-flash"]')[0] but had no luck, it always returned true.
I tried installing extra npm(s) including ones like activex-support and activex-data-support as well as their #types cousins. After setting them up I found out that they did nothing to help my case.
Here are the exact errors the CLI & VScode-Intellisense gave me:
VScode:
[ts] 'ActiveXObject' only refers to a type, but is being used as a value here. [2693]
any
CLI:
ERROR in src/app/games/games.component.ts(51,30): error TS2304: Cannot find name 'ActiveXObject'.
It doesn't throw this error when ran inside plain JS, but I've looked around and can't seem to figure out how to run pure JS inside Angular 2 (7). Also looked here with no luck.
Please help, completely lost here.
EDIT: Found the fix -->
The answer was here listed inside the comments (will need to make minor changes)(shown below)
change from:
checkFlash() {
var hasFlash = false;
try {
hasFlash = Boolean(new ActiveXObject("ShockwaveFlash.ShockwaveFlash"));
} catch (exception) {
hasFlash = "undefined" != typeof navigator.mimeTypes["application/x-
shockwave-flash"];
}
return hasFlash;
}
to:
function checkFlash() {
var hasFlash = false;
try {
var flash =
navigator.mimeTypes &&
navigator.mimeTypes["application/x-shockwave-flash"]
? navigator.mimeTypes["application/x-shockwave-flash"].enabledPlugin
: 0;
if (flash) hasFlash = true;
} catch (e) {
if (navigator.mimeTypes["application/x-shockwave-flash"] != undefined)
hasFlash = true;
}
return hasFlash;
}
This issue with ActiveXObject can be solve as shown below:
Goto your tsconfig.json file and add the 'scripthost' library.
Then recompile your application.
"lib": [
"es2017",
"dom",
"scripthost"
]
The answer was here listed inside the comments (will need to make minor changes)(shown below)
change from:
checkFlash() {
var hasFlash = false;
try {
hasFlash = Boolean(new ActiveXObject("ShockwaveFlash.ShockwaveFlash"));
} catch (exception) {
hasFlash = "undefined" != typeof navigator.mimeTypes["application/x-
shockwave-flash"];
}
return hasFlash;
}
to:
function checkFlash() {
var hasFlash = false;
try {
var flash =
navigator.mimeTypes &&
navigator.mimeTypes["application/x-shockwave-flash"]
? navigator.mimeTypes["application/x-shockwave-flash"].enabledPlugin
: 0;
if (flash) hasFlash = true;
} catch (e) {
if (navigator.mimeTypes["application/x-shockwave-flash"] != undefined)
hasFlash = true;
}
return hasFlash;
}
I am making a simple note taking app to learn node and ES6. I have 3 modules - App, NotesManager and Note. I am importing the Note class into the NotesManager and am trying to instantiate it in its addNote function. The problem is that even though the import is correct, it turns out to be undefined inside the class definition. A simpler solution would be to just instantiate the NotesManager class and add the Note class to its constructor however, I want to have NotesManager as a static utility class.
Here is my code.
Note.js
class Note {
constructor(title, body) {
this.title = title;
this.body = body;
}
}
module.exports = Note;
NotesManager.js
const note = require("./Note");
console.log("Note: ", note); //shows correctly
class NotesManager {
constructor() {}
static addNote(title, body) {
const note = new note(title, body); //Fails here as note is undefined
NotesManager.notes.push(note);
}
static getNote(title) {
if (title) {
console.log(`Getting Note: ${title}`);
} else {
console.log("Please provide a legit title");
}
}
static removeNote(title) {
if (title) {
console.log(`Removing Note: ${title}`);
} else {
console.log("Please provide a legit title");
}
}
static getAll() {
//console.log("Getting all notes ", NotesManager.notes, note);
}
}
NotesManager.notes = []; //Want notes to be a static variable
module.exports.NotesManager = NotesManager;
App.js
console.log("Starting App");
const fs = require("fs"),
_ = require("lodash"),
yargs = require("yargs"),
{ NotesManager } = require("./NotesManager");
console.log(NotesManager.getAll()); //works
const command = process.argv[2],
argv = yargs.argv;
console.log(argv);
switch (command) {
case "add":
const title = argv.title || "No title given";
const body = argv.body || "";
NotesManager.addNote(title, body); //Fails here
break;
case "list":
NotesManager.getAll();
break;
case "remove":
NotesManager.removeNote(argv.title);
break;
case "read":
NotesManager.getNote(argv.title);
break;
default:
notes.getAll();
break;
}
Is it possible for me to create a strict utility class which I can use without instantiating like in Java? Pretty new here and have tried searching for it without any luck. Thank you for your help.
When you do this:
const note = new note(title, body);
you redefine note shadowing the original note from the outer scope. You need to pick a different variable name.
Something like this should work better:
static addNote(title, body) {
const some_note = new note(title, body); //Fails here as note is undefined
NotesManager.notes.push(some_note);
}
The private array $list_of_files stays uninitialized. How can I update it from the while loop?
class listOfFiles {
private $list_of_files = [];
function __construct() {
if ($handle = opendir(WEB_STORAGE_DIR)) {
while (false !== ($entry = readdir($handle))) {
$this->list_of_files[$entry] = filesize(WEB_STORAGE_DIR.DIRECTORY_SEPARATOR.$entry);
}
closedir($handle);
// Remove . and .. from the list
unset($list_of_files['.']);
unset($list_of_files['..']);
}
}
function is_empty() {
return empty($list_of_files);
}
}
$list_of_files is referring to a variable, which is not the same as a property which would be $this->list_of_files.
Variables declared/referenced in a function are only available in that function (unless you use global - but this is generally considered 'evil' and should be avoided)
Properties are available from all methods in the class (unless they are static) and persist for the life of the object.
<?php
//lets show all error so we can see if anything else is going on..
error_reporting(E_ALL & ~E_NOTICE);
class listOfFiles {
private $list_of_files = [];
function __construct() {
if ($handle = opendir(WEB_STORAGE_DIR)) {
while (false !== ($entry = readdir($handle))) {
$this->list_of_files[$entry] = filesize(WEB_STORAGE_DIR.DIRECTORY_SEPARATOR.$entry);
}
closedir($handle);
// Remove . and .. from the list
unset($this->list_of_files['.']);
unset($this->list_of_files['..']);
}
}
function is_empty() {
return empty($this->list_of_files);
}
}
Is the issue that the directory doesn't exist? It would be better to check this before trying to open, and also allow for what to do when it does exist but you cant actually read it:
<?php
//lets show all error so we can see if anything else is going on..
error_reporting(E_ALL & ~E_NOTICE);
class listOfFiles {
private $list_of_files = [];
function __construct() {
if(!is_dir(WEB_STORAGE_DIR)){
throw new Exception("Missing Web Storage Directory");
}
$handle = opendir(WEB_STORAGE_DIR);
if (!$handle) {
throw new Exception("Could not read Web Storage Directory");
}
else{
while (false !== ($entry = readdir($handle))) {
$this->list_of_files[$entry] = filesize(WEB_STORAGE_DIR.DIRECTORY_SEPARATOR.$entry);
}
closedir($handle);
// Remove . and .. from the list
unset($this->list_of_files['.']);
unset($this->list_of_files['..']);
}
}
function is_empty() {
return empty($this->list_of_files);
}
}
I have added error_reporting(E_ALL & ~E_NOTICE); to the examples as this would make sure that you see any errors and may help debug your issue. More info on this here: http://php.net/manual/en/function.error-reporting.php
The access a property, you need to use $this, otherwise you are making a local variable. You do this at one place, but e.g. not here
return empty($list_of_files);
As that variable is never set, this will always return the same thing.
return empty($this->list_of_files);
The same goes for other references to that property, making the complete code (this is untested of course, as you didn't provide anything testable) look something like this
class listOfFiles {
private $list_of_files = [];
function __construct() {
if ($handle = opendir(WEB_STORAGE_DIR)) {
while (false !== ($entry = readdir($handle))) {
$this->list_of_files[$entry] = filesize(WEB_STORAGE_DIR.DIRECTORY_SEPARATOR.$entry);
}
closedir($handle);
// Remove . and .. from the list
unset( $this->list_of_files['.']);
unset( $this->list_of_files['..']);
}
}
function is_empty() {
return empty( $this->list_of_files);
}
}
I'm using chrome.storage in an extension and would like to avoid triggering runtime errors due to exceeding one of the documented throttles for either the sync or local stores. (things like QUOTA_BYTES, QUOTA_BYTES_PER_ITEM)
My first choice would be to intercept these errors prior to a runtime error being generated; alternatively I could track usage on the extension side and try to avoid triggering them.
This feels like an issue that someone must have addressed, but I can't seem to find any solutions - any suggestions appreciated.
Here's a sample of the solution I'm going with (using Angular, so there are promises in here), although having to regex the chrome.runtime.lastError value is pretty ugly IMO:
var service = {
error: function(lastError) {
if((lastError) && (lastError.message)) {
var errorString = lastError.message;
if(/QUOTA_BYTES/.test(errorString)) {
return true;
} else if(/QUOTA_BYTES_PER_ITEM/.test(errorString)) {
return true;
} else if(/MAX_ITEMS/.test(errorString)) {
return true;
} else if(/MAX_WRITE_OPERATIONS_PER_HOUR/.test(errorString)) {
return true;
} else if(/MAX_SUSTAINED_WRITE_OPERATIONS_PER_MINUTE/.test(errorString)) {
return true;
}
return false;
} else {
return false;
}
},
write: function(key, value) {
var deferred = $q.defer();
var data = {};
data[key] = value;
chrome.storage.sync.set(data, function() {
if(service.error(chrome.runtime.lastError)) {
deferred.reject('Write operation failed: '
+ chrome.runtime.lastError.message);
} else {
deferred.resolve();
}
});
return deferred.promise;
}
};
return service;