I have an application (UI) that monitors multicast streams to see if the streams are working correctly.
On top of that, I have a docker container (that runs in "network_mode: host") that also listens to the multicast streams and cache them in a database.
The compose file looks like this :
version: "3"
services:
my-multicast-container:
image: my-multicast-container-image:latest
depends_on:
- my-database
network_mode: host
my-database:
image: my-database-image:latest
restart: always
ports:
- ... #forwarded ports for the other container
My issue is : when I listen to the multicast streams inside my docker container, the monitoring application that runs on the same host as the docker isn't able to listen to the same streams that the docker is listening to. As I've read online, it's not possible to listen to multicast in a docker container without "network_mode: host" because of how containers works,... and can't seem to find a solution to that problem.
How can I receive the multicast packets in my docker container and in my desktop application ?
FYI: don't know if it's important but I'm using CentOS as a host OS
The problem was not really about multicast but, in fact, was about the user which owns the multicast UDP socket.
By default, the docker container is started as root user and the monitoring interface is started with the host's user. And, as mentioned in the SO_REUSEPORT documentation :
To prevent unwanted processes from hijacking a port that has already been bound by a server using SO_REUSEPORT, all of the servers that later bind to that port must have an effective user ID that matches the effective user ID used to perform the first bind on the socket.
So, to re-use the socket, the solution was to use the host's user to run the docker container like this :
docker run --rm -u $(id -u ${USER}):$(id -g ${USER}) --network=host \
my-multicast-container-image:latest
Related
I pull a docker image (will use python 3 as an example)
docker pull python:3.6
Then I launch a docker container
docker run -it -p 127.0.0.1:8000:8000 python:3.6 bash
(note that here 127.0.0.1 in 127.0.0.1:8000:8000 allows to specify the destination, host IP but not the source)
So if I launch a server inside the container at 0.0.0.0:
python -m http.server 8000 --bind 0.0.0.0
then I can access the container's server from the host machine without any problem by going to http://127.0.0.1:8000 at the host machine
However if my docker server binds to 127.0.0.1 instead of 0.0.0.0:
python -m http.server 8000 --bind 127.0.0.1
then accessing http://127.0.0.1:8000 from the host does not work.
What's the proper way of binding the container's loopback 127.0.0.1 to the host loopback?
What's the proper way of binding the container's loopback 127.0.0.1 to the host loopback?
On Linux, this can be done by configuring your Docker container to use the hosts network namespace, ie:
docker run --network=host
This only works on Linux because on Linux, your machine is the host, and the containers run as containers in your machines OS. On Windows/OSX, the Docker host runs as a virtual machine, with the containers running in the virtual machine, and so they can't share your machines network namespace.
What's the proper way of binding the container's loopback 127.0.0.1 to the host loopback?
You can't do that. The loopback interface inside a container means "only this container", just like on the host means "only this host". If a service is binding to 127.0.0.1 then there is no way -- from your host or from another container -- to reach that service.
The only way to do what you want is either:
Modify the application configuration to listen on all interfaces (or eth0 specifically), or
Run a proxy inside your container that binds to all interfaces and forwards connections to the localhost address.
I am using docker compose and hypriotos on a raspberry pi running a node container. I would like to receive udp multicast messages send to 239.255.255.250:1982 in local network. My code is working on other machines outside of docker so I think it's a docker issue.
I already exposed port 1982/udp in the docker file and in the docker-compose file I added "1982:1982" and "239.255.255.250:1982:1982/udp" to ports. I still can't receive anything. Am I missing something?
My concrete plan is to receive advertisement messages from a yeelight. These messages are documented here
Any help would be nice. Thanks.
While you can do udp with -p 1982:1982/udp I don't believe docker's port forwarding currently supports multicast. You may have better luck if you disable the userland proxy on the daemon (dockerd --userland-proxy=false ...), but that's just a guess.
The fast/easy solution, while removing some of the isolation, is to use the host network with docker run --net=host ....
I have a daemon on my host running on some port (i.e. 8008) and my code normally interacts with the daemon by contacting localhost:8008 for instance.
I've now containerized my code but not yet the daemon.
How can I forward the localhost:8008 on my container to localhost:8008 on the host running the container (and therefore the daemon as well).
The following is netstat -tlnp on my host. I'd like the container to forward localhost:2009 to localhost:2009 on the host
Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State PID/Program name
tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:2009 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 22547/ssh
tcp6 0 0 :::22 :::* LISTEN -
tcp6 0 0 ::1:2009 :::* LISTEN 22547/ssh
So the way you need to think about this is that Docker containers have their own network stack (unless you explicitly tell it to share the host's stack with --net=host). This means ports need to be exposed both inside the docker container and also on the outside (documentation), when linked with host ports. The ports exposed on the container need to be bound to the host ports explicitly (with -p xxxx:yyyy in your docker run command) or implicitly (using EXPOSE in your Dockerfile and using -P on the command line), like it says here. If your Dockerfile does not contain EXPOSE 8008, or you do not specify --expose 8008 in your docker run command, your container can't talk to the outside world, even if you then use -p 8008:8008 in your docker run command!
So to get tcp/8008 on the host linked with tcp/8008 on the container, you need EXPOSE 8008 inside your Dockerfile (and then docker build your container) OR --expose 8008 in your docker run command. In addition, you need to either use -P to implicitly or -p 8008:8008 to explicitly link that exposed container port to the host port. An example docker run command to do this might look like:
docker run -it --expose 8008 -p 8008:8008 myContainer
It's handy to remember that in the -p 8008:8008 command line option, the order for this operation is -p HOST_PORT:CONTAINER_PORT. Also, don't forget that you won't be able to SSH into your container from another machine on the internet unless you also have this port unblocked in iptables on the host. I always end up forgetting about that and waste half an hour before I remember I forgot to iptables -A INPUT ... for that specific tcp port on the host machine. But you should be able to SSH from your host into the container without the iptables rule, since it uses loopback for local connections. Good luck!
TL;DR: You can use the special hostname host.docker.internal instead of localhost anywhere inside the container that you want to access localhost on the host. Note that:
macOS and Windows versions of Docker Desktop have this feature enabled by default.
Linux hosts (using Docker v 20.10 and above - since December 14th 2020) require you to add --add-host=host.docker.internal:host-gateway to your Docker command to enable the feature.
Docker Compose on Linux requires you to add the following lines to the container definition:
extra_hosts:
- "host.docker.internal:host-gateway"
Full answer: Is the host running MacOS or Windows? Buried in the documentation for Docker Desktop is the fact that there is no docker0 bridge on MacOS and there is no docker0 bridge on Windows. Apparently that's the cause of this. In both cases the workaround (given right after, in a subsection titled "Use cases and workarounds") is to use the special hostname host.docker.internal in placed of localhost anywhere inside the container that you want to access localhost on the host.
If the host is Linux, there are some Linux-only techniques for achieving this. However, host.docker.internal is also useable with a Linux host, but it has to be enabled first. See the Linux part of the TL;DR, above, for instructions.
By this method, in OP's case host.docker.internal:8008 should be used instead of localhost:8008. Note that this is a code or configuration change of the application code running inside the container. There is no need to mention the port in the container configuration. Do not try to use -p or --expose in the docker run commandline. Not only is it not necessary, but your container will fail to start if the host application you want the container to connect to is already listening on that port.
After checked the answers and did some investigation, I believe there are 2 ways of doing that and these 2 only work in Linux environment.
The first is in this post How to access host port from docker container
The second should be set your --network=host when you docker run or docker container create. In this case, your docker will use the same network interface you use in Mac.
However, both ways above cannot be used in Mac, so I think it is not possible to forward from the container to host in Mac environment. Correct me if I am wrong.
I'm not sure if you can do that just with docker's settings.
If my under standing is correct, expose port is not what you looking for.
Instead, establish ssh port forwarding from container to host mightbe the answer.
You can easily use -p 127.0.0.1:8008:8008 and forward the container's port 8008 to localhost's port 8008. An example docker command would be:
docker run -it -p 127.0.0.1:8008:8008 <image name>
If you're doing this on your local machine, you can simple specify the network type as host when starting your container (--network host), which will make your host machine share network with your docker container.
eg:
Start your container:
docker run -it --rm --network host <container>
On your host machine, Run:
python3 -m http.server 8822
Now from your container run:
curl 127.0.0.1:8822
If all went well you'll see traffic on your host terminal.
Serving HTTP on 0.0.0.0 port 8822 (http://0.0.0.0:8822/) ...
127.0.0.1 - - [24/Jan/2023 22:37:01] "GET / HTTP/1.1" 200 -
docker run -d --name <NAME OF YOUR CONTAINER> -p 8008:8008 <YOUR IMAGE>
That will publish port 8008 in your container to 8008 on your host.
I'm having some troubles running Apache under Docker, and I wanted to ask for some directions. My current setup is the following : I have Docker 0.8 installed on an Ubuntu 12.04 server.
I want to run an Apache server under Docker, and bind it to a specific ip on the host, my intention being to run multiple Apache servers under Docker on the same hardware node each with it's one interface.
Now, I've been able to start the Apache server inside Docker, and have it run like a daemon (-D FOREGROUND, or under supervisord), and I've even been able to bind it to 0.0.0.0:$PORT and access it from the outside. But when I created multiple interfaces on the hardware node let's say 10.10.10.1, and 10.10.10.2, and tried to bind to -p 10.10.10.1:80:80, I'm not able to access 10.10.10.1:80 from the outside.
A little info about the network setup: I have my eth0 interface which has trunking out of which I create multiple vlans on which I want to put Docker instances (probably with a bridge on the eth0.$VLAN_NO, when I want to put more on the same vlan).
So basically, to reiterate, i have started a Docker container bound with -p 10.10.10.1:80:80, with an Apache inside Docker on port 80 and I can't access it (although binded on 0.0.0.0:80:80 works).
Is it possible to have a Docker container access ports opened by the host? Concretely I have MongoDB and RabbitMQ running on the host and I'd like to run a process in a Docker container to listen to the queue and (optionally) write to the database.
I know I can forward a port from the container to the host (via the -p option) and have a connection to the outside world (i.e. internet) from within the Docker container but I'd like to not expose the RabbitMQ and MongoDB ports from the host to the outside world.
EDIT: some clarification:
Starting Nmap 5.21 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2013-07-22 22:39 CEST
Nmap scan report for localhost (127.0.0.1)
Host is up (0.00027s latency).
PORT STATE SERVICE
6311/tcp open unknown
joelkuiper#vps20528 ~ % docker run -i -t base /bin/bash
root#f043b4b235a7:/# apt-get install nmap
root#f043b4b235a7:/# nmap 172.16.42.1 -p 6311 # IP found via docker inspect -> gateway
Starting Nmap 6.00 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2013-07-22 20:43 UTC
Nmap scan report for 172.16.42.1
Host is up (0.000060s latency).
PORT STATE SERVICE
6311/tcp filtered unknown
MAC Address: E2:69:9C:11:42:65 (Unknown)
Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 13.31 seconds
I had to do this trick to get any internet connection within the container: My firewall is blocking network connections from the docker container to outside
EDIT: Eventually I went with creating a custom bridge using pipework and having the services listen on the bridge IP's. I went with this approach instead of having MongoDB and RabbitMQ listen on the docker bridge because it gives more flexibility.
A simple but relatively insecure way would be to use the --net=host option to docker run.
This option makes it so that the container uses the networking stack of the host. Then you can connect to services running on the host simply by using "localhost" as the hostname.
This is easier to configure because you won't have to configure the service to accept connections from the IP address of your docker container, and you won't have to tell the docker container a specific IP address or host name to connect to, just a port.
For example, you can test it out by running the following command, which assumes your image is called my_image, your image includes the telnet utility, and the service you want to connect to is on port 25:
docker run --rm -i -t --net=host my_image telnet localhost 25
If you consider doing it this way, please see the caution about security on this page:
https://docs.docker.com/articles/networking/
It says:
--net=host -- Tells Docker to skip placing the container inside of a separate network stack. In essence, this choice tells Docker to not containerize the container's networking! While container processes will still be confined to their own filesystem and process list and resource limits, a quick ip addr command will show you that, network-wise, they live “outside” in the main Docker host and have full access to its network interfaces. Note that this does not let the container reconfigure the host network stack — that would require --privileged=true — but it does let container processes open low-numbered ports like any other root process. It also allows the container to access local network services like D-bus. This can lead to processes in the container being able to do unexpected things like restart your computer. You should use this option with caution.
Your docker host exposes an adapter to all the containers. Assuming you are on recent ubuntu, you can run
ip addr
This will give you a list of network adapters, one of which will look something like
3: docker0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP
link/ether 22:23:6b:28:6b:e0 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 172.17.42.1/16 scope global docker0
inet6 fe80::a402:65ff:fe86:bba6/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
You will need to tell rabbit/mongo to bind to that IP (172.17.42.1). After that, you should be able to open connections to 172.17.42.1 from within your containers.
As stated in one of the comments, this works for Mac (probably for Windows/Linux too):
I WANT TO CONNECT FROM A CONTAINER TO A SERVICE ON THE HOST
The host has a changing IP address (or none if you have no network access). We recommend that you connect to the special DNS name host.docker.internal which resolves to the internal IP address used by the host. This is for development purpose and will not work in a production environment outside of Docker Desktop for Mac.
You can also reach the gateway using gateway.docker.internal.
Quoted from https://docs.docker.com/docker-for-mac/networking/
This worked for me without using --net=host.
You could also create an ssh tunnel.
docker-compose.yml:
---
version: '2'
services:
kibana:
image: "kibana:4.5.1"
links:
- elasticsearch
volumes:
- ./config/kibana:/opt/kibana/config:ro
elasticsearch:
build:
context: .
dockerfile: ./docker/Dockerfile.tunnel
entrypoint: ssh
command: "-N elasticsearch -L 0.0.0.0:9200:localhost:9200"
docker/Dockerfile.tunnel:
FROM buildpack-deps:jessie
RUN apt-get update && \
DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive \
apt-get -y install ssh && \
apt-get clean && \
rm -rf /var/lib/apt/lists/*
COPY ./config/ssh/id_rsa /root/.ssh/id_rsa
COPY ./config/ssh/config /root/.ssh/config
COPY ./config/ssh/known_hosts /root/.ssh/known_hosts
RUN chmod 600 /root/.ssh/id_rsa && \
chmod 600 /root/.ssh/config && \
chown $USER:$USER -R /root/.ssh
config/ssh/config:
# Elasticsearch Server
Host elasticsearch
HostName jump.host.czerasz.com
User czerasz
ForwardAgent yes
IdentityFile ~/.ssh/id_rsa
This way the elasticsearch has a tunnel to the server with the running service (Elasticsearch, MongoDB, PostgreSQL) and exposes port 9200 with that service.
TLDR;
For local development only, do the following:
Start the service or SSH tunnel on your laptop/computer/PC/Mac.
Build/run your Docker image/container to connect to hostname host.docker.internal:<hostPort>
Note: There is also gateway.docker.internal, which I have not tried.
END_TLDR;
For example, if you were using this in your container:
PGPASSWORD=password psql -h localhost -p 5432 -d mydb -U myuser
change it to this:
PGPASSWORD=password psql -h host.docker.internal -p 5432 -d mydb -U myuser
This magically connects to the service running on my host machine. You do not need to use --net=host or -p "hostPort:ContainerPort" or -P
Background
For details see: https://docs.docker.com/docker-for-mac/networking/#use-cases-and-workarounds
I used this with an SSH tunnel to an AWS RDS Postgres Instance on Windows 10. I only had to change from using localhost:containerPort in the container to host.docker.internal:hostPort.
I had a similar problem accessing a LDAP-Server from a docker container.
I set a fixed IP for the container and added a firewall rule.
docker-compose.yml:
version: '2'
services:
containerName:
image: dockerImageName:latest
extra_hosts:
- "dockerhost:192.168.50.1"
networks:
my_net:
ipv4_address: 192.168.50.2
networks:
my_net:
ipam:
config:
- subnet: 192.168.50.0/24
iptables rule:
iptables -A INPUT -j ACCEPT -p tcp -s 192.168.50.2 -d $192.168.50.1 --dport portnumberOnHost
Inside the container access dockerhost:portnumberOnHost
If MongoDB and RabbitMQ are running on the Host, then the port should already exposed as it is not within Docker.
You do not need the -p option in order to expose ports from container to host. By default, all port are exposed. The -p option allows you to expose a port from the container to the outside of the host.
So, my guess is that you do not need -p at all and it should be working fine :)
For newer versions of Docker, this worked for me. Create the tunnel like this (notice the 0.0.0.0 at the start):
-L 0.0.0.0:8080:localhost:8081
This will allow anyone with access to your computer to connect to port 8080 and thus access port 8081 on the connected server.
Then, inside the container just use "host.docker.internal", for example:
curl host.docker.internal:8081
why not use slightly different solution, like this?
services:
kubefwd:
image: txn2/kubefwd
command: ...
app:
image: bash
command:
- sleep
- inf
init: true
network_mode: service:kubefwd
REF: txn2/kubefwd: Bulk port forwarding Kubernetes services for local development.
Easier way under all platforms nowadays is to use host.docker.internal. Let's first start with the Docker run command:
docker run --add-host=host.docker.internal:host-gateway [....]
Or add the following to your service, when using Docker Compose:
extra_hosts:
- "host.docker.internal:host-gateway"
Full example of such a Docker Compose file should then look like this:
version: "3"
services:
your_service:
image: username/docker_image_name
restart: always
networks:
- your_bridge_network
volumes:
- /home/user/test.json:/app/test.json
ports:
- "8080:80"
extra_hosts:
- "host.docker.internal:host-gateway"
networks:
your_bridge_network:
Again, it's just an example. But in if this docker image will start a service on port 80, it will be available on the host on port 8080.
And more importantly for your use-case; if the Docker container want to use a service from your host system that would now be possible using the special host.docker.internal name. That name will automatically be resolved into the internal Docker IP address (of the docker0 interface).
Anyway, let's say... you also running a web service on your host machine on (port 80). You should now be able to reach that service within your Docker container.. Try it out: nc -vz host.docker.internal 80.
All WITHOUT using network_mode: "host".