I came across an issue and I would love to get your help.
I am working with a certain codebase at work, and came across a function which returns 2 values, let's call this function my_func.
In some other function, my_func's output is being unpacked, for example:
a,b = my_func()
The thing is, I want to expand my_func to return 3 values instead of 2, however my_func is sort of an "interface function" which means that it is implemented by a lot of classes and I'm trying to avoid going to each of these classes and extend it's implementation directly.
I was wondering if there's something I can do to get the following results:
a,b,c = my_func()
without getting any unpacking exception. I would like if possible that c will get the value None from the "old implementation" classes.
Is this a good / bad practice? would love to get your opinion and help.
Related
It probably has been asked before,
But I couldn't find something like that,
I'm trying to print a generator object:
n="12234451"
print(*[n[c]for c in range(len(n))if n[c]!=n[c-1]or c==0],sep="")
I usually use something like that, however, I'm wondering if it's the most efficient way to do it
(without changing the fact that the expression is in the print)
Thanks for your time
I've been going through a course and trying to find ways to shorten my code. I had this assignment to open a text file, split it, then add all of the unique values to a list, then finally sort it. I passed the assignment, but I have been trying to shorten it to learn some ways to apply any shortening concepts to future codes. The main issues I keep running into is trying to make the opened file into strings to turn them into lists to append and such without read(). If I don't used read() I get back TextIO errors. I tried looking into it but what I found involved importing os and doing some other funky stuff, which seems like it would take more time.
So if anyone would mind giving me tips to more effectively code this that are beginner friendly I would be appreciative.
romeo = open('romeo').read()
mylist = list()
for line in romeo.split() :
if line not in mylist:
mylist.append(line)
mylist.sort()
print(mylist)
I saw that set() is pretty good for unique values, but then I don't think I can sort it. Then trying flip flop between a list and set would seem wacky. I tried those swanky one line for loop boys, but couldn't get it to work. like for line not in mylist : mylist.append(line) I know that's not how to do it or even close, but I don't know how to convey what I mean.
So to iterate:
1. How to get the same result without read() / getting around textIO
2. How to write this code in a more stream lined way.
I'm new to the site and coding, so hopefully I didn't trigger anyone.
I am working on developing a large-scale Python (backend) project. I was working with a firm that does extensive testing, and they built the frontend and test tools. Before every deploy, all the tools (like linters) are run regularly.
I had put down the code for a while, and now it fails many tests. Some of these are deprecation warnings for features or syntax soon to be deprecated, and they note they started classifying those as warnings (to later become errors) starting January 1, 2020, so I know they make dynamic changes in the tools themselves.
My problem is a bunch of code that used to pass no longer does. And the error is always the same: if I have a line that looks like so, I get an error that says something along the lines of "error: may not use operator '-' with incompatible types; a and b are of types numpy.array and NoneType":
x = a - b
This gets fixed by making the code super-messy with this sort of fix:
x = a.astype(float) - b.astype(float)
It's even worse because in the actual code there are 3 variables, all doing addition and subtraction with a 'c' that is an integer array kicking around along with the two numpy arrays. But then the code goes from:
x = a - b - c
to:
x = a.astype(float) - b.astype(float) - c.astype(float)
And this won't work since int's don't have an astype method. The error looks like this now:
File "/home/engine.py", line 165, in Foo
lower_array[t].astype(float)) / num_values.astype(float)
AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'astype'
Thus, I end up with:
x = a.astype(float) - b.astype(float) - float(c)
This is all extraordinarily cumbersome and nasty casting that is required, and makes the code impossible to read.
The odd thing to me is that all three arrays were instantiated as numpy arrays, i.e.,:
a=numpy.array(_a)
b=numpy.array(_b)
c=numpy.array(_c)
When I ask the code to put output to stdout the type of all three vars, they all say . Yet, the next line of code blows up and dumps, saying "Attribute error: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'astype'"
I can't fathom how a static code analyzer determines the types - other than as numpy.ndarray type - since Python uses duck-typing. Thus, the type could change dynamically. But that's not the case here; all three vars are identified as numpy.ndarray type, but "z = a - b - c" fails.
Anyone understand what's going on here?
After much work, the answer is to ignore the linter. Readable code is the object, not code that satisfies a linter.
In boto3 there's a function:
ec2.instances.filter()
The documentation:
http://boto3.readthedocs.org/en/latest/reference/services/ec2.html#instance
Say it returns a list(ec2.Instance) I wish...
when I try printing the return I get this:
ec2.instancesCollection(ec2.ServiceResource(), ec2.Instance)
I've tried searching for any mention of an ec2.instanceCollection, but the only thing I found was something similar for ruby.
I'd like to iterate through this instanceCollection so I can see how big it is, what machines are present and things like that.
Problem is I have no idea how it works, and when it's empty iteration doesn't work at all(It throws an error)
The filter method does not return a list, it returns an iterable. This is basically a Python generator that will produce the desired results on demand in an efficient way.
You can use this iterator in a loop like this:
for instance in ec2.instances.filter():
# do something with instance
or if you really want a list you can turn the iterator into a list with:
instances = list(ec2.instances.filter())
I'm adding this answer because 5 years later I had the same question and went round in circles trying to find the answer.
First off, the return type in the documentation is wrong (still). As you say, it states that the return type is: list(ec2.Instance)
where it should be:ec2.instancesCollection.
At the time of writing there's an open issue in github covering this - https://github.com/boto/boto3/issues/2000.
When you call the filter method a ResourceCollection is created for the particular type of resource against which you called the method. In this case the resource type is instance which gives an instancesCollection. You can see the code for the ResourceCollection superclass of instancesCollection here:
https://github.com/boto/boto3/blob/develop/boto3/resources/collection.py
The documentation here gives an overview of the collections: https://boto3.amazonaws.com/v1/documentation/api/latest/guide/collections.html
To get to how to use it and actually answer your question, what I did was to turn the iterator into a list and iterate over the list if the size is > 0.
testList = list(ec2.instances.filter(Filters=filters))
if len(testList) > 0;
for item in testList;
.
.
.
This may well not be the best way of doing it but it worked for me.
I'm trying to create a function (without using a built in function) that turns this
([f,u,n],[1,2,3,4])
into this [(f,1),(u,2),(n,3)]
Basically taking the first element of both lists and turning them into a tuple, then the second element of both lists, etc.
I have this so far:
>> def zipup(lista,listb):
>> for x in range(len(lista)):
>>for y in range(len(listb)):
>>return [(lista[x],listb[y])]
But I keep getting this: [(f,1)]
Help?!
The error message is saying that the variable i is not defined, it is not even in the code snippet that you showed ... that a look at the line that the error shows.
As for the zip, take a look at the docs for the standard library for the izip, there is a equivalent python implementation that you can use as a guide.