According to automapper docs, I can map nested objects to destination using IncludeMembers function. I have issues with next sample.
Code is available on net fiddle, below is quick reference:
How I map:
var source = new CategoryStatus
{
Subgroup = new CategorySubgroup
{
SubgroupCode = "SubgroupCode",
CategoryGroup = new CategoryGroup { GroupCode = "SubgroupCode" }
}
};
var result = Mapper.Map<Dest, CategoryStatus>(source);
My classes:
public class Dest
{
public string SubgroupCode { get; set; }
public string GroupCode { get; set; }
}
public class CategoryStatus
{
public CategorySubgroup Subgroup { get; set; }
}
public class CategorySubgroup
{
public string SubgroupCode { get; set; }
public CategoryGroup CategoryGroup { get; set; }
}
public class CategoryGroup
{
public string GroupCode { get; set; }
}
My Configuration:
var cfg2 = new MapperConfiguration(cfg => {
cfg.CreateMap<CategoryStatus, Dest>()
.IncludeMembers(x => x.Subgroup);
cfg.CreateMap<CategoryGroup, Dest>();
cfg.CreateMap<CategorySubgroup, Dest>()
.IncludeMembers(x => x.CategoryGroup);
});
Error:
[System.ArgumentException: Property 'System.String GroupCode' is not defined for type 'CategorySubgroup']
Any ideas about configuration setup? Automapper version is 10.0.0
Update
Version 9.0.0 works. Possible latest will also work, but it contains some breaking changes for me, so I didn't test it.
Related
Having an issue with version 6.1.1. In the below, the result of the reverse map still has the Company object populated. Per this post, which shows what I am doing below, except they are ignoring a property, and I'm ignoring a complex object.
What am I missing?
CreateMap<Item, ItemViewModel>(MemberList.Destination)
.ReverseMap()
.ForMember(x => x.Company, x => x.Ignore())
;
With AutoMapper 6.1 you could use ForPath instead ForMember to ignore complex objects.
See How to ignore property with ReverseMap for further information.
I see not what is wrong, but here is a running sample:
namespace AutomapperTest2
{
internal class Program
{
#region Methods
private static void Main(string[] args)
{
// Configure the mappings
Mapper.Initialize(cfg =>
{
cfg.CreateMap<ApplicantEducation, ApplicantEducationVM>();
cfg.CreateMap<Applicant, ApplicantVM>().ReverseMap()
.ForMember(x => x.Education, x => x.Ignore());
});
var config = new MapperConfiguration(cfg => cfg.CreateMissingTypeMaps = true);
var mapper = config.CreateMapper();
Applicant ap = new Applicant
{
Name = "its me",
Education =
new ApplicantEducation
{
SomeInt = 10,
SomeString = "sampleString"
}
};
// Map
ApplicantVM apVm = Mapper.Map<Applicant, ApplicantVM>(ap);
Applicant apBack = Mapper.Map<ApplicantVM, Applicant>(apVm);
}
#endregion
}
/// Your source classes
public class Applicant
{
public ApplicantEducation Education { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
}
public class ApplicantEducation
{
public int SomeInt { get; set; }
public string SomeString { get; set; }
}
// Your VM classes
public class ApplicantVM
{
public string Description { get; set; }
public ApplicantEducationVM Education { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
}
public class ApplicantEducationVM
{
public int SomeInt { get; set; }
public string SomeString { get; set; }
}
}
}
I have this Party class which contains an object data type coming from a service. It can contain two different member types for the Item property.
public class Party
{
public string DMVID {get; set;}
public object Item { get; set; }
}
and this DTO
public class PartyDTO
{
public string DMVID {get; set;}
public BusinessDTO BusinessItem { get; set; }
public IndividualDTO IndividualItem { get; set; }
}
How can I map the output of the Item to BusinessItem or IndividualItem.
I know this one would not work. Mapper.CreateMap<Party, PartyDTO>();
I don't know if conditional mapping can solve this or a resolver like this one.
Hey maybe this will help you out! I tested it, but i am using AutoMapper just for two days!
Allright here are your noted classes!!!
public class Party
{
public string DMVID { get; set; }
public object Item { get; set; }
}
public class PartyDTO
{
public string DMVID { get; set; }
public BuisnessDTO BusinessItem { get; set; }
public IndividualDTO IndividualItem { get; set; }
}
public class BuisnessDTO
{
public int Number
{
get;
set;
}
}
public class IndividualDTO
{
public string Message
{
get;
set;
}
}
and here your is the MapperConfiguration for this current scenario!
// Edit There was no need here for some conditions
AutoMapper.Mapper.CreateMap<Party, PartyDTO>()
.ForMember(dto => dto.BusinessItem, map =>
map.MapFrom(party => party.Item as BuisnessDTO);
)
.ForMember(dto => dto.IndividualItem, map =>
map.MapFrom(party => party.Item as IndividualDTO);
);
// And this is another way to achive the mapping in this scenario
AutoMapper.Mapper.CreateMap<PartyDTO, Party>()
.ForMember(party => party.Item, map => map.MapFrom( dto => (dto.BusinessItem != null) ? (dto.BusinessItem as object) : (dto.IndividualItem as object)));
And i created this sample for it!
Party firstParty = new Party()
{
DMVID = "something",
Item = new BuisnessDTO()
{
Number = 1
}
};
Party secondParty = new Party()
{
DMVID = "something",
Item = new IndividualDTO()
{
Message = "message"
}
};
PartyDTO dtoWithBuisness = AutoMapper.Mapper.Map<PartyDTO>(firstParty);
PartyDTO dtoWithIndividual = AutoMapper.Mapper.Map < PartyDTO>(secondParty);
Party afterParty = AutoMapper.Mapper.Map<Party>(dtoWithBuisness);
afterParty = AutoMapper.Mapper.Map < Party>(dtoWithIndividual);
Of course there are other possibility, but I think thats exactly what you wanted.
When you try to create a one-to-many relationship from the use a composite key, I get the error "the sequence contains more than one matching element"
Help me please!
modelBuilder.Entity<PracticePilotScoringInfo>()
.HasKey(info => new { info.DriverName, info.Control,info.VehicleClass, info.ScoringInfoId });
modelBuilder.Entity<PracticeScoringInfo>()
.HasKey(info => info.Id)
.HasMany(info => info.PracticePilotScoringInfos)
.WithRequired(info => info.ScoringInfo)
.HasForeignKey(info => new { info.DriverName, info.Control, info.VehicleClass, info.ScoringInfoId });
public class PracticeScoringInfo : ScoringInfo
{
public int GrandPrixId { get; set; }
public GrandPrix GrandPrix { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<PracticePilotScoringInfo> PracticePilotScoringInfos { get; set; }
}
public class PracticePilotScoringInfo : PilotScoringInfo
{
public string DriverName { get; set; }
public ControlType Control { get; set; }
public string VehicleClass { get; set; }
public Guid ScoringInfoId { get; set; }
public virtual PracticeScoringInfo ScoringInfo { get; set; }
}
public Configuration()
{
AutomaticMigrationsEnabled = true;
AutomaticMigrationDataLossAllowed = true;
}
Looks like I'm not identified in Fluent API mapping.
declaration a below is working fine
modelBuilder.Entity<ScoringInfo>()
.HasKey(info => info.Id);
modelBuilder.Entity<PracticeScoringInfo>()
.HasKey(info => info.Id);
modelBuilder.Entity<PilotScoringInfo>()
.HasKey(info => new { info.DriverName, info.Control, info.VehicleClass, info.ScoringInfoId });
modelBuilder.Entity<PracticePilotScoringInfo>()
.HasKey(info => new { info.DriverName, info.Control, info.VehicleClass, info.ScoringInfoId });
i want register custo generic type like default generic type that register in autoMaper (like List, Array) in AutoMappper.
i have one generic type in project this Code :
class PagedResult<T>
{
public List<T> PageOfResults { get; set; }
public int TotalItems { get; set; }
}
and Dto Class is:
class StudentDto
{
public int ID { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
}
and VM Model is :
class StudentVM
{
public int ID { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
}
and service class:
class MyServie
{
public PagedResult<StudentDto> Swap()
{
var test2 = new PagedResult<StudentDto>();
test2.PageOfResults = new List<StudentDto>();
test2.PageOfResults.Add(new StudentDto() { ID = 10, Name = "Ten" });
test2.TotalItems = 10;
return test2;
}
}
i want use from AutoMapper Object Manager for register PagedResult<> in automapper but i can not do this
var allMappers = MapperRegistry.AllMappers();
MapperRegistry.AllMappers = () => new IObjectMapper[]{
new IdentifiableMapper(),
}.Concat(allMappers);
var service = new MyServie();
PagedResult<StudentDto> pageableStudentDto = service.Swap();
Mapper.CreateMap<StudentDto, StudentVM>();;
PagedResult<StudentVM> vm = Mapper.Map<PagedResult<StudentDto>, PagedResult<StudentVM>>(pageableStudentDto);
and implement of
public class PageOfMapper : IObjectMapper
{
public bool IsMatch(ResolutionContext context)
{
return typeof(PagedResult<>).IsAssignableFrom(context.SourceType.GetGenericTypeDefinition()) &&
typeof(PagedResult<>).IsAssignableFrom(context.DestinationType.GetGenericTypeDefinition());
//return true;
}
public object Map(ResolutionContext context, IMappingEngineRunner mapper)
{
// please help me in this code for map ******************
return null;
}
}
Here is what I have where I hope someone can help us out:
class Source
{
string name { get; set; }
Inner { get; set; }
}
class Inner
{
Col A { get; set; }
Col B { get; set; }
}
class Col : IList<ClassX>, IEnunmerable<ClassX>
I need to map class Source to a destination type which has:
class Dest
{
string name { get; set; }
IList<ClassY> A { get; set;}
IList<ClassY> B { get; set;}
}
Now, ClassX and class ClassY share the same properties. ClassY class has a subset of the ClassX primitive properties with the exact same names and types.
Tried all kinds of mappings. Just the ClassX to ClassY map, with the collections, without and with any mapping get no mapping found between or missing configuration between Source and Dest
AutoMapper.Mapper.Map<Source, Dest>(src);
Can someone help me out with the mapping? Thanks in advance.
This question is a few months old, but if you're still looking for an answer, this is what I tried that worked:
class Source
{
public string Name { get; set; }
public Inner Inner { get; set; }
}
class Inner
{
public Col A { get; set; }
public Col B { get; set; }
}
class Col : List<ClassX> { }
class ClassX
{
public int Index { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public ClassX() : this(0, "") { }
public ClassX(int index, string name)
{
this.Index = index;
this.Name = name;
}
}
class ClassY
{
public int Index { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public ClassY() : this(0, "") { }
public ClassY(int index, string name)
{
this.Index = index;
this.Name = name;
}
}
class Dest
{
public string Name { get; set; }
public List<ClassY> A { get; set; }
public List<ClassY> B { get; set; }
}
[TestMethod]
public void ComplexTest()
{
Mapper.CreateMap<Source, Dest>()
.ForMember(dest => dest.A, config => config.MapFrom(src => src.Inner.A))
.ForMember(dest => dest.B, config => config.MapFrom(src => src.Inner.B));
Mapper.CreateMap<ClassX, ClassY>();
Source source = new Source
{
Name = "Source",
Inner = new Inner
{
A = new Col
{
new ClassX(1, "First"),
new ClassX(2, "Second"),
new ClassX(3, "Third"),
new ClassX(4, "Fourth"),
},
B = new Col
{
new ClassX(5, "Fifth"),
new ClassX(6, "Sixth"),
new ClassX(7, "Seventh"),
new ClassX(8, "Eighth"),
},
}
};
Dest destination = Mapper.Map<Source, Dest>(source);
Assert.AreEqual(source.Name, destination.Name);
Assert.AreEqual(source.Inner.A.Count, destination.A.Count);
Assert.AreEqual(source.Inner.B.Count, destination.B.Count);
Assert.AreEqual(source.Inner.A[0].Name, destination.A[0].Name);
Assert.AreEqual(source.Inner.B[0].Name, destination.B[0].Name);
}
I didn't go too in-depth with my Asserts, so there may be something I missed, but they appear to be mapped properly.