Having an issue with version 6.1.1. In the below, the result of the reverse map still has the Company object populated. Per this post, which shows what I am doing below, except they are ignoring a property, and I'm ignoring a complex object.
What am I missing?
CreateMap<Item, ItemViewModel>(MemberList.Destination)
.ReverseMap()
.ForMember(x => x.Company, x => x.Ignore())
;
With AutoMapper 6.1 you could use ForPath instead ForMember to ignore complex objects.
See How to ignore property with ReverseMap for further information.
I see not what is wrong, but here is a running sample:
namespace AutomapperTest2
{
internal class Program
{
#region Methods
private static void Main(string[] args)
{
// Configure the mappings
Mapper.Initialize(cfg =>
{
cfg.CreateMap<ApplicantEducation, ApplicantEducationVM>();
cfg.CreateMap<Applicant, ApplicantVM>().ReverseMap()
.ForMember(x => x.Education, x => x.Ignore());
});
var config = new MapperConfiguration(cfg => cfg.CreateMissingTypeMaps = true);
var mapper = config.CreateMapper();
Applicant ap = new Applicant
{
Name = "its me",
Education =
new ApplicantEducation
{
SomeInt = 10,
SomeString = "sampleString"
}
};
// Map
ApplicantVM apVm = Mapper.Map<Applicant, ApplicantVM>(ap);
Applicant apBack = Mapper.Map<ApplicantVM, Applicant>(apVm);
}
#endregion
}
/// Your source classes
public class Applicant
{
public ApplicantEducation Education { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
}
public class ApplicantEducation
{
public int SomeInt { get; set; }
public string SomeString { get; set; }
}
// Your VM classes
public class ApplicantVM
{
public string Description { get; set; }
public ApplicantEducationVM Education { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
}
public class ApplicantEducationVM
{
public int SomeInt { get; set; }
public string SomeString { get; set; }
}
}
}
Related
I have the below two Entities (one-to-many)
public class ApplicationCode
{
public Guid ApplicationId { get; set; }
public string? ApplicationAcrynom { get; set; }
public int ApplicationIndex { get; set; }
public IList<ApplicationCodeTranslation> ApplicationCodeTranslations { get; private set; } = new List<ApplicationCodeTranslation>();
}
public class ApplicationCodeTranslation
{
public Guid ApplicationCodeTranslationId { get; set; }
public Guid ApplicationId { get; set; }
public Guid LanguageId { get; set; }
public string? ApplicationDescription { get; set; }
public ApplicationCode ApplicationCode { get; set; } = null!;
}
The goal is to populate the below Dto where I need to filter one language from the child list (IList ApplicationCodeTranslations) in the ApplicationCode entity to get the description value
public class ApplicationCodeDto : IMapFrom<ApplicationCode>
{
public Guid ApplicationId { get; set; }
public string? ApplicationAcrynom { get; set; }
public string? ApplicationDescription { get; set; }
public void Mapping(Profile profile)
{
profile.CreateMap<ApplicationCode, ApplicationCodeDto>();
profile.CreateMap<ApplicationCodeTranslation, ApplicationCodeDto>();
}
}
I tried below, but it does not give the intended result.
It omits the ApplicationDescription (gives null), the whole .Include line is not translated to SQL at all.
var test1 = await _context.ApplicationCodes
.Include(e => e.ApplicationCodeTranslations.Where(l => l.LanguageId == _languageId))
.ProjectTo<ApplicationCodeDto>(_mapper.ConfigurationProvider)
.ToListAsync();
The other option I tried is
var test2 = await _context.ApplicationCodes
.SelectMany(e => e.ApplicationCodeTranslations)
.Where(l => l.LanguageId == _languageId)
.ProjectTo<ApplicationCodeDto>(_mapper.ConfigurationProvider)
.ToListAsync();
Which omits the properties of the CodeApplication and brings only the child list properties, as SelectMany only brings back the props of the child.
The only way I managed to make it work is below:
var test3 = await _context.ApplicationCodes
.SelectMany(e => e.ApplicationCodeTranslations.Where(l => l.LanguageId == _languageId),
(a,t) => new ApplicationCodeDto{
ApplicationId = a.ApplicationId,
ApplicationAcrynom = a.ApplicationAcrynom,
ApplicationDescription = t.ApplicationDescription,
})
.ToListAsync();
How can AutoMapper (v.11) help in this scenario to avoid mapping the DTO props manually?
Does ProjectTo work here?
According to automapper docs, I can map nested objects to destination using IncludeMembers function. I have issues with next sample.
Code is available on net fiddle, below is quick reference:
How I map:
var source = new CategoryStatus
{
Subgroup = new CategorySubgroup
{
SubgroupCode = "SubgroupCode",
CategoryGroup = new CategoryGroup { GroupCode = "SubgroupCode" }
}
};
var result = Mapper.Map<Dest, CategoryStatus>(source);
My classes:
public class Dest
{
public string SubgroupCode { get; set; }
public string GroupCode { get; set; }
}
public class CategoryStatus
{
public CategorySubgroup Subgroup { get; set; }
}
public class CategorySubgroup
{
public string SubgroupCode { get; set; }
public CategoryGroup CategoryGroup { get; set; }
}
public class CategoryGroup
{
public string GroupCode { get; set; }
}
My Configuration:
var cfg2 = new MapperConfiguration(cfg => {
cfg.CreateMap<CategoryStatus, Dest>()
.IncludeMembers(x => x.Subgroup);
cfg.CreateMap<CategoryGroup, Dest>();
cfg.CreateMap<CategorySubgroup, Dest>()
.IncludeMembers(x => x.CategoryGroup);
});
Error:
[System.ArgumentException: Property 'System.String GroupCode' is not defined for type 'CategorySubgroup']
Any ideas about configuration setup? Automapper version is 10.0.0
Update
Version 9.0.0 works. Possible latest will also work, but it contains some breaking changes for me, so I didn't test it.
I'm mapping from an existing database to a DTO and back again use Automapper (4.1.1) and I've hit a few small problems.
I have a (simplified) model for the database table:
public class USER_DETAILS
{
[Key]
public string UDT_LOGIN { get; set; }
public string UDT_USER_NAME { get; set; }
public string UDT_INITIALS { get; set; }
public string UDT_USER_GROUP { get; set; }
public decimal UDT_CLAIM_LIMIT { get; set; }
public string UDT_CLAIM_CCY { get; set; }
}
and a DTO object:
public class User
{
public string Login { get; set; }
public string UserName { get; set; }
public string Initials { get; set; }
public string UserGroup { get; set; }
public double ClaimLimit { get; set; }
public string ClaimCurrency { get; set; }
}
I've created a profile
public class FromProfile : Profile
{
protected override void Configure()
{
this.RecognizePrefixes("UDT_");
this.ReplaceMemberName("CCY", "Currency");
this.SourceMemberNamingConvention = new UpperUnderscoreNamingConvention();
this.DestinationMemberNamingConvention = new PascalCaseNamingConvention();
this.CreateMap<decimal, double>().ConvertUsing((decimal src) => (double)src);
this.CreateMap<USER_DETAILS, User>();
}
}
However, it seems that Automapper doesn't like combining this many settings in the config. Even simplifying the models, I can't get
this.RecognizePrefixes("UDT_");
this.ReplaceMemberName("CCY", "Currency");
to work together, and whilst
this.CreateMap<decimal, double>().ConvertUsing((decimal src) => (double)src);
works ok with the models in the test, it fails when using it against a database.
Is there a way to get all this to work together, or should I fall back to using ForMember(). I was really hoping I could get this working as there are a lot of tables in this system, and I'd rather not have to do each one individually.
You will need to extend this for other types, only tested with strings, I have an extension method that does all the work and looks for unmapped properties.
public class USER_DETAILS
{
public string UDT_LOGIN { get; set; }
public string UDT_USER_NAME { get; set; }
public string UDT_INITIALS { get; set; }
public string UDT_USER_GROUP { get; set; }
// public decimal UDT_CLAIM_LIMIT { get; set; }
public string UDT_CLAIM_CCY { get; set; }
}
public class User
{
public string Login { get; set; }
public string UserName { get; set; }
public string Initials { get; set; }
public string UserGroup { get; set; }
//public double ClaimLimit { get; set; }
public string ClaimCurrency { get; set; }
}
public static class AutoMapperExtensions
{
public static IMappingExpression<TSource, TDestination>
CustomPropertyMapper<TSource, TDestination>(this IMappingExpression<TSource, TDestination> expression)
{
var sourceType = typeof(TSource);
var destinationType = typeof(TDestination);
var existingMaps = Mapper.GetAllTypeMaps().First(x => x.SourceType == sourceType && x.DestinationType == destinationType);
var properties = sourceType.GetProperties();
foreach (var property in existingMaps.GetUnmappedPropertyNames())
{
var similarPropertyName =
properties.FirstOrDefault(x => x.Name.Replace("_", "").Replace("UDT", "").ToLower().Contains(property.ToLower()));
if(similarPropertyName == null)
continue;
var myPropInfo = sourceType.GetProperty(similarPropertyName.Name);
expression.ForMember(property, opt => opt.MapFrom<string>(myPropInfo.Name));
}
return expression;
}
}
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
InitializeAutomapper();
var userDetails = new USER_DETAILS
{
UDT_LOGIN = "Labi-Login",
UDT_USER_NAME = "Labi-UserName",
UDT_INITIALS = "L"
};
var mapped = Mapper.Map<User>(userDetails);
}
static void InitializeAutomapper()
{
Mapper.CreateMap<USER_DETAILS, User>().CustomPropertyMapper();
}
}
}
I have this Party class which contains an object data type coming from a service. It can contain two different member types for the Item property.
public class Party
{
public string DMVID {get; set;}
public object Item { get; set; }
}
and this DTO
public class PartyDTO
{
public string DMVID {get; set;}
public BusinessDTO BusinessItem { get; set; }
public IndividualDTO IndividualItem { get; set; }
}
How can I map the output of the Item to BusinessItem or IndividualItem.
I know this one would not work. Mapper.CreateMap<Party, PartyDTO>();
I don't know if conditional mapping can solve this or a resolver like this one.
Hey maybe this will help you out! I tested it, but i am using AutoMapper just for two days!
Allright here are your noted classes!!!
public class Party
{
public string DMVID { get; set; }
public object Item { get; set; }
}
public class PartyDTO
{
public string DMVID { get; set; }
public BuisnessDTO BusinessItem { get; set; }
public IndividualDTO IndividualItem { get; set; }
}
public class BuisnessDTO
{
public int Number
{
get;
set;
}
}
public class IndividualDTO
{
public string Message
{
get;
set;
}
}
and here your is the MapperConfiguration for this current scenario!
// Edit There was no need here for some conditions
AutoMapper.Mapper.CreateMap<Party, PartyDTO>()
.ForMember(dto => dto.BusinessItem, map =>
map.MapFrom(party => party.Item as BuisnessDTO);
)
.ForMember(dto => dto.IndividualItem, map =>
map.MapFrom(party => party.Item as IndividualDTO);
);
// And this is another way to achive the mapping in this scenario
AutoMapper.Mapper.CreateMap<PartyDTO, Party>()
.ForMember(party => party.Item, map => map.MapFrom( dto => (dto.BusinessItem != null) ? (dto.BusinessItem as object) : (dto.IndividualItem as object)));
And i created this sample for it!
Party firstParty = new Party()
{
DMVID = "something",
Item = new BuisnessDTO()
{
Number = 1
}
};
Party secondParty = new Party()
{
DMVID = "something",
Item = new IndividualDTO()
{
Message = "message"
}
};
PartyDTO dtoWithBuisness = AutoMapper.Mapper.Map<PartyDTO>(firstParty);
PartyDTO dtoWithIndividual = AutoMapper.Mapper.Map < PartyDTO>(secondParty);
Party afterParty = AutoMapper.Mapper.Map<Party>(dtoWithBuisness);
afterParty = AutoMapper.Mapper.Map < Party>(dtoWithIndividual);
Of course there are other possibility, but I think thats exactly what you wanted.
Here is what I have where I hope someone can help us out:
class Source
{
string name { get; set; }
Inner { get; set; }
}
class Inner
{
Col A { get; set; }
Col B { get; set; }
}
class Col : IList<ClassX>, IEnunmerable<ClassX>
I need to map class Source to a destination type which has:
class Dest
{
string name { get; set; }
IList<ClassY> A { get; set;}
IList<ClassY> B { get; set;}
}
Now, ClassX and class ClassY share the same properties. ClassY class has a subset of the ClassX primitive properties with the exact same names and types.
Tried all kinds of mappings. Just the ClassX to ClassY map, with the collections, without and with any mapping get no mapping found between or missing configuration between Source and Dest
AutoMapper.Mapper.Map<Source, Dest>(src);
Can someone help me out with the mapping? Thanks in advance.
This question is a few months old, but if you're still looking for an answer, this is what I tried that worked:
class Source
{
public string Name { get; set; }
public Inner Inner { get; set; }
}
class Inner
{
public Col A { get; set; }
public Col B { get; set; }
}
class Col : List<ClassX> { }
class ClassX
{
public int Index { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public ClassX() : this(0, "") { }
public ClassX(int index, string name)
{
this.Index = index;
this.Name = name;
}
}
class ClassY
{
public int Index { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public ClassY() : this(0, "") { }
public ClassY(int index, string name)
{
this.Index = index;
this.Name = name;
}
}
class Dest
{
public string Name { get; set; }
public List<ClassY> A { get; set; }
public List<ClassY> B { get; set; }
}
[TestMethod]
public void ComplexTest()
{
Mapper.CreateMap<Source, Dest>()
.ForMember(dest => dest.A, config => config.MapFrom(src => src.Inner.A))
.ForMember(dest => dest.B, config => config.MapFrom(src => src.Inner.B));
Mapper.CreateMap<ClassX, ClassY>();
Source source = new Source
{
Name = "Source",
Inner = new Inner
{
A = new Col
{
new ClassX(1, "First"),
new ClassX(2, "Second"),
new ClassX(3, "Third"),
new ClassX(4, "Fourth"),
},
B = new Col
{
new ClassX(5, "Fifth"),
new ClassX(6, "Sixth"),
new ClassX(7, "Seventh"),
new ClassX(8, "Eighth"),
},
}
};
Dest destination = Mapper.Map<Source, Dest>(source);
Assert.AreEqual(source.Name, destination.Name);
Assert.AreEqual(source.Inner.A.Count, destination.A.Count);
Assert.AreEqual(source.Inner.B.Count, destination.B.Count);
Assert.AreEqual(source.Inner.A[0].Name, destination.A[0].Name);
Assert.AreEqual(source.Inner.B[0].Name, destination.B[0].Name);
}
I didn't go too in-depth with my Asserts, so there may be something I missed, but they appear to be mapped properly.