AzureDevOps - Creating WorkItem via JsonPatchOperation - azure-web-app-service

To create a workitem I need to specify its fields but where exactly can I see all the possible "field paths" on my AzureDevOps site?
I've edited an existing workitem and added some more fields to it but I cant seem to find the needed "field path" for my JsonPatchOperation.
Any ideas? Thanks in advance!
public static WorkItem CreateWorkItem(VssConnection connection, string title, string type, string description, string tags)
{
string project = "xxx";
// Construct the object containing field values required for the new work item
JsonPatchDocument patchDocument = new JsonPatchDocument();
patchDocument.Add(
new JsonPatchOperation()
{
Operation = Operation.Add,
Path = "/fields/System.Title", <-- field path
Value = title
}
);
patchDocument.Add(
new JsonPatchOperation()
{
Operation = Operation.Add,
Path = "/fields/System.Description", <-- field path
Value = description
}
);
// Get a client
WorkItemTrackingHttpClient workItemTrackingClient = connection.GetClient<WorkItemTrackingHttpClient>();
// Create the new work item
WorkItem newWorkItem = workItemTrackingClient.CreateWorkItemAsync(patchDocument, project, type).Result;
Console.WriteLine("Created work item ID {0} {1}", newWorkItem.Id, newWorkItem.Fields["System.Title"]);
return newWorkItem;
}

You can use the process template editor to see all fields in your org.
Install Process Editor to VS:
Open Fields Browser:
Check needed fields:

Another way: using the rest api.
WorkItemTrackingProcessHttpClient ProcessHttpClient = Connection.GetClient<WorkItemTrackingProcessHttpClient>();
string processName = "My New Process"; //existing process
string witName = "Task"; //existing work item type
Guid procId;
string witRefName;
GetProcAndWIT(processName, witName, out procId, out witRefName);
ShowCurrentFields(procId, witRefName);
private static void ShowCurrentFields(Guid procId, string witRefName)
{
var fields = ProcessHttpClient.GetAllWorkItemTypeFieldsAsync(procId, witRefName).Result;
Console.WriteLine("{0, -20} : {1, -40} : {2, -10} : {3, -8} : {4, -8} : {5, -8}",
"Name", "Reference Name", "Type", "Required", "ReadOnly", "Default");
foreach (var field in fields)
{
Console.WriteLine("------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------");
Console.WriteLine("{0, -20} : {1, -40} : {2, -10} : {3, -8} : {4, -8} : {5, -8}",
field.Name, field.ReferenceName, field.Type, field.Required, field.ReadOnly, field.DefaultValue);
}
Console.WriteLine("------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\n");
}
private static void GetProcAndWIT(string processName, string witName, out Guid procId, out string witRefName)
{
procId = GetProcessGuid(processName);
if (procId == null)
{
throw new Exception("Can not find process.");
}
witRefName = GetWITrefName(procId, witName);
if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(witRefName))
{
throw new Exception("Can not find work item type.");
}
}
private static Guid GetProcessGuid(string processName)
{
Guid newProcessGuid = Guid.Empty;
var processes = ProcessHttpClient.GetListOfProcessesAsync().Result;
return (from p in processes where p.Name == processName select p.TypeId).FirstOrDefault();
}
private static string GetWITrefName(Guid procGuid, string witName)
{
var wiTypes = ProcessHttpClient.GetProcessWorkItemTypesAsync(procGuid).Result;
return (from p in wiTypes where p.Name == witName select p.ReferenceName).FirstOrDefault();
}

Related

Extend Umbraco back office search to search custom proerties not just title

What I would like to do is be able to type an custom property within the back office search. e.g. put the ISBN into the search field and have the results shown currently it always returns "no items found" as the search will only show results for the title node.
How do I enable the content search as seen in the image to search the data in the custom fields?
The data is in the internal index, I have checked the index is working and can see the result with "Examine Management" if I search via the custom data.
The solution is what I used to extend the search
https://dev.to/skttl/how-to-customize-searching-in-umbraco-list-views-1knk
Add a new file in the App_Code (SearchExtender)
using System.Linq;
using Examine;
using Umbraco.Core;
using Umbraco.Core.Cache;
using Umbraco.Core.Configuration;
using Umbraco.Core.Logging;
using Umbraco.Core.Models;
using Umbraco.Core.Persistence;
using Umbraco.Core.Persistence.DatabaseModelDefinitions;
using Umbraco.Core.PropertyEditors;
using Umbraco.Core.Services;
using Umbraco.Web;
using Umbraco.Web.Editors;
using Umbraco.Web.Models.ContentEditing;
namespace SearchExtender
{
public class CustomListViewSearchController : ContentController
{
public CustomListViewSearchController(PropertyEditorCollection propertyEditors, IGlobalSettings globalSettings, IUmbracoContextAccessor umbracoContextAccessor, ISqlContext sqlContext, ServiceContext services, AppCaches appCaches, IProfilingLogger logger, IRuntimeState runtimeState, UmbracoHelper umbracoHelper)
: base(propertyEditors, globalSettings, umbracoContextAccessor, sqlContext, services, appCaches, logger, runtimeState, umbracoHelper)
{
}
public PagedResult<ContentItemBasic<ContentPropertyBasic>> GetChildrenCustom(int id, string includeProperties, int pageNumber = 0, int pageSize = 0, string orderBy = "SortOrder", Direction orderDirection = Direction.Ascending, bool orderBySystemField = true, string filter = "", string cultureName = "")
{
// get the parent node, and its doctype alias from the content cache
var parentNode = Services.ContentService.GetById(id);
var parentNodeDocTypeAlias = parentNode != null ? parentNode.ContentType.Alias : null;
// if the parent node is not "books", redirect to the core GetChildren() method
if (parentNode?.ContentType.Alias != "books")
{
return GetChildren(id, includeProperties, pageNumber, pageSize, orderBy, orderDirection, orderBySystemField, filter);
}
// if we can't get the InternalIndex, redirect to the core GetChildren() method, but log an error
if (!ExamineManager.Instance.TryGetIndex("InternalIndex", out IIndex index))
{
Logger.Error<CustomListViewSearchController>("Couldn't get InternalIndex for searching products in list view");
return GetChildren(id, includeProperties, pageNumber, pageSize, orderBy, orderDirection, orderBySystemField, filter);
}
// find children using Examine
// create search criteria
var searcher = index.GetSearcher();
var searchCriteria = searcher.CreateQuery();
var searchQuery = searchCriteria.Field("parentID", id);
if (!filter.IsNullOrWhiteSpace())
{
searchQuery = searchQuery.And().GroupedOr(new [] { "nodeName", "isbn" }, filter);
}
// do the search, but limit the results to the current page 👉 https://shazwazza.com/post/paging-with-examine/
// pageNumber is not zero indexed in this, so just multiply pageSize by pageNumber
var searchResults = searchQuery.Execute(pageSize * pageNumber);
// get the results on the current page
// pageNumber is not zero indexed in this, so subtract 1 from the pageNumber
var totalChildren = searchResults.TotalItemCount;
var pagedResultIds = searchResults.Skip((pageNumber > 0 ? pageNumber - 1 : 0) * pageSize).Select(x => x.Id).Select(x => int.Parse(x)).ToList();
var children = Services.ContentService.GetByIds(pagedResultIds).ToList();
if (totalChildren == 0)
{
return new PagedResult<ContentItemBasic<ContentPropertyBasic>>(0, 0, 0);
}
var pagedResult = new PagedResult<ContentItemBasic<ContentPropertyBasic>>(totalChildren, pageNumber, pageSize);
pagedResult.Items = children.Select(content =>
Mapper.Map<IContent, ContentItemBasic<ContentPropertyBasic>>(content))
.ToList(); // evaluate now
return pagedResult;
}
}
}
change requests for /umbraco/backoffice/UmbracoApi/Content/GetChildren (the default endpoint for child nodes), and change it to my newly created one, which is located at /umbraco/backoffice/api/CustomListViewSearch/GetChildrenCustom.
This is done easily by adding a js file containing an interceptor like this.
Add file to /App_Plugins/CustomListViewSearch/CustomListViewSearch.js
angular.module('umbraco.services').config([
'$httpProvider',
function ($httpProvider) {
$httpProvider.interceptors.push(function ($q) {
return {
'request': function (request) {
// Redirect any requests for the listview to our custom list view UI
if (request.url.indexOf("backoffice/UmbracoApi/Content/GetChildren?id=") > -1)
request.url = request.url.replace("backoffice/UmbracoApi/Content/GetChildren", "backoffice/api/CustomListViewSearch/GetChildrenCustom");
return request || $q.when(request);
}
};
});
}]);
a package.manifest file in my App_Plugins folder.
{
"javascript": [
"/App_Plugins/CustomListViewSearch/CustomListViewSearch.js"
]
}
If the node Alais isnot working make sure its set in the documnt type (far right on document type name)

How to get Opportunity Relations in Sales Order

In Opportunity screen, the definition of the data view for Relations is simply :
public CRRelationsList<CROpportunity.noteID> Relations;
When a Sales Order is raised from the Opportunity. I'd like to display the Relations defined from the source Opporunity in another tab. And I'm just struggling how to write the the data view and pass the Opportunity noteid.
public CRRelationsList<???>Relations;
Thanks !
The generic type in dataviews often resolve to the current record.
In CRRelationsList class the generic type is named TNoteField:
public class CRRelationsList<TNoteField> : PXSelect<CRRelation>
where TNoteField : IBqlField
ssuming the dataview is declared as CRRelationsList<CROpportunity.noteID>.
The generic type value will be resolved like this Caches[typeof(CROpportunity)].Current.NoteID.
protected virtual void CRRelation_RefNoteID_FieldDefaulting(PXCache sender, PXFieldDefaultingEventArgs e)
{
// Get a cache object of type CROpportunity
var refCache = sender.Graph.Caches[BqlCommand.GetItemType(typeof(TNoteField))];
// Get the NoteID field value of the current CROpportunity object
e.NewValue = refCache.GetValue(refCache.Current, typeof(TNoteField).Name);
}
So to set DAC.Field of CRelationsList<DAC.field> you would do:
// In a graph extension (PXGraphExtension)
Base.Caches[typeof(DAC)].Current.Fied = ???;
// Or in graph (PXGraph)
Caches[typeof(DAC)].Current.Fied = ???;
If current DAC object is null you need to insert a record in a dataview or directly in the cache object.
I'm not sure re-using CRRelationsList list is the best approach if you want to simply display records because it does much more than that. It should be possible to extract the select request out of it and directly substitute the TNoteField value:
private static PXSelectDelegate GetHandler()
{
return () =>
{
var command = new Select2<CRRelation,
LeftJoin<BAccount, On<BAccount.bAccountID, Equal<CRRelation.entityID>>,
LeftJoin<Contact,
On<Contact.contactID, Equal<Switch<Case<Where<BAccount.type, Equal<BAccountType.employeeType>>, BAccount.defContactID>, CRRelation.contactID>>>,
LeftJoin<Users, On<Users.pKID, Equal<Contact.userID>>>>>,
Where<CRRelation.refNoteID, Equal<Current<TNoteField>>>>();
var startRow = PXView.StartRow;
int totalRows = 0;
var list = new PXView(PXView.CurrentGraph, false, command).
Select(null, null, PXView.Searches, PXView.SortColumns, PXView.Descendings, PXView.Filters,
ref startRow, PXView.MaximumRows, ref totalRows);
PXView.StartRow = 0;
foreach (PXResult<CRRelation, BAccount, Contact, Users> row in list)
{
var relation = (CRRelation)row[typeof(CRRelation)];
var account = (BAccount)row[typeof(BAccount)];
relation.Name = account.AcctName;
relation.EntityCD = account.AcctCD;
var contact = (Contact)row[typeof(Contact)];
if (contact.ContactID == null && relation.ContactID != null &&
account.Type != BAccountType.EmployeeType)
{
var directContact = (Contact)PXSelect<Contact>.
Search<Contact.contactID>(PXView.CurrentGraph, relation.ContactID);
if (directContact != null) contact = directContact;
}
relation.Email = contact.EMail;
var user = (Users)row[typeof(Users)];
if (account.Type != BAccountType.EmployeeType)
relation.ContactName = contact.DisplayName;
else
{
if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(relation.Name))
relation.Name = user.FullName;
if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(relation.Email))
relation.Email = user.Email;
}
}
return list;
};
}

Detect Change in EntityFrameWork

In my current project I need write in a table all values are changed in the application.
Ex. the guy update the UserName, I need put in a table UserName old value "1" new value "2".
I tried use the ObjectStateEntry but this return all fields. I think the FW return all because my code.
public USER Save(USER obj)
{
using(TPPTEntities db = new TPPTEntities())
{
db.Connection.Open();
USER o = (from n in db.USERs where n.ID == obj.ID select n).FirstOrDefault();
if (o == null)
{
o = new USER()
{
BruteForce = 0,
Email = obj.Email,
IsBlock = false,
LastLogin = DateTime.Now,
Name = obj.Name,
UserName = obj.UserName,
UserPassword = new byte[0],
};
db.AddToUSERs(o);
}
else
{
o.Email = obj.Email;
o.Name = obj.Name;
o.UserName = obj.UserName;
}
db.SaveChanges();
db.Connection.Close();
}
return obj;
}
A way to get old and new values is this:
var ose = this.ObjectStateManager.GetObjectStateEntry(o.EntityKey);
foreach (string propName in ose.GetModifiedProperties())
{
string.Format("Property '{0}', old value: {1}, new value: {2}",
propName, ose.OriginalValues[propName], ose.CurrentValues[propName]);
}
This is pretty useless, of course, but I'm sure you'll know what to do in the foreach loop to store the changes.
Is this a WCF Service? In that case, the changes will probably never come trough since changes to the Object Graph are made where the Object Context is not available. Consider using Self-Tracking Entities

How do I create an OrderBy statement using a reflected value?

I would like to create a method that orders an IEnumerable List by a given property where the property is passed into the method by a string i.e. (Mind you the first code example does not work, but the second does and is what I am trying to emulate dynamically).
string sortName = "SerialNumber";
IEnumerable<PartSummary> partList = FunctionToCreateList();
partOrderedList = partList.OrderBy(what do I stick in here);
that would be equivalent to
IEnumerable<PartSummary> partList = FunctionToCreateList();
partOrderedList = partList.OrderBy(p => p.SerialNumber);
How can I accomplish this?
Are you saying you want to pass the order by in to your method? If so, you can use this:
Expression<Func<PartSummary, bool>> orderByClause
Then you can do this:
partOrderedList = partList.OrderBy(orderByClause);
Then you can handle your order by in your business layer or wherever you wish.
Okay, update: If you want to pass in the column name as a string you can do something like as follows:
Create a static class for an extension method (reference: http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/linqprojectgeneral/thread/39028ad2-452e-409f-bc9e-d1b263e921f6/):
static class LinqExtensions
{
public static IQueryable<T> OrderBy<T>(this IQueryable<T> source, string sortingColumn, bool isAscending)
{
if (String.IsNullOrEmpty(sortingColumn))
{
return source;
}
ParameterExpression parameter = Expression.Parameter(source.ElementType, String.Empty);
MemberExpression property = Expression.Property(parameter, sortingColumn);
LambdaExpression lambda = Expression.Lambda(property, parameter);
string methodName = isAscending ? "OrderBy" : "OrderByDescending";
Expression methodCallExpression = Expression.Call(typeof(Queryable), methodName,
new Type[] { source.ElementType, property.Type },
source.Expression, Expression.Quote(lambda));
return source.Provider.CreateQuery<T>(methodCallExpression);
}
}
Then you can create your method:
static IQueryable<PartSummary> FunctionToCreateList()
{
IList<PartSummary> list = new List<PartSummary>();
list.Add(new PartSummary
{
Id = 1,
SerialNumber = "A",
});
list.Add(new PartSummary
{
Id = 2,
SerialNumber = "B",
});
return list.AsQueryable();
}
And then call your method:
static void Main(string[] args)
{
IQueryable<PartSummary> partOrderedList = FunctionToCreateList();
PartSummary partSummary = new PartSummary();
string sortBy = "Id";
partOrderedList = partOrderedList.OrderBy(sortBy, false);
foreach (PartSummary summary in partOrderedList)
{
Console.WriteLine(summary.Id + ", " + summary.SerialNumber);
}
Console.ReadLine();
}
Now you can pass in the column name as a string and sort.
Hope this helps!
You can also avoid extending and just use a compiled expression tree to accomplish this:
public Func<T, object> ResolveToProperty<T>(String propertyName)
{
Type t = typeof(T);
var paramExpression = Expression.Parameter(t, "element");
var propertyExpression = Expression.Property(paramExpression, propertyName);
return Expression.Lambda<Func<T, object>>(propertyExpression, paramExpression).Compile();
}
string sortName = "SerialNumber";
IEnumerable<PartSummary> partList = FunctionToCreateList();
var partOrderedList = partList.OrderBy(ResolveToProperty<PartSummary>(sortName));

Check if a List Column Exists using SharePoint Client Object Model?

Using the Client Object Model (C#) in SharePoint 2010, how can I determine if a specified column (field) name exists in a given List?
Thanks, MagicAndi.
Just found this while searching for the same thing, but it looks like Sharepoint 2010 has something built in for this, at least for the Server model: list.Fields.ContainsField("fieldName");
Not sure if it exists for Client side though. Figured it would be a good place to store this information however.
Server Object Model
string siteUrl = "http://mysite";
using (SPSite site = new SPSite(siteUrl))
{
using (SPWeb web = site.OpenWeb())
{
SPList list = web.Lists["my forum"];
for (int i = 0; i < list.Fields.Count; i++)
{
if (list.Fields[i].Title == "xyz")
{
-
-
}
}
}
}
Client Object Model
string siteUrl = "http://MyServer/sites/MySiteCollection";
ClientContext clientContext = new ClientContext(siteUrl);
SP.List List = clientContext.Web.Lists.GetByTitle("my forum");
for (int i = 0; i < list.Fields.Count; i++)
{
if (list.Fields[i].Title == "xyz")
{
-
-
}
}
The following method demonstrates how to determine whether a specified column exists in a List using CSOM:
static class FieldCollectionExtensions
{
public static bool ContainsField(this List list,string fieldName)
{
var ctx = list.Context;
var result = ctx.LoadQuery(list.Fields.Where(f => f.InternalName == fieldName));
ctx.ExecuteQuery();
return result.Any();
}
}
Usage
using(var ctx = new ClientContext(webUrl))
{
var list = ctx.Web.Lists.GetByTitle(listTitle);
if(list.ContainsField("Title")){
//...
}
}
Here's an extension code (CSOM) for sharepoint list
public static bool DoesFieldExist(this List list, ClientContext clientContext, string internalFieldname)
{
bool exists = false;
clientContext.Load(list.Fields, fCol => fCol.Include(
f => f.InternalName
).Where(field => field.InternalName == internalFieldname));
clientContext.ExecuteQuery();
if (list.Fields != null && list.Fields.Count > 0)
{
exists = true;
}
return exists;
}
usage
List targetList = this.Context.Web.Lists.GetById(<ListID>);
targetList.DoesFieldExist(<ClientContext>, <Field internal Name>)
enjoy :)
I ended up retrieving the details of the list's fields prior to my operation, and saving them in a generic list of structs (containing details of each field). I then query this (generic) list to see if the current field actually exists in the given (SharePoint) list.
// Retrieve detail sof all fields in specified list
using (ClientContext clientContext = new ClientContext(SharePointSiteUrl))
{
List list = clientContext.Web.Lists.GetByTitle(listName);
_listFieldDetails = new List<SPFieldDetails>();
// get fields name and their types
ClientObjectPrototype allFields = list.Fields.RetrieveItems();
allFields.Retrieve( FieldPropertyNames.Title,
FieldPropertyNames.InternalName,
FieldPropertyNames.FieldTypeKind,
FieldPropertyNames.Id,
FieldPropertyNames.ReadOnlyField);
clientContext.ExecuteQuery();
foreach (Field field in list.Fields)
{
SPFieldDetails fieldDetails = new SPFieldDetails();
fieldDetails.Title = field.Title;
fieldDetails.InternalName = field.InternalName;
fieldDetails.Type = field.FieldTypeKind;
fieldDetails.ID = field.Id;
fieldDetails.ReadOnly = field.ReadOnlyField;
listFieldDetails.Add(fieldDetails);
}
}
// Check if field name exists
_listFieldDetails.Exists(field => field.Title == fieldName);
// Struct to hold details of the field
public struct SPFieldDetails
{
public string Title { get; set; }
public string InternalName { get; set; }
public Guid ID { get; set; }
public FieldType Type { get; set; }
public bool ReadOnly { get; set; }
}
Some good answers above. I personally used this one:
List list = ctx.Web.Lists.GetByTitle("Some list");
FieldCollection fields = list.Fields;
IEnumerable<Field> fieldsColl = ctx.LoadQuery(fields.Include(f => f.InternalName));
ctx.ExecuteQuery();
bool fieldMissing = fieldsColl.Any(f => f.InternalName != "Internal_Name");
You can also use 'Where' after Include method and check if returned collection/field is null. It's about personal preference, because both options are querying on client side.
I prefer the SharePoint Plus Library as it is really clean:
http://aymkdn.github.io/SharepointPlus/symbols/%24SP%28%29.list.html
$SP().list("My List").get({
fields:"Title",
where:"Author = '[Me]'"
},function getData(row) {
console.log(row[0].getAttribute("Title"));
});
You could setup a for loop to loop through the row and check if the column you're looking for exists.
A cut down and simplified version of Mitya's extension method:
public static bool FieldExists(this List list, string internalFieldname)
{
using (ClientContext clientContext = list.Context as ClientContext)
{
clientContext.Load(list.Fields, fCol => fCol.Include(
f => f.InternalName
).Where(field => field.InternalName == internalFieldname));
clientContext.ExecuteQuery();
return (list.Fields != null) && (list.Fields.Count > 0);
}
}
There's no need to pass in a separate client context parameter when you can already use the context that comes in with the list.
to much code use this
load Fields first then
bool exists= clientContext2.Site.RootWeb.Fields.Any(o => o.Id.ToString() == a.Id.ToString());

Resources