How do I create an OrderBy statement using a reflected value? - c#-4.0

I would like to create a method that orders an IEnumerable List by a given property where the property is passed into the method by a string i.e. (Mind you the first code example does not work, but the second does and is what I am trying to emulate dynamically).
string sortName = "SerialNumber";
IEnumerable<PartSummary> partList = FunctionToCreateList();
partOrderedList = partList.OrderBy(what do I stick in here);
that would be equivalent to
IEnumerable<PartSummary> partList = FunctionToCreateList();
partOrderedList = partList.OrderBy(p => p.SerialNumber);
How can I accomplish this?

Are you saying you want to pass the order by in to your method? If so, you can use this:
Expression<Func<PartSummary, bool>> orderByClause
Then you can do this:
partOrderedList = partList.OrderBy(orderByClause);
Then you can handle your order by in your business layer or wherever you wish.
Okay, update: If you want to pass in the column name as a string you can do something like as follows:
Create a static class for an extension method (reference: http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/linqprojectgeneral/thread/39028ad2-452e-409f-bc9e-d1b263e921f6/):
static class LinqExtensions
{
public static IQueryable<T> OrderBy<T>(this IQueryable<T> source, string sortingColumn, bool isAscending)
{
if (String.IsNullOrEmpty(sortingColumn))
{
return source;
}
ParameterExpression parameter = Expression.Parameter(source.ElementType, String.Empty);
MemberExpression property = Expression.Property(parameter, sortingColumn);
LambdaExpression lambda = Expression.Lambda(property, parameter);
string methodName = isAscending ? "OrderBy" : "OrderByDescending";
Expression methodCallExpression = Expression.Call(typeof(Queryable), methodName,
new Type[] { source.ElementType, property.Type },
source.Expression, Expression.Quote(lambda));
return source.Provider.CreateQuery<T>(methodCallExpression);
}
}
Then you can create your method:
static IQueryable<PartSummary> FunctionToCreateList()
{
IList<PartSummary> list = new List<PartSummary>();
list.Add(new PartSummary
{
Id = 1,
SerialNumber = "A",
});
list.Add(new PartSummary
{
Id = 2,
SerialNumber = "B",
});
return list.AsQueryable();
}
And then call your method:
static void Main(string[] args)
{
IQueryable<PartSummary> partOrderedList = FunctionToCreateList();
PartSummary partSummary = new PartSummary();
string sortBy = "Id";
partOrderedList = partOrderedList.OrderBy(sortBy, false);
foreach (PartSummary summary in partOrderedList)
{
Console.WriteLine(summary.Id + ", " + summary.SerialNumber);
}
Console.ReadLine();
}
Now you can pass in the column name as a string and sort.
Hope this helps!

You can also avoid extending and just use a compiled expression tree to accomplish this:
public Func<T, object> ResolveToProperty<T>(String propertyName)
{
Type t = typeof(T);
var paramExpression = Expression.Parameter(t, "element");
var propertyExpression = Expression.Property(paramExpression, propertyName);
return Expression.Lambda<Func<T, object>>(propertyExpression, paramExpression).Compile();
}
string sortName = "SerialNumber";
IEnumerable<PartSummary> partList = FunctionToCreateList();
var partOrderedList = partList.OrderBy(ResolveToProperty<PartSummary>(sortName));

Related

Generic Template String like in Python in Dart

In python, I often use strings as templates, e.g.
templateUrl = '{host}/api/v3/{container}/{resourceid}'
params = {'host': 'www.api.com', 'container': 'books', 'resourceid': 10}
api.get(templateUrl.format(**params))
This allows for easy base class setup and the like. How can I do the same in dart?
I'm assuming I will need to create a utility function to parse the template and substitute manually but really hoping there is something ready to use.
Perhaps a TemplateString class with a format method that takes a Map of name/value pairs to substitute into the string.
Note: the objective is to have a generic "format" or "interpolation" function that doesn't need to know in advance what tags or names will exist in the template.
Further clarification: the templates themselves are not resolved when they are set up. Specifically, the template is defined in one place in the code and then used in many other places.
Dart does not have a generic template string functionality that would allow you to insert values into your template at runtime.
Dart only allows you to interpolate strings with variables using the $ syntax in strings, e.g. var string = '$domain/api/v3/${actions.get}'. You would need to have all the variables defined in your code beforehand.
However, you can easily create your own implementation.
Implementation
You pretty much explained how to do it in your question yourself: you pass a map and use it to have generic access to the parameters using the [] operator.
To convert the template string into something that is easy to access, I would simply create another List containing fixed components, like /api/v3/ and another Map that holds generic components with their name and their position in the template string.
class TemplateString {
final List<String> fixedComponents;
final Map<int, String> genericComponents;
int totalComponents;
TemplateString(String template)
: fixedComponents = <String>[],
genericComponents = <int, String>{},
totalComponents = 0 {
final List<String> components = template.split('{');
for (String component in components) {
if (component == '') continue; // If the template starts with "{", skip the first element.
final split = component.split('}');
if (split.length != 1) {
// The condition allows for template strings without parameters.
genericComponents[totalComponents] = split.first;
totalComponents++;
}
if (split.last != '') {
fixedComponents.add(split.last);
totalComponents++;
}
}
}
String format(Map<String, dynamic> params) {
String result = '';
int fixedComponent = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < totalComponents; i++) {
if (genericComponents.containsKey(i)) {
result += '${params[genericComponents[i]]}';
continue;
}
result += fixedComponents[fixedComponent++];
}
return result;
}
}
Here would be an example usage, I hope that the result is what you expected:
main() {
final templateUrl = TemplateString('{host}/api/v3/{container}/{resourceid}');
final params = <String, dynamic>{'host': 'www.api.com', 'container': 'books', 'resourceid': 10};
print(templateUrl.format(params)); // www.api.com/api/v3/books/10
}
Here it is as a Gist.
Here is my solution:
extension StringFormating on String {
String format(List<String> values) {
int index = 0;
return replaceAllMapped(new RegExp(r'{.*?}'), (_) {
final value = values[index];
index++;
return value;
});
}
String formatWithMap(Map<String, String> mappedValues) {
return replaceAllMapped(new RegExp(r'{(.*?)}'), (match) {
final mapped = mappedValues[match[1]];
if (mapped == null)
throw ArgumentError(
'$mappedValues does not contain the key "${match[1]}"');
return mapped;
});
}
}
This gives you a very similar functionality to what python offers:
"Test {} with {}!".format(["it", "foo"]);
"Test {a} with {b}!".formatWithMap({"a": "it", "b": "foo"})
both return "Test it with foo!"
It's even more easy in Dart. Sample code below :
String host = "www.api.com"
String container = "books"
int resourceId = 10
String templateUrl = "$host/api/v3/$container/${resourceId.toString()}"
With the map, you can do as follows :
Map<String, String> params = {'host': 'www.api.com', 'container': 'books', 'resourceid': 10}
String templateUrl = "${params['host']}/api/v3/${params['container']}/${params['resourceId']}"
Note : The above code defines Map as <String, String>. You might want <String, Dynamic> (and use .toString())
Wouldn't it be simplest to just make it a function with named arguments? You could add some input validation if you wanted to.
String templateUrl({String host = "", String container = "", int resourceid = 0 }) {
return "$host/api/v3/$container/$resourceId";
}
void main() {
api.get(templateUrl(host:"www.api.com", container:"books", resourceid:10));
}

How to get Opportunity Relations in Sales Order

In Opportunity screen, the definition of the data view for Relations is simply :
public CRRelationsList<CROpportunity.noteID> Relations;
When a Sales Order is raised from the Opportunity. I'd like to display the Relations defined from the source Opporunity in another tab. And I'm just struggling how to write the the data view and pass the Opportunity noteid.
public CRRelationsList<???>Relations;
Thanks !
The generic type in dataviews often resolve to the current record.
In CRRelationsList class the generic type is named TNoteField:
public class CRRelationsList<TNoteField> : PXSelect<CRRelation>
where TNoteField : IBqlField
ssuming the dataview is declared as CRRelationsList<CROpportunity.noteID>.
The generic type value will be resolved like this Caches[typeof(CROpportunity)].Current.NoteID.
protected virtual void CRRelation_RefNoteID_FieldDefaulting(PXCache sender, PXFieldDefaultingEventArgs e)
{
// Get a cache object of type CROpportunity
var refCache = sender.Graph.Caches[BqlCommand.GetItemType(typeof(TNoteField))];
// Get the NoteID field value of the current CROpportunity object
e.NewValue = refCache.GetValue(refCache.Current, typeof(TNoteField).Name);
}
So to set DAC.Field of CRelationsList<DAC.field> you would do:
// In a graph extension (PXGraphExtension)
Base.Caches[typeof(DAC)].Current.Fied = ???;
// Or in graph (PXGraph)
Caches[typeof(DAC)].Current.Fied = ???;
If current DAC object is null you need to insert a record in a dataview or directly in the cache object.
I'm not sure re-using CRRelationsList list is the best approach if you want to simply display records because it does much more than that. It should be possible to extract the select request out of it and directly substitute the TNoteField value:
private static PXSelectDelegate GetHandler()
{
return () =>
{
var command = new Select2<CRRelation,
LeftJoin<BAccount, On<BAccount.bAccountID, Equal<CRRelation.entityID>>,
LeftJoin<Contact,
On<Contact.contactID, Equal<Switch<Case<Where<BAccount.type, Equal<BAccountType.employeeType>>, BAccount.defContactID>, CRRelation.contactID>>>,
LeftJoin<Users, On<Users.pKID, Equal<Contact.userID>>>>>,
Where<CRRelation.refNoteID, Equal<Current<TNoteField>>>>();
var startRow = PXView.StartRow;
int totalRows = 0;
var list = new PXView(PXView.CurrentGraph, false, command).
Select(null, null, PXView.Searches, PXView.SortColumns, PXView.Descendings, PXView.Filters,
ref startRow, PXView.MaximumRows, ref totalRows);
PXView.StartRow = 0;
foreach (PXResult<CRRelation, BAccount, Contact, Users> row in list)
{
var relation = (CRRelation)row[typeof(CRRelation)];
var account = (BAccount)row[typeof(BAccount)];
relation.Name = account.AcctName;
relation.EntityCD = account.AcctCD;
var contact = (Contact)row[typeof(Contact)];
if (contact.ContactID == null && relation.ContactID != null &&
account.Type != BAccountType.EmployeeType)
{
var directContact = (Contact)PXSelect<Contact>.
Search<Contact.contactID>(PXView.CurrentGraph, relation.ContactID);
if (directContact != null) contact = directContact;
}
relation.Email = contact.EMail;
var user = (Users)row[typeof(Users)];
if (account.Type != BAccountType.EmployeeType)
relation.ContactName = contact.DisplayName;
else
{
if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(relation.Name))
relation.Name = user.FullName;
if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(relation.Email))
relation.Email = user.Email;
}
}
return list;
};
}

Auto Mapper : how to map Expressions

public IEnumerable<CustomBo> FindBy(Expression<Func<CustomBo, bool>> predicate)
{
Mapper.CreateMap<Expression<Func<CustomBo, bool>>, Expression<Func<Entity, bool>>>();
var newPredicate = Mapper.Map<Expression<Func<Entity, bool>>>(predicate);
IQueryable<Entity> query = dbSet.Where(newPredicate);
Mapper.CreateMap<Entity,CustomBo>();
var searchResult = Mapper.Map<List<CustomBo>>(query);
return searchResult;
}
I want to map customBo type to Entity Type..
Here customBo is my model and Entity is Database entity from edmx.
I'm using AutoMapper.
I'm Getting following Error
Could not find type map from destination type Data.Customer to source type Model.CustomerBO. Use CreateMap to create a map from the source to destination types.
Could not find type map from destination type Data.Customer to source type Model.CustomerBO. Use CreateMap to create a map from the source to destination types.
Any Suggession what I'm missiong here..
Thanks
I find a work around. I create my custom methods to map Expression.
public static class MappingHelper
{
public static Expression<Func<TTo, bool>> ConvertExpression<TFrom, TTo>(this Expression<Func<TFrom, bool>> expr)
{
Dictionary<Expression, Expression> substitutues = new Dictionary<Expression, Expression>();
var oldParam = expr.Parameters[0];
var newParam = Expression.Parameter(typeof(TTo), oldParam.Name);
substitutues.Add(oldParam, newParam);
Expression body = ConvertNode(expr.Body, substitutues);
return Expression.Lambda<Func<TTo, bool>>(body, newParam);
}
static Expression ConvertNode(Expression node, IDictionary<Expression, Expression> subst)
{
if (node == null) return null;
if (subst.ContainsKey(node)) return subst[node];
switch (node.NodeType)
{
case ExpressionType.Constant:
return node;
case ExpressionType.MemberAccess:
{
var me = (MemberExpression)node;
var newNode = ConvertNode(me.Expression, subst);
MemberInfo info = null;
foreach (MemberInfo mi in newNode.Type.GetMembers())
{
if (mi.MemberType == MemberTypes.Property)
{
if (mi.Name.ToLower().Contains(me.Member.Name.ToLower()))
{
info = mi;
break;
}
}
}
return Expression.MakeMemberAccess(newNode, info);
}
case ExpressionType.AndAlso:
case ExpressionType.OrElse:
case ExpressionType.LessThan:
case ExpressionType.LessThanOrEqual:
case ExpressionType.GreaterThan:
case ExpressionType.GreaterThanOrEqual:
case ExpressionType.Equal: /* will probably work for a range of common binary-expressions */
{
var be = (BinaryExpression)node;
return Expression.MakeBinary(be.NodeType, ConvertNode(be.Left, subst), ConvertNode(be.Right, subst), be.IsLiftedToNull, be.Method);
}
default:
throw new NotSupportedException(node.NodeType.ToString());
}
}
}
Now I'm calling it like
public CustomBo FindBy(Expression<Func<CustomBo, bool>> predicateId)
{
var newPredicate = predicateId.ConvertExpression<CustomBo, Entity>();
}
Still if anyone know how to do it by automapper then plz let me know.
Thanks
Looks like this was added after your asked your question: Expression Translation (UseAsDataSource)
Now all you have to do is dbSet.UseAsDataSource().For<CustomBo>().Where(expression).ToList();. Much nicer!

Issue with SqlScalar<T> and SqlList<T> when calling stored procedure with parameters

The new API for Servicestack.OrmLite dictates that when calling fx a stored procedure you should use either SqlScalar or SqlList like this:
List<Poco> results = db.SqlList<Poco>("EXEC GetAnalyticsForWeek 1");
List<Poco> results = db.SqlList<Poco>("EXEC GetAnalyticsForWeek #weekNo", new { weekNo = 1 });
List<int> results = db.SqlList<int>("EXEC GetTotalsForWeek 1");
List<int> results = db.SqlList<int>("EXEC GetTotalsForWeek #weekNo", new { weekNo = 1 });
However the named parameters doesn't work. You HAVE to respect the order of the parameters in the SP. I think it is because the SP is executed using CommandType=CommandType.Text instead of CommandType.StoredProcedure, and the parameters are added as dbCmd.Parameters.Add(). It seems that because the CommandType is Text it expects the parameters to be added in the SQL querystring, and not as Parameters.Add(), because it ignores the naming.
An example:
CREATE PROCEDURE [dbo].[sproc_WS_SelectScanFeedScanRecords]
#JobNo int = 0
,#SyncStatus int = -1
AS
BEGIN
SET NOCOUNT ON;
SELECT
FSR.ScanId
, FSR.JobNo
, FSR.BatchNo
, FSR.BagNo
, FSR.ScanType
, FSR.ScanDate
, FSR.ScanTime
, FSR.ScanStatus
, FSR.SyncStatus
, FSR.JobId
FROM dbo.SCAN_FeedScanRecords FSR
WHERE ((FSR.JobNo = #JobNo) OR (#JobNo = 0) OR (ISNULL(#JobNo,1) = 1))
AND ((FSR.SyncStatus = #SyncStatus) OR (#SyncStatus = -1) OR (ISNULL(#SyncStatus,-1) = -1))
END
When calling this SP as this:
db.SqlList<ScanRecord>("EXEC sproc_WS_SelectScanFeedScanRecords #SyncStatus",new {SyncStatus = 1});
It returns all records with JobNo = 1 instead of SyncStatus=1 because it ignores the named parameter and add by the order in which they are defined in the SP.
I have to call it like this:
db.SqlList<ScanRecord>("EXEC sproc_WS_SelectScanFeedScanRecords #SyncStatus=1");
Is this expected behavior? I think it defeats the anonymous type parameters if I can't trust it
TIA
Bo
My solution was to roll my own methods for stored procedures. If people finds them handy, I could add them to the project
public static void StoredProcedure(this IDbConnection dbConn, string storedprocedure, object anonType = null)
{
dbConn.Exec(dbCmd =>
{
dbCmd.CommandType = CommandType.StoredProcedure;
dbCmd.CommandText = storedprocedure;
dbCmd.SetParameters(anonType, true);
dbCmd.ExecuteNonQuery();
});
}
public static T StoredProcedureScalar<T>(this IDbConnection dbConn, string storedprocedure, object anonType = null)
{
return dbConn.Exec(dbCmd =>
{
dbCmd.CommandType = CommandType.StoredProcedure;
dbCmd.CommandText = storedprocedure;
dbCmd.SetParameters(anonType, true);
using (IDataReader reader = dbCmd.ExecuteReader())
return GetScalar<T>(reader);
});
}
public static List<T> StoredProcedureList<T>(this IDbConnection dbConn, string storedprocedure, object anonType = null)
{
return dbConn.Exec(dbCmd =>
{
dbCmd.CommandType = CommandType.StoredProcedure;
dbCmd.CommandText = storedprocedure;
dbCmd.SetParameters(anonType, true);
using (var dbReader = dbCmd.ExecuteReader())
return IsScalar<T>()
? dbReader.GetFirstColumn<T>()
: dbReader.ConvertToList<T>();
});
}
They are just modified versions of the SqlScalar and SqlList plus the ExecuteNonQuery

Entity Framework - IQueryable to DataTable

I'm trying to convert an IQueryable object to a DataTable. Here's an example of a query that I would like to convert to a DataTable:
var query = DbContext.SomeObjectSet.Select(x => new { PropertyName1 = x.ColumnName1, PropertyName2 = x.ColumnName2 });
Please note the anonymous object that is created in the Select method and the names of the properties:
new { PropertyName1 = x.ColumnName1, PropertyName2 = x.ColumnName2 }
After Googling this issue, I came across the following code that converts an IQueryable object to a DataTable:
public static DataTable EntityToDatatable(this IQueryable result)
{
ObjectQuery query = (result as ObjectQuery);
ObjectContext context = query.Context;
EntityConnection entityCon = (context.Connection as EntityConnection);
using (SqlConnection sqlCon = new SqlConnection(entityCon.StoreConnection.ConnectionString))
{
using (SqlCommand cmd = new SqlCommand(query.ToTraceString(), sqlCon))
{
foreach (var param in query.Parameters)
{
cmd.Parameters.AddWithValue(param.Name, param.Value);
}
using (SqlDataAdapter dataAdapter = new SqlDataAdapter(cmd))
{
using (DataTable dataTable = new DataTable())
{
dataAdapter.Fill(dataTable);
return dataTable;
}
}
}
}
}
The code above "works" and the SQL statement from the ToTraceString() method is as follows:
SELECT [Extent1].[ColumnName1] AS [ColumnName1], [Extent1].[ColumnName2] AS [ColumnName2] FROM [dbo].[TableName] AS [Extent1]
Problem: The column names of the SQL statement (i.e. columnName1 and columnName2) do not correspond to the names of the properties of the objects (i.e. PropertyName1 and PropertyName2) that would be materialized if a ToList() or AsEnumerable() method was called on the query. This wouldn't be so bad if the SQL statement columns were in the same order as the anonymous object properties...but, this is not always the case. Somewhere (I guess inside of the IQueryable object) there must be a mapping between the SQL statement column names and the resulting anonymous object property names.
Does anyone know how to get at this mapping?
I've managed to find a solution to my problem:
First, you need the following code (from How does Entity Framework manage mapping query result to anonymous type?) which maps the positions of my anonymous object properties to the SQL statement column position:
public static Int32[] GetPropertyPositions(this ObjectQuery query)
{
// get private ObjectQueryState ObjectQuery._state;
// of actual type internal class
// System.Data.Objects.ELinq.ELinqQueryState
Object queryState = GetProperty(query, "QueryState");
AssertNonNullAndOfType(queryState, "System.Data.Objects.ELinq.ELinqQueryState");
// get protected ObjectQueryExecutionPlan ObjectQueryState._cachedPlan;
// of actual type internal sealed class
// System.Data.Objects.Internal.ObjectQueryExecutionPlan
Object plan = GetField(queryState, "_cachedPlan");
AssertNonNullAndOfType(plan, "System.Data.Objects.Internal.ObjectQueryExecutionPlan");
// get internal readonly DbCommandDefinition ObjectQueryExecutionPlan.CommandDefinition;
// of actual type internal sealed class
// System.Data.EntityClient.EntityCommandDefinition
Object commandDefinition = GetField(plan, "CommandDefinition");
AssertNonNullAndOfType(commandDefinition, "System.Data.EntityClient.EntityCommandDefinition");
// get private readonly IColumnMapGenerator EntityCommandDefinition._columnMapGenerator;
// of actual type private sealed class
// System.Data.EntityClient.EntityCommandDefinition.ConstantColumnMapGenerator
Object columnMapGenerator = GetField(commandDefinition, "_columnMapGenerator");
AssertNonNullAndOfType(columnMapGenerator, "System.Data.EntityClient.EntityCommandDefinition+ConstantColumnMapGenerator");
// get private readonly ColumnMap ConstantColumnMapGenerator._columnMap;
// of actual type internal class
// System.Data.Query.InternalTrees.SimpleCollectionColumnMap
Object columnMap = GetField(columnMapGenerator, "_columnMap");
AssertNonNullAndOfType(columnMap, "System.Data.Query.InternalTrees.SimpleCollectionColumnMap");
// get internal ColumnMap CollectionColumnMap.Element;
// of actual type internal class
// System.Data.Query.InternalTrees.RecordColumnMap
Object columnMapElement = GetProperty(columnMap, "Element");
AssertNonNullAndOfType(columnMapElement, "System.Data.Query.InternalTrees.RecordColumnMap");
// get internal ColumnMap[] StructuredColumnMap.Properties;
// array of internal abstract class
// System.Data.Query.InternalTrees.ColumnMap
Array columnMapProperties = GetProperty(columnMapElement, "Properties") as Array;
AssertNonNullAndOfType(columnMapProperties, "System.Data.Query.InternalTrees.ColumnMap[]");
Int32 n = columnMapProperties.Length;
Int32[] propertyPositions = new Int32[n];
for (Int32 i = 0; i < n; ++i)
{
// get value at index i in array
// of actual type internal class
// System.Data.Query.InternalTrees.ScalarColumnMap
Object column = columnMapProperties.GetValue(i);
AssertNonNullAndOfType(column, "System.Data.Query.InternalTrees.ScalarColumnMap");
//string colName = (string)GetProp(column, "Name");
// can be used for more advanced bingings
// get internal int ScalarColumnMap.ColumnPos;
Object columnPositionOfAProperty = GetProperty(column, "ColumnPos");
AssertNonNullAndOfType(columnPositionOfAProperty, "System.Int32");
propertyPositions[i] = (int)columnPositionOfAProperty;
}
return propertyPositions;
}
static object GetProperty(object obj, string propName)
{
PropertyInfo prop = obj.GetType().GetProperty(propName, BindingFlags.NonPublic | BindingFlags.Instance);
if (prop == null) throw EFChangedException();
return prop.GetValue(obj, new object[0]);
}
static object GetField(object obj, string fieldName)
{
FieldInfo field = obj.GetType().GetField(fieldName, BindingFlags.NonPublic | BindingFlags.Instance);
if (field == null) throw EFChangedException();
return field.GetValue(obj);
}
static void AssertNonNullAndOfType(object obj, string fullName)
{
if (obj == null) throw EFChangedException();
string typeFullName = obj.GetType().FullName;
if (typeFullName != fullName) throw EFChangedException();
}
static InvalidOperationException EFChangedException()
{
return new InvalidOperationException("Entity Framework internals has changed, please review and fix reflection code");
}
Then I can modify the EntityToDatatable method as follows:
public static DataTable EntityToDatatable(this IQueryable query)
{
SqlConnection sqlConnection = null;
SqlCommand sqlCommand = null;
SqlDataAdapter sqlDataAdapter = null;
DataTable dataTable = null;
try
{
ObjectQuery objectQuery = (query as ObjectQuery);
ObjectContext objectContext = objectQuery.Context;
EntityConnection entityConnection = (objectContext.Connection as EntityConnection);
sqlConnection = new SqlConnection(entityConnection.StoreConnection.ConnectionString);
sqlCommand = new SqlCommand(objectQuery.ToTraceString(), sqlConnection);
foreach (var parameter in objectQuery.Parameters)
{
sqlCommand.Parameters.AddWithValue(parameter.Name, parameter.Value);
}
sqlDataAdapter = new SqlDataAdapter(sqlCommand);
dataTable = new DataTable();
sqlDataAdapter.Fill(dataTable);
// Get the mapping between the object property position and
// the SQL statment column position.
Int32[] propertyPositions = objectQuery.GetPropertyPositions();
// Create a column name to column position (ordinal) lookup.
Dictionary<String, Int32> mapColumnNameToColumnPosition = new Dictionary<string, int>();
// Populate the lookup.
for (Int32 i = 0; i < propertyPositions.Length; ++i)
{
mapColumnNameToColumnPosition.Add(dataTable.Columns[propertyPositions[i]].ColumnName, i);
}
// Get the object's property information.
PropertyInfo[] pi = query.GetType().GetGenericArguments()[0].GetProperties();
// Iterate through the lookup and change the position of the datatable columns.
// The order of the datatable columns will now correspond to the order of the object
// properties.
foreach (var map in mapColumnNameToColumnPosition)
{
// Change the column position.
dataTable.Columns[map.Key].SetOrdinal(map.Value);
// Change the column name.
dataTable.Columns[map.Key].ColumnName = pi[map.Value].Name;
}
return dataTable;
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
// Something went wrong and we're going to raise an exception...we
// might as well dispose of the datatable if it exists because it's
// not going to be used.
if (dataTable != null) dataTable.Dispose();
throw new Exception("IQueryable to DataTable conversion error.", ex);
}
finally
{
// Do some cleanup on objects that are no longer needed.
if (sqlDataAdapter != null) sqlDataAdapter.Dispose();
if (sqlCommand != null) sqlCommand.Dispose();
if (sqlConnection != null) sqlConnection.Dispose();
}
}

Resources