Let's say I have a silly script:
while true;do
touch ~/test_file
sleep 3
done
And I start the script into the background and leave the terminal:
chmod u+x silly_script.sh
./silly_script.sh &
exit
Is there a way for me to identify and stop that script now? The way I see it is, that every command is started in it's own process and I might be able to catch and kill one command like the 'sleep 3' but not the execution of the entire script, am I mistaken? I expected a process to appear with the scripts name, but it does not. If I start the script with 'source silly_script.sh' I can't find a process by the name of 'source'. Do I need to identify the instance of bash, that is executing the script? How would I do that?
EDIT: There have been a few creative solutions, but so far they require the PID of the script execution to be stored right away, or the bash session to not be left with ^D or exit. I understand, that this way of running scripts should maybe be avoided, but I find it hard to believe, that any low privilege user could, even by accident, start an annoying script into the background, that is for instance filling the drive with garbage files or repeatedly starting new instances of some software and even the admin has no other option, than to restart the server, because a simple script can hide it's identifier without even trying.
With the help of the fine people here I was able to derive the answer I needed:
It is true, that the script runs every command in it's own process, so for instance killing the sleep 3 command won't do anything to the script being run, but through a command like the sleep 3 you can find the bash instance running the script, by looking for the parent process:
So after doing the above, you can run ps axf to show all processes in a tree form. You will then find this section:
18660 ? S 0:00 /bin/bash
18696 ? S 0:00 \_ sleep 3
Now you have found the bash instance, that is running the script and can stop it: kill 18660
(Of course your PID will be different from mine)
The jobs command will show you all running background jobs.
You can kill background jobs by id using kill, e.g.:
$ sleep 9999 &
[1] 58730
$ jobs
[1]+ Running sleep 9999 &
$ kill %1
[1]+ Terminated sleep 9999
$ jobs
$
58730 is the PID of the backgrounded task, and 1 is the task id of it. In this case kill 58730 and kill %1` would have the same effect.
See the JOB CONTROL section of man bash for more info.
When you exit, the backgrounded job will get a kill signal and die (assuming that's how it handles the signal - in your simple example it is), unless you disown it first.
That kill will propogate to the sleep process, which may well ignore it and continue sleeping. If this is the case you'll still see it in ps -e output, but with a parent pid of 1 indicating its original parent no longer exists.
You can use ps -o ppid= <pid> to find the parent of a process, or pstree -ap to visualise the job hierarchy and find the parent visually.
Related
I have a bash script running on Ubuntu.
Is it possible to see the line/command executed now without script restart.
The issue is that script sometimes never exits. This is really hard to reproduce (now I caught it), so I can't just stop the script and start the debugging.
Any help would be really appreciated
P.S. Script logic is hard to understand, so I can't to figure out why it's frozen by power of thoughts.
Try to find the process id (pid) of the shell, you may use ps -ef | grep <script_name>
Let's set this pid in the shell variable $PID.
Find all the child processes of this $PID by:
ps --ppid $PID
You might find one or more (if for example it's stuck in a pipelined series of commands). Repeat this command couple of times. If it doesn't change this means the script is stuck in certain command. In this case, you may attach trace command to the running child process:
sudo strace -p $PID
This will show you what is being executed, either indefinite loop (like reading from a pipe) or waiting on some event that never happens.
In case you find ps --ppid $PID changes, this indicates that your script is advancing but it's stuck somewhere, e.g. local loop in the script. From the changing commands, it can give you a hint where in the script it's looping.
I have started my process in background and I would like to kill that process using a C program using popen().
I have tried in many ways but in vain. The reason is when I run a C code, it is executed in a sub-shell because of which I can't get the processes running in main shell.
I used $! to get the latest pid running in the background, but because of the above reason it didn't work.
my_process & pids="${pids-} $!" //start my process
sleep 10 // run for 10 seconds
kill -2 $pids //kill the process
Also you can store PID in file and kill it.like
./process1.sh &
echo $! > /tmp/process1.pid
kill -9 `cat /tmp/process*.pid`
rm /tmp/process*.pid
You should make your process into a daemon, that way you can start, end and restart it without complications.
You can start here: Best way to make a shell script daemon?
+1 on Raydel's answer
Another alternative (since there are so many ways to do things) If you have root you can also create it as a service and then start it and stop it manually using the "service" commands.
(Sorry wanted to add as a comment to Raydel's but my rep is not high enough apparently so adding as a separate answer)
(OSX 10.7) An application we use let us assign scripts to be called when certain activities occur within the application. I have assigned a bash script and it's being called, the problem is that what I need to do is to execute a few commands, wait 30 seconds, and then execute some more commands. If I have my bash script do a "sleep 30" the entire application freezes for that 30 seconds while waiting for my script to finish.
I tried putting the 30 second wait (and the second set of commands) into a separate script and calling "./secondScript &" but the application still sits there for 30 seconds doing nothing. I assume the application is waiting for the script and all child processes to terminate.
I've tried these variations for calling the second script from within the main script, they all have the same problem:
nohup ./secondScript &
( ( ./secondScript & ) & )
( ./secondScript & )
nohup script -q /dev/null secondScript &
I do not have the ability to change the application and tell it to launch my script and not wait for it to complete.
How can I launch a process (I would prefer the process to be in a scripting language) such that the new process is not a child of the current process?
Thanks,
Chris
p.s. I tried the "disown" command and it didn't help either. My main script looks like this:
[initial commands]
echo Launching second script
./secondScript &
echo Looking for jobs
jobs
echo Sleeping for 1 second
sleep 1
echo Calling disown
disown
echo Looking again for jobs
jobs
echo Main script complete
and what I get for output is this:
Launching second script
Looking for jobs
[1]+ Running ./secondScript &
Sleeping for 1 second
Calling disown
Looking again for jobs
Main script complete
and at this point the calling application sits there for 45 seconds, waiting for secondScript to finish.
p.p.s
If, at the top of the main script, I execute "ps" the only thing it returns is the process ID of the interactive bash session I have open in a separate terminal window.
The value of $SHELL is /bin/bash
If I execute "ps -p $$" it correctly tells me
PID TTY TIME CMD
26884 ?? 0:00.00 mainScript
If I execute "lsof -p $$" it gives me all kinds of results (I didn't paste all the columns here assuming they aren't relevant):
FD TYPE NAME
cwd DIR /private/tmp/blahblahblah
txt REG /bin/bash
txt REG /usr/lib/dyld
txt REG /private/var/db/dyld/dyld_shared_cache_x86_64
0 PIPE
1 PIPE -> 0xffff8041ea2d10
2 PIPE -> 0xffff 8017d21cb
3r DIR /private/tmp/blahblah
4r REG /Volumes/DATA/blahblah
255r REG /Volumes/DATA/blahblah
The typical way of doing this in Unix is to double fork. In bash, you can do this with
( sleep 30 & )
(..) creates a child process, and & creates a grandchild process. When the child process dies, the grandchild process is inherited by init.
If this doesn't work, then your application is not waiting for child processes.
Other things it may be waiting for include the session and open lock files:
To create a new session, Linux has a setsid. On OS X, you might be able to do it through script, which incidentally also creates a new session:
# Linux:
setsid sleep 30
# OS X:
nohup script -q -c 'sleep 30' /dev/null &
To find a list of inherited file descriptors, you can use lsof -p yourpid, which will output something like:
sleep 22479 user 0u CHR 136,32 0t0 35 /dev/pts/32
sleep 22479 user 1u CHR 136,32 0t0 35 /dev/pts/32
sleep 22479 user 2u CHR 136,32 0t0 35 /dev/pts/32
sleep 22479 user 5w REG 252,0 0 1048806 /tmp/lockfile
In this case, in addition to the standard FDs 0, 1 and 2, you also have a fd 5 open with a lock file that the parent can be waiting for.
To close fd 5, you can use exec 5>&-. If you think the lock file might be stdin/stdout/stderr themselves, you can use nohup to redirect them to something else.
Another way is to abandon the child
#!/bin/bash
yourprocess &
disown
As far as I understand, the application replaces the normal bash shell because it is still waiting for a process to finish even if init should have taken care of this child process.
It could be that the "application" intercepts the orphan handling which is normally done by init.
In that case, only a parallel process with some IPC can offer a solution (see my other answer)
I think it depends on how your parent process tries to detect if your child process has been finished.
In my case (my parent process was gnu make), I succeed by closing stdout and stderr (slightly based on the answer of that other guy) like this:
sleep 30 >&- 2>&- &
You might also close stdin
sleep 30 <&- >&- 2>&- &
or additionally disown your child process (not for Mac)
sleep 30 <&- >&- 2>&- & disown
Currently tested only in bash on kubuntu 14.04 and Mac OSX.
If all else fails:
Create a named pipe
start the "slow" script independent from the "application", make sure executes it's task in an endless loop, starting with reading from the pipe. It will become read-blocked when it tries to read..
from the application, start your other script. When it needs to invoke the "slow" script, just write some data to the pipe. The slow script will start independently so your script won't wait for the "slow" script to finish.
So, to answer the question:
bash - how can I launch a new process that is NOT a child of the original process?
Simple: don't launch it but let an independent entity launch it during boot...like init or on the fly with the command at or batch
Here I have a shell
└─bash(13882)
Where I start a process like this:
$ (urxvt -e ssh somehost&)
I get a process tree (this output snipped from pstree -p):
├─urxvt(14181)───ssh(14182)
where the process is parented beneath pid 1 (systemd in my case).
However, had I instead done this (note where the & is) :
$ (urxvt -e ssh somehost)&
then the process would be a child of the shell:
└─bash(13882)───urxvt(14181)───ssh(14182)
In both cases the shell prompt is immediately returned and I can exit
without terminating the process tree that I started above.
For the latter case the process tree is reparented beneath pid 1 when
the shell exits, so it ends up the same as the first example.
├─urxvt(14181)───ssh(14182)
Either way, the result is a process tree that outlives the shell. The
only difference is the initial parenting of that process tree.
For reference, you can also use
nohup urxvt -e ssh somehost &
urxvt -e ssh somehost & disown $!
Both give the same process tree as the second example above.
└─bash(13882)───urxvt(14181)───ssh(14182)
When the shell is terminated the process tree is, like before, reparented
to pid 1.
nohup additionally redirects the process' standard output to a file
nohup.out so, if that is a useful trait, it may be a more useful choice.
Otherwise, with the first form above, you immediately have a completely
detached process tree.
Ok, just like in this thread, How to get PID of background process?, I know how to get the PID of background process. However, what I need to do countains more than one operation.
{
sleep 300;
echo "Still running after 5 min, killing process manualy.";
COMMAND COMMAND COMMAND
echo "Shutdown complete"
}&
PID_CHECK_STOP=$!
some stuff...
kill -9 $PID_CHECK_STOP
But it doesn't work. It seems i get either a bad PID or I just can't kill it. I tried to run ps | grep sleep and the pid it gives is always right next to the one i get in PID_CHECK_STOP. Is there a way to make it work? Can i wrap those commands an other way so i can kill them all when i need to?
Thx guys!
kill -9 kills the process before it can do anything else, including signalling its children to exit. Use a gentler signal (kill by itself, which sends a TERM, should be sufficient). You do need to have the process signal its children to exit (if any) explicitly, though, via a trap command.
I'm assuming sleep is a placeholder for the real command. sleep is tricky, however, as it ignores any signals until it returns (i.e., it is non-interruptible). To make your example work, put sleep itself in the background and immediately wait on it. When you kill the "outer" background process, it will interrupt the wait call, which will allow sleep to be killed as well.
{
trap 'kill $(jobs -p)' EXIT
sleep 300 & wait
echo "Still running after 5 min, killing process manualy.";
COMMAND COMMAND COMMAND
echo "Shutdown complete"
}&
PID_CHECK_STOP=$!
some stuff...
kill $PID_CHECK_STOP
UPDATE: COMMAND COMMAND COMMAND includes a command that runs via sudo. To kill that process, kill must also be run via sudo. Keep in mind that doing so will run the external kill program, not the shell built-in (there is little difference between the two; the built-in exists to allow you to kill a process when your process quota has been reached).
You can have another script containing those commands and kill that script. If you are dynamically generating code for the block, just write out a script, execute it and kill when you are done.
The { ... } surrounding the statements starts a new shell, and you get its PID afterwards. sleep and other commands within the block get separate PIDs.
To illustrate, look for your process in ps afux | less - the parent shell process (above the sleep) has the PID you were just given.
Well, I'm basically trying to make a bash script runs a node script forever. I made the following bash script:
#!/bin/bash
while true ; do
cd /myscope/
unlink nohup.out
node myscript.js
sleep 6
done & echo $! > pid
I'm expecting that when it runs, it starts up node with the given script, checks if node exits, sleeps for 6 seconds if so and reopen node. Also, I'm expecting it to run in background and writes it's pid (the bash pid) on a file called "pid".
Everything explained above works as expected, apparently, but I'm also expecting that when the pid of the bash script is killed, the node script would stop running, I don't know why that made sense in my mind, but when it comes to practice, it doesn't work. The bash script is killed indeed, but the node script keeps running and that is freaking me out.
I've tested it in the terminal, by not sending the bash script to the background and entering ctrl+c, both scripts gets killed.
I'm obviously miss understanding something on the way the background process works. For god sake, can anybody help me?
There are lots of tools that let you do what you're trying, just two off the top of my head:
https://github.com/nodejitsu/forever - A simple CLI tool for ensuring that a given script runs continuously (i.e. forever)
https://github.com/remy/nodemon - Monitor for any changes in your node.js application and automatically restart the server - perfect for development
Maybe the second it's not what you're looking for, but still worth a look.
If you can't or don't want to use those then the problem is that if you kill the parent process the child one is still there, so, you should kill that too:
pkill -TERM -P $PID
where $PID is the parent PID.