Ok, just like in this thread, How to get PID of background process?, I know how to get the PID of background process. However, what I need to do countains more than one operation.
{
sleep 300;
echo "Still running after 5 min, killing process manualy.";
COMMAND COMMAND COMMAND
echo "Shutdown complete"
}&
PID_CHECK_STOP=$!
some stuff...
kill -9 $PID_CHECK_STOP
But it doesn't work. It seems i get either a bad PID or I just can't kill it. I tried to run ps | grep sleep and the pid it gives is always right next to the one i get in PID_CHECK_STOP. Is there a way to make it work? Can i wrap those commands an other way so i can kill them all when i need to?
Thx guys!
kill -9 kills the process before it can do anything else, including signalling its children to exit. Use a gentler signal (kill by itself, which sends a TERM, should be sufficient). You do need to have the process signal its children to exit (if any) explicitly, though, via a trap command.
I'm assuming sleep is a placeholder for the real command. sleep is tricky, however, as it ignores any signals until it returns (i.e., it is non-interruptible). To make your example work, put sleep itself in the background and immediately wait on it. When you kill the "outer" background process, it will interrupt the wait call, which will allow sleep to be killed as well.
{
trap 'kill $(jobs -p)' EXIT
sleep 300 & wait
echo "Still running after 5 min, killing process manualy.";
COMMAND COMMAND COMMAND
echo "Shutdown complete"
}&
PID_CHECK_STOP=$!
some stuff...
kill $PID_CHECK_STOP
UPDATE: COMMAND COMMAND COMMAND includes a command that runs via sudo. To kill that process, kill must also be run via sudo. Keep in mind that doing so will run the external kill program, not the shell built-in (there is little difference between the two; the built-in exists to allow you to kill a process when your process quota has been reached).
You can have another script containing those commands and kill that script. If you are dynamically generating code for the block, just write out a script, execute it and kill when you are done.
The { ... } surrounding the statements starts a new shell, and you get its PID afterwards. sleep and other commands within the block get separate PIDs.
To illustrate, look for your process in ps afux | less - the parent shell process (above the sleep) has the PID you were just given.
Related
Let's say I have a silly script:
while true;do
touch ~/test_file
sleep 3
done
And I start the script into the background and leave the terminal:
chmod u+x silly_script.sh
./silly_script.sh &
exit
Is there a way for me to identify and stop that script now? The way I see it is, that every command is started in it's own process and I might be able to catch and kill one command like the 'sleep 3' but not the execution of the entire script, am I mistaken? I expected a process to appear with the scripts name, but it does not. If I start the script with 'source silly_script.sh' I can't find a process by the name of 'source'. Do I need to identify the instance of bash, that is executing the script? How would I do that?
EDIT: There have been a few creative solutions, but so far they require the PID of the script execution to be stored right away, or the bash session to not be left with ^D or exit. I understand, that this way of running scripts should maybe be avoided, but I find it hard to believe, that any low privilege user could, even by accident, start an annoying script into the background, that is for instance filling the drive with garbage files or repeatedly starting new instances of some software and even the admin has no other option, than to restart the server, because a simple script can hide it's identifier without even trying.
With the help of the fine people here I was able to derive the answer I needed:
It is true, that the script runs every command in it's own process, so for instance killing the sleep 3 command won't do anything to the script being run, but through a command like the sleep 3 you can find the bash instance running the script, by looking for the parent process:
So after doing the above, you can run ps axf to show all processes in a tree form. You will then find this section:
18660 ? S 0:00 /bin/bash
18696 ? S 0:00 \_ sleep 3
Now you have found the bash instance, that is running the script and can stop it: kill 18660
(Of course your PID will be different from mine)
The jobs command will show you all running background jobs.
You can kill background jobs by id using kill, e.g.:
$ sleep 9999 &
[1] 58730
$ jobs
[1]+ Running sleep 9999 &
$ kill %1
[1]+ Terminated sleep 9999
$ jobs
$
58730 is the PID of the backgrounded task, and 1 is the task id of it. In this case kill 58730 and kill %1` would have the same effect.
See the JOB CONTROL section of man bash for more info.
When you exit, the backgrounded job will get a kill signal and die (assuming that's how it handles the signal - in your simple example it is), unless you disown it first.
That kill will propogate to the sleep process, which may well ignore it and continue sleeping. If this is the case you'll still see it in ps -e output, but with a parent pid of 1 indicating its original parent no longer exists.
You can use ps -o ppid= <pid> to find the parent of a process, or pstree -ap to visualise the job hierarchy and find the parent visually.
I'm new in linux and I'm building a program that receives the name of a process, gets its PID (i have no problem with that part) and then pass the PID to the kill command but its not working. It goes something like this:
read -p "Process to kill: " proceso
proid= pidof $proceso
echo "$proid"
kill $proid
Can someone tell me why it isn't killing it ? I know that there are some other ways to do it, even with the PID, but none of them seems to work for me. I believe it's some kind of problem with the Bash language (which I just started learning).
Instead of this:
proid= pidof $proceso
You probably meant this:
proid=$(pidof $proceso)
Even so,
the program might not get killed.
By default, kill PID sends the TERM signal to the specified process,
giving it a chance to shut down in an orderly manner,
for example clean up resources it's using.
The strongest signal to send a process to kill without graceful cleanup is KILL, using kill -KILL PID or kill -9 PID.
I believe it's some kind of problem with the bash language (which I just started learning).
The original line you posted, proid= pidof $proceso should raise an error,
and Bash would print an error message about it.
Debugging problems starts by reading and understanding the error messages the software is trying to tell you.
kill expects you to tell it **how to kill*, so there must be 64 different ways to kill your process :) They have names and numbers. The most lethal is -9. Some interesting ones include:
SIGKILL - The SIGKILL (also -9) signal forces the process to stop executing immediately. The program cannot ignore this signal. This process does not get to clean-up either.
SIGHUP - The SIGHUP signal disconnects a process from the parent process. This an also be used to restart processes. For example, "killall -SIGUP compiz" will restart Compiz. This is useful for daemons with memory leaks.
SIGINT - This signal is the same as pressing ctrl-c. On some systems, "delete" + "break" sends the same signal to the process. The process is interrupted and stopped. However, the process can ignore this signal.
SIGQUIT - This is like SIGINT with the ability to make the process produce a core dump.
use the following command to display the port and PID of the process:
sudo netstat -plten
AND THEN
kill -9 PID
Here is an example to kill a process running on port 8283 and has PID=25334
You have to send the SIGKILL flag with the kill statement.
kill -9 [pid]
If you don't the operating system will choose to kill the process at its convenience, SIGKILL (-9) will tell the os to kill the process NOW without ignoring the command until later.
Try this
kill -9
It will kill any process with PID given in brackets
Try "kill -9 $proid" or "kill -SIGKILL $proid" commands. If you want more information, click.
Based on what you have there, it looks like you aren't getting the actual PID in your proid variable. If you want to capture the output of pidof, you will need to enclose that command in backtics for the old form of command substitution ...
proid=`pidof $proceso`
... or like so for the new form of command substitution.
proid=$(pidof $proceso)
I had a similar problem, only wanting to run monitor (Video surveillance) for several hours a day.
Wrote two sh scripts;
cat startmotion.sh
#!/bin/sh
motion -c /home/username/.config/motion/motion.conf
And the second;
cat killmotion.sh
#!/bin/sh
OA=$(cat /var/run/motion/motion.pid)
kill -9 $OA
These were called from crontab at the scheduled time
ctontab -e
0 15 * * * /home/username/startmotion.sh
0 17 * * * /home/username/killmotion.sh
Very simple, but that's all I needed.
I have started my process in background and I would like to kill that process using a C program using popen().
I have tried in many ways but in vain. The reason is when I run a C code, it is executed in a sub-shell because of which I can't get the processes running in main shell.
I used $! to get the latest pid running in the background, but because of the above reason it didn't work.
my_process & pids="${pids-} $!" //start my process
sleep 10 // run for 10 seconds
kill -2 $pids //kill the process
Also you can store PID in file and kill it.like
./process1.sh &
echo $! > /tmp/process1.pid
kill -9 `cat /tmp/process*.pid`
rm /tmp/process*.pid
You should make your process into a daemon, that way you can start, end and restart it without complications.
You can start here: Best way to make a shell script daemon?
+1 on Raydel's answer
Another alternative (since there are so many ways to do things) If you have root you can also create it as a service and then start it and stop it manually using the "service" commands.
(Sorry wanted to add as a comment to Raydel's but my rep is not high enough apparently so adding as a separate answer)
I have a bash script that does some parallel processing in a loop. I don't want the parallel process to spike the CPU, so I use a sleep command. Here's a simplified version.
(while true;do sleep 99999;done)&
So I execute the above line from a bash prompt and get something like:
[1] 12345
Where [1] is the job number and 12345 is the process ID (pid) of the while loop. I do a kill 12345 and get:
[1]+ Terminated ( while true; do
sleep 99999;
done )
It looks like the entire script was terminated. However, I do a ps aux|grep sleep and find the sleep command is still going strong but with its own pid! I can kill the sleep and everything seems fine. However, if I were to kill the sleep first, the while loop starts a new sleep pid. This is such a surprise to me since the sleep is not parallel to the while loop. The loop itself is a single path of execution.
So I have two questions:
Why did the sleep command get its own process ID?
How do I easily kill the while loop and the sleep?
Sleep gets its own PID because it is a process running and just waiting. Try which sleep to see where it is.
You can use ps -uf to see the process tree on your system. From there you can determine what the PPID (parent PID) of the shell (the one running the loop) of the sleep is.
Because "sleep" is a process, not a build-in function or similar
You could do the following:
(while true;do sleep 99999;done)&
whilepid=$!
kill -- -$whilepid
The above code kills the process group, because the PID is specified as a negative number (e.g. -123 instead of 123). In addition, it uses the variable $!, which stores the PID of the most recently executed process.
Note:
When you execute any process in background on interactive mode (i.e. using the command line prompt) it creates a new process group, which is what is happening to you. That way, it's relatively easy to "kill 'em all", because you just have to kill the whole process group. However, when the same is done within a script, it doesn't create any new group, because all new processes belong to the script PID, even if they are executed in background (jobs control is disabled by default). To enable jobs control in a script, you just have to put the following at the beginning of the script:
#!/bin/bash
set -m
Have you tried doing kill %1, where 1 is the number you get after launching the command in background?
I did it right now after launching (while true;do sleep 99999;done)& and it correctly terminated it.
"ps --ppid" selects all processes with the specified parent pid, eg:
$ (while true;do sleep 99999;done)&
[1] 12345
$ ppid=12345 ; kill -9 $ppid $(ps --ppid $ppid -o pid --no-heading)
You can kill the process group.
To find the process group of your process run:
ps --no-headers -o "%r" -p 15864
Then kill the process group using:
kill -- -[PGID]
You can do it all in one command. Let's try it out:
$ (while true;do sleep 99999;done)&
[1] 16151
$ kill -- -$(ps --no-headers -o "%r" -p 16151)
[1]+ Terminated ( while true; do
sleep 99999;
done )
To kill the while loop and the sleep using $! you can also use a trap signal handler inside the subshell.
(trap 'kill ${!}; exit' TERM; while true; do sleep 99999 & wait ${!}; done)&
kill -TERM ${!}
In Linux I would like to run a program but only for a limited time, like 1 second. If the program exceeds this running time I would like to kill the process and show an error message.
Ah well. timeout(1).
DESCRIPTION
Start COMMAND, and kill it if still running after DURATION.
StackOverflow won't allow me to delete my answer since it's the accepted one. It's garnering down-votes since it's at the top of the list with a better solution below it. If you're on a GNU system, please use timeout instead as suggested by #wRAR. So in the hopes that you'll stop down-voting, here's how it works:
timeout 1s ./myProgram
You can use s, m, h or d for seconds (the default if omitted), minutes, hours or days. A nifty feature here is that you may specify another option -k 30s (before the 1s above) in order to kill it with a SIGKILL after another 30 seconds, should it not respond to the original SIGTERM.
A very useful tool. Now scroll down and up-vote #wRAR's answer.
For posterity, this was my original - inferior - suggestion, it might still be if some use for someone.
A simple bash-script should be able to do that for you
./myProgram &
sleep 1
kill $! 2>/dev/null && echo "myProgram didn't finish"
That ought to do it.
$! expands to the last backgrounded process (through the use of &), and kill returns false if it didn't kill any process, so the echo is only executed if it actually killed something.
2>/dev/null redirects kill's stderr, otherwise it would print something telling you it was unable to kill the process.
You might want to add a -KILL or whichever signal you want to use to get rid of your process too.
EDIT
As ephemient pointed out, there's a race here if your program finishes and the some other process snatches the pid, it'll get killed instead. To reduce the probability of it happening, you could react to the SIGCHLD and not try to kill it if that happens. There's still chance to kill the wrong process, but it's very remote.
trapped=""
trap 'trapped=yes' SIGCHLD
./myProgram &
sleep 1
[ -z "$trapped" ] && kill $! 2>/dev/null && echo '...'
Maybe CPU time limit (ulimit -t/setrlimit(RLIMIT_CPU)) will help?
you could launch it in a shell script using &
your_program &
pid=$!
sleep 1
if [ `pgrep $pid` ]
then
kill $pid
echo "killed $pid because it took too long."
fi
hope you get the idea, I'm not sure this is correct my shell skills need some refresh :)
tail -f file & pid=$!
sleep 10
kill $pid 2>/dev/null && echo '...'
If you have the sources, you can fork() early in main() and then have the parent process measure the time and possibly kill the child process. Just use standard system calls fork(), waitpid(), kill(), ... maybe some standard Unix signal handling. Not too complicated but takes some effort.
You can also script something on the shell although I doubt it will be as accurate with respect to the time of 1 second.
If you just want to measure the time, type time <cmd ...> on the shell.
Ok, so just write a short C program that forks, calls execlp or something similar in the child, measures the time in the parent and kills the child. Should be easy ...