I try to split a part of my serverless.yml template, events node, into multiple sub-files. I have a fairly large lamba api gateway. The “events” node is growing very long, its becoming difficult to manage.
I CANT split a function or service, its important that reamin only one api service.
Its possible to divide only “events” node of serverless template into sub several files, for example for each event of my api service (sections, roles, etc), such as:
sections-events.sls.yml, roles-events.sls.yml, and so on?
Ive tried more solutions but none worked..
This is my original serverless.yml template.
This is one of the tests I've done using template variables but it doesn't work ..
Looking at the sls documentation, I thought it was possible to structure the template as follows:
functions:
graphql:
handler: src/index.handler
...
events:
${file(./sections-events.serverless.yml):events}
${file(./roles-events.serverless.yml):events}
but the template validator returns an error as the events node must be an array and this syntax is not possible.
TEST 1:
TEST 2:
I hope someone can help me find a possible path, even though im convinced that isn't feasible!
Thanks a lot to the whole community!
Good Job.
Related
Creating new project with auto-testing feature.
It uses basic express.
The question is how to orginize the code in order to be able to test it properly. (with mocha)
Almost every controller needs to have access to the database in order to fetch some data to proceed. But while testing - reaching the actual database is unwanted.
There are two ways as I see:
Stubbing a function, which intends to read/write from/to database.
Building two separate controller builders, one of each will be used to reach it from the endpoints, another one from tests.
just like that:
let myController = new TargetController(AuthService, DatabaseService...);
myController.targetMethod()
let myTestController = new TargetController(FakeAuthService, FakeDatabaseService...);
myTestController.targetMethod() // This method will use fake services which doesnt have any remote connection functionality
Every property passed will be set to a private variable inside the constructor of the controller. And by aiming to this private variable we could not care about what type of call it is. Test or Production one.
Is that a good approach of should it be remade?
Alright, It's considered to be a good practice as it is actually a dependency injection pattern
I am thinking of using AsyncAPI in my project for documenting the RabbitMQ messaging system.
What I need to do is, rather than creating a single yaml/json file for all the messages in the application, I want to create the AsyncAPI definition for each message in its own file, very much like its done in Swagger.
I am using Swagger 2.0, on a node express server for the REST API definitions. For the definition of the APIs, I write comments on each API with the #swagger decorator for Swagger to pick up the documentation. For example:
/**
* #swagger
* /user/register:
* post:
* description: Register a new user
...
...
*/
I also have a common definition in a routes.js file, where I define all the reusables.
Such definitions sit on the top of each API end point file. Swagger, collects all these documentations distributed over various files, and creates a single documentation for all the APIs in the application.
I was wondering if something similar can be done in AsyncAPI and if yes, how do I achieve that.
Would really appreciate your response on this.
Thanks,
Rachit
What I need to do is, rather than creating a single yaml/json file for all the messages in the application, I want to create the AsyncAPI definition for each message in its own file, very much like its done in Swagger.
Split definition of schema objects across several files is possible in AsyncAPI exactly in the same way like in OpenAPI
I am using Swagger 2.0, on a node express server for the REST API definitions. For the definition of the APIs, I write comments on each API with the #swagger decorator for Swagger to pick up the documentation. For example:
Up to now there is no code-first tool to generate AsyncAPI from the JS source code
I have Clarion 9 app that I want to be able to communicate with HTTP servers. I come from PHP background. I have 0 idea on what to do.
What I wish to be able to do:
Parse JSON data and convert QUEUE data to JSON [Done]
Have a global variable like 'baseURL' that points to e.g. http://localhost.com [Done]
Call functions such apiConnection.get('/users') would return me the contents of the page. [I'm stuck here]
apiConnection.post('/users', myQueueData) would POST myQueueData contents.
I tried using winhttp.dll by reading it from LibMaker but it didn't read it. Instead, I'm now using wininet.dll which LibMaker successfully created a .lib file for it.
I'm currently using the PROTOTYPE procedures from this code on GitHub https://gist.github.com/ddur/34033ed1392cdce1253c
What I did was include them like:
SimpleApi.clw
PROGRAM
INCLUDE('winInet.equ')
ApiLog QUEUE, PRE(log)
LogTitle STRING(10)
LogMessage STRING(50)
END
MAP
INCLUDE('winInetMap.clw')
END
INCLUDE('equates.clw'),ONCE
INCLUDE('DreamyConnection.inc'),ONCE
ApiConnection DreamyConnection
CODE
IF DreamyConnection.initiateConnection('http://localhost')
ELSE
log:LogTitle = 'Info'
log:LogMessage = 'Failed'
ADD(apiLog)
END
But the buffer that winInet's that uses always returns 0.
I have created a GitHub repository https://github.com/spacemudd/clarion-api with all the code to look at.
I'm really lost in this because I can't find proper documentation of Clarion.
I do not want a paid solution.
It kind of depends which version of Clarion you have.
Starting around v9 they added ClaRunExt which provides this kind of functionality via .NET Interop.
From the help:
Use HTTP or HTTPS to download web pages, or any other type of file. You can also post form data to web servers. Very easy way to send HTTP web requests (and receive responses) to Web Servers, REST Web Services, or standard Web Services, with the most commonly used HTTP verbs; POST, GET, PUT, and DELETE.
Otherwise, search the LibSrc\ directory for "http" and you will get an idea of what is already there. abapi.inc for example, appears to provide a wrapper around wininet.lib.
The project I'm working on uses the feathers JS framework server side. Many of the services have hooks (or middleware) that make other calls and attach data before sending back to the client. If I have a new feature that needs to query a database but for a only few specific things I'm thinking I don't want to use the already built out "find" method for this database query as that "find" method has many other unneeded hooks and calls to other databases to get data I do not need for this new query on my feature.
My two solutions so far:
I could use the standard "find" query and just write if statements in all hooks that check for a specific string parameter that can be passed in on client side so these hooks are deactivated on this specific call but that seems tedious especially if I find this need for several other different services that have already been built out.
I initialize a second service below my main service so if my main service is:
app.use('/comments', new JHService(options));
right underneath I write:
app.use('/comments/allParticipants', new JHService(options));
And then attach a whole new set of hooks for that service. Basically it's a whole new service with the only relation to the origin in that the first part of it's name is 'comments' Since I'm new to feathers I'm not sure if that is a performant or optimal solution.
Is there a better solution then those options? or is option 1 or option 2 the most correct way to solve my current issue?
You can always wrap the population hooks into a conditional hook:
const hooks = require('feathers-hooks-common');
app.service('myservice').after({
create: hooks.iff(hook => hook.params.populate !== false, populateEntries)
});
Now population will only run if params.populate is not false.
I'm trying to programmatically create tasks/bugs on Maniphest: https://www.phacility.com/phabricator/maniphest/
but i can't quite seem to find a RESTful API that can do this.
am i totally missing out on something? or does there not currently exist one
Conduit (https://secure.phabricator.com/book/phabricator/article/conduit/) should work for you. There is a method called createtask (looks like https://secure.phabricator.com/conduit/method/maniphest.createtask/) that is exactly what you are looking for.
You can access phabricator's api, to create task ,query user info etc.
here is the demo for access https api by postman .
Note: for multi value field such as "ccPHIDs" , you should use format like the image.
but in conduit UI Test. you have to use json format, like this: ["PHID-PROJ-xxx3", "PHID-PROJ-xx12"]
phabricator's API is the wrost api set, I have used by now. so sick...