How can We correct "Invalid file name: 'con' error" in Android studio? - android-studio

I have spent time googling but without results. I get following error when creating projects with latest android studio:
Invalid file name: 'con'
New Module was only partially completed.
Your project may not compile.
You may want to Undo to get back to the original state
I have also tried previous version of android studio, but without any result.
What could be the cause of this issue and how can I correct it? I am on Windows 10.
Thank you
I Feel silly now because it was because of con word in package name. The accepted answer helped.

A module name is automatically used as directory name.
As you are on Windows the file-system has several file- and folder-names that are disallowed. con is one such disallowed names (case insensitive).
This means no matter what file-system you use as long as you are running Android Studio on Windows you will never ab able to create a file or a folder named con.
Other disallowed file names are:
CON, PRN, AUX, NUL, COM1, COM2, COM3, COM4, COM5, COM6, COM7, COM8, COM9, LPT1, LPT2, LPT3, LPT4, LPT5, LPT6, LPT7, LPT8, and LPT9. source
Therefore you have two possibilities: Use a different name for the module or use a different OS.

Related

Android Studio 2.3.2 Gradle Error

I am new to Android Studio, and everything was going fine until I received a nonsense error:
"Error:Execution failed for task ':app:processDebugResources'. > Duplicate symbol in table with resource type 'id' and symbol name 'title_conctact'"
I have no idea what it means and I have tried to fix it for two days. I tried uninstalling Android Studio which deleted all my progress, but still, the error remained. Please help, this is annoying. By the way, I am using the latest version 2.3.2.
hi after finding so much on web i don't get any solution so i tried myself to debug it and i got success to fix this issue you need to find the name in files in your case the name is title_conctact so you will get duplicate id's, now you need to rename and make them unique
that's it your problem will be fixed
I had the same issue. The issue I had was due to the keys declared differently in one of my module's resource file and my app's resource file.
In the module's strings.xml file, if you declare the key as 'title.conctact' and in the app's strings.xml file if you declare it as 'title_conctact', then you will face this error.
Changing it to a single format resolved my issue.
Double-clicking SHIFT will open a window. Put the title_conctact inside the search and you will find the .xml file that contains the duplicate id

VS2012 & 2013: Can't publish Services project - specified path is too long

I have a VS2012 solution, containing 10 projects, and suddenly, I can no longer publish my Services project to any folder.
When I try to publish to D:\temp, I get this error:
The expression "[System.IO.Path]::GetFullPath(obj\Release%25252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252528Prod%25252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252529\)" cannot be evaluated. The specified path, file name, or both are too long. The fully qualified file name must be less than 260 characters, and the directory name must be less than 248 characters. C:\Program Files (x86)\MSBuild\Microsoft\VisualStudio\v11.0\Web\Microsoft.Web.Publishing.targets
Huh ?
VS2012 (with update 4) seems to have taken my configuration name "Release(Prod)" and completely messed it up, causing the GetFullPath to produce too long a path name.
How the heck can I fix this ?
Out of desperation, I tried to build and publish the same project in VS2013 - and it had the same error message.
One of my colleagues said he'd seen the same thing, but had fixed it by removing the spaces from his configuration name. I tried this, which is why my configuration name is now "Release(Prod)" rather than "Release (Prod)", but it made no difference.
I did also open the file which this error is suggesting is the cause of the error:
C:\Program Files (x86)\MSBuild\Microsoft\VisualStudio\v11.0\Web\Microsoft.Web.Publishing.targets
..and noticed that there's something in there concerning the AnyCPU platform name. I have tried getting my Services project to use "AnyCPU" and "Any CPU" (depressed sigh) but neither seems to make any difference.
<PropertyGroup Condition=" '$(IntermediateOutputPath)' == '' ">
<IntermediateOutputPath Condition=" '$(PlatformName)' == 'AnyCPU' Or '$(PlatformName)' == ''">$(BaseIntermediateOutputPath)$(Configuration)\</IntermediateOutputPath>
. . .
</PropertyGroup>
Has anyone else seen this issue ?
(A little bit later..)
This is so odd (and frustrating).
My Solution has 5 configurations - the default Debug and Release ones, plus extra configurations for Test, PreProduction and Production environments.
If I select any of these three configurations containing brackets, I get this ridiculous "The specified path is too long" error, as VS2012 corrupts the pathname (as shown in my first screenshot above).
I can't help wondering... is this some kind of VS2012 bug, handling spaces or brackets in the configuration name ?
I can deploy to a path directly with (, (, )) in the Target Location on tyhe Connection tab when publishing to the file system (i.e. not building a path from the configuration name) - but that is not a solution to targeting different locations based on the Configuration.
If you want to keep special characters in the configuration name, but specify a path to the deployment folder that will not cause and issue this post might help: Visual Studio: How to properly build and specify the configurations and platforms for x64 and x86
Specifically play with the settings in here:
In the project properties page, select the various permutations of
Debug/Release and x86/x64 in the solution dropdowns. Make sure the
target processor is set correctly (it should be, but I found instances
when they were not, probably because of my previous attempts). Also,
set the output directory. That should be okay and automatic
(/bin/x86/Debug, etc.). If not, fix.
Looking at what is actually seems to be going on is also potentially useful:
Looking at the numbers inserted:
%25 is an encoded %,
%28 is an encoded (
%29 is an encoded )
Looking at the path:
obj\Release%252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525***28***Prod%252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525***29***)
What I think is happening:
So that seems like a good clue that these are being URL or XML encoded. What appears to be happening is that the ( is being encoded as %28 and then the % is being recursively encoded as %25 - generating an infinite %252525252525252525....
A more interesting question is actually why it stops creating 25's from the %'s with this bug (both times it stops creating 25's at 214 characters including the % and the 28 / 29 - not a very interesting number).
Looking at the file C:\Program Files (x86)\MSBuild\Microsoft\VisualStudio\v11.0\Web\Microsoft.Web.Publishing.targets you reference - it makes sense that these strings are being encoded for XML. I would say this is definitely a bug... I have no suggestions for a fix.
Well, I'm going to accept Matthew's answer as the "Accepted Answer".
Thank you for your help.
This is a really odd problem though, and I'm amazed no one else has reported this elsewhere.
Summary of problem (in case Microsoft is interested, or if anyone tries to Google this issue in the coming years)
With a configuration name of "Release (Prod)", I could happily build my code, run it locally, but when I tried to publish it, even to a local drive, I'd get this message:
It's an odd exception, because the Build did create the "obj\Release (Prod)" folder, without any issues. It's just the Publish which seemed to be looking in the wrong place for it.
Following the advice given in this thread, today I attempted to create a new configuration, with the same settings, but without a space in the name: "Release(SecondProd)". Look what happens:
Interestingly, despite this error, it did create a new configuration with this name.
Anyway, I recreated a new configuration, called it ReleaseProduction, and it worked fine.
Of course, I needed to create new "web.config" Transformation for this name, as this doesn't get automatically copied when you create a new configuration based on an old one.
One last thought (just to confuse matters worse !)
When I posted this plea-for-help, the Services project in my Solution refused to publish to a local drive, but my web site would publish okay.
Today, two days since I last attempted a website Publish, I found that the website also now produces the same GetFullPath exception. Nothing's changed ! We use TFS, I have done a file compare with my project files today against two days ago, and they're identical !
It's a really bizarre bug in VS2012 & VS2013.
Btw, this solution & the projects in it, were originally a VS2010 project. They were upgraded to VS2012 over a year ago, but this Publish problem only started happening recently. I'm not sure if the problem is related to using upgraded VS projects.
Again, thanks for your help.
Now I have some Test, PreProd & Production configurations to recreate !
Maybe I'll grab a beer first..
Summarizing and completing Matthew's answer:
Cause: You have configurations with chars that require URI-encoding - in your case, '(' and ')'.
Workaround: Rename those configs.
What happens: Presumably web deploy URI-encodes the path, replacing % => %25, ( => %28, ) => %29. It does so over and over:
obj\Release(Prod)
obj\Release%28Prod%29
obj\Release%2528Prod%2529
obj\Release%252528Prod%252529
...
Until the path exceeds MAX_PATH=260.
I ran into the same thing and all though it does not resolve the issue I found that if I switch the solution configuration away from a build containing "(" or ")"
Then use the appropriate build in the publish dialog it will not error out.

An unhandled exception of type 'System.IO.IOException' occurred in PresentationFramework.dll

Application is unable to load ANY xaml. Nor create empty window "var abc = new Window1();"
Error message is still the same:
An exception of type 'System.IO.IOException' occurred in PresentationFramework.dll but was not handled in user code
Additional information: Cannot locate resource 'wvmlog.xaml'. (for wvmlog.xaml)
Exception occur on InitializeComponent();
These objects are created without error on another PC - so problem is not in Project settings.
Do not help:
reinstall VS
new install of VS
reinstal .net frameworks
undo source from TFS
complete new workspace and load from TFS
visual studio Clean colution
find and delete all cached dll, pbd
remove all obj directories in solution
install and use VS 2010, VS 2012, VS 2013
move VS and solution into another hard drive
Do Help:
Copy of project (help for 1-2 days, then problem appear again without any manipulation with xaml)
Change solution configuration from 'Debug' to 'Release' (help for 1-2 days, then problem appear in Release configuration without any manipulation with xaml)
Problem is at one PC with Win 7, 64-bit.
The problem occur suddenly after some xaml window renaming, but these changes was many times undo-ed, but problem remain.
Maybe some OS damage, or some wpf/.net caches?
Why wpf/.net show such error on project which is compiled without error - so compiler KNOW that these resources does exist?
Any help is appreciated.
I had this very same issue.
What design pattern are you using?
The issue I had was when I changed the output window ie created a new one and deleted the old one.
I am using MVVM so I created the window in the View folder.
If this is your issue, your APP.XAML will look like:
<Application x:Class="dotDiff2013.App"
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
StartupUri="MainWindow.xaml">
<Application.Resources>
</Application.Resources>
</Application>
You then change the startURI to wherever your new window is stored. ie in the view folder.
StartupUri="Main/MainWindow.xaml"
This helped for me. Hope it's the solver to your problem.

publishing MVC 4 app exception.., The specified path, file name, or both are too long

I am attempting to publish a website, using the file system method. I used this method with visual studio 2010 and I didn't run into to many problems. But I recieved the above error when trying in visual studio 2012. The full error is bellow...
Error : Copying file Service References\ACOServiceReference\FocusedReadMissionsRedux.ACOServiceReference.searchPatientbyDemographicsResponse.datasource to obj\Release\Package\PackageTmp\Service References\ACOServiceReference\FocusedReadMissionsRedux.ACOServiceReference.searchPatientbyDemographicsResponse.datasource failed. The specified path, file name, or both are too long. The fully qualified file name must be less than 260 characters, and the directory name must be less than 248 characters.
What am I missing or doing wrong? Obviously a file path is too long, but is there a way I can create like path variables or something to shorten the path names? How can I set that up?
No you can't shorten it as Windows will use the fully qualified name (C:\aaa\aaa...).
Two solutions:
Shorten your namespace (FocusedReadMissionsRedux.ACOServiceReference.searchPatientbyDemographicsResponse.datasource)
Change the location of your project (ie D:\Code\ProjectOne)
I was able to solve this problem on my project by navigating to the files under the service reference then under Reference.svcmap. Select each one of them and change the build action from Content to none. These files aren't usually needed for the app so they don't need to be published.

Build is producing a .momd in the bundle that is missing the .mom file

I have an app that has been running fine on the iPhone simulator for some time. Recently, I decided I wanted to re-use the data model and related classes in another project - so I dragged them from this project window to the other then told Xcode not to copy, just to make references. At first this didn't work so I jumped through a number of hoops to try to fix it (I may be asking more about that in another post). After all this, I re-compiled and tried to run the original app -- and it's not working any more. On further investigation, I discovered that when I re-compile the original app, I end up with a bundle that contains a .momd package but it contains only a Versioninfo.plist file - no .mom file, no .omo file like I'm expecting to see. I don't recall making any changes to the original app. I don't get any warnings. I just get an incomplete .momd package (and, not surprisingly, my app now crashes).
What's going on here?
BTW, the app now crashes with this message:
Terminating app due to uncaught exception 'NSInvalidArgumentException', reason: '* -[__NSArrayM insertObject:atIndex:]: object cannot be nil'
Which I get when executing this line of code:
self.productRegistry = [[UIManagedDocument alloc] initWithFileURL:self.productRegistryURL];
I figured this out by looking more closely at the file locations in the project directory using Finder. In the Xcode window, everything looks normal but in the actual project directory I found that the .datamodeld package had ended up at the top level of the project directory -- at the same level as the project package itself. Xcode apparently did not like this but unfortunately it did not complain -- it just created a partial build output. Once I moved the .datamodeld package into the same folder as the rest of the project's code, everything worked just fine.
This would appear to be just a quirk. I would expect that Xcode would either see that all is well and build correctly OR it would see that things weren't quite as they should be and fail. In this case, it did not build correctly but was silent about it.
Hope this answer helps someone else someday.

Resources