VS2012 & 2013: Can't publish Services project - specified path is too long - visual-studio-2012

I have a VS2012 solution, containing 10 projects, and suddenly, I can no longer publish my Services project to any folder.
When I try to publish to D:\temp, I get this error:
The expression "[System.IO.Path]::GetFullPath(obj\Release%25252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252528Prod%25252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252529\)" cannot be evaluated. The specified path, file name, or both are too long. The fully qualified file name must be less than 260 characters, and the directory name must be less than 248 characters. C:\Program Files (x86)\MSBuild\Microsoft\VisualStudio\v11.0\Web\Microsoft.Web.Publishing.targets
Huh ?
VS2012 (with update 4) seems to have taken my configuration name "Release(Prod)" and completely messed it up, causing the GetFullPath to produce too long a path name.
How the heck can I fix this ?
Out of desperation, I tried to build and publish the same project in VS2013 - and it had the same error message.
One of my colleagues said he'd seen the same thing, but had fixed it by removing the spaces from his configuration name. I tried this, which is why my configuration name is now "Release(Prod)" rather than "Release (Prod)", but it made no difference.
I did also open the file which this error is suggesting is the cause of the error:
C:\Program Files (x86)\MSBuild\Microsoft\VisualStudio\v11.0\Web\Microsoft.Web.Publishing.targets
..and noticed that there's something in there concerning the AnyCPU platform name. I have tried getting my Services project to use "AnyCPU" and "Any CPU" (depressed sigh) but neither seems to make any difference.
<PropertyGroup Condition=" '$(IntermediateOutputPath)' == '' ">
<IntermediateOutputPath Condition=" '$(PlatformName)' == 'AnyCPU' Or '$(PlatformName)' == ''">$(BaseIntermediateOutputPath)$(Configuration)\</IntermediateOutputPath>
. . .
</PropertyGroup>
Has anyone else seen this issue ?
(A little bit later..)
This is so odd (and frustrating).
My Solution has 5 configurations - the default Debug and Release ones, plus extra configurations for Test, PreProduction and Production environments.
If I select any of these three configurations containing brackets, I get this ridiculous "The specified path is too long" error, as VS2012 corrupts the pathname (as shown in my first screenshot above).
I can't help wondering... is this some kind of VS2012 bug, handling spaces or brackets in the configuration name ?

I can deploy to a path directly with (, (, )) in the Target Location on tyhe Connection tab when publishing to the file system (i.e. not building a path from the configuration name) - but that is not a solution to targeting different locations based on the Configuration.
If you want to keep special characters in the configuration name, but specify a path to the deployment folder that will not cause and issue this post might help: Visual Studio: How to properly build and specify the configurations and platforms for x64 and x86
Specifically play with the settings in here:
In the project properties page, select the various permutations of
Debug/Release and x86/x64 in the solution dropdowns. Make sure the
target processor is set correctly (it should be, but I found instances
when they were not, probably because of my previous attempts). Also,
set the output directory. That should be okay and automatic
(/bin/x86/Debug, etc.). If not, fix.
Looking at what is actually seems to be going on is also potentially useful:
Looking at the numbers inserted:
%25 is an encoded %,
%28 is an encoded (
%29 is an encoded )
Looking at the path:
obj\Release%252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525***28***Prod%252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525252525***29***)
What I think is happening:
So that seems like a good clue that these are being URL or XML encoded. What appears to be happening is that the ( is being encoded as %28 and then the % is being recursively encoded as %25 - generating an infinite %252525252525252525....
A more interesting question is actually why it stops creating 25's from the %'s with this bug (both times it stops creating 25's at 214 characters including the % and the 28 / 29 - not a very interesting number).
Looking at the file C:\Program Files (x86)\MSBuild\Microsoft\VisualStudio\v11.0\Web\Microsoft.Web.Publishing.targets you reference - it makes sense that these strings are being encoded for XML. I would say this is definitely a bug... I have no suggestions for a fix.

Well, I'm going to accept Matthew's answer as the "Accepted Answer".
Thank you for your help.
This is a really odd problem though, and I'm amazed no one else has reported this elsewhere.
Summary of problem (in case Microsoft is interested, or if anyone tries to Google this issue in the coming years)
With a configuration name of "Release (Prod)", I could happily build my code, run it locally, but when I tried to publish it, even to a local drive, I'd get this message:
It's an odd exception, because the Build did create the "obj\Release (Prod)" folder, without any issues. It's just the Publish which seemed to be looking in the wrong place for it.
Following the advice given in this thread, today I attempted to create a new configuration, with the same settings, but without a space in the name: "Release(SecondProd)". Look what happens:
Interestingly, despite this error, it did create a new configuration with this name.
Anyway, I recreated a new configuration, called it ReleaseProduction, and it worked fine.
Of course, I needed to create new "web.config" Transformation for this name, as this doesn't get automatically copied when you create a new configuration based on an old one.
One last thought (just to confuse matters worse !)
When I posted this plea-for-help, the Services project in my Solution refused to publish to a local drive, but my web site would publish okay.
Today, two days since I last attempted a website Publish, I found that the website also now produces the same GetFullPath exception. Nothing's changed ! We use TFS, I have done a file compare with my project files today against two days ago, and they're identical !
It's a really bizarre bug in VS2012 & VS2013.
Btw, this solution & the projects in it, were originally a VS2010 project. They were upgraded to VS2012 over a year ago, but this Publish problem only started happening recently. I'm not sure if the problem is related to using upgraded VS projects.
Again, thanks for your help.
Now I have some Test, PreProd & Production configurations to recreate !
Maybe I'll grab a beer first..

Summarizing and completing Matthew's answer:
Cause: You have configurations with chars that require URI-encoding - in your case, '(' and ')'.
Workaround: Rename those configs.
What happens: Presumably web deploy URI-encodes the path, replacing % => %25, ( => %28, ) => %29. It does so over and over:
obj\Release(Prod)
obj\Release%28Prod%29
obj\Release%2528Prod%2529
obj\Release%252528Prod%252529
...
Until the path exceeds MAX_PATH=260.

I ran into the same thing and all though it does not resolve the issue I found that if I switch the solution configuration away from a build containing "(" or ")"
Then use the appropriate build in the publish dialog it will not error out.

Related

How can We correct "Invalid file name: 'con' error" in Android studio?

I have spent time googling but without results. I get following error when creating projects with latest android studio:
Invalid file name: 'con'
New Module was only partially completed.
Your project may not compile.
You may want to Undo to get back to the original state
I have also tried previous version of android studio, but without any result.
What could be the cause of this issue and how can I correct it? I am on Windows 10.
Thank you
I Feel silly now because it was because of con word in package name. The accepted answer helped.
A module name is automatically used as directory name.
As you are on Windows the file-system has several file- and folder-names that are disallowed. con is one such disallowed names (case insensitive).
This means no matter what file-system you use as long as you are running Android Studio on Windows you will never ab able to create a file or a folder named con.
Other disallowed file names are:
CON, PRN, AUX, NUL, COM1, COM2, COM3, COM4, COM5, COM6, COM7, COM8, COM9, LPT1, LPT2, LPT3, LPT4, LPT5, LPT6, LPT7, LPT8, and LPT9. source
Therefore you have two possibilities: Use a different name for the module or use a different OS.

Typo3 linux server error: Could not load layout file

After I uploaded my Typo3-Website onto a linux server and tryed to call the homepage, I get the error: "Could not load layout file. Tried following paths: "/Main.html", "/Main" "
I checked the correct spelling (uppercase) of my layout file: It seems to be correct and in the right place. Any ideas?
Thanks a lot. I have checked the file paths and noticed I had to delete the two slashes after the equal signs.
This works on a windows platform:
partialRootPath = /fileadmin/Private/Partials/
layoutRootPath = /fileadmin/Private/Layouts
But on a linux server it has to look this way:
partialRootPath = fileadmin/Private/Partials/
layoutRootPath = fileadmin/Private/Layouts
You seem to be using TYPO3 before 7 and the StandaloneView. In this case, identify in your code where you use this view and check the calls to setTemplatePathAndFilename or the templateRootPath. You are probably having an issue with the root path being set to something that does not exist.
This might be a situation of incompatible cAsiNg of the directory name. This is especially possible if you are testing locally on MacOS (case insensitive) and then uploading to Linux (case sensitive).
If this does not help, please provide us with more information about your scenario (code, settings, environment where it works, etc).

Microsoft.VisualStudio.SharePoint.targets(418,7): error MSB4131: The "IsDebugging" parameter is not supported

I'm using Visual Studio 2012 to build a empty SharePoint 2013 project (added a test list). However when I try to deploy the project I receive the following:
C:\Program Files (x86)\MSBuild\Microsoft\VisualStudio\v11.0\SharePointTools\Microsoft.VisualStudio.SharePoint.targets(418,7): error MSB4131: The "IsDebugging" parameter is not supported by the "SetPackagingProperties" task. Verify the parameter exists on the task, and it is a gettable public instance property.
I've tried commenting out various lines but it just leads to more problems. Furthermore it then does not package the solution.
The setPackagingProperties task, as documented here http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/microsoft.visualstudio.sharepoint.tasks.setpackagingproperties.aspx, indeed does not include a IsDebugging property. Therefore is the file C:\Program Files (x86)\MSBuild\Microsoft\VisualStudio\v11.0\SharePointTools\Microsoft.VisualStudio.SharePoint.targets incorrect? I'm using SharePoint Found Server 2013.
Thanks for any help - this one is doing my head in!
Turns out that the solution was simple: a conflict of DLLs.
To anyone else with the same problem:
C:\Program Files (x86)\MSBuild\Microsoft\VisualStudio\v11.0\SharePointTools\Microsoft.VisualStudio.SharePoint.Tasks.dll DOES contain the IsDebugging property (undocumented!). My problem was that I had VS 2010 installed with the SP developer tools. This meant that VS 2012 was referencing the incorrect DLL version of Microsoft.VisualStudio.Sharepoint.Tasks.dll. My solution was simple to therefore search the entire system for this DLL and delete all copies apart from the one referenced in the path above.
Pareto's ratio: 80% of time wasted is attributable to just 20% of problems encountered, like this one!!!

Modifying project with multiple solutions files and multiple project files referencing each other

I have a project structure like -
proj_Main
proj_A(directory)
somefile.cs(etc.)
proj_A.csproj
proj_B(dir)
somefile.cs
proj_B.csproj
proj_C(dir)
somefile.cs
proj_C.csproj
proj_D(dir)
somefile.cs
proj_D.csproj
proj_Main(dir)
other dirs etc.
some.cs files
proj_Main.csproj
proj_Main.csproj.user
proj_Main2010.csproj
proj_Main2010.csproj.user
proj_Main2010.v11.suo
proj_A.sln
proj_B.sln
proj_C.sln
proj_D.sln
proj_Main.sln
proj_Main2010.sln
(There are actually more than 10 solutions inside it, to keep it simple, I have depicted 4 above.)
While opening it in VS 2012 I have opened proj_Main2010.sln and it shows other linked projects with it, opens them inside the solution. This proj_Main refers the dll of other projects from those other projects. So far fine.
Now I have to modify the code from all project files, but if I do that, the previously referenced classes and code stops working, and throws errors of all sort -
Error 2 The type or namespace name 'XXXX' could not be found (are you missing a using directive or an assembly reference?)
I am not sure, If this is the correct way to depict the scenario, my apologies for that.
My problem is, I am not sure If I am opening the right file to work on this solution or if I am trying to modify the files safely.
Any suggestions would be appreciated.
p.s. I also have a setup project in it ( but I guess its related to deploying an application not useful while developing /redeveloping it)

Build is producing a .momd in the bundle that is missing the .mom file

I have an app that has been running fine on the iPhone simulator for some time. Recently, I decided I wanted to re-use the data model and related classes in another project - so I dragged them from this project window to the other then told Xcode not to copy, just to make references. At first this didn't work so I jumped through a number of hoops to try to fix it (I may be asking more about that in another post). After all this, I re-compiled and tried to run the original app -- and it's not working any more. On further investigation, I discovered that when I re-compile the original app, I end up with a bundle that contains a .momd package but it contains only a Versioninfo.plist file - no .mom file, no .omo file like I'm expecting to see. I don't recall making any changes to the original app. I don't get any warnings. I just get an incomplete .momd package (and, not surprisingly, my app now crashes).
What's going on here?
BTW, the app now crashes with this message:
Terminating app due to uncaught exception 'NSInvalidArgumentException', reason: '* -[__NSArrayM insertObject:atIndex:]: object cannot be nil'
Which I get when executing this line of code:
self.productRegistry = [[UIManagedDocument alloc] initWithFileURL:self.productRegistryURL];
I figured this out by looking more closely at the file locations in the project directory using Finder. In the Xcode window, everything looks normal but in the actual project directory I found that the .datamodeld package had ended up at the top level of the project directory -- at the same level as the project package itself. Xcode apparently did not like this but unfortunately it did not complain -- it just created a partial build output. Once I moved the .datamodeld package into the same folder as the rest of the project's code, everything worked just fine.
This would appear to be just a quirk. I would expect that Xcode would either see that all is well and build correctly OR it would see that things weren't quite as they should be and fail. In this case, it did not build correctly but was silent about it.
Hope this answer helps someone else someday.

Resources