I have some Mathematical expressions to which I would like to add some classes within its subelements. For example,
\sqrt[3]{x}
would be similar to
\sqrt[<span class="xyz">3</span>]{x}
However, this would make the LaTeX invalid. Is there any way to embed HTML inside LaTeX expressions like this?
I am using KaTeX https://katex.org/docs/supported.html if that matters.
Thanks.
To style certain block you can use this command:
\style{background-color:yellow}{\frac{x+1}{y+2}}
Rendering the cubic root of x in KaTeX works both in display mode and inline mode:
<link rel="stylesheet" href="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/katex#0.11.1/dist/katex.min.css"
integrity="sha384-zB1R0rpPzHqg7Kpt0Aljp8JPLqbXI3bhnPWROx27a9N0Ll6ZP/+DiW/UqRcLbRjq" crossorigin="anonymous">
<script defer src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/katex#0.11.1/dist/katex.min.js"
integrity="sha384-y23I5Q6l+B6vatafAwxRu/0oK/79VlbSz7Q9aiSZUvyWYIYsd+qj+o24G5ZU2zJz" crossorigin="anonymous"></script>
<script defer src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/katex#0.11.1/dist/contrib/auto-render.min.js"
integrity="sha384-kWPLUVMOks5AQFrykwIup5lo0m3iMkkHrD0uJ4H5cjeGihAutqP0yW0J6dpFiVkI" crossorigin="anonymous"
onload="renderMathInElement(document.body);"></script>
<!-- -->
\[
\sqrt[3]{x}
\]
<p>Text \(\sqrt[3]{x}\) text.</p>
<p>Text ³√x text.</p>
Otherwise, to make it inline, you can use html entities as in the last line of my code above.
Please comment If I misunderstood your doubt or if you need further setting or explaination!
Related
I use Asciidoctor for our User Guide. A requirement is that there is no access to the internet for the users.
I use prettify:
:source-highlighter: prettify
This creates in the HTML:
<link rel="stylesheet" href="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/prettify/r298/prettify.min.css">
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/prettify/r298/prettify.min.js"></script>
<script>prettyPrint()</script>
What I need is something, like
<link rel="stylesheet" href="assets/css/prettify.min.css">
<script src="assets/js/prettify.min.js"></script>
<script>prettyPrint()</script>
Is there a way to achieve this?
After looking at the source you can specify
:prettifydir: assets
to receive an HTML output of
<link rel="stylesheet" href="assets/prettify.min.css">
<script src="assets/run_prettify.min.js"></script>
To make it work for your users, you'll need to put the referenced files at the location yourself; Asciidoctor won't do that for you AFAIK.
Use asciidoctor-rouge or asciidoctor-highlight.js.
I use JSF 2.3 for developing web application.
As a web developer, I care about the performance of loading speed of a site.
As I was exploring on how I could make my site faster, I encountered this post on Stack Overflow. And the quote from the accepted and most up-voted answer said
stylesheets should always be specified in the head of a document for better performance, it's important, where possible, that any external JS files that must be included in the head (such as those that write to the document) follow the stylesheets, to prevent delays in download time.
I know that JavaScript performs better when it is placed at the bottom of the <body>, but I want to include reCAPTCHA and Google instructs us to place the required external JavaScript before the closing </head> tag.
So, I decided to include the required external JavaScript before the closing </head> tag and after CSS files to boost the performance.
However, my CSS files are declared in a JSF way like <h:outputStylesheet name="css/default.css"/>, and I realized that the CSS files declared this way are always placed after files that are declared in a non-JSF way, which is <script src="https://www.google.com/recaptcha/api.js"></script>. I also considered making the external JavaScript behave in a JSF way by changing <script> to <h:outputScript>, but the <h:outputScript> can only render local scripts as described in this post .
So, the result will always be as follows.
<head>
<script src="https://www.google.com/recaptcha/api.js"></script>
<link type="text/css" rel="stylesheet" href="/project/javax.faces.resource/css/default.css.xhtml" />
</head>
insted of
<head>
<link type="text/css" rel="stylesheet" href="/project/javax.faces.resource/css/default.css.xhtml" />
<script src="https://www.google.com/recaptcha/api.js"></script>
</head>
Maybe I'm thinking too much, and the placement order of link and script doesn't affect the performance that much, but if the loading speed gets faster even a little, I want to follow the better way.
When my ejs file is linked to a semantic ui, the second .css link doesn't work. Is it possible to change html and body background color using semantic-ui?
I linked these two css files:
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="semantic.min.css">
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="homepage.css">
In homepage.css, when I type html {background-color:pink} this doesn't have any effect. What am I missing?
Not exactly what your asking for but could be a workaround.
If you were to edit site.variables which is usally located at: semantic/src/site/globals/site.variables
And add an entry #pageBackground: #5CDB95; and change the #5CDB95 to a colour of your choice, that will then be the default background colour of all pages where you include semantic ui.
After your entry dont forget to run gulp build-css
Hope this is of some help... Not sure why your css isnt overriding sematic ui, I know it sounds stupid but check you have included the <html> tags in your file.
I have the following template:
<!DOCTYPE HTML>
<html>
<head>
<link href="css/style.css" rel="stylesheet"/>
<script type="text/javascript" src="/js/libs-0001.js" async="async"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="/js/app-0004.js" async="async"></script>
<script>
var name = {literal}<%= name %>{/literal};
var version = {literal}<%= version %>{/literal}};
</script>
</head><body></body></html>
Like in smarty, from php, I want to use {literal} declarations in the template, under the script session.
How to do this in locomotivejs views?
As far as I understand {literal}/{/literal}, everything between those tags isn't interpreted. EJS templates don't have something similar, although there are ways of circumventing that.
One way is to configure EJS to use different open/close tags, described here.
Another way is to use a different templating engine altogether, which isn't too difficult since LocomotiveJS isn't hardcoded to using EJS templates. I like the Swig templating engine myself, which has the {% raw %} tag that seems to do the same as {literal}.
I am trying to create a modal window with hidden content using thickbox
It opens the window fine , not sure whys its not showing the content inside the id="hiddencontent".
i am following as suggested in the examples for inline http://jquery.com/demo/thickbox/#
-thanks
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" />
<title>Untitled Document</title>
<script type="text/javascript" src="jquery.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="thickbox.js"></script>
<link rel="stylesheet" href="thickbox.css" type="text/css" media="screen" />
</head>
<body>
Show Content
<div id="hiddenContent" style="display: none">inline content comes here</div>
</body>
</html>
It seems you don't have css file, you can copy thickbox css on http://jquery.com/demo/thickbox/#sectiona-3 to your page (or save as style.css file).
-- edit --
Yeh, sorry, didn't notice that css is already loaded :(
By the way, just found the solution, try to add p tag inside your hiddenContent div:
<div id="hiddenContent" style="display: none"><p>inline content comes here</p></div>
Hope helps ;)
This is a bug in thickbox. Here is how you can fix it:
Inside thickbox.js
on or about line 221 you should see this line of code:
$("#TB_ajaxContent").append($('#'+params['inlineId']).children());
change it to this:
$("#TB_ajaxContent").html($('#'+params['inlineId']).html())
and then, on or about line 223 you will see this line:
$('#'+params['inlineId']).append($("#TB_ajaxContent").children());
disable the line by adding two slashes before it like this:
//$('#'+params['inlineId']).append($("#TB_ajaxContent").children());
Explanation:
When thickbox copies the content from the hidden div into the thickbox container, it does so by copying all .children() elements. If you have only text inside your hidden div there ARE NO CHILDREN because text is not itself a child element. This is why wrapping your content in a <p> tag will work because now there is a child (the <p> tag).
So if you want to have text only in your hidden div using .html() instead will grab everything in your hidden div. The second line being disabled prevents thickbox from trying to copy the content back to the hidden div when the thickbox closes, which would cause any content within child tags to be duplicated in the hidden div.
There is no need to edit the .js file, the solution is quite simple.
Maybe a bit later :) but I overcomed the issue only changing the ? char in #TB_inline? by &
The issue is on the internal parseQuery tickbox function, that parses match pairs but it blows when the query have a double ? like in the case.
UPDATE: In some cases the <p> fix is also needed ;)
Hope it helps.
The function tb_position() needs to be updated.
this condition
if ( !(jQuery.browser.msie && jQuery.browser.version < 7))
is the reason for error.
jQuery does not support jQuery.browser anymore. For detecting IE6 in this case change the above condition to this
if ( !(/\bMSIE 6/.test(navigator.userAgent)))