We are using auth0 for user authentication & authorization, and configured custom DB with postgresDB.
Auth0 account is using node 16 as runtime engine for running custom DB scripts.
Loaded postgres template and modified with required changes.
When testing the script, it was giving error saying postgres.connection is not a function.
The same code works well for other account which have node 12 as runtime.
Any suggestions?
This is common issue when using old version of pg.
Latest pg version supported in Auth0 is 8.7.1
Ref: https://auth0-extensions.github.io/canirequire/#pg
So you can update the statement
require('pg')
to
require('pg#8.7.1')
Also please refere https://node-postgres.com/apis/client for correct way to use the Client from pg.
I'm trying to use the Graph SDK and NuGet 5.0.0-preview16 and forwarding the example it says to use Request method in example
var users = await graphClient.Users.Request().GetAsync();
but I have an error in the code:
'UsersRequestBuilder' does not contain a definition for 'Request' and
no accessible extension method 'Request' accepting a first argument of
type 'UsersRequestBuilder' could be found (are you missing a using
directive or an assembly reference?
Since C# SDK V5 Request method is removed and you can call directly GetAsync method. But V5 is still in preview and it's better to use latest V4 version.
var users = await graphClient.Users.GetAsync();
Upgrade guide can be found here.
Fixed: I changed Microsoft.Graph on NuGet from 5.0.0-preview16 to 4.47.0
I've been using NuxtJS (v2.15.8) with Nuxt Firebase (v7.6.1), running on NodeJS engine 12 (v12.21.0 to be exact) for the web application I've been developping incrementally for the past couple of years and my web app is now quite complex.
I am trying to upgrade NodeJS to the latest LTS version (v16.13.2) and encounter one major issue after switching version of NodeJS (using nvm) and changing the package.json of my five packages from node 12 to node 16 :
package.json :
"engines": {
"node": "16",
..
},
When running exactly the wame web application after these changes, it starts correctly but Firebase Rules seem to break, with this error FirebaseError: false for 'get' # L61, false for 'get' # L268.
It is a cryptic error, but from experience and from all I could find online, it happens when a call to Firestore that gets blocked by defined Firebase Security rules). In my case, it happens on a "onSnapshot" call to listen to the changes of the currently logged in user. Some other calls to Firestore (using "get" and not "onSnapshot") seem to work fine, and the Firebase Authentication works well too.
Here is the full error stack :
loggedInUser.js?384a:65 Error listening to user changes
FirebaseError: false for 'get' # L61, false for 'get' # L268
at new n (prebuilt-306f43d8-45d6f0b9.js?23bd:188:1)
at eval (prebuilt-306f43d8-45d6f0b9.js?23bd:10426:1)
at eval (prebuilt-306f43d8-45d6f0b9.js?23bd:10427:1)
at n.onMessage (prebuilt-306f43d8-45d6f0b9.js?23bd:10449:1)
at eval (prebuilt-306f43d8-45d6f0b9.js?23bd:10366:1)
at eval (prebuilt-306f43d8-45d6f0b9.js?23bd:10397:1)
at eval (prebuilt-306f43d8-45d6f0b9.js?23bd:15160:1)
at eval (prebuilt-306f43d8-45d6f0b9.js?23bd:15218:1)
The portion of code triggerring the error is :
listenUser({ commit }, userId) {
const userRef = this.$fire.firestore.collection('users').doc(userId);
userListener = userRef.onSnapshot(function(userDoc) {
if (userDoc.exists) {
const user = userConverter.fromFirestoreData(userDoc.data());
commit('SET_LOGGED_IN_USER', user);
}
},
function(error) {
console.error("Error listening to user changes", error);
});
},
As soon as I revert back to Node 12, the same call works fine and isn't blocked by the Firebase rules, so the error doesn't appear.
I therefore have several questions :
Does anyone understand what's happening there ? Is there known changes in the behavior of Firebase rules directly related to the NodeJS engine ?
Do you think this issue can come from Nuxt or its Nuxt Firebase module are not working correctly under NodeJS 16 ?
It is required to also upgrade NuxtJS to a newer version or should it be possible to simply update the Node Engine ?
Is it required to update to a newer version of Firebase (modular implementation) despite the Nuxt Firebase module stating :
"This module does not support the new modular syntax from Firebase v9+. If you plan to use the new modular mode of Version 9, we advise you to implement Firebase manually as described in the following medium article. It is currently unclear when, and if, this module will support the new modular mode."
Source : their Github repo
Any help to understand what's going on here is welcome !!
Thanks a lot for your help !
Regarding your questions:
I'm unaware of what is causing this issue but there are no known changes in the behavior of Firebase Rules depending on the NodeJS version you are using.
It's hard to assess without having more information. However I deployed a sample NuxtJS app following this guide on NodeJS 16 and it worked. Additionally the error code, as you mentioned, is caused when a Firestore Rule blocks a query. Therefore I think the root cause might be in the NuxtJS firebase module.
I wasn't able to find any documentation suggesting that you need to upgrade NuxtJS when upgrading NodeJS. Additionally you mentioned that you are using version 2.15.8 of NuxtJS which according to this release notes is the latest version.
I'm unsure on further support for NuxtJS considering that statement, but according to this Firebase documentation it is recommended to upgrade to version 9.
If you decide to attempt to upgrade to firebase v9 make sure to also upgrade Nuxt Firebase module to version 8.0.0 or higher, this version provides support to the compat library so you can use Firebase v9 although still with the old syntax, more information can be found here.
Lastly, if you'd like to test if a Firebase rule is working as expected you can quickly test it using the Rules Playground.
Long story short : upgrading to Firebase v9 worked.
Before I did that, I got stuck with rules preventing me to access firestore documents as soon as I tried running the project under Node16 engine.
So I had to do the following changes :
updating Firebase to v9
implement the configuration through a plugin rather than the nuxt-firebase module
make all the required changes in my code to make use of v9 modular (I didn't try using the compat version)
Now that I use the latest version of Firebase, I tried again switching to NodeJS 16 and it runs fine, including the Firebase security rules.
Googles docs indicate they support the latest LTS of Nodejs, and that they support the latest version of the specified version.
https://cloud.google.com/appengine/docs/standard/nodejs/runtime
it uses the latest stable release of the version you choose.
Currently, NodeJS is on 14 for LTS, and 12.18.4 for version 12. However, App Engine Standard appears to be stuck on 12.16.3 as it's latest version.
Is there any indication of their release cadence? When can we expect an upgrade?
Motivation: I'm trying to setup a typescript monorepo with published packages & App engine. This relies package.json specifying "exports" field, but 12.16 seems not to support it, even behind the --experimental-exports tag.
I have deployed a quickstart with node12 in AppEngine Standard and had the sames results than yours, the current latest TLS for Node seems to be: v12.16.3.
I printed the version with this code:
app.get('/', (req, res) => {
res.status(200).send('Hello, world!>>'+process.version).end();
});
The result was:
This is happening also in the Flexible environment, I faced a similar issue in which is supposed to pick the latest major version, instead always pick a lower, but it is consistent on picking always the same. This seems to be a expected behavior, but it is well worth to know the reason.
I tried setting the specific version 12.18.4 but with no success.
**ERROR**: (gcloud.app.deploy) INVALID_ARGUMENT: The 'package.json' configuration file must specify a supported nodejs12 version that is compatible with the runtime specified in the deployment. Please pin your application to a compatible major version of the runtime via the 'engines.node' property. Supported 'engines.node' values for the runtime 'nodejs12' are: [12.x.x, 12.X.X, 12.x, 12.X, 12.*.*, 12.*, ~12, ~12.0, ~12.0.0, 12, ^12, ^12.0, ^12.0.0, >=12, >=12.0, >=12.0.0, >12.0, >12.0.0, >=1, >=1.0, >=1.0.0, >1, >1.0, >1.0.0, >=2, >=2.0, >=2.0.0, >2, >2.0, >2.0.0, >=3, >=3.0, >=3.0.0, >3, >3.0, >3.0.0, >=4, >=4.0, >=4.0.0, >4, >4.0, >4.0.0, >=5, >=5.0, >=5.0.0, >5, >5.0, >5.0.0, >=6, >=6.0, >=6.0.0, >6, >6.0, >6.0.0, >=7, >=7.0, >=7.0.0, >7, >7.0, >7.0.0, >=8, >=8.0, >=8.0.0, >8, >8.0, >8.0.0, >=9, >=9.0, >=9.0.0, >9, >9.0, >9.0.0, >=10, >=10.0, >=10.0.0, >10, >10.0, >10.0.0, >=11, >=11.0, >=11.0.0, >11, >11.0, >11.0.0].
I think you can file an issue in the Public Issue Tracker, I found this similar in Flexible. This issue could be related to some internal stuff architecture of App Engine. When filing the issue, provide as much information as possible, always sanitizing to avoid sharing sensitive information, such as project ID, passwords, etc.
I am having problems with using joi array-item validation in foxx applications as well as the arango-shell with arangodb-2.5.5.
The joi-documentation suggests to use something like:
var Joi = require('joi');
Joi.array().items({'name': Joi.string().required()});
for validating a dataset similar to:
[{'name': 'Peter'}, {'name': 'Edeltraut'}, ...]
However, using it in a Foxx application results in the application to stop working. Pasting the snippet from above into the arango-shell produces the following output:
JavaScript exception: TypeError: undefined is not a function
!Joi.array().items({'name': Joi.string().required()});
! ^
stacktrace: TypeError: undefined is not a function
at <shell command>:1:13
Is there something I am missing, or is arangodb using a modified / smaller version of joi that has this feature stripped out?
ArangoDB 2.5 uses an older version of joi. The method in question was renamed to items in joi 6.0 and was previously called includes.
You can find the documentation for joi 4.9.0 (the version shipped with ArangoDB 2.5) at https://github.com/hapijs/joi/tree/v4.9.0
ArangoDB 2.6 will ship with joi 6.4.3, which is the latest version at this time.
If you want to know the version of an NPM dependency shipped with ArangoDB, you can also find out the version number by importing its package.json file like this:
require('joi/package.json').version
You don't have to wait for ArangoDB 2.6 to use the latest version of joi. If you npm install joi --save inside of your Foxx app's APP folder, it'll be used instead of the one bundled with ArangoDB. I've been doing that for a while now.