Oracle Netsuite Saved Search - Class Split like Text to Columns - netsuite

I realize this is another thread with a similar question:
Netsuite: Saved Search Function much like "Text To Columns" in Excel
but the answer only pulled the first Class, none of the sub classes.
What if you want all of the Classes split into columns?
"Class" could have many levels out to
Main:Sub1:Sub2:Sub3
Could have any number of sub classes.
I'm assuming I could create 6 (or more) different columns with each one resulting in each respective Main and Sub -
Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 etc.
Main Sub1 Sub2 etc.
This seems like a common desire I can't find an answer to.
Thanks!

You can use REGEXP_SUBSTR to extract the part of the string for the corresponding column.
Method 1
Main Class (First Column)
TRIM(REGEXP_SUBSTR({class}, '^[^:]+'))
Subclass 1 (Second Column)
TRIM(REGEXP_SUBSTR({class}, '^[^:]+:([^:]+)',1,1,'i',1))
Subclass 2 (Third Column)
TRIM(REGEXP_SUBSTR({class}, '^[^:]+:[^:]+:([^:]+)',1,1,'i',1))
Extend this pattern using additional groups of [^:]+: immediately after the first '^' of the regex string to add extra columns.
Method 2
Main Class (First Column)
TRIM(REGEXP_SUBSTR({class}, '^([^:]*):*([^:]*):*([^:]*):*([^:]*):*([^:]*):*([^:]*)',1,1,'i',1))
Subclass 1 (Second Column)
TRIM(REGEXP_SUBSTR({class}, '^([^:]*):*([^:]*):*([^:]*):*([^:]*):*([^:]*):*([^:]*)',1,1,'i',2))
Subclass 2 (Third Column)
TRIM(REGEXP_SUBSTR({class}, '^([^:]*):*([^:]*):*([^:]*):*([^:]*):*([^:]*):*([^:]*)',1,1,'i',3))
Extend this to additional columns by simply changing the value of the last parameter, up to the number of capture groups in the regex string - in the examples shown this will work up to 6 columns. For more than 6 columns you would also have to add extra ([^:]*):* groups to the regex string.

Related

How to extract text from a string between where there are multiple entires that meet the criteria and return all values

This is an exmaple of the string, and it can be longer
1160752 Meranji Oil Sats -Mt(MA) (000600007056 0001), PE:Toolachee Gas Sats -Mt(MA) (000600007070 0003)GL: Contract Services (510000), COT: Network (N), CO: OM-A00009.0723,Oil Sats -Mt(MA) (000600007053 0003)
The result needs to be column1 600007056 column2 600007070 column3 600007053
I am working in Spotfire and creating calclated columns through transformations as I need the columns to join to other data sets
I have tried the below, but it is only picking up the 1st 600.. number not the others, and there can be an undefined amount of those.
Account is the column with the string
Mid([Account],
Find("(000",[Account]) + Len("(000"),
Find("0001)",[Account]) - Find("(000",[Account]) - Len("(000"))
Thank you!
Assuming my guess is correct, and the pattern to look for is:
9 numbers, starting with 6, preceded by 1 opening parenthesis and 3 zeros, followed by a space, 4 numbers and a closing parenthesis
you can grab individual occurrences by:
column1: RXExtract([Amount],'(?<=\\(000)6\\d{8}(?=\\s\\d{4}\\))',1)
column2: RXExtract([Amount],'(?<=\\(000)6\\d{8}(?=\\s\\d{4}\\))',2)
etc.
The tricky bit is to find how many columns to define, as you say there can be many. One way to know would be to first calculate a max number of occurrences like this:
maxn: Max((Len([Amount]) - Len(RXReplace([Amount],'(?<=\\(000)6\\d{8}(?=\\s\\d{4}\\))','','g'))) / 9)
still assuming the number of digits in each column to extract is 9. This compares the length of the original [Amount] to the one with the extracted patterns replaced by an empty string, divided by 9.
Then you know you can define up to maxn columns, the extra ones for the rows with fewer instances will be empty.
Note that Spotfire always wants two back-slash for escaping (I had to add more to the editor to make it render correctly, I hope I have not missed any).

Using tbl.Lookup to match just part of a column value

This question relates to the Schematiq add-in for Microsoft Excel.
Using =tbl.Lookup(table, columnsToSearch, valuesToFind, resultColumn, [defaultValue]) the values in the valuesToFind column have a consistent 3 characters to the left and then varying characters after (e.g. 908-123456 or 908-321654 - i.e. 908 is always consistent)
How can I tell the function to lookup the value based on the first 3 characters only? The expected answer should be the sum of the results of the above, i.e. 500 + 300 = 800
tbl.Lookup() works by looking for an exact match - this helps ensure it's fast but in this case it means you need an extra step to calculate a column of lookup values, something like this:
A2: =tbl.CalculateColumn(A1, "code", "x => LEFT(x, 3)", "startOfCode")
This will give you a new column that you can use for the columnsToSearch argument, however tbl.Lookup() also looks for just one match - it doesn't know how to combine values together if there is more than one matching row in the table, so I think you also need one more step to group your table by the first 3 chars of the code, like this:
A3: =tbl.Group(A2, "startOfCode", "amount")
Because tbl.Group() adds values together by default, this will give you a table with a row for each distinct value of startOfCode and the subtotal of amount for each of those values. Finally, you can do the lookup exactly as you requested, which for your input table will return 800:
A4: =tbl.Lookup(A3, "startOfCode", "908", "amount")

Excel SUMIF with exact word but not case sensitive match

I have a simplified table for this problem example
Column A       |  Column B  |  Column C
war            | 1          | war
War            | 2
warred         | 3
war and peace  | 4
awful war      | 5
dead war horse | 6
Now I need to find all rows containing the word "war" that is not case sensitive, but must be a separate word, not a part of another word.
For example
=SUMIF(A1:A6;"C1";B1:B6)
right now finds only values "war" and "War" and SUM is 3.
I want it to find also values "war and peace", "awful war" and "dead war horse" since they all contain the word "war" and the SUM value should be 18.
I can't use search term
"*war*"
since this also includes the value "warred" and this is a separate word and shouldn't match.
One possibility is to create 4 different SUMIF-s with terms
war
war_*
*_war
*_war_*
_ is space
and then sum those four, but this is not that elegant.
I thought SUMPRODUCT with EXACT would work, but this seems to work over columns, not rows and EXACT isn't suitable..it think.
Is there a way to match row based on word that is not case sensitive and then sum all the values in Column B that have a matching row?
You could use:
=SUMPRODUCT((ISNUMBER(SEARCH(" "&C1&" "," "&A1:A6&" ")))*B1:B6)

Excel: Countifs on Multiple Columns and Only on Visible Rows (Filtering)

I've seen several forum posts with the answer to this question, but I can't really understand how it's supposed to work, so I figured I'd come here for an explanation.
I have three columns:
CITY........|.Attribute 1.|.Attribute 2.|
Chicago..|........1........|........1........|
Chicago..|........1........|..................|
Boston....|........1........|........1........|
Chicago..|..................|..................|
Boston....|..................|..................|
Boston....|..................|........1........|
Chicago..|........1........|........1........|
Chicago..|........1........|........1........|
I want to get a count of the number of times a city has a "1" in Attribute 1 and Attribute 2. Normally, you would use COUNTIFS (=COUNTIFS(B2:B9,"1",C2:C9,"1"))which would give you the value of 4 - Rows 2, 4, 8, and 9.
But I want to be able to filter this list on the fly, and only be able to see data for Chicago rows, for instance. And thus, want to see the value of 3 - Rows 2, 8, and 9. But when the data is filtered, I still get the value of 4.
What code do I need to insert into my cell to get the value of 3 after filtering my list to only show Chicago, if I want to see when a city has a "1" in both Attribute 1 and Attribute 2?
Thanks!
Would this not work for Chicago?:
=COUNTIFS(A2:A9, "Chicago", B2:B9,"1", C2:C9, "1")
This would not require you to filter the data.
A variant of this could be used:
SUMPRODUCT((Attribute 1.=Satisfactory)*(SUBTOTAL(103,OFFSET(AW3,ROW(tblStudentProgress[D3 Activity])-MIN(ROW(tblStudentProgress[D3 Activity])),0))))
You could also create a helper column and sum attributes 1 and 2. If your helper column row equals 2 then you know both attributes exist. You could take this one step further and use concatenate to combine "Chicago" and your sum. And then filter by Chicago2.

Return a row number that matches multiple criteria in vbs excel

I need to be able to search my whole table for a row that matches multiple criteria. We use a program that outputs data in the form of a .csv file. It has rows that separate sets of data, each of these headers don't have any columns that are unique in of them self but if i searched the table for multiple values i should be able to pinpoint each header row. I know i can use Application.WorksheetFunction.Match to return a row on a single criteria but i need to search on two three or four criteria.
In pseudo-code it would be something like this:
Return row number were column A = bill & column B = Woods & column C = some other data
We need to work with arrays:
There are 2 kinds of arrays:
numeric {1,0,1,1,1,0,0,1}
boolean {TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE}
to convert between them we can use:
MATCH function
MATCH(1,{1,0,1,1,1,0,0,1},0) -> will result {TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE}
simple multiplication
{TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE}*{TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,TRUE} -> will result {1,0,1,1,1,0,0,1}
you can can check an array in the match function, entering it like in the picture below, be warned that MATCH function WILL TREAT AN ARRAY AS AN "OR" FUNCTION (one match will result in true
ie:
MATCH(1,{1,0,1,1,1,0,0,1},0)=TRUE
, YOU MUST CTR+SHIFT+ENTER !!! FOR IT TO GIVE AN ARRAY BACK!!!
in the example below i show that i want to sum the hours of all the employees except the admin per case
we have 2 options, the long simple way, the complicated fast way:
long simple way
D2=SUMPRODUCT(C2:C9,(A2=A2:A9)*("admin"<>B2:B9)) <<- SUMPRODUCT makes a multiplication
basically A1={2,3,11,3,2,4,5,6}*{0,1,1,0,0,0,0,0} (IT MUST BE A NUMERIC ARRAY TO THE RIGHT IN SUMPRODUCT!!!)
ie: A1=2*0+3*1+11*1+3*0+2*0+4*0+5*0+6*0
this causes a problem because if you drag the cell to autocomplete the rest of the cells, it will edit the lower and higher values of
ie: D9=SUMPRODUCT(C9:C16,(A9=A9:A16)*("admin"<>B9:B16)), which is out of bounds
same as the above if you have a table and want to view the results in a diferent order
the fast complicated way
D3=SUMPRODUCT(INDIRECT("c2:c9"),(A3=INDIRECT("a2:a9"))*("admin"<>INDIRECT("b2:b9")))
it's the same, except that INDIRECT was used on the cells that we want not be modified when autocompleting or table reorderings
be warned that INDIRECT sometimes give VOLATILE ERROR,i recommend not using it on a single cell or using it only once in an array
f* c* i cant post pictures :(
table is:
case emplyee hours totalHoursPerCaseWithoutAdmin
1 admin 2 14
1 him 3 14
1 her 11 14
2 him 3 5
2 her 2 5
3 you 4 10
3 admin 5 10
3 her 6 10
and for the functions to check the arrays, open the insert function button (it looks like and fx) then doubleclick MATCH and then if you enter inside the Lookup_array a value like
A2=A2:A9 for our example it will give {TRUE,TRUE,TRUE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE,FALSE} that is because only the first 3 lines are from case=1
Something like this?
Assuming that you data in in A1:C20
I am looking for "Bill" in A, "Woods" in B and "some other data" in C
Change as applicable
=IF(INDEX(A1:A20,MATCH("Bill",A1:A20,0),1)="Bill",IF(INDEX(B1:B20,MATCH("Woods",B1:B20,0),1)="Woods",IF(INDEX(C1:C20,MATCH("some other data",C1:C20,0),1)="some other data",MATCH("Bill",A1:A20,0),"Not Found")))
SNAPSHOT
I would use this array* formula (for three criteria):
=MATCH(1,((Range1=Criterion1)*(Range2=Criterion2)*(Range3=Criterion3)),0)
*commit with Ctrl+Shift+Enter

Resources