There are some actors in same scene, I need to hide an actor of specific index (Not remove it, just hide). Maybe There are some API in python-vtk, but i don't know.
To hide an actor:
actor.GetProperty().SetOpacity(0)
Here is the vtkProperty API (c++ but Python is quite the same)
edit
Or as #mmusy suggest, simply
actor.VisibilityOff()
actor API.
If you want to hide a specific actor, you should be able to first select it. Actors in vtk is not indexed. So what you can do is, create a vtkActorCollection [https://vtk.org/doc/nightly/html/classvtkActorCollection.html].
`ActorCollection=vtk.vtkActorCollection()`
Now add your actors to the collection by,
ActorCollection.AddItem(actor)
Each actor now hold an index in the collection. You can get the actor by calling
select_actor = ActorCollection.GetItemAsObject(i)
Where i is the index of the item.
Change the visibility of the selected actor by
select_actor.VisibilityOff()
Related
I am a bit confused how to use the component <sw-entity-multi-select>. I understand that the difference between this component and the <sw-entity-multi-id-select> is that the first one returns the entities and the latter one returns just the id of the selected entities. But from the structure and the props they are totally different.
I am confused, because I mainly use the component as this:
<sw-entity-multi-select
entityName="language"
:entity-collection="languages"
:criteria="salesChannelLanguageCriteria"
:label="Language"
#change="selectLanguage"
>
</sw-entity-multi-select>
I could remove the entityName here, as the name is retrieved from the collection as well. But when I dig into the core, I see that inside selectLanguage I should do this:
selectLanguage(languages) {
this.languageIds = languages.getIds();
this.languages = languages;
}
I now understand that languageIds are kind of the v-model that determine, which entities should be selected in the component. Is this true? Why do I have to set the this.languages here again then? To me it's kind of magic if languageIds have this role here, because it's not referenced anywhere on the component. How does it work and how do I tell the component which items are selected - is using languageIds the correct way?
I now understand that languageIds are kind of the v-model that determine, which entities should be selected in the component. Is this true?
No. This example probably just extracts the IDs for some other use, e.g. for adding associations of language to another entity. One could arguably that if this is the only purpose of the selection sw-entity-multi-id-select might be the better component to use.
Why do I have to set the this.languages here again then?
Because you want to store the updated entity collection to persist the selection. Whatever is selected within the multi select is derived from that collection. So, let's say, initially you start out with an empty entity collection. You select some entities and the change is emitted with the updated collection containing the selected entities. Given we have :entity-collection="languages" we then want this.languages to be this updated collection, so the selection persists. So we kinda complete a loop here.
On another note, you could also use the collection with v-model="languages". In that case any additions or removals within the selection would be applied reactively to the collection and you wouldn't need to set this.languages after each change and you could also remove :entity-collection="languages". So basically, which of these approaches you use depends on whether you want your changes applied reactively or not.
I am making a class diagram for Class/Course Registration where students have to first register their course then select their class schedules (timetable)
I am unsure if I can have CourseRegistration and ClassRegistration table like that. The reason why I made it like that is, a student can register for a course but doesnt register to a class directly. so they can wait few days and then only register. So I have to make sure the course registration is saved in the database.
Thank you for all the help
PS: pls don't mind my attributes, they're just a draft.
Your business logic for the registration process (register both for a course and a corresponding class) is too complicated. Normally, one would only register for a class, which would then imply taking the corresponding course.
Also, what does "ClassSchedule" stand for? Is an instance of a "ClassSchedule" a class meeting?
Since your model is supposed to define a design (of database tables and of, e.g., Java classes), each entity class should have an ID attribute defined, which is expressed in UML with the keyword "id" in curly braces appended to the attribute declaration. Having "ID" in the attribute names is not a formal declaration. Also, an ID attribute seems to be missing for ClassSchedule.
Yes, that's fine this way. You could alternatively use the association class notation like this:
Some side notes:
labeling associations is not that helpful except you are on a business level analysis. Rather use role names on either end where appropriate.
Edit I somehow overlooked that you're designing tables. So my previous comment
remove all the id attributes. Each object will have its unique id assigned by the runtime system. Use such an id only if it's of public meaning (e.g. a passport id or a student's registration number). And then use that specific name (e.g. passportId) rather than a <class>id.
goes just for basic class design. If you already have a (derived) table design you can just go with those ids.
In an application that uses event sourcing is it acceptable to have aggregate-wide events?
Consider a contrived example of a blog application that provides the ability to create posts and add and remove simple tags (post would be the aggregate root).
This might result in the following events:
PostCreated: postId, "title", "content"
TagAdded: postId, "Foo"
TagAdded: postId, "Bar"
TagAdded: postId, "Baz"
TagRemoved: postId, "Bar"
Replaying the above event stream would result in a post with a title, content and two tags ("Foo" & "Baz").
Now imagine the user interface only allows you to select existing tags whilst creating a post and doesn't accept free text; only privileged users have the ability to update the master list of tags.
Now when a privileged user creates a new tag, a corresponding event needs to be created so that a) the information is actually stored in the event storage and b) at some point the read model is updated so that users creating blog posts can select the new tag in the UI.
Having an event that looks like TagCreated: postId, "NewTag" doesn't seem right to me as the information does not directly apply to a single post.
Considering that in this case the information does not warrant it's own aggregate root and will only be used in this bounded context I would expect an event along the lines of:
TagCreated("NewTag")
These events would be stored in the event storage using the same aggregate id as the previous set of events for a specific post but without an id for the specific aggregate instance.
So far this sounds like a logical way to handle the problem but was wondering if I am missing anything obvious by approaching it this way.
IMHO you're complicating your life unnecessary. Domain events are usually available cross bounded context and they should be associated with an aggregate root (AR) by referencing its id.
In your example, I'd consider Tag to be a value object, so it would require a post id. But if you want the Tag to be available as itself, then it would be an AR and so, the event would have a TagId property.
Btw, a domain event is a DTO, meant to be available everywhere, they're not a domain detail that needs to be encapsulated in an aggregate.
I think you missed the concept "tag catalog" or something like that. It could have a single aggregate (or perhaps you will sometimes have several catalogs for different user groups or something like that) with the catalog as the root, containing all the tags as value objects.
Is it possible to associate a view with different documents (not simultaneously of course)?
What I want to achieve: the application can have multiple documents of the same type, that can be added during runtime, and set of suitable views, the main of which is CFormview-based. The user can choose the number of the document to show per combobox in the toolbar. The views then associate themselves with this document and update with data from it.
Is it possible to achieve with CMultiDocTemplate?
If yes, how? especially is it possible to retrieve a document by it order number?
If not I'll probably have to abstain from using the templates altogether, which of course means more coding (and more questions to friendly community), but it will do what I want it to do and not Microsoft thought I should be doing
Yes, you could but not out of the 'box'. Instead I'd recommend a different strategy. Rather than trying to attach a View to an existing CDocument derived class LOAD the Views CDocument with the information you want. That could done by adding a simple Copy method to the CDocument or you could move your actual data into a separate class then just point the CDocument to 'data' you want.
Trying to change the CDocument instance for a CView is going against the MFC grain which normally means lot of ASSERTS.
I have core data app with an entity OBSERVATION that has as one of its attributes DEALNAME.
I want to reference through Interface Builder or by making custom modifications to an NSArrayController a list of unique sorted dealnames so that I can use them in a pop-up.
I have attempted to use #distinctUnionOfSets (and #distinctUnionOfArrays) but am unable to locate the proper key sequence.
I can sort the ArrayController by providing a sort descriptor, but do not know how to eliminate duplicates.
Are the #distinct... keys the right methodology? It would seem to provide the easiest way to optimize the use of IB.
Is there a predicate form for removing duplicates?
Or do I need to use my custom controller to extract an NSSet of the specific dealnames, put them back in an array and sort it and reference the custom array from IB?
Any help would be appreciated. I am astounded that other have not tried to create a sorted-unique pop-up in tableviews.
You need to take a look at -[NSFetchRequest returnsDistinctResults]. That is the level you need to be handling the uniquing of data.
Although I do not have a definitive answer for you, I think there are two ways you can go about it.
The way you already started. You need to bind the contents array of the PopUp button, not just against the arrayController.arrangedObjects, but continue on the path and somehow filter only objects with distinct "DealName"s. This means - the arrayController presents ALL the entities (and may sort them for you) but the PopUp button will have its contents filter via some sophisticated binding to the array controller.
Make your filtering at the ArrayController level (as suggested in another answer here). Here it depends how you set up the array controller. If It is set up to use an "Entity" (vs. "Class") which means the array controller will fetch CoreData entities directly - you can modify its "Fetch" to only bring a subset of the "OBSERVATION" entities with distinct values of "DEALNAME". I don't know how to control WHICH entities are filtered out in this case. Otherwise, you can setup the arrayController to work with "Class" objects, and then you can fetch the entities yourself (in code) and populate the arrayController programmatically, with just the entities you like.
In the second option, the Popup button should be bound normally to the arrayController's arrangedObjects.