I'm trying to write a test for my inherited profile class:
public class MyProfile : Profile
{
public MyProfile()
{
CreateMap<SomeModelDto, SomeModel>();
}
}
Test:
[Test]
public void AutoMapper_MyProfileMapping_IsValid()
{
// arrange
var profile = new MyProfile();
// act
var configuration = new MapperConfiguration(cfg => cfg.AddProfile(profile)));
// assert
configuration.AssertConfigurationIsValid();
}
How can I test that my profile is containing all necessary maps? Do I generally need to check something like this?
greetings
Related
I have to do some extra logic layer on existing classes. I'm using autofac.
The project is Windows service having also Kestrel server. Program.cs e.g.
void Main(string[] args) {
var customQueue = new CustomQueue();
var someClass = new SomeClass(customQueue);
var randomClass = new RandomClass();
// do some logic here with using declared instances
var server = new Server(someClass, randomClass);
server.Start();
}
And here is the Server.cs
class Server {
private IWebHost _host;
public Server(SomeClass cls, RandomClass cls1) {
// set to fields
}
void Start() {
_host = new WebHostBuilder()
.UseKestrel()
.ConfigureServices(services =>
{
services.AddAutoFac(); // first as per doc in order to scaffold 'ConfigureContainer'?
services.AddSingleton(someClass); // fields
services.AddSingleton(randomClass); // fields
})
.UseContentRoot(Directory.GetCurrentDirectory())
.ConfigureAppConfiguration(...)
.ConfigureLogging(...);
.UseStartup<Startuo>()
.Build();
_host.StartAsync();
}
}
Startup.cs
public class Startup
{
public ILifetimeScope AutofacContainer { get; private set; }
public IServiceProvider ConfigureServices(IServiceCollection services)
{
// create a container-builder and register dependencies
var builder = new ContainerBuilder();
// populate the service-descriptors added to `IServiceCollection`
// BEFORE you add things to Autofac so that the Autofac
// registrations can override stuff in the `IServiceCollection`
// as needed
builder.Populate(services);
builder.RegisterType<SomeClass>()
.As<ISomeClass>()
.EnableInterfaceInterceptors()
.InterceptedBy(typeof(SomeClassInterceptor));
builder.Register(_ => new SomeClassInterceptor());
AutofacContainer = builder.Build();
return new AutofacServiceProvider(AutofacContainer);
}
}
And last SomeClassInterceptor.cs
public class SomeClassInterceptor : IInterceptor
{
public void Intercept(IInvocation invocation)
{
try
{
invocation.Proceed();
if (invocation.ReturnValue is Task taskResult)
{
taskResult.ContinueWith(
t =>
{
Console.WriteLine("OOHH YEAHH");
}, TaskContinuationOptions.None);
}
else
{
Console.WriteLine("WOW");
}
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
Console.WriteLine("EXCEPTIOOOOOOOOOOOOONNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN");
}
}
}
I've tried with Named and Typed registration with having Intercept(...) attribute but still no success. Nothing gets triggered.
Also ISomeClass is inheriting other interfaces, I've tried setting .As<>() also with those but no.
What am I missing?
In order to let the interceptor works. The class should be build by Autofac.
services.AddAutofac();
services.AddSingleton(someClass);
services.AddSingleton(randomClass);
In your case you configure Autofac using the AddAutofac method then add SomeClass as a singleton using the AddSingleton which will override the Autofac configuration. There is no way that Autofac can inject the interceptor in it.
If you want to register SomeClass as singleton you should register it using the SingleInstance() method
builder.RegisterType<SomeClass>()
.As<ISomeClass>()
.SingleInstance()
.EnableInterfaceInterceptors()
.InterceptedBy(typeof(SomeClassInterceptor));
Does anyone know how to configure AutoMapper using LightInject? The AutoMapper documentation only has examples for Ninject and Simple Injector.
I am having difficulty trying to register the AutoMapper configuration.
I'm using ASP.NET MVC C#.
public class CompositionRoot : ICompositionRoot
{
public void Compose(IServiceRegistry serviceRegistry)
{
serviceRegistry.Register(c => new AutoMapperConfiguration());
}
}
public static class AutoMapperConfiguration
{
public AutoMapperConfiguration()
{
Mapper.Initialize(cfg =>
cfg.AddProfiles(typeof(Namespace.Class).Assembly)
);
}
}
I figured it out. The code below is in the CompositionRoot, where the factory is registered using IServiceRegistry. I will be moving the var config = new MapperConfiguration(cfg => cfg.AddProfiles(typeof(CustomProfileClass).Assembly)); code to a custom MapperConfiguration class that I will create.
public class CompositionRoot : ICompositionRoot
{
public void Compose(IServiceRegistry serviceRegistry)
{
var config = new MapperConfiguration(cfg => cfg.AddProfiles(typeof(CustomProfileClass)));
serviceRegistry.Register(c => config.CreateMapper());
}
}
I'm getting an error when i try to run some tests on my servicestack web service.
I'm using ServiceStack 4.5.8 and Nunit 3.5. The solution was created initially from a ServiceStackVS template.
The error, which appears on a number of tests, is
System.IO.InvalidDataException : ServiceStackHost.Instance has already been set (BasicAppHost)</br>
TearDown : System.NullReferenceException : Object reference not set to an instance of an object.</br>
at ServiceStack.ServiceStackHost.Init()</br>
at MyApp.Tests.EchoServiceUnitTests.OneTimeSetup() in </br>
C:\Repos\MyApp\Myapp\MyApp.Tests\EchoServiceUnitTests.cs:line 45 </br>
--TearDown</br>
at MyApp.Tests.EchoServiceUnitTests.TestFixtureTearDown() in </br>C:\Repos\MyApp\MyApp\MyApp.Tests\EchoServiceUnitTests.cs:line 54
One of the tests that regularly generates this error is
namespace Tests
{
[TestFixture]
public class EchoServiceUnitTests
{
private ServiceStackHost appHost;
[OneTimeSetUp]
public void OneTimeSetup()
{
this.appHost = new BasicAppHost(typeof(EchoService).Assembly).Init();
}
[OneTimeTearDown]
public void TestFixtureTearDown()
{
this.appHost.Dispose();
}
[Test]
public void TestService()
{
const string Message = "Hello";
var service = this.appHost.Container.Resolve <EchoService>();
var response = (EchoResponse)service.Any(new Echo
{
Message = Message
});
Assert.That(response.Message,
Is.EqualTo(Message));
}
}
}
the service for this is
namespace ServiceInterface
{
public class EchoService : Service
{
public object Any(Echo request)
{
return new EchoResponse {Message = request.Message};
}
}
}
[Route("/Echo")]
[Route("/Echo/{Message}")]
public class Echo : IReturn<EchoResponse>
{
public string Message { get; set; }
}
public class EchoResponse : IHasResponseStatus
{
public EchoResponse()
{
this.ResponseStatus = new ResponseStatus();
}
public string Message { get; set; }
public ResponseStatus ResponseStatus { get; set; }
}
And finally my apphost
namespace MyApplication
{
using System;
using Funq;
using ServiceInterface;
using ServiceModel.Validators;
using ServiceStack;
using ServiceStack.Admin;
using ServiceStack.Api.Swagger;
using ServiceStack.Caching;
using ServiceStack.Configuration;
using ServiceStack.Logging;
using ServiceStack.Logging.NLogger;
using ServiceStack.MsgPack;
using ServiceStack.OrmLite;
using ServiceStack.OrmLite.SqlServer.Converters;
using ServiceStack.ProtoBuf;
using ServiceStack.Razor;
using ServiceStack.Validation;
using ServiceStack.VirtualPath;
using ServiceStack.Wire;
public class AppHost : AppHostBase
{
public static ILog Log = LogManager.GetLogger(typeof(AppHost));
public AppHost()
: base("MyApp",
typeof(HelloService).Assembly) { }
public override void Configure(Container container)
{
LogManager.LogFactory = new NLogFactory();
Log = LogManager.GetLogger(this.GetType());
this.Plugins.Add(new RazorFormat());
this.Plugins.Add(new PostmanFeature());
this.Plugins.Add(new SwaggerFeature());
this.Plugins.Add(new AdminFeature());
var ormSettings = new AppSettings();
container.Register <ICacheClient>(new MemoryCacheClient());
var dbFactory = new OrmLiteConnectionFactory(ormSettings.GetString("SqlDbConnection"),
SqlServerDialect.Provider);
dbFactory.RegisterConnection("Database2",
ormSettings.GetString("Sql2Connection"),
SqlServerDialect.Provider);
SqlServerDialect.Provider.RegisterConverter<DateTime?>(new SqlServerDateTimeConverter());
this.Plugins.Add(new RequestLogsFeature
{
RequestLogger = new CsvRequestLogger(files: new FileSystemVirtualPathProvider(this,
this.Config.WebHostPhysicalPath),
requestLogsPattern: "requestlogs/{year}-{month}/{year}-{month}-{day}.csv",
errorLogsPattern: "requestlogs/{year}-{month}/{year}-{month}-{day}-errors.csv",
appendEvery: TimeSpan.FromSeconds(1)),
EnableRequestBodyTracking = true,
EnableResponseTracking = true,
EnableErrorTracking = true,
});
this.Plugins.Add(new AutoQueryDataFeature
{
MaxLimit = 1000
});
this.Plugins.Add(new AutoQueryFeature());
var sse = new ServerEventsFeature
{
StreamPath = "/event-stream",
HeartbeatPath = "/event-heartbeat",
UnRegisterPath = "/event-unregister",
SubscribersPath = "/event-subscribers",
LimitToAuthenticatedUsers = false,
IdleTimeout = TimeSpan.FromSeconds(30),
HeartbeatInterval = TimeSpan.FromSeconds(10),
NotifyChannelOfSubscriptions = true,
};
this.Plugins.Add(sse);
Plugins.Add(new AdminFeature());
Plugins.Add(new WireFormat());
Plugins.Add(new MsgPackFormat());
Plugins.Add(new ProtoBufFormat());
}
}
}
I've tried a variety of suggestions including making the apphost in the test static, but nothing seems to work for me. I then tried the following test which also generated the same error which suggests to me that there is something in the apphost which is wrong but I can't see what.
[TestFixture(Category = "AppHost")]
public class AppHostTests
{
/// <summary>
/// The app host doesnt throw exception.
/// </summary>
[Test]
public void AppHostDoesntThrowException()
{
var apphost = new AppHost();
Assert.That(() => apphost.Init(),
Throws.Nothing);
}
}
The tests that generate this error whether I am using NCRUNCH (set to run one at a time) or if I use resharpers run all tests. It's generally the same tests that generate this error, though that seems to vary. In all cases, if I then run the tests manually they all pass.
You can only have 1 AppHost initialized and running at the same time where somehow NCrunch test is being run whilst there is another AppHost still in use. Maybe you can try debugging and setting a breakpoint that checks if ServiceStackHost.Instance is not null before trying to initialize another AppHost.
Note the AppHostBase is an ASP.NET Web App which may be causing the interference if it's running in the same project as the unit tests. If you want an integration test use AppSelfHostBase instead which you would use in place of BasicAppHost where you'd want to run a full integration test.
I've encountered a problem while upgrading from AutoMapper's static API.
I'm following the example on this page, which states that
Typical usage from 4.1 and before was:
Mapper.Initialize(cfg => {
cfg.AddProfile<AppProfile>();
cfg.CreateMap<Source, Dest>(); });
var dest = Mapper.Map<Source, Dest>(new Source());
In 4.2 and later, this would look like:
var config = new MapperConfiguration(cfg => {
cfg.AddProfile<AppProfile>();
cfg.CreateMap<Source, Dest>();
});
var mapper = config.CreateMapper();
var dest = mapper.Map<Source, Dest>(new Source());
However, while using v4.2.1 via NuGet I can't see this 'CreateMapper' method.
What am I supposed to use?
I've realised what was causing my problem.
In order to use the MapperConfiguration application-wide I was storing it as a static property:
public static IMapperConfiguration { get; private set; }
public static void Init()
{
MapperConfiguration = new MapperConfiguration(...);
...
MapperConfiguration. // CreateMapper() not available
}
The problem here is that the CreateMapper method is only available on the MapperConfiguration class, not the IMapperConfiguration interface.
I've installed excel module in order to generate reports from datas recorded by my application into database.
It works fine : i can create report simply by clicking on a link into my main page and render into excel template.
But i'd rather generate excel file periodically (using a job) and save it into a shared folder, and that without any human action (so not by clicking on a link).
It's like I want to trigger the associated controller to render into my template automatically.
Does anyone got any tips on it for me?
So the problem is you can't pass some parameters into the job, or...?
Using something like this just doesn't work?
#On("0 45 4-23 ? * MON-FRI")
public class ExcelJob extends Job {
public void doJob() {
// generate excel
}
}
I wrote my own Excel generator using JExcel, and I use it for scheduled generation without a problem. It also doesn't require a template, because the report structure is derived from annotations. This is roughly 20 lines of code - you may want to try it for yourself.
This is really rough and lacks good user feedback, but gives you the idea...
Excel generator - not Play-specific in any way
public class ExcelGenerator
{
public void generateReport(Function successCallback,
Function failureCallback)
{
try
{
byte[] report = // generate your report somehow
successCallback.execute(report);
}
catch (Exception e)
{
failureCallback.execute(e.getMessage());
}
}
}
A function interface for callbacks (very basic)
public interface Function
{
public void execute(Object... args);
}
Your Play controller
public class MyController extends Controller
{
public static void index()
{
render();
}
public static void createReport()
{
Function failureCallback = new Function()
{
public void execute(Object... args)
{
flash.error(args[0]);
indxe();
}
};
Function successCallback = new Function()
{
public void execute(Object... args)
{
renderBinary((byte[])args[0]);
}
};
ExcelGenerator excelGenerator = new ExcelGenerator();
excelGenerator.generateReport(successCallback,
failureCallback);
}
}
Finally, re-use the ExcelGenerator from your job
public class MyJob extends Job
{
public void doJob()
{
Function failureCallback = new Function()
{
public void execute(Object... args)
{
Logger.error(args[0]);
}
}
Function successCallback = new Function()
{
public void execute(Object... args)
{
byte[] report = (byte[])args[0];
// write report to disk
}
}
ExcelGenerator excelGenerator = new ExcelGenerator();
excelGenerator.generateReport(successCallback,
failureCallback);
}
}
You'll still need to write your own report generator, or refactor the existing excel module to provide what you need.
So if you want to run and manage several jobs you can do something like this
for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
SendingMessageJob sendingMessageJob = new SendingMessageJob();
promises.add(sendingMessageJob.now());
}
boolean allDone = false;
while (!allDone) {
allDone = true;
for (F.Promise promise : promises) {
if (!promise.isDone()) {
allDone = false;
break;
}
}
}
// when arrive here all jobs have finished their process
You can check the Play documentation, specifically the section on jobs, where you'll see examples on how to create automatically triggered methods. This should solve your issue.
EDIT (update on comment):
You can manually trigger a job, do this:
new MyExcelGeneratorJob().doJob();
Thing is, Play is stateless, so the job should use data from the database. Instead of trying to pass parameters from your request into the Job (won't work) try to store that data in a staging area in the database that the job loads and processes to generate the excel.