I run into this problem pretty frequently while developing react applications. The latest is hwid. I am using yarn to manage dependencies.
I added the module using
yarn add hwid
It added it to the package.json file and gave me no errors. When I run the application, it says it is unable to find the module. The module is there in node_modules and everything seems to be correct and in place. So I tried deleting node_modules and running yarn install. I've done this several times. I tried force cleaning the npm cache. I have run yarn remove and yarn add several times.
I am using the WebStorm IDE. It gives me no errors, and in fact, if I let it resolve the import, it finds it just fine. This seems to only happen to me in react projects. I think, but I'm not sure, that it is usually typescript modules that give me problems.
Is there a magic bullet for this? The module is a pretty critical part of my app, so if I can't resolve it using node and react's import system, I'm going to have to just copy the files into my project. I would really rather not do that for obvious reasons.
Any help is appreciated.
If it's about typescript modules, have you tries also installing types of that modulea?
E.g.yarn add #types/hwid
Related
I've got quite some experience in (web) development (Java, ASP.NET and PHP amongst all), and fairly new to React and Node JS.
Although I did multiple tutorials and read multiple articles, I feel like I'm missing some point here and there. Currently I'm working on a React app which implements a nice HTML template I found.
One React tutorial I did used Webpack for building and deploying the app (local). This works nice, does the job of transpiling ES6 (.jsx) and SASS using babel. So far so good :)
My template has an image slider (Owl Carousel), so I installed the react-owl-carousel module.
This gave me quite some problems with jQuery (also installed as a module).
After several attempts to fix this I decided to move on to another slider module, React Awesome slider.
I used the module as the README.md explained. But upon building it (npm run build), I got an error that the .scss file within react-awesome-slider could not be transpiled. A message like "are you missing a loader".
So I installed sass, node-sass, sass-loader etc etc and configured these in my webpack.config.js.
I also noticed the react-awesome-slider module within node-modules contained a webpack.config.js.
Long story so far, sorry, now to the essence of this question.
In what way can the modules installed (like react-awesome-slider) be considered "black boxes"?
It doesn't feel logical that all the modules get build when building the main app. The "exclude: /node_modules/," config in webpack.config.js prevents this, not?
So why does the react-awesome-slider give an error about .scss transpiling? I had no .scss rule in my webpack config then.
Will all dependend modules automatically get installed when installing a new module? So when I run "npm i react-awesome-slider --save-dev", will its dependencies also be installed? Or is this not necessary? And do I need to update (webpack) configuration after installing a new module? Or is it really black box and "self-containing"?
Any help would greatly be appreciated!!! Maybe there is a good react-webpack sample app on Github or something like that?
That also confusing me for a really long time. Here are some answers to your question.
people publish packages to the NPM, so a module your project depends on
can be pre-builded or source code, it depends. I have checked react-awesome-slider, it's main field in package.json is dist/index.js, directly import it won't cause an issue because there are no SCSS files.If you follow the CSS module usage instruction you have import react-awesome-slider/src/styles and you will find src/styles.js file import ../styled.scss,so webpack will load it with SCSS loader which you have not configured, that's why an error occurred.
while you install modules, npm will go
through its dependency tree, install its dependencies, dependencies'
dependencies, until there's no more dependency module to install. before npm 3.0 the node_module folder is tree structure reflects the dependency tree, but it causes problems that many modules relay on the same dependency, npm will download and save too many same files, after version 3.0 it becomes flat(release note here, search flat keyword).
You don't need to update your webpack config after you install a dependency cause webpack build process will handle it with file dependency tree. You have installed a package and import it in your activation code, file there will be handle( with its package.json main field file as an entry), you have installed a package without using it or import it in a dead file(dead file means you cannot find it from webpack entry file), it will be ignored by webpack as it's dead code.
I have too many confuse until I read npm docs. Good luck to you.
Node modules are build to execute packages.When the are compiled they have proper configuration to handle extensions that are imported in it and when you import something like .scss in your main app then it does not know about that extension then your webpack need rules to include that extensions.
It does exclude node_modules as the are pre-converted pr pre build.
More over webpack is bit tough so developers create CRA Have look at it.
I'm trying to write an npm package that will be published and used as a framework in other projects. The problem is -- I can't figure out a solid workflow for working on it at the same time as working on projects that depend on it.
I know this seems super basic and that npm link solves the issue, but this is a bigger one than just being able to import one local package from another.
I have my framework package scaffolded out; let's call it gumby, It exports a function that does console.log('hello from gumby'). That's all that matters for right now.
Now I'm ready to create a project that will use gumby. Let's call this one client. I set that up too and npm link gumby so client can import from it, etc. OK cool, it's working as expected.
So now it's time to publish gumby. I run npm publish and it goes out to npm as version 0.0.1.
At this point, how do I get the published, npm-hosted version of gumby into the package.json for client? I mean, I could just delete the symlinked copy from my node_modules and then yarn add gumby, but what if I want to go back and work on it locally again? And then run it against the npm version again? And then work on it some more? And then...
You get the point, I imagine. There's no obvious way to switch between the npm copy of a package that you're working on, and the local one. There's the additional problem of how to do that without messing with your package.json too much, e.g. what if I accidentally commit to it version control with some weird file:// dependency path. Any suggestions would be much appreciated.
For local development, having the package symlinked is definitely the way to go, the idea of constantly publishing / re-installing the package sounds like a total pain.
The real issue sounds more like you’re concerned about committing a dev configuration to prod - you could address that problem with something as simple as a pre-commit hook on your VCS e.g. block if it detects any local file references in the package.json.
I put some common code in this local module called 'client-common'. In one of the app project using this common module, I add this to package.json dependencies:
"client-common": "../client-common"
After npm install the module gets copied to node_modules. When I run (it's an Ionic project) ionic serve, it builds all fine, but at runtime in the browser I get
Runtime Error
Cannot find module "client-common"
I'm assuming this is a webpack issue? The question is why is the local module treated differently and not bundled at all?
It seems that I was supposed to supply an index.js in the common module. After adding an index.js duplicated from the existing index.d.ts, exporting everything, it just works now.
Hello and thanks for reading,
Historically, when I ran the command:
npm install module
Module would install in the node_modules dir of the current working directory. This still happens, however, the modules that the module use, is now installing alongside the original module, so that my node_modules dir might look like:
./node_modules/module/
./node_modules/module-of-that-module/
When it used to look like:
./node_modules/module/node_modules/module-of-that-module/
I suppose it might boil down to preference, but I don't really like the sub-modules installing alongside the main module I was trying to install, as my main node_modules directory became cluttered with hundreds of random modules fast. Also it seems kind of strange for the structure to be this way if the modules of modules need different versions.
Can anyone please explain what changed here? And how I might change it back? I tried to find a solution prior to writing this, but it's unclear to me how to search around this issue or what category it falls under.
I've been using Node.js and npm for a few weeks with great success and have started to question the best practice for installing local modules. I understand the Global vs Local argument, however, my question has more to do with where to place a local install. Let's say that I have a project located at ~/ProjectA/ which is version controlled and worked on by multiple developers. When initially playing with Node.js and npm I wasn't aware of the default local installation paths and just simply installed the necessary modules in a default terminal which resulted in a installation path of ~/node_modules. What this ended up doing is requiring all the other developers working on the project to install the modules on their own machines in order to run the application. Having seen where some of the developers ran npm install I'm still really surprised that it worked on their machines at all (I guess it relates to how Node.js and require() looks for modules), but needless to say, it worked.
Now that the project is getting past the "toying around" stage, I would like to setup the project folder correctly. So, my question is, should the modules be installed at ~/ProjectA/node_modules and therefore be part of the version controlled project files, or should it continue to be located at a developer-machine specific location...or does it not really matter at all?
I'm just looking for a little "best-practice" guidance on this one and what others do when setting up your projects.
I think that the "best practice" here is to keep the dependencies within the project folder.
Almostly all Node projects I've seen so far (I'm a Node developer has about 8 months now) do that.
You don't need to version control the dependencies. That's how I manage my Node projects:
Keep the versions locked in the package.json file, so everyone gets the same working version, or use the npm shrinkwrap command in your project root.
Add the node_modules folder to your VCS ignore file (I use git, so mine is .gitignore)
Be happy, you're done!