function to add new Objekt in an existing object - object

i am pretty new to Javascript an had a idea for a small thing to code. The idea was to make an Objekt (kunden) in here we have some clients. In this Objekt i have one existing Client (kunde_1) and a Method (erstellen() ). With the Method i want to add a new client (new Objekt) to the exisiting Objekt (kunden) using a client counter. The counter should count up everytime the function ist called. Here ist my Try, but i have no real idea how to use my counter to create the new client. Here ist the Error that i get:
Uncaught TypeError: Cannot create property 'vorname' on string 'kunde_2'
Is it possible to adjust my code a bit to get it right or am i on a complete wrong path...
let count_kunde = 1; // because i already have one client called kunde_1
let kunden = {
erstellen() {
count_kunde +=1;
let neuer_kunde = `kunden_${count_kunde}`; // the idea was to create a variable that stores "kunde_2" and through DOT Notation add the values via prompt.
neuer_kunde.vorname = prompt("Vorname:"),
neuer_kunde.nachname= prompt("Nachname"),
neuer_kunde.straße= prompt("Straße"),
neuer_kunde.hausnummer= prompt("Hausnummer"),
neuer_kunde.plz= prompt("Plz"),
neuer_kunde.ort= prompt("Ort")
},
kunde_1: {
vorname: "Bengt",
nachname: "Flecks",
straße: "Scheffelstraße",
hausnummer: 33,
plz: 10367,
ort: "Berlin"
}
};
Here ist the new code after solving the Problem with special thanks to #Deivid Ugarte (with my comments in german):
// Anzahl aktueller Kunden zum Start des Programms
let count_kunde = 1;
// Erstellung des Objektes kunden zum speichern der neu erstellten
Kunden
let kunden = {
kunde_1: {
vorname: "Bengt",
nachame: "Flecks",
straße: "Scheffelstraße",
hausnummer: 33,
plz: 10367,
ort: "Berlin"
}
};
//Funktion zum erstellen eines neuen Kunden
const kunden_erstellen = function() {
count_kunde += 1;
let neuer_kunde = `kunde_${count_kunde}`;
// Erstellung des Objektes kunden.kunde_n wobei n = count_kunde um
im nächsten Schritt die Eigentschaften mit den eingeegebenen Werten
hinzuzufügen
kunden[neuer_kunde] = {};
kunden[neuer_kunde].vorname = prompt("Vorname:"),
kunden[neuer_kunde].nachname = prompt("Nachname"),
kunden[neuer_kunde].straße= prompt("Straße"),
kunden[neuer_kunde].hausnummer= prompt("Hausnummer"),
kunden[neuer_kunde].plz= prompt("Plz"),
kunden[neuer_kunde].ort= prompt("Ort")
};
// Funktionsaufruf zum erstellen eines Kunden
kunden_erstellen();

You need to define neuer_kunde as an object let neuer_kunde = {} and then assign the name to the object neuer_kunde.name = kunden_${count_kunde}.
The error you had was that you are trying to assign a property to the first created string

Related

How to set output contexts while creating a intent in dialogflow PHP?

I am trying to set output context to a particular intent via v2 create intent API.
Please check my code.
use Google\Cloud\Dialogflow\V2\SessionsClient;
use Google\Cloud\Dialogflow\V2\TextInput;
use Google\Cloud\Dialogflow\V2\QueryInput;
use Google\Cloud\Dialogflow\V2\IntentsClient;
use Google\Cloud\Dialogflow\V2\Intent_TrainingPhrase_Part;
use Google\Cloud\Dialogflow\V2\Intent_TrainingPhrase;
use Google\Cloud\Dialogflow\V2\Intent_Message_Text;
use Google\Cloud\Dialogflow\V2\Intent_Message;
use Google\Cloud\Dialogflow\V2\Intent;
use Google\Cloud\Dialogflow\V2\Context;
use Google\Cloud\Dialogflow\V2\ContextsClient;
private function intent_create(){
putenv('GOOGLE_APPLICATION_CREDENTIALS='.getcwd() . '/strive_stage.json');
$intentsClient = new IntentsClient();
/** Create Intent **/
$disaplayName = "Where is Goa";
$utterances = ["Goa", "Where is Goa"];
// prepare training phrases for intent
$trainingPhrases = [];
foreach ($utterances as $trainingPhrasePart) {
$part = new Intent_TrainingPhrase_Part();
$part->setText($trainingPhrasePart);
// create new training phrase for each provided part
$trainingPhrase = new Intent_TrainingPhrase();
$trainingPhrase->setParts([$part]);
$trainingPhrases[] = $trainingPhrase;
}
$messageTexts = 'Goa is in India.';
// prepare messages for intent
$text = new Intent_Message_Text();
$text->setText([$messageTexts]);
$message = new Intent_Message();
$message->setText($text);
$createIntentObject = $intentsClient->projectAgentName(env("DIALOG_FLOW_PROJECT_ID"));
// prepare intent
$intent = new Intent();
$intent->setDisplayName($disaplayName);
$intent->setTrainingPhrases($trainingPhrases);
$intent->setMessages([$message]);
$contexts = ['test'];
foreach($contexts as $con){
$contextObj = new Context();
$contextObj->setName($con);
$contextData[] = $contextObj;
$intent->setOutputContexts($contextData);
}
// $intent->getOutputContexts('test');
//dd($intent);
$response = $intentsClient->createIntent($createIntentObject, $intent);
printf('Intent created: %s' . PHP_EOL, $response->getName());
}
I am getting error message
{
"message": "com.google.apps.framework.request.BadRequestException: Resource name does not match format 'projects/{project_id}/agent/sessions/{session_id}/contexts/{context_id}' or 'projects/{project_id}/locations/{location_id}/agent/sessions/{session_id}/contexts/{context_id}'.",
"code": 3,
"status": "INVALID_ARGUMENT",
"details": []
}
I believe the issue is with the format of storing the output context. Please help me on this.
I had the same issue. The answer is to not put in the bare name, but to have a string of a certain format made
see http://googleapis.github.io/google-cloud-php/#/docs/google-cloud/v0.131.0/dialogflow/v2/intent?method=setOutputContexts
// $projectId your project id
// $sessionId can be anything, I use $sessionId = uniqid();
$uri = "projects/$projectId/agent/sessions/$sessionId/contexts/$con";
$contextObj->setName($uri);
I can see that there are any response about this topic.
I leave here my solution for the next generations
To create a output context you need to create the correct format, for this objetive you can use Context class Google\Cloud\Dialogflow\V2\Context
private function parseoOutputContexts($contexts, $project_id, $lifespan = 5)
{
$newContexts = array();
foreach ($contexts as $context) {
$newContexts[] = new Context(
[
'name' => 'projects/' . $project_id . '/agent/sessions/-/contexts/' . $context,
'lifespan_count' => $lifespan
]
);
}
return $newContexts;
}
And you can use this function to finnaly add the output context to the object Intent.
$dialogflow_intent = new Intent();
$output_contexts = ['output_context_1'. 'output_context_2'];
$output_contexts = $this->parseOutputContexts($output_contexts, '[YOUR_PROJECT_ID]');
$dialogflow_intent->setOutputContexts($output_contexts);

Why is array.push() not working correctly?

I have a function which returns an array of dishes from a firestore database.
With console.log I check that the dish I want to push is correctly formatted, then push it.
Finally I console.log the array to check if everything is alright.
Here is what I got:
https://image.noelshack.com/fichiers/2019/05/5/1549048418-arraypush.png
switch (type) {
case "Plats": {
this.nourritureCollection.ref.get().then(data => {
let platArray : Plat[] = [];
data.docs.forEach(doc => {
this.plat.name = doc.data().nourritureJson.name;
this.plat.price = doc.data().nourritureJson.price;
this.plat.ingredients = doc.data().nourritureJson.ingredients;
this.plat.type = doc.data().nourritureJson.type;
this.plat.availableQuantity = doc.data().nourritureJson.availableQuantity;
this.plat.isAvailableOffMenu = doc.data().nourritureJson.isAvailableOffMenu;
this.plat.imgUrl = doc.data().nourritureJson.imgUrl;
this.plat.temp = doc.data().nourritureJson.temp;
console.log(this.plat)
platArray.push(this.plat);
});
console.log(platArray)
return platArray;
});
break;
}...
plat is instantiated within my service component, I couldn't declare a new Plat() inside my function.
The expected result is that dishes should be different in my array of dishes.
You are updating this.plat in every iteration. So it will have n number of references in the array pointing to the same object, therefore, the values for all the array elements will be last updated value of this.plat
What you need is to create new Plat object for every iteration.
data.docs.forEach(doc => {
let plat: Plat = new Plat();
plat.name = doc.data().nourritureJson.name;
plat.price = doc.data().nourritureJson.price;
plat.ingredients = doc.data().nourritureJson.ingredients;
plat.type = doc.data().nourritureJson.type;
plat.availableQuantity = doc.data().nourritureJson.availableQuantity;
plat.isAvailableOffMenu = doc.data().nourritureJson.isAvailableOffMenu;
plat.imgUrl = doc.data().nourritureJson.imgUrl;
plat.temp = doc.data().nourritureJson.temp;
console.log(plat)
platArray.push(plat);
});
As pointed out in the comment, you can only use new Plat() if Plat is a class, if it is an interface, just let plat:Plat; would do.

Getting an error while saving JSON in to mongodb [duplicate]

How do I display the content of a JavaScript object in a string format like when we alert a variable?
The same formatted way I want to display an object.
Use native JSON.stringify method.
Works with nested objects and all major browsers support this method.
str = JSON.stringify(obj);
str = JSON.stringify(obj, null, 4); // (Optional) beautiful indented output.
console.log(str); // Logs output to dev tools console.
alert(str); // Displays output using window.alert()
Link to Mozilla API Reference and other examples.
obj = JSON.parse(str); // Reverses above operation (Just in case if needed.)
Use a custom JSON.stringify replacer if you
encounter this Javascript error
"Uncaught TypeError: Converting circular structure to JSON"
If you want to print the object for debugging purposes, use the code:
var obj = {
prop1: 'prop1Value',
prop2: 'prop2Value',
child: {
childProp1: 'childProp1Value',
},
}
console.log(obj)
will display:
Note: you must only log the object. For example, this won't work:
console.log('My object : ' + obj)
Note ': You can also use a comma in the log method, then the first line of the output will be the string and after that, the object will be rendered:
console.log('My object: ', obj);
var output = '';
for (var property in object) {
output += property + ': ' + object[property]+'; ';
}
alert(output);
console.dir(object):
Displays an interactive listing of the properties of a specified JavaScript object. This listing lets you use disclosure triangles to examine the contents of child objects.
Note that the console.dir() feature is non-standard. See MDN Web Docs
Try this:
console.log(JSON.stringify(obj))
This will print the stringify version of object. So instead of [object] as an output you will get the content of object.
Well, Firefox (thanks to #Bojangles for detailed information) has Object.toSource() method which prints objects as JSON and function(){}.
That's enough for most debugging purposes, I guess.
If you want to use alert, to print your object, you can do this:
alert("myObject is " + myObject.toSource());
It should print each property and its corresponding value in string format.
If you would like to see data in tabular format you can use:
console.table(obj);
Table can be sorted if you click on the table column.
You can also select what columns to show:
console.table(obj, ['firstName', 'lastName']);
You can find more information about console.table here
Function:
var print = function(o){
var str='';
for(var p in o){
if(typeof o[p] == 'string'){
str+= p + ': ' + o[p]+'; </br>';
}else{
str+= p + ': { </br>' + print(o[p]) + '}';
}
}
return str;
}
Usage:
var myObject = {
name: 'Wilson Page',
contact: {
email: 'wilson#hotmail.com',
tel: '123456789'
}
}
$('body').append( print(myObject) );
Example:
http://jsfiddle.net/WilsonPage/6eqMn/
In NodeJS you can print an object by using util.inspect(obj). Be sure to state the depth or you'll only have a shallow print of the object.
Simply use
JSON.stringify(obj)
Example
var args_string = JSON.stringify(obj);
console.log(args_string);
Or
alert(args_string);
Also, note in javascript functions are considered as objects.
As an extra note :
Actually you can assign new property like this and access it console.log or display it in alert
foo.moo = "stackoverflow";
console.log(foo.moo);
alert(foo.moo);
To print the full object with Node.js with colors as a bonus:
console.dir(object, {depth: null, colors: true})
Colors are of course optional, 'depth: null' will print the full object.
The options don't seem to be supported in browsers.
References:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Console/dir
https://nodejs.org/api/console.html#console_console_dir_obj_options
NB:
In these examples, yourObj defines the object you want to examine.
First off my least favorite yet most utilized way of displaying an object:
This is the defacto way of showing the contents of an object
console.log(yourObj)
will produce something like :
I think the best solution is to look through the Objects Keys, and then through the Objects Values if you really want to see what the object holds...
console.log(Object.keys(yourObj));
console.log(Object.values(yourObj));
It will output something like :
(pictured above: the keys/values stored in the object)
There is also this new option if you're using ECMAScript 2016 or newer:
Object.keys(yourObj).forEach(e => console.log(`key=${e} value=${yourObj[e]}`));
This will produce neat output :
The solution mentioned in a previous answer: console.log(yourObj) displays too many parameters and is not the most user friendly way to display the data you want. That is why I recommend logging keys and then values separately.
Next up :
console.table(yourObj)
Someone in an earlier comment suggested this one, however it never worked for me. If it does work for someone else on a different browser or something, then kudos! Ill still put the code here for reference!
Will output something like this to the console :
Here's a way to do it:
console.log("%o", obj);
Use this:
console.log('print object: ' + JSON.stringify(session));
As it was said before best and most simply way i found was
var getPrintObject=function(object)
{
return JSON.stringify(object);
}
(This has been added to my library at GitHub)
Reinventing the wheel here! None of these solutions worked for my situation. So, I quickly doctored up wilsonpage's answer. This one is not for printing to screen (via console, or textfield or whatever). It does work fine in those situations and works just fine as the OP requested, for alert. Many answers here do not address using alert as the OP requested. Anyhow, It is, however, formatted for data transport. This version seems to return a very similar result as toSource(). I've not tested against JSON.stringify, but I assume this is about the same thing. This version is more like a poly-fil so that you can use it in any environment. The result of this function is a valid Javascript object declaration.
I wouldn't doubt if something like this was already on SO somewhere, but it was just shorter to make it than to spend a while searching past answers. And since this question was my top hit on google when I started searching about this; I figured putting it here might help others.
Anyhow, the result from this function will be a string representation of your object, even if your object has embedded objects and arrays, and even if those objects or arrays have even further embedded objects and arrays. (I heard you like to drink? So, I pimped your car with a cooler. And then, I pimped your cooler with a cooler. So, your cooler can drink, while your being cool.)
Arrays are stored with [] instead of {} and thus dont have key/value pairs, just values. Like regular arrays. Therefore, they get created like arrays do.
Also, all string (including key names) are quoted, this is not necessary unless those strings have special characters (like a space or a slash). But, I didn't feel like detecting this just to remove some quotes that would otherwise still work fine.
This resulting string can then be used with eval or just dumping it into a var thru string manipulation. Thus, re-creating your object again, from text.
function ObjToSource(o){
if (!o) return 'null';
var k="",na=typeof(o.length)=="undefined"?1:0,str="";
for(var p in o){
if (na) k = "'"+p+ "':";
if (typeof o[p] == "string") str += k + "'" + o[p]+"',";
else if (typeof o[p] == "object") str += k + ObjToSource(o[p])+",";
else str += k + o[p] + ",";
}
if (na) return "{"+str.slice(0,-1)+"}";
else return "["+str.slice(0,-1)+"]";
}
Let me know if I messed it all up, works fine in my testing. Also, the only way I could think of to detect type array was to check for the presence of length. Because Javascript really stores arrays as objects, I cant actually check for type array (there is no such type!). If anyone else knows a better way, I would love to hear it. Because, if your object also has a property named length then this function will mistakenly treat it as an array.
EDIT: Added check for null valued objects. Thanks Brock Adams
EDIT: Below is the fixed function to be able to print infinitely recursive objects. This does not print the same as toSource from FF because toSource will print the infinite recursion one time, where as, this function will kill it immediately. This function runs slower than the one above, so I'm adding it here instead of editing the above function, as its only needed if you plan to pass objects that link back to themselves, somewhere.
const ObjToSource=(o)=> {
if (!o) return null;
let str="",na=0,k,p;
if (typeof(o) == "object") {
if (!ObjToSource.check) ObjToSource.check = new Array();
for (k=ObjToSource.check.length;na<k;na++) if (ObjToSource.check[na]==o) return '{}';
ObjToSource.check.push(o);
}
k="",na=typeof(o.length)=="undefined"?1:0;
for(p in o){
if (na) k = "'"+p+"':";
if (typeof o[p] == "string") str += k+"'"+o[p]+"',";
else if (typeof o[p] == "object") str += k+ObjToSource(o[p])+",";
else str += k+o[p]+",";
}
if (typeof(o) == "object") ObjToSource.check.pop();
if (na) return "{"+str.slice(0,-1)+"}";
else return "["+str.slice(0,-1)+"]";
}
Test:
var test1 = new Object();
test1.foo = 1;
test1.bar = 2;
var testobject = new Object();
testobject.run = 1;
testobject.fast = null;
testobject.loop = testobject;
testobject.dup = test1;
console.log(ObjToSource(testobject));
console.log(testobject.toSource());
Result:
{'run':1,'fast':null,'loop':{},'dup':{'foo':1,'bar':2}}
({run:1, fast:null, loop:{run:1, fast:null, loop:{}, dup:{foo:1, bar:2}}, dup:{foo:1, bar:2}})
NOTE: Trying to print document.body is a terrible example. For one, FF just prints an empty object string when using toSource. And when using the function above, FF crashes on SecurityError: The operation is insecure.. And Chrome will crash on Uncaught RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded. Clearly, document.body was not meant to be converted to string. Because its either too large, or against security policy to access certain properties. Unless, I messed something up here, do tell!
If you would like to print the object of its full length, can use
console.log(require('util').inspect(obj, {showHidden: false, depth: null})
If you want to print the object by converting it to the string then
console.log(JSON.stringify(obj));
I needed a way to recursively print the object, which pagewil's answer provided (Thanks!). I updated it a little bit to include a way to print up to a certain level, and to add spacing so that it is properly indented based on the current level that we are in so that it is more readable.
// Recursive print of object
var print = function( o, maxLevel, level ) {
if ( typeof level == "undefined" ) {
level = 0;
}
if ( typeof level == "undefined" ) {
maxLevel = 0;
}
var str = '';
// Remove this if you don't want the pre tag, but make sure to remove
// the close pre tag on the bottom as well
if ( level == 0 ) {
str = '<pre>';
}
var levelStr = '';
for ( var x = 0; x < level; x++ ) {
levelStr += ' ';
}
if ( maxLevel != 0 && level >= maxLevel ) {
str += levelStr + '...</br>';
return str;
}
for ( var p in o ) {
if ( typeof o[p] == 'string' ) {
str += levelStr +
p + ': ' + o[p] + ' </br>';
} else {
str += levelStr +
p + ': { </br>' + print( o[p], maxLevel, level + 1 ) + levelStr + '}</br>';
}
}
// Remove this if you don't want the pre tag, but make sure to remove
// the open pre tag on the top as well
if ( level == 0 ) {
str += '</pre>';
}
return str;
};
Usage:
var pagewilsObject = {
name: 'Wilson Page',
contact: {
email: 'wilson#hotmail.com',
tel: '123456789'
}
}
// Recursive of whole object
$('body').append( print(pagewilsObject) );
// Recursive of myObject up to 1 level, will only show name
// and that there is a contact object
$('body').append( print(pagewilsObject, 1) );
You can also use ES6 template literal concept to display the content of a JavaScript object in a string format.
alert(`${JSON.stringify(obj)}`);
const obj = {
"name" : "John Doe",
"habbits": "Nothing",
};
alert(`${JSON.stringify(obj)}`);
I always use console.log("object will be: ", obj, obj1).
this way I don't need to do the workaround with stringify with JSON.
All the properties of the object will be expanded nicely.
Another way of displaying objects within the console is with JSON.stringify. Checkout the below example:
var gandalf = {
"real name": "Gandalf",
"age (est)": 11000,
"race": "Maia",
"haveRetirementPlan": true,
"aliases": [
"Greyhame",
"Stormcrow",
"Mithrandir",
"Gandalf the Grey",
"Gandalf the White"
]
};
//to console log object, we cannot use console.log("Object gandalf: " + gandalf);
console.log("Object gandalf: ");
//this will show object gandalf ONLY in Google Chrome NOT in IE
console.log(gandalf);
//this will show object gandalf IN ALL BROWSERS!
console.log(JSON.stringify(gandalf));
//this will show object gandalf IN ALL BROWSERS! with beautiful indent
console.log(JSON.stringify(gandalf, null, 4));
Javascript Function
<script type="text/javascript">
function print_r(theObj){
if(theObj.constructor == Array || theObj.constructor == Object){
document.write("<ul>")
for(var p in theObj){
if(theObj[p].constructor == Array || theObj[p].constructor == Object){
document.write("<li>["+p+"] => "+typeof(theObj)+"</li>");
document.write("<ul>")
print_r(theObj[p]);
document.write("</ul>")
} else {
document.write("<li>["+p+"] => "+theObj[p]+"</li>");
}
}
document.write("</ul>")
}
}
</script>
Printing Object
<script type="text/javascript">
print_r(JAVACRIPT_ARRAY_OR_OBJECT);
</script>
via print_r in Javascript
var list = function(object) {
for(var key in object) {
console.log(key);
}
}
where object is your object
or you can use this in chrome dev tools, "console" tab:
console.log(object);
Assume object obj = {0:'John', 1:'Foo', 2:'Bar'}
Print object's content
for (var i in obj){
console.log(obj[i], i);
}
Console output (Chrome DevTools) :
John 0
Foo 1
Bar 2
Hope that helps!
I prefer using console.table for getting clear object format, so imagine you have this object:
const obj = {name: 'Alireza', family: 'Dezfoolian', gender: 'male', netWorth: "$0"};
And you will you see a neat and readable table like this below:
Circular references solution
To make string without redundant information from object which contains duplicate references (references to same object in many places) including circular references, use JSON.stringify with replacer (presented in snippet) as follows
let s = JSON.stringify(obj, refReplacer(), 4);
function refReplacer() {
let m = new Map(), v= new Map(), init = null;
return function(field, value) {
let p= m.get(this) + (Array.isArray(this) ? `[${field}]` : '.' + field);
let isComplex= value===Object(value)
if (isComplex) m.set(value, p);
let pp = v.get(value)||'';
let path = p.replace(/undefined\.\.?/,'');
let val = pp ? `#REF:${pp[0]=='[' ? '$':'$.'}${pp}` : value;
!init ? (init=value) : (val===init ? val="#REF:$" : 0);
if(!pp && isComplex) v.set(value, path);
return val;
}
}
// ---------------
// TEST
// ---------------
// gen obj with duplicate references
let a = { a1: 1, a2: 2 };
let b = { b1: 3, b2: "4" };
let obj = { o1: { o2: a }, b, a }; // duplicate reference
a.a3 = [1,2,b]; // circular reference
b.b3 = a; // circular reference
let s = JSON.stringify(obj, refReplacer(), 4);
console.log(s);
alert(s);
This solution based on this (more info there) create JSONPath like path for each object value and if same object occurs twice (or more) it uses reference with this path to reference that object e.g. #REF:$.bar.arr[3].foo (where $ means main object) instead 'render' whole object (which is less redundant)
BONUS: inversion
function parseRefJSON(json) {
let objToPath = new Map();
let pathToObj = new Map();
let o = JSON.parse(json);
let traverse = (parent, field) => {
let obj = parent;
let path = '#REF:$';
if (field !== undefined) {
obj = parent[field];
path = objToPath.get(parent) + (Array.isArray(parent) ? `[${field}]` : `${field?'.'+field:''}`);
}
objToPath.set(obj, path);
pathToObj.set(path, obj);
let ref = pathToObj.get(obj);
if (ref) parent[field] = ref;
for (let f in obj) if (obj === Object(obj)) traverse(obj, f);
}
traverse(o);
return o;
}
// ------------
// TEST
// ------------
let s = `{
"o1": {
"o2": {
"a1": 1,
"a2": 2,
"a3": [
1,
2,
{
"b1": 3,
"b2": "4",
"b3": "#REF:$.o1.o2"
}
]
}
},
"b": "#REF:$.o1.o2.a3[2]",
"a": "#REF:$.o1.o2"
}`;
console.log('Open Chrome console to see nested fields');
let obj = parseRefJSON(s);
console.log(obj);
A little helper function I always use in my projects for simple, speedy debugging via the console.
Inspiration taken from Laravel.
/**
* #param variable mixed The var to log to the console
* #param varName string Optional, will appear as a label before the var
*/
function dd(variable, varName) {
var varNameOutput;
varName = varName || '';
varNameOutput = varName ? varName + ':' : '';
console.warn(varNameOutput, variable, ' (' + (typeof variable) + ')');
}
Usage
dd(123.55); outputs:
var obj = {field1: 'xyz', field2: 2016};
dd(obj, 'My Cool Obj');
The console.log() does a great job of debugging objects, but if you are looking to print the object to the page content, here's the simplest way that I've come up with to mimic the functionality of PHP's print_r(). A lot these other answers want to reinvent the wheel, but between JavaScript's JSON.stringify() and HTML's <pre> tag, you get exactly what you are looking for.
var obj = { name: 'The Name', contact: { email: 'thename#gmail.com', tel: '123456789' }};
$('body').append('<pre>'+JSON.stringify(obj, null, 4)+'</pre>');
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.3.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
i used pagewil's print method, and it worked very nicely.
here is my slightly extended version with (sloppy) indents and distinct prop/ob delimiters:
var print = function(obj, delp, delo, ind){
delp = delp!=null ? delp : "\t"; // property delimeter
delo = delo!=null ? delo : "\n"; // object delimeter
ind = ind!=null ? ind : " "; // indent; ind+ind geometric addition not great for deep objects
var str='';
for(var prop in obj){
if(typeof obj[prop] == 'string' || typeof obj[prop] == 'number'){
var q = typeof obj[prop] == 'string' ? "" : ""; // make this "'" to quote strings
str += ind + prop + ': ' + q + obj[prop] + q + '; ' + delp;
}else{
str += ind + prop + ': {'+ delp + print(obj[prop],delp,delo,ind+ind) + ind + '}' + delo;
}
}
return str;
};

How to create Purchase Order in Netsuite with ScriptSuite?

I am new to Netsuite and I was asked to perform a script that was launched from an application programmed in java. The script with a function to generate a Purchase Order in Netsuite and other function to list the Purchase Order created earlier. It turns out that for this I am using the api SuiteScript but when creating the Purchase Order run the java application and launches the script but it gives the following error:
Aug 03, 2015 2:49:00 PM com.gargoylesoftware.htmlunit.WebClient printContentIfNecessary
INFO: {"error": {"code": "user_error", "message": "Please enter value (s) for: Vendor"}}
Javascript function to create is:
function CreatePurchase_Orders(datain){
var output = '';
nlapiLogExecution('DEBUG','createRecord','ingreso la consulta' ) ;
nlapiLogExecution('DEBUG','createRecord', 'Ingresa: '+ datain);
//var msg = validateTimeBills(datain);
var msg = null;
if (msg){
var err = new Object();
err.status = "failed";
err.message= msg;
return err;
}
var Purchase_Orders = datain.Purchase_Order;
nlapiLogExecution('DEBUG','createRecord', 'obtuvo el objeto: '+ Purchase_Orders);
for (var Purchase_Orderobject in Purchase_Orders){
var Purchase_Order = Purchase_Orders[Purchase_Orderobject];
var transdate = Purchase_Order.Transdate;
var Form = Purchase_Order.Form;
var Vendor = Purchase_Order.Vendor;
var Currency = Purchase_Order.Currency;
var Item = Purchase_Order.Item;
nlapiLogExecution('DEBUG','campos','transdate: '+ transdate+'/Form: '+Form + ' /Vendor: ' + Vendor + ' /Currency: ' + Currency
+ ' /Item: ' + Item);
var Purchase_Order = nlapiCreateRecord('purchaseorder');
var nlobjAssistant = nlapiCreateAssistant ( 'asistente' , false ) ;
var Purchase_Orderid = 1;//nlapiSubmitRecord( Purchase_Order , true, true);
if(Purchase_Order){
nlapiLogExecution('DEBUG', 'Purchase_Order ' + Purchase_Orderid + ' successfully created', '');
nlapiLogExecution('DEBUG', 'createRecord', 'creo el record');
}
Purchase_Order.setFieldValue('transdate', transdate);
Purchase_Order.setFieldValue('inpt_customform1', Form);
Purchase_Order.setFieldValue('vendor', Vendor);
Purchase_Order.setFieldValue('inpt_currency7', Currency);
Purchase_Order.setFieldValue('inpt_item', Item);
Purchase_Order.setFieldText('quantity_formattedValue', '1');
Purchase_Order.setFieldText('rate_formattedValue', '1');
Purchase_Order.setFieldText('amount_formattedValue', '1');
Purchase_Order.setFieldText('inpt_taxcode', 'VAT_MX:UNDEF_MX');
Purchase_Order.setFieldText('grossamt_formattedValue', '1');
Purchase_Order.setFieldText('tax1amt_formattedValue', '0');
Purchase_Order.setFieldText('expectedreceiptdate', '24/6/2015');
//var Purchase_Orderid = 1;//nlapiSubmitRecord( Purchase_Order , true, true);
var submitRecord = nlapiSubmitRecord(Purchase_Order);//,true);
nlapiLogExecution('DEBUG', 'submirRecord ' + submitRecord);
}
var mesg = new Object();
mesg.status = "OK";
mesg.message= nlobjAssistant.getAllFields();
return mesg;
}
And the function code in Java is:
WebClient client = new WebClient(BrowserVersion.FIREFOX_31);
client.getOptions().setJavaScriptEnabled(false);
client.getOptions().setThrowExceptionOnScriptError(false);
WebRequest requestSettings = new WebRequest(new URL(url),HttpMethod.POST);
requestSettings.setAdditionalHeader("Host", "rest.na1.netsuite.com");
requestSettings.setAdditionalHeader("User-Agent", "SuiteScript-Call");
requestSettings.setAdditionalHeader("Accept", "text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8");
requestSettings.setAdditionalHeader("Accept-Language", " es-cl,es;q=0.8,en-us;q=0.5,en;q=0.3");
requestSettings.setAdditionalHeader("Accept-Encoding", "gzip, deflate");
requestSettings.setAdditionalHeader("Content-Type", "application/json");
requestSettings.setAdditionalHeader("Pragma", "no-cache");
requestSettings.setAdditionalHeader("Cache-Control", "no-cache");
requestSettings.setAdditionalHeader("Referer", "http://localhost:8084");
requestSettings.setAdditionalHeader("Cookie", "");
requestSettings.setAdditionalHeader("Connection", "keep-alive");
requestSettings.setAdditionalHeader("Authorization", "NLAuth nlauth_account=" + account + ", nlauth_email=" + mail + ", nlauth_signature=" + pass + ", nlauth_role=" + role + "");
Gson gson = new Gson();
//objeto llenado estaticamente de forma momentanea, se debe leer desde archivo externo
Purchase_Order purchaseOrder = new Purchase_Order("25/06/2015","formTest","vendorTest","CurrencyTest","itemTest");
String cuerpo = gson.toJson(purchaseOrder);
System.out.println(cuerpo);
// Set the request parameters
requestSettings.setRequestBody(cuerpo);
Page page = client.getPage(requestSettings);
WebResponse response = page.getWebResponse();
String json = response.getContentAsString();
System.out.println(json);
With this javascript function you should create me a record Purchase Order but I can not find the error and the solution if someone could please help me I would appreciate it a lot.
PS: if you have to create a customized form could tell me how?
thanks!
Here are some points :
As your error message says Please enter value (s) for: Vendor, you're missing the value for vendor field, which is mandatory. In your piece of code you're passing wrong internalid value for vendor. You should use entity instead of vendor
Purchase_Order.setFieldValue('entity', Vendor); // where vendor is the internal id of the vendor record
For setting custom form you can use
Purchase_Order.setFieldValue('customform', Form); // where Form is the id of the custom form
I also noticed that you're setting some values in purchase order which I suspect are to be a kind of custom one. If that is the case, then your custom field internal id should be prefixed with custbody.
For all the standard fields internal id you can refer to the Suite script Records Browser.

OracleBulkCopy error: '0' is not a valid value for 'Interval'

I have the following code
using (OracleConnection srcConn = new OracleConnection())
using (OracleConnection destConn = new OracleConnection())
{
srcConn.ConnectionString = AppInfo.SrcConnStr;
srcConn.Open();
destConn.ConnectionString = AppInfo.DestConnStr;
destConn.Open();
using (OracleCommand destCmd = new OracleCommand("ALTER SESSION SET NLS_DATE_FORMAT = 'yyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss'", destConn))
using (OracleCommand srcCmd = new OracleCommand("ALTER SESSION SET NLS_DATE_FORMAT = 'yyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss'", srcConn))
{
// Non-query
srcCmd.ExecuteNonQuery();
destCmd.ExecuteNonQuery();
if (Timing) { ut.TimeIt(stopwatch, "Get Connection and Command"); }
srcCmd.CommandTimeout = 0;
destCmd.CommandTimeout = 0;
srcCmd.CommandText = "select * from table_name";
rd = srcCmd.ExecuteReader();
rd.FetchSize = rd.RowSize * AppInfo.BatchSize; }
OracleBulkCopy copy = new OracleBulkCopy(destConn);
copy.DestinationTableName = DestTable;
copy.BatchSize = AppInfo.BatchSize;
copy.NotifyAfter = AppInfo.BatchSize;
copy.OracleRowsCopied += new OracleRowsCopiedEventHandler(OnOracleRowsCopied);
copy.BulkCopyTimeout = AppInfo.CommandTimeOut;
copy.WriteToServer(rd);
}
}
When it got to copy.WriteToServer(rd); it gives the following error
System.ArgumentException was caught
Message='0' is not a valid value for 'Interval'. 'Interval' must be greater than 0.
Source=System
StackTrace:
at System.Timers.Timer.set_Interval(Double value)
at Oracle.DataAccess.Client.OracleBulkCopy.PerformBulkCopy()
at Oracle.DataAccess.Client.OracleBulkCopy.WriteDataSourceToServer()
at Oracle.DataAccess.Client.OracleBulkCopy.WriteToServer(IDataReader reader)
My question is, How do I fix it?
Any help is appreciated.
The issue might be setting CommandTimeouts to zero. Try a reasonable number. I think this is specified in seconds.

Resources