Dataframe:
id review name label
1 it is a great product for turning lights on. Ashley
2 plays music and have a good sound. Alex
3 I love it, lots of fun. Peter
I want to use probabilistic classifier (linear_svc) to predict labels (probability of 1) based on review. My code:
from sklearn.svm import LinearSVC
from sklearn.calibration import CalibratedClassifierCV
from sklearn import datasets
#Load dataset
X = training['review']
y = training['label']
linear_svc = LinearSVC() #The base estimator
# This is the calibrated classifier which can give probabilistic classifier
calibrated_svc = CalibratedClassifierCV(linear_svc,
method='sigmoid', #sigmoid will use Platt's scaling. Refer to documentation for other methods.
cv=3)
calibrated_svc.fit(X, y)
# predict
prediction_data = predict_data['review']
predicted_probs = calibrated_svc.predict_proba(prediction_data)
It gives following error on calibrated_svc.fit(X, y):
ValueError: could not convert string to float: 'it is a great product
for turning...'
I would appreciate your help.
SVM models cannot handle text data directly. You need to extract some numeric features from the text first. I recommend reading some content on NLP such as Bag of Words and TF-IDF. In any case, for the example you're suggesting, a functional minimal pipeline would be:
from sklearn.calibration import CalibratedClassifierCV
from sklearn import datasets
from sklearn.pipeline import make_pipeline
from sklearn.feature_extraction.text import TfidfVectorizer
#Load dataset
X = training['review']
y = training['label']
linear_svc = make_pipeline(TfIdfVectorizer(), LinearSVC())
# This is the calibrated classifier which can give probabilistic classifier
calibrated_svc = CalibratedClassifierCV(linear_svc,
method='sigmoid',
cv=3)
calibrated_svc.fit(X, y)
# predict
prediction_data = predict_data['review']
predicted_probs = calibrated_svc.predict_proba(prediction_data)
You probably also want to clean the text a bit by removing special characters, lowercasing, stemming, etc. Take a look at spacy the library for text-processing.
Try this:
from sklearn.feature_extraction.text import TfidfVectorizer
X = training['review']
y = training['label']
prediction_data = predict_data['review']
tfv = TfidfVectorizer(min_df=1, stop_words = 'english')
tfv.fit(list(X) + list(prediction_data))
X = tfv.transform(X)
prediction_data = tfv.transform(prediction_data)
Then build the model:
linear_svc = LinearSVC()
calibrated_svc = CalibratedClassifierCV(linear_svc, method='sigmoid', cv=3)
calibrated_svc.fit(X, y)
Related
In sklearn.model_selection.cross_validate , is there a way to output the samples / indices which were used as test set by the CV splitter for each fold?
There's an option to specify the cross-validation generator, using cv option :
cv int, cross-validation generator or an iterable, default=None
Determines the cross-validation splitting strategy. Possible inputs
for cv are:
None, to use the default 5-fold cross validation,
int, to specify the number of folds in a (Stratified)KFold,
CV splitter,
An iterable yielding (train, test) splits as arrays of indices.
For int/None inputs, if the estimator is a classifier and y is either
binary or multiclass, StratifiedKFold is used. In all other cases,
KFold is used. These splitters are instantiated with shuffle=False so
the splits will be the same across calls.
If you provide it as an input to cross_validate :
from sklearn import datasets, linear_model
from sklearn.model_selection import cross_validate
from sklearn.model_selection import KFold
from sklearn.svm import LinearSVC
diabetes = datasets.load_diabetes()
X = diabetes.data[:150]
y = diabetes.target[:150]
lasso = linear_model.Lasso()
kf = KFold(5, random_state = 99, shuffle = True)
cv_results = cross_validate(lasso, X, y, cv=kf)
You can extract the index like this:
idx = [test_index for train_index, test_index in kf.split(X)]
Where the first in the list will be the test index for the 1st fold and so on..
It is a multi-class classification model with sklearn.
I am using OneVsOneClassifier model to train and predict 150 intents. Its a multi-class classification problem.
Data:
text intents
text1 int1
text2 int2
I convert these intents in labels using:
le = LabelEncoder()
y_train = le.fit_transform(y_train)
y_test = le.fit_transform(y_test)
Expectation:
Without changing the training pipeline or parameters, note the inference time. Currently, it's slow, ~1second for 1 inference. So to convert pipeline to ONNX format and then use for inferencing on 1 example.
Code:
from sklearn.feature_extraction.text import TfidfVectorizer
from sklearn.compose import ColumnTransformer
from sklearn.multiclass import OneVsRestClassifier, OneVsOneClassifier
from sklearn.pipeline import Pipeline
from sklearn.svm import SVC,LinearSVC
def create_pipe(clf):
# Each pipeline uses the same column transformer.
column_trans = ColumnTransformer(
[('Text', TfidfVectorizer(), 'text')
],
remainder='drop')
pipeline = Pipeline([('prep',column_trans),
('clf', clf)])
return pipeline
def fit_and_print(pipeline):
pipeline.fit(X_train, y_train)
y_pred = pipeline.predict(X_test)
print(metrics.classification_report(y_test, y_pred,
target_names=le.classes_,
digits=3))
clf = OneVsOneClassifier(LinearSVC(random_state=42, class_weight='balanced'))
pipeline = create_pipe(clf)
%time fit_and_print(pipeline)
# convert input to df
def create_test_data(x):
d = {'text' : x}
df = pd.DataFrame(d, index=[0])
return df
revs=[]
for idx in [948, 5717, 458]:
cur = test.loc[idx, 'text']
revs.append(cur)
print(revs)
revs=sam['text'].values
%%time
for rev in revs:
c_res = pipeline.predict(create_test_data(rev))
print(rev, '=', labels[c_res[0]])
ONNX conversion code
from skl2onnx import convert_sklearn
from skl2onnx.common.data_types import FloatTensorType, StringTensorType
initial_type = [('UTTERANCE', StringTensorType([None, 2]))]
model_onnx = convert_sklearn(pipeline, initial_types=initial_type)
Error
MissingShapeCalculator: Unable to find a shape calculator for type '<class 'sklearn.multiclass.OneVsOneClassifier'>'.
It usually means the pipeline being converted contains a
transformer or a predictor with no corresponding converter
implemented in sklearn-onnx. If the converted is implemented
in another library, you need to register
the converted so that it can be used by sklearn-onnx (function
update_registered_converter). If the model is not yet covered
by sklearn-onnx, you may raise an issue to
https://github.com/onnx/sklearn-onnx/issues
to get the converter implemented or even contribute to the
project. If the model is a custom model, a new converter must
be implemented. Examples can be found in the gallery.
How to resolve this? Also how to do prediction after converting to ONNX format?
Following reproducible script is used to compute the accuracy of a Word2Vec classifier with the W2VTransformer wrapper in gensim:
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
from sklearn.linear_model import LogisticRegression
from sklearn.pipeline import Pipeline
from gensim.sklearn_api import W2VTransformer
from gensim.utils import simple_preprocess
# Load synthetic data
data = pd.read_csv('https://pastebin.com/raw/EPCmabvN')
data = data.head(10)
# Set random seed
np.random.seed(0)
# Tokenize text
X_train = data.apply(lambda r: simple_preprocess(r['text'], min_len=2), axis=1)
# Get labels
y_train = data.label
train_input = [x[0] for x in X_train]
# Train W2V Model
model = W2VTransformer(size=10, min_count=1)
model.fit(X_train)
clf = LogisticRegression(penalty='l2', C=0.1)
clf.fit(model.transform(train_input), y_train)
text_w2v = Pipeline(
[('features', model),
('classifier', clf)])
score = text_w2v.score(train_input, y_train)
score
0.80000000000000004
The problem with this script is that it only works when train_input = [x[0] for x in X_train], which essentially is always the first word only.
Once change to train_input = X_train (or train_input simply substituted by X_train), the script returns:
ValueError: cannot reshape array of size 10 into shape (10,10)
How can I solve this issue, i.e. how can the classifier work with more than one word of input?
Edit:
Apparently, the W2V wrapper can't work with the variable-length train input, as compared to D2V. Here is a working D2V version:
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
from sklearn.linear_model import LogisticRegression
from sklearn.model_selection import cross_val_score
from sklearn.metrics import accuracy_score, classification_report
from sklearn.pipeline import Pipeline
from gensim.utils import simple_preprocess, lemmatize
from gensim.sklearn_api import D2VTransformer
data = pd.read_csv('https://pastebin.com/raw/bSGWiBfs')
np.random.seed(0)
X_train = data.apply(lambda r: simple_preprocess(r['text'], min_len=2), axis=1)
y_train = data.label
model = D2VTransformer(dm=1, size=50, min_count=2, iter=10, seed=0)
model.fit(X_train)
clf = LogisticRegression(penalty='l2', C=0.1, random_state=0)
clf.fit(model.transform(X_train), y_train)
pipeline = Pipeline([
('vec', model),
('clf', clf)
])
y_pred = pipeline.predict(X_train)
score = accuracy_score(y_train,y_pred)
print(score)
This is technically not an answer, but cannot be written in comments so here it is. There are multiple issues here:
LogisticRegression class (and most other scikit-learn models) work with 2-d data (n_samples, n_features).
That means that it needs a collection of 1-d arrays (one for each row (sample), in which the elements of array contains the feature values).
In your data, a single word will be a 1-d array, which means that the single sentence (sample) will be a 2-d array. Which means that the complete data (collection of sentences here) will be a collection of 2-d arrays. Even in that, since each sentence can have different number of words, it cannot be combined into a single 3-d array.
Secondly, the W2VTransformer in gensim looks like a scikit-learn compatible class, but its not. It tries to follows "scikit-learn API conventions" for defining the methods fit(), fit_transform() and transform(). They are not compatible with scikit-learn Pipeline.
You can see that the input param requirements of fit() and fit_transform() are different.
fit():
X (iterable of iterables of str) – The input corpus.
X can be simply a list of lists of tokens, but for larger corpora, consider an iterable that streams the sentences directly from
disk/network. See BrownCorpus, Text8Corpus or LineSentence in word2vec
module for such examples.
fit_transform():
X (numpy array of shape [n_samples, n_features]) – Training set.
If you want to use scikit-learn, then you will need to have the 2-d shape. You will need to "somehow merge" word-vectors for a single sentence to form a 1-d array for that sentence. That means that you need to form a kind of sentence-vector, by doing:
sum of individual words
average of individual words
weighted averaging of individual words based on frequency, tf-idf etc.
using other techniques like sent2vec, paragraph2vec, doc2vec etc.
Note:- I noticed now that you were doing this thing based on D2VTransformer. That should be the correct approach here if you want to use sklearn.
The issue in that question was this line (since that question is now deleted):
X_train = vectorizer.fit_transform(X_train)
Here, you overwrite your original X_train (list of list of words) with already calculated word vectors and hence that error.
Or else, you can use other tools / libraries (keras, tensorflow) which allow sequential input of variable size. For example, LSTMs can be configured here to take a variable input and an ending token to mark the end of sentence (a sample).
Update:
In the above given solution, you can replace the lines:
model = D2VTransformer(dm=1, size=50, min_count=2, iter=10, seed=0)
model.fit(X_train)
clf = LogisticRegression(penalty='l2', C=0.1, random_state=0)
clf.fit(model.transform(X_train), y_train)
pipeline = Pipeline([
('vec', model),
('clf', clf)
])
y_pred = pipeline.predict(X_train)
with
pipeline = Pipeline([
('vec', model),
('clf', clf)
])
pipeline.fit(X_train, y_train)
y_pred = pipeline.predict(X_train)
No need to fit and transform separately, since pipeline.fit() will automatically do that.
All code is in python. I have a python list named "corpus" that contains reviews in total 2000(+ve and -ve reviews both). The main/important part of mycode is:
from sklearn.feature_extraction.text import CountVectorizer
vectorizer = CountVectorizer(max_features=2000, max_df=0.6, min_df=3, stop_words=stopwords.words("english"))
X = vectorizer.fit_transform(corpus)
from sklearn.feature_extraction.text import TfidfTransformer
transformer = TfidfTransformer()
X = transformer.fit_transform(X)
from sklearn.cross_validation import train_test_split
X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test = train_test_split(X, y, test_size=0.20, random_state=0)
from sklearn.linear_model import LogisticRegression
logistic_reg = LogisticRegression()
logistic_reg.fit(X_train, y_train)
Now I want to predict a sentence as +ve or -ve('1' or '0'). The sentence is
sample = ["you are a nice person and have a good life"]
How should I go about predicting for the above.(I know what is the role of CountVectorizer and TdfidfTransformer but it is sort of confusing me with the TdfidfVectorizer)
The things you have achieved by CountVectorizer and TfidfTranformer can be achieved by TfidfVecorizer alone.
Answer to your question:
sample = ["you are a nice person and have a good life"]
This is your sample data you want to predict.Here i have used transform method on vectorizer (CountVectorizer)
Count_sample = vectorizer.transform(sample)
After transforming CountVectorizer we have to use transform method on transformer(TfidfTranformer)
Tfidf_sample = transformer.transform(Count_sample)
After completing all the transformation of data use predict function of LogisticRegression
predicted = logistic_reg.predict(Tfidf_sample)
I'm trying to recompute grid.best_score_ I obtained on my own data without success...
So I tried it using a conventional dataset but no more success. Here is the code :
from sklearn import datasets
from sklearn import linear_model
from sklearn.cross_validation import ShuffleSplit
from sklearn import grid_search
from sklearn.metrics import r2_score
import numpy as np
lr = linear_model.LinearRegression()
boston = datasets.load_boston()
target = boston.target
param_grid = {'fit_intercept':[False]}
cv = ShuffleSplit(target.size, n_iter=5, test_size=0.30, random_state=0)
grid = grid_search.GridSearchCV(lr, param_grid, cv=cv)
grid.fit(boston.data, target)
# got cv score computed by gridSearchCV :
print grid.best_score_
0.677708680059
# now try a custom computation of cv score
cv_scores = []
for (train, test) in cv:
y_true = target[test]
y_pred = grid.best_estimator_.predict(boston.data[test,:])
cv_scores.append(r2_score(y_true, y_pred))
print np.mean(cv_scores)
0.703865991851
I can't see why it's different, GridSearchCV is supposed to use scorer from LinearRegression, which is r2 score. Maybe the way I code cv score is not the one used to compute best_score_... I'm asking here before going through GridSearchCV code.
Unless refit=False in the GridSearchCV constructor, the winning estimator is refit on the entire dataset at the end of fit. best_score_ is the estimator's average score using the cross-validation splits, while best_estimator_ is an estimator of the winning configuration fit on all the data.
lr2 = linear_model.LinearRegression(fit_intercept=False)
scores2 = [lr2.fit(boston.data[train,:], target[train]).score(boston.data[test,:], target[test])
for train, test in cv]
print np.mean(scores2)
Will print 0.67770868005943297.