Is it possible to fill the duedate field based on the terms field? For example, I have a date in the duedate field, but I want to extend it based on the terms field. How can I do it? Through Suitescript or workflow?
The code is incomplete because I don’t know if I’m on the right path.
(NB: It is a user event)
function beforeLoad(context) {
}
function beforeSubmit(context) {
}
function afterSubmit(context) {
var dataEntrega = context.currentRecord
currentRecordRecord.getValue({
fieldId: 'duedate'
})
var dataCondicoes = context.currentRecord
currentRecord.getValue({
fieldId: 'terms'
})
}
return {
beforeLoad: beforeLoad,
beforeSubmit: beforeSubmit,
afterSubmit: afterSubmit
}
Why do you need to script this? I believe the due date is calculated based on the terms out of the box, no need for scripting
The following code should work. Depending on your needs I recommend adding some limitations to when this logic is executed. For example you can only execute based on if the transaction/record mode is create/copy (decide if you want to include edit or not). You can also check the status of the transaction, and only execute if the status is not partially paid/paid in full...
function afterSubmit(context) {
//load record
var curRec = context.newRecord; //can substitute "context.oldRecord", or "currentRecord.get();"
//get current due date
var transDueDate = curRec.getValue({fieldId: 'duedate'});
//get the terms, this will likely come as an internal id. use getText if you want the text.
var transTerms = curRec.getValue({fieldId: 'terms'});
//empty string to hold terms as a number of days
var addtlDays;
//transform the internal id to terms as a number of days
switch (transTerms){
case 1: // Ex: 1 = internal id for term "Net 15"
addtlDays = 15;
break;
case 2: // Ex: 2 = internal id for term "Net 30"
addtlDays = 30;
break;
//add additional case statements as needed
default:
addtlDays = 0;
}
//calculuate the new due date
var d = new Date(transDueDate);
var newDueDate = d.setDate(d.getDate() + addtlDays);
//set the new due date
curRec.setValue({
fieldId: 'duedate',
value: newDueDate,
ignoreFieldChange: true //optional, default is false
});
}
Related
I'm trying to get the serial numbers from a inventory adjustment in a user event script. The following code works very well for me when the amount to adjust is positive, but not when it is negative.
var invDet = transaction.getSublistSubrecord({sublistId:'inventory',
fieldId:'inventorydetail',
line:x});
for(var y = 0; y = invDet.getLineCount('inventoryassignment'); y++) {
var lotNumber = invDet.getSublistValue({sublistId:'inventoryassignment',
fieldId:'receiptinventorynumber',
line:y});
log.debug('lotNumber', lotNumber);
}
When adjust quantity is negative, receiptinvetorynumber is empty
I have tried using field id equal to 'issueinventorynumber' or 'binnunber' but the returned value is empty.
I found the following comment in a NetsuiteHub forum...
In 2.0 the getValue call returns the internal ID of the serial/lot number and the getText equivalent does not work. Depending on the exact logic you need to execute for the obtained numbers you might need to call a subsequent saved search to obtain the actual serial/lot numbers and not internal IDs (an 'inventorynumber' search will do the trick).
I tried this...
try{
var internalId = invdet.getSublistValue({sublistId:'inventoryassignment',fieldId:'internalid', line:y});
search.create({type:'inventorynumber', filters:[
['internalid', 'is', internalId]
], columns:['inventorynumber']}).run().each(function (result) {
binText = result.getValue('inventorynumber');
log.debug('binText', binText);
});
} catch(e) {
log.debug('Error', e.message);
throw e.message;
}
I am too inexperienced to make this work. I appreciate any help you can give me.
Thanks.
The challenge is that this area of the NetSuite API is not well documented. However, I pushed through it through trial and error and search hours.
var invDet = transaction.getSublistSubrecord({sublistId:'inventory',
fieldId:'inventorydetail',
line:x});
for(var y = 0; y = invDet.getLineCount('inventoryassignment'); y++) {
var Qty = invdet.getSublistValue({sublistId:'inventoryassignment',
fieldId:'quantity',
line:y});
var lotNumber = '';
if(Qty < 0)
{
var ivnNumId = nvdet.getSublistValue({sublistId:'inventoryassignment',
fieldId:'issueinventorynumber',
line:y});
if(ivnNumId !== '')
{
var invNum = record.load({type: 'inventorynumber',id:ivnNumId});
lotNumber = invNum.getValue({fieldId: 'inventorynumber'});
}
}
else
{
lotNumber = invdet.getSublistValue({sublistId:'inventoryassignment',
fieldId:'receiptinventorynumber',
line:y});
}
log.debug('lotNumber', lotNumber);
}
This information was very helpful in ss1.0
I hope it is useful to someone
I have a custom list that is used as a matrix option of Inventory item. Its 'Color'. This custom list has an abbreviation column. I am creating a saved search on item and using Color field(join) and trying to access 'Abbreviation' field of color.
Abbreviation on custom list is available on when 'Matrix Option List' is checked.
Can someone please help me achieve this? I tried to do this through script and it seems like we cannot access 'Abbreviation' column through script. I also tried to use script to write a search directly on 'Color' - custom list and get the 'abbreviation' through search columns. It did not work. Is there a way to access 'Abbreviation' from custom lists?
Thanks in Advance
You can access it via suitescript by using the record type "customlist" and the internal id of the list like so:
var rec = nlapiLoadRecord('customlist', 5);
var abbreviation = rec.getLineItemValue('customvalue', 'abbreviation', 1);
nlapiLogExecution('DEBUG', 'abbreviation', abbreviation);
Keep in mind that the third argument of getLineItemValue is the line number, not the internal ID of the item in the list. If you want to find a specifc line item, you may want to use rec.findLineItemValue(group, fldnam, value).
Unfortunately, it doesn't look like this translates to saved searches. The suiteanswer at https://netsuite.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/10653 has the following code:
var col = new Array();
col[0] = new nlobjSearchColumn('name');
col[1] = new nlobjSearchColumn('internalid');
var results = nlapiSearchRecord('customlist25', null, null, col);
for ( var i = 0; results != null && i < results.length; i++ )
{
var res = results[i];
var listValue = (res.getValue('name'));
var listID = (res.getValue('internalid'));
nlapiLogExecution('DEBUG', (listValue + ", " + listID));
}
However, whatever part of the application layer translates this into a query doesn't handle the abbreviation field. One thing to keep in mind is that the 'custom list' record is basically a header record, and each individual entry is it's own record that ties to it. You can see some of the underlying structure here, but the takeaway is that you'd need some way to drill-down into the list entries, and the saved search interface doesn't really support it.
I could be wrong, but I don't think there's any way to get it to execute in a saved search as-is. I thought the first part of my answer might help you find a workaround though.
Here is a NetSuite SuiteScript 2.0 search I use to find the internalId for a given abbreviation in a custom list.
/**
* look up the internal id value for an abbreviation in a custom list
* #param string custom_list_name
* #param string abbreviation
* #return int
* */
function lookupNetsuiteCustomListInternalId( custom_list_name, abbreviation ){
var internal_id = -1;
var custom_list_search = search.create({
type: custom_list_name,
columns: [ { name:'internalId' }, { name:'abbreviation' } ]
});
var filters = [];
filters.push(
search.createFilter({
name: 'formulatext',
formula: "{abbreviation}",
operator: search.Operator.IS,
values: abbreviation
})
);
custom_list_search.filters = filters;
var result_set = custom_list_search.run();
var results = result_set.getRange( { start:0, end:1 } );
for( var i in results ){
log.debug( 'found custom list record', results[i] );
internal_id = results[i].getValue( { name:'internalId' } );
}
return internal_id;
}
Currently NetSuite does not allows using join on matrix option field. But as you mentioned, you can use an extra search to get the result, you could first fetch color id from item and then use search.lookupFields as follows
search.lookupFields({ type: MATRIX_COLOR_LIST_ID, id: COLOR_ID, columns: ['abbreviation'] });
Note: Once you have internalid of the color its better to use search.lookupFields rather than creating a new search with search.create.
I am attempting to retrieve a single sales order based on the Customer Order field in Acumatica with the Contract Based API. See my code below, which I based off of code in the Contract Based Documentation (page 82).
public SalesOrder GetSalesOrder(string orderNumber)
{
var binding = new System.ServiceModel.BasicHttpBinding()
{
AllowCookies = true,
MaxReceivedMessageSize = 655360,
MaxBufferSize = 655360,
SendTimeout = new TimeSpan(0, 2, 0)
};
var soToBeFound = new SalesOrder()
{
OrderType = new StringValue { Value = "SO" },
CustomerOrder = new StringValue { Value = orderNumber }
};
var address = new System.ServiceModel.EndpointAddress(ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["AcumaticaUrl"]);
using (DefaultSoapClient client = new DefaultSoapClient(binding, address))
{
client.Login(_acumaticaUid, _acumaticaPwd, _acumaticaCompany, null, null);
var existingOrder = (SalesOrder)client.Get(soToBeFound);
client.Logout();
return existingOrder;
}
}
When I execute this code I get this exception:
The request channel timed out while waiting for a reply after
00:01:59.9880722. Increase the timeout value passed to the call to
Request or increase the SendTimeout value on the Binding. The time
allotted to this operation may have been a portion of a longer
timeout."
As you can see, I've already increased the timeout to 2 minutes, which seems like forever. Is the Acumatica API really just this slow? Or am I doing something wrong in code?
EDIT:
When I try to get by the "OrderNbr" field instead of "CustomerOrder" field, it works perfectly. Is getting by "CustomerOrder" not allowed in this way? If not, how can I use "CustomerOrder" in a get request?
When you do search via the Contract-Based API, it's required to assign instance of the [FieldType]Search type instead of [FieldType]Value to all fields used in search criteria (StringSearch must be used instead of StringValue in your case):
var soToBeFound = new SalesOrder()
{
OrderType = new StringSearch { Value = "SO" },
CustomerOrder = new StringSearch { Value = orderNumber }
};
Just to confirm, StringSearch is also used in the sample on page 82 from the Contract Based documentation.
I have a userevent script to change the Field in Contract record from PO record. The Script is running fine. But whenever I edit a contract record and try to submit it : It throws the error "Another user has updated this record since you began editing it. Please close the record and open it again to make your changes".
May I know the reason behind this ?
/*---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Description : Whenever the PO vendor is changed(due to Split vendor) that should replace the same in Contract page record automatically.
Script type : User Event Script
Script id : customscript452
Version : 1.0
Applied to : Contract
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
function srchfield()
{
var stRecordid = nlapiGetRecordId(); //returns the contract id
if(stRecordid== undefined || stRecordid== null || stRecordid==' ')
{
}
else
{
var stRecordtype = nlapiGetRecordType(); //returns the contract record type = jobs
var stRecord = nlapiLoadRecord(nlapiGetRecordType(), stRecordid);
nlapiLogExecution('debug','Load Object',stRecord);
var stContractID = stRecord.getFieldValue('entityid'); //returns the value of the field contractid whose fieldid is = entityid
nlapiLogExecution('debug','stContractID',stContractID);
var stCompanyName = stRecord.getFieldValue('companyname'); //returns the value of the field company name whose fieldid is = companyname
nlapiLogExecution('debug','stCompanyName',stCompanyName);
var stConcatenate = stContractID+" : "+stCompanyName; //Concatenate the two Fields to get the result which needs to be found in PO
var arrFilters = new Array(); // This is Array Filters all the Purchase Order Record Search
arrFilters.push(new nlobjSearchFilter('type', null, 'anyof',
[
'PurchOrd'
]));
arrFilters.push(new nlobjSearchFilter('mainline', null, 'is', 'T')); //This is to exclude line level results
arrFilters.push(new nlobjSearchFilter('custbodycontract', null, 'is', stRecordid)); //This is Filters in Contracts Search
var arrColumns = new Array();
arrColumns.push(new nlobjSearchColumn('entity')); //This is Search Column Field in Records
var arrSearchresults = nlapiSearchRecord('purchaseorder', null, arrFilters, arrColumns); //This is Filters in Search Result Purchase Order
if(arrSearchresults== undefined || arrSearchresults== null || arrSearchresults==' ')
{
}
else
{
var length = arrSearchresults.length;
}
if(length== undefined || length== null || length==' ')
{
}
else
{
for (var i = 0; arrSearchresults != null && i < arrSearchresults.length; i++)
{
var objResult = arrSearchresults[i];
var stRecId = objResult.getId();
var stRecType = objResult.getRecordType();
var stCntrctName = objResult.getValue('entity'); //This is Value are Get Purchase Order Records and Field for Vendor = entity
}
}
//var record = nlapiLoadRecord(nlapiGetRecordType(), stRecordid, stCntrctName);
if (stCntrctName =='custentityranking_vendor_name')
{
}
else
{
var stChangeName = stRecord.setFieldValue('custentityranking_vendor_name', stCntrctName); //This is Value are the Set in Main Vendor Field = custentityranking_vendor_name
nlapiSubmitRecord(stRecord, null, null); // Submit the Field Value in Record Type
}
}
}
The User Event script executes as the Contract record is being saved to the database. At the same time, you are loading a second copy of the record from the database and trying to submit the copy as well. This is causing the error you're seeing.
You fix this by just using nlapiSetFieldValue to set the appropriate field on the Contract.
I might also recommend getting more familiar with JavaScript by going through the JavaScript Guide over at MDN. In particular, take a look at the Boolean description so that you know how JavaScript evaluates Boolean expressions. This will help you greatly reduce the amount of code you've written here, as many of your conditionals are unnecessary.
What userevent do you have? It is happening depending on what type of user event and API you are using. Looking at your code, you are trying to load contract record that is already updated at the database. So you might consider below to address your issue. Hope, it helps.
If it is a before submit, you don't need to load the record where the script is deployed.
Just use nlapiGet* and nlapiSet* to get and set values. You also don't need to use nlapiSubmitRecord to reflect the change. With before submit, it executes before the record is being saved to the database. So your changes will still be reflected.
Then if it is after submit, it will be executed after the record has been saved to the database, Thus you might use the following API depending on your needs. Actually, this is the best practice to make sure the solution .
nlapiGetNewRecord - only use this if the script only needs to retrieve info from header and sublists. And nothing to set.
nlapiLookupField - use this if the script only needs to get value/s at the header and nothing from the line.
nlapiSubmitField - the script don't need to load and submit record if the changes only on header. Just use this API.
nlapiLoadRecord and nlapiSubmitRecord- use the former if the script will have changes at the line and then use the latter api to commit it on the database.
Being a user event script code, The code you showed is very not good considering performance.
Here is the sample you can merge
var stRecordid = nlapiGetRecordId(); //returns the contract id
// Every record has an internal id associated with it. No need to add condition explicitly to check if its null
var stRecordtype = nlapiGetRecordType();
var fields = ['entityid','companyname'];
var columns = nlapiLookupField(stRecordtype, stRecordid, fields);
var stContractID = columns.entityid;
var stCompanyName = columns.companyname;
nlapiLogExecution('debug','stContractID/stCompanyName',stContractID+'/'+stCompanyName);
var stConcatenate = stContractID+" : "+stCompanyName; //Concatenate the two Fields to get the result which needs to be found in PO
//
//your code of search
//you can improve that code also by using nlapilook up
nlapiSubmitField(stRecordtype, stRecordid, 'custentityranking_vendor_name', 'name to be updated');
I was searching for a value from contract record in Purchase record but i am unable to get the field where the value is. Below is the code for that. I am applying this code for the contract record and the function is for before submit.
I think I am applying the search in wrong way.
function srchfield()
{
var recordid = nlapiGetRecordId() //retunrs the contract id
nlapiLogExecution('DEBUG', 'recordid ', recordid );
var recordtype = nlapiGetRecordType(); //retunrs the contract recordtype = jobs
nlapiLogExecution('DEBUG', 'RecordType', recordtype);
var loadrecord = nlapiLoadRecord(recordtype, recordid); //loads the record
nlapiLogExecution('DEBUG', 'Load Record', loadrecord );
var contractname = nlapiGetFieldValue('entityid'); //returs the value of the field contractname whose fieldid is = entityid
nlapiLogExecution('DEBUG', 'ContractName ', contractname );
var filters = new Array();
new nlobjSearchFilter('entityid', null, 'anyof', contractname ); // entityid is field id in contract Record and contractname is defined above for contract record
// nlapiLogExecution('DEBUG', 'SearchFilter', filters );
var columns = new Array();
new nlobjSearchColumn('custbodycontract'); // custbodycontractis field id in PO Record
var searchresults = nlapiSearchRecord('purchaseorder', null, filters, columns);
for ( var i = 0; searchresults != null && i < searchresults.length; i++ )
{
var searchresult = searchresults[ i ];
var record = searchresult.getId( );
var rectype = searchresult.getRecordType( );
var cntrct_name= searchresult.getValue( 'custbodycontract' );
}
}
Thanks in advance
****Update: I have completed my answer based on the comments provided. Please see at the last section. I hope it helps. Thanks!***
**I might provide you the snippet if you will explain this further. Please advise
If I understand correctly your code, these are what you are doing and you want to do:
Your contract record is the native entity record - project/job. It had just been renamed to contract by your functional consultant.
You have an user event script (SuiteScript 1.0) before submit and deployed to the contract (project/job) record.
Using the information from the contract record (in this case using the contract name (entityid), you wanted to search for POs to get 'custbodycontract' at the header.
Then you are filtering the search on POs using "entityid" but PO doesnt have that native field on the header. It only has it on the expense line and item line but the id is 'customer'.
Can you explain how is the contract record related to PO. Which field (native/custom) is available on PO that can be used as a join on contract record?
Then, please take note this best practice as freebie.
To optimize your script. You don't need to use nlapiLoadRecord on beforesubmit. Please see below the best practice.:
- With beforesubmit and if you are only getting or setting values on the script deployed record, use nlapiGet** and nlapiSet** API.
- On beforesubmit, only use nlapiLoadRecord if you are getting and setting the value on the sublist of a different record. But utilize first nlapiSearchRecord if you are only getting value at the line level (different record). If it will not give what you need, use nlapiLoadRecord.
- On aftersubmit, only use nlapiLoadRecord if you are setting and getting value at the line level of the deployed record and different record. If you are only getting value at the level, same practice with beforesubmit.
- On aftersubmit, use nlapiLookUp for getting value from the header, and nlapiSubmitField if you are setting. Only use nlapiLoadRecord if it doesnt give you what you need.
****This might what you need...
function srchfield()
{
var stRecordid = nlapiGetRecordId(); /*retunrs the contract id*/
nlapiLogExecution('DEBUG', 'recordid ', stRecordid);
var stRecordtype = nlapiGetRecordType(); /*retunrs the contract recordtype = jobs*/
nlapiLogExecution('DEBUG', 'RecordType', stRecordtype);
var stContractname = nlapiGetFieldValue('entityid'); /*returs the value of the field contractname whose fieldid is = entityid*/
nlapiLogExecution('DEBUG', 'ContractName ', stContractname);
var arrFilters = new Array();
arrFilters.push(new nlobjSearchFilter('type', null, 'anyof',
[
'PurchOrd'
])); /*As best practice, instead of directly searching on POs, add filter for transaction type since you might use this later in other transaction.*/
arrFilters.push(new nlobjSearchFilter('mainline', null, 'is', 'T')); /*This is to exclude line level results*/
arrFilters.push(new nlobjSearchFilter('custbodycontract', null, 'is', stContractname));
var arrColumns = new Array();
arrColumns.push(new nlobjSearchColumn('trandate')); /*I just wanted to include this column on the result. :)*/
arrColumns.push(new nlobjSearchColumn('type')); /*I just wanted to include this column on the result. :)*/
arrColumns.push(new nlobjSearchColumn('tranid')); /*I just wanted to include this column on the result. :)*/
arrColumns.push(new nlobjSearchColumn('custbodycontract')); /*This is what you need.*/
var arrSearchresults = nlapiSearchRecord('transaction', null, arrFilters, arrColumns);
for (var i = 0; arrSearchresults != null && i < arrSearchresults.length; i++)
{
var objResult = arrSearchresults[i];
var stRecId = objResult.getId();
var stRecType = objResult.getRecordType();
var stCntrctName = objResult.getValue('custbodycontract');
}
The problem I notice on your code is the creation of the filter.
You instantiated nlobjSearchFilter but you didn't push it in an array. So basically, you are searching without filter.
And I believe your search criteria were complete.
Try below codes. By the way make sure that the field type of custbodycontract is a freeform text to properly compare it with the entityid of the contract record.
function srchfield()
{
var stRecordid = nlapiGetRecordId(); /*retunrs the contract id*/
nlapiLogExecution('DEBUG', 'recordid ', stRecordid);
var stRecordtype = nlapiGetRecordType(); /*retunrs the contract recordtype = jobs*/
nlapiLogExecution('DEBUG', 'RecordType', stRecordtype);
var stContractname = nlapiGetFieldValue('entityid'); /*returs the value of the field contractname whose fieldid is = entityid*/
nlapiLogExecution('DEBUG', 'ContractName ', stContractname);
var arrFilters = new Array();
arrFilters.push(new nlobjSearchFilter('type', null, 'anyof',
[
'PurchOrd'
])); /*As best practice, instead of directly searching on POs, add filter for transaction type since you might use this later in other transaction.*/
arrFilters.push(new nlobjSearchFilter('mainline', null, 'is', 'T')); /*This is to exclude line level results*/
arrFilters.push(new nlobjSearchFilter('custbodycontract', null, 'is', stContractname));
var arrColumns = new Array();
arrColumns.push(new nlobjSearchColumn('trandate')); /*I just wanted to include this column on the result. :)*/
arrColumns.push(new nlobjSearchColumn('type')); /*I just wanted to include this column on the result. :)*/
arrColumns.push(new nlobjSearchColumn('tranid')); /*I just wanted to include this column on the result. :)*/
arrColumns.push(new nlobjSearchColumn('custbodycontract')); /*This is what you need.*/
var arrSearchresults = nlapiSearchRecord('transaction', null, arrFilters, arrColumns);
for (var i = 0; arrSearchresults != null && i < arrSearchresults.length; i++)
{
var objResult = arrSearchresults[i];
var stRecId = objResult.getId();
var stRecType = objResult.getRecordType();
var stCntrctName = objResult.getValue('custbodycontract');
}
}