Question
Does MsGraph give a lower priority to change notifications when running a subscribed webhook locally? If not, I'm open to hearing any theories as to why this extra delay (from MsGraph to the webhook) could be happening on the local machine, but not when running it in their cloud.
Some background info
When running an Azure Function webhook locally through ngrok (reverse proxy), there's considerable delay in MsGraph sending change notifications to the webhook. Once ngrok receives a notification, it's passed on almost instantly to the correct API call. Calling the ngrok url manually has an near-instant response time. The problem is in Microsoft Graph not sending the notification updates at all (or tens of minutes to hours later).
Forging my own change notifications and feeding them to an Azure Queue for now, but I'd rather just receive live updates to properly test the different paths.
I'm subscribing to the 'messages' change notifications.
Edit: One could work around the delay by forging notifications and manually feeding them to a queue.
Related
If an envelope-level (vs account-level) Connect event created via the API with RequireAcknowledgement set to TRUE exhausts all retries, what happens?
In the support article, "Connect Failures and Retries", it mentions, "Administrators can choose to receive email notifications. You receive two proactive emails and another email at deactivation.". However, it seems like that applies to account-level Connect configurations, not envelope-level Connect events created through the API.
Basically, I'm trying to determine what happens after the 15-day mark, when all retries have been exhausted. Ideally, I'd receive an email notification.
After 15 days we will no longer auto-retry events and those specific events will need to be manually retried via the republish tool in the UI or with our new Republish API call.
Envelope-level Connect configurations are not being auto-disabled at this time so there will be no email notification.
I want to send FCM to everyone who installed the app. Is it essential to get everyone's tokens from the database every time?
My app is using firebase firestore overall. If there are 100,000 users,
do I have to read 100,000 from database to send fcm each time? (I think it`s little heavy stuff isn`t it?)
another workroad exists?
I wonder Is the only way to send it by putting it in the registration ID?
And can you send it on time? All apps on the market send push messages on time, but if you read 100,000 and send fcm separately, shouldn't it arrive like this at 9:01 or 9:02? But why do I always get messages at 9 o'clock?
What are the methods, logic, algorithms they use (the way companies usually use)
I still have no clue at all.
There is no "send to all users" operation in FCM. You either will have to send to each token (that's not a heave operation for FCM, which handles billions of such calls every second), or you have to subscribe all instances to a specific topic and then send to that topics (which ends up the same behind the scenes, just with Firebase loading the tokens for the topic for you).
This has been covered a few times before, so I recommend checking:
How do you send a Firebase Notification to all devices via CURL?
How to send notifications to all devices using Firebase Cloud Messaging
Firebase Cloud Messaging - Send message to all users
The notifications panel in the Firebase console has an option to deliver messages at a specific time, but no such option exists in the Firebase Cloud Messaging API. You'll have to either implement your own mechanism to schedule the delivery, or you can deliver a data message right away and then only display the notification on the device when it's time.
This also has been covered a few times before, so check:
Firebase Messaging FCM Distribution over configurable time interval
How can scheduled Firebase Cloud Messaging notifications be made outside of the Firebase Console?
Flutter Firebase Messaging: How to send push notifications to users at specified time
Scenario
When business transactions are performed, we're supposed to make that data available to end clients.
Current Design
Our web app publishes transaction messages are added to a topic on the Azure Service Bus.
We expose APIs to clients through which they can consume the data from those transactions.
Upon calling these APIs, we read the messages from the Subscription and return it to the client.
Problem
We want a guaranteed delivery - we want to make sure the client acknowledges the delivery of the data. So we don't want to remove the message from the subscription immediately. We want to keep it until the client acknowledges it.
So we only want to do a "Peek" instead of "Receive".
So the client calls the first API, to get the data, where we do a Peek.
And once the client has received the packets, the client would call a second API, to acknowledge.
At this point, we want to remove the message from the Subscription, making it Complete.
The current design of the Service Bus Message Receiver is that, a Complete can be performed only using the same Receiver instance that performed the Peek, as per the documentation, and we also observed the same when we tried it out.
Both the APIs, are two separate APIs and we cannot do the Peek and Complete using the same instance of the Receiver.
Thinking about options to somehow make the Receiver as a Singleton, across APIs within that App Service.
However this will be a problem when the App Service scales out.
Is there a different way to achieve what we're trying to do here ?
There is an option available in Azure Service Bus to defer messages. Once a message is deferred, it can be received with the help of it's sequence number.
The first client should receive the message and instead of completing it, it should defer it and return it.
The second client (which has sequence number) can receive the message from the Subscription. Refer here for more details.
Another option would be to not use a Service Bus Client on your backend and instead your clients could directly work with Service Bus using its Service REST API (assuming they can't use the AMQP client if I am understanding your scenario correctly).
There are APIs to
Peek-Lock
Renew Lock
Unlock
Delete (Complete)
You could also proxy these requests if you'd like using your backend itself or a service like APIM if you are already using it.
PS: Cross posting the answer for the same query on the MSDN forum
I am creating a bot using Microsoft Bot Framework (BotBuilder) and want it to message the user when an appointment is about to begin.
I currently use Microsoft Graph api to access the user's Office 365 calendar and store the appointments. A background thread then keeps track of time and then messages the user when an appointment is about to start.
The current idea is to use Graph webhooks to notify my bot about new appointments.
My question is, would it be smarter to use an Azure service (such as Scheduler) to keep track of the appointments, and send rest messages to my bot, which will then send a message to the user?
My worry is, that as the amount of users rise, the amount of appointments and time checks will become too large, and that maybe Azure services would be able to handle it better.
This is a perfect fit for Azure Functions with a HTTP Trigger.
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/azure-functions/functions-bindings-http-webhook
This article explains how to configure and work with HTTP triggers and bindings in Azure Functions. With these, you can use Azure Functions to build serverless APIs and respond to webhooks.
Azure Functions provides the following bindings:
An HTTP trigger lets you invoke a function with an HTTP request. This can be customized to respond to webhooks.
An HTTP output binding allows you to respond to the request.
I'm trying to piece together the general workflow of giving a user push notifications via the service worker.
I have followed this Google Developers service worker push notifications tutorial and am currently thinking about how I can implement this sort of thing in a small user based web app for experimentation.
In my mind, the general workflow of an web app supporting push notifications is as follows:
Client visits app
Service worker yields a push notification endpoint
Client sends the endpoint to the server
Server associates the endpoint with the current user that the endpoint was generated for
Every time something that your app would say is notification worthy happens, the server grabs the push notification endpoint(s) associated with the user, and hits it to send a push notification to any user devices (possibly with a data payload in Chrome 50+, etc)
Basically I just want to confirm that my general implementation thoughts with this technology are accurate, else get feedback if I am missing something.
You are pretty much bang on, there are some specifics that aren't quite right (but this is largely phrasing and may be done to personally taste).
Client visits app
Register a Service Worker that you want to use for push messaging
Use the service worker registration to subscribe the user to push messaging, at which point the user agent will configure an endpoint + additional values for encrypting payloads (If the the user agent supports it).
Client sends the endpoint to the server
Server store the the endpoint and data for later use (The server can associate the endpoint with the current user if the server if the web app has user accounts).
When ever the server wishes to send a notification to a user(s), it grabs the appropriate endpoints and calls them that will wake up the service worker which can then display a notification.
Payload support in coming in Chrome 50+ and at the time of writing payload is support in Firefox, but there are 3 different versions of encryption used for the payloads in 3 different versions of Firefox, so I'd wait for the payload support story to be ironed out a little before using it / relying on it.