Vaadin 14 Label/span/text line break in word if exceed max width - components

is there any option to continue one word in other line if it length exceed max width?
In my code line breaks are working correctly when word isnt long enough to exceed max width. when i have too long word in my text component then it is drawing outside the layout area.

adding
word-wrap:break-word
worked for me

Related

Categorical yticks position to the left

I've created a Gantt chart with categorical yticks on the left, However, I did not find a way on how to justify them to the left (make all ticks start from the same left level). I read that there is no direct way on how to do it yet but I am wondering if there is an update regarding that! I tried a bypass solution where I created a new ticks with extra blank spaces to the left (I counted the maximum character in one tick, then I added the difference to the others) but still did not make it because the space character length is not the same as letters.

Is there a relation between a typography's character width and character height

I encounter a problem when i use python-pptx, i need to put a line of text to a fixed width textbox and keep it in one line, so i have to calculate the proper font size manually.
The problem is that the font size is determined by character's height, not its width, and i have not found out the relation between its height and width. Can anyone help me out?
The width of a string in pixels will be approximately some value depending on the text, multiplied by the font size. Approximately, because there may be jumps. A 12 point font might have the exact same width as 11 point, and 13 point might be wider. You might be able to choose 12.4 points which depending on the implementation might be wider or not wider than 12.3 or 12 point.
I suggest that you start by making a wild guess about the best font size based on the length. Sure, WWWWW is a lot wider than iiiii, but for average text it works. You measure the width, then you make a better guess for the best font size.

How to line up numbers in columns where last row numbers have percent sign

All the columns for numbers are right-aligned. The row with secondary totals should have a percent sign (%), but the digits should still line up. I tried single-character indent for all numbers except this row, but no variation of font produces digits lining up.
I also tried adding a thin column just to house the percent sign on that row, but, alas, there seems to be some built-in column margin or padding so it looks like 26 % instead of 26%. Anybody know a workaround? Thanks.
Using Custom number format
_-* #,##0_%
The trailing _% means include a space the width of the % character
If this is what you're after: then change the right indent to be 1 character for the cells before the %
Select range.
right click
select format cells
select alignment
change horizontal to "right (indent)"
Change Indent to 1
Added courier new to show the even better alignment

Flash - Text overlaps in a text box

The image below should say enough.
When trying to go to the next line using enter it goes on top of (slightly lower) than the text line above it.
http://www.dreamincode.net/forums/uploads/monthly_05_2012/post-303110-13359838269609.png.pagespeed.ce.xEvMztZ7Ot.png
In the character properties of the textfield, check your Leading (it's a percentile value next to the font size). This sets the line height of a textfield.
Default value is 100%.

Row height in points mentioned in Open XML part differs from that shown in MS Excel UI

i have observed that row height written in Sheet's XML part is different from which the MS Excel interprets it. For example if value written in Xml part is 15 points, then MS Excel shows 15.12 points. Could some one explain this behavior.
Also the number of rows that can fit in a page vary with the printer resolution. For example for a given page size say Letter, changing resolution from 300 DPI to 600 DPI causes increase in number of rows fitting in a page in MS Excel. However this shouldn't be dependent upon printer resolution. Because row height is asumed to be present in points (absolute units).
Regards
Himanshu

Resources