I am trying to create my own security scanner which will check dependencies. To test the functionality, I created a "mock scanner" which downloads a file from webhook, and saves it as an artifact ought to be uploaded to the server.
The artifact is uploaded successfully and in the CI output I can see the 201 code, but for some reason it is not presented in the security dashboard.
What am I doing wrong?
Thank you!
The CI job looks as following:
mysec_dependency_scanning:
stage: test
script:
- curl https://webhook.site/XXXX -o gl-dependency-scanning-report.json
- sleep 3
allow_failure: true
artifacts:
reports:
dependency_scanning: gl-dependency-scanning-report.json
The content of the json file is from the example provided by gitlab and it as following:
{
"version": "2.0",
"vulnerabilities": [
{
"id": "51e83874-0ff6-4677-a4c5-249060554eae",
"category": "dependency_scanning",
"name": "alik alik",
"message": "Regular Expression Denial of Service in debug",
"description": "alik to regular expression denial of service when untrusted user input is passed into the `o` formatter. It takes around 50k characters to block for 2 seconds making this a low severity issue.",
"severity": "Unknown",
"solution": "Upgrade to latest versions.",
"scanner": {
"id": "dadada",
"name": "dadada"
},
"location": {
"file": "yarn.lock",
"dependency": {
"package": {
"name": "debug"
},
"version": "1.0.5"
}
},
"identifiers": [
{
"type": "gemnasium",
"name": "Gemnasium-37283ed4-0380-40d7-ada7-2d994afcc62a",
"value": "37283ed4-0380-40d7-ada7-2d994afcc62a",
"url": "https://deps.sec.gitlab.com/packages/npm/debug/versions/1.0.5/advisories"
}
],
"links": [
{
"url": "https://nodesecurity.io/advisories/534"
},
{
"url": "https://github.com/visionmedia/debug/issues/501"
},
{
"url": "https://github.com/visionmedia/debug/pull/504"
}
]
},
{
"id": "5d681b13-e8fa-4668-957e-8d88f932ddc7",
"category": "dependency_scanning",
"name": "Authentication bypass via incorrect DOM traversal and canonicalization",
"message": "Authentication bypass via incorrect DOM traversal and canonicalization in saml2-js",
"description": "Some XML DOM traversal and canonicalization APIs may be inconsistent in handling of comments within XML nodes. Incorrect use of these APIs by some SAML libraries results in incorrect parsing of the inner text of XML nodes such that any inner text after the comment is lost prior to cryptographically signing the SAML message. Text after the comment, therefore, has no impact on the signature on the SAML message.\r\n\r\nA remote attacker can modify SAML content for a SAML service provider without invalidating the cryptographic signature, which may allow attackers to bypass primary authentication for the affected SAML service provider.",
"severity": "Unknown",
"solution": "Upgrade to fixed version.\r\n",
"scanner": {
"id": "dadada",
"name": "dadada"
},
"location": {
"file": "yarn.lock",
"dependency": {
"package": {
"name": "saml2-js"
},
"version": "1.5.0"
}
},
"identifiers": [
{
"type": "gemnasium",
"name": "Gemnasium-9952e574-7b5b-46fa-a270-aeb694198a98",
"value": "9952e574-7b5b-46fa-a270-aeb694198a98",
"url": "https://deps.sec.gitlab.com/packages/npm/saml2-js/versions/1.5.0/advisories"
},
{
"type": "cve",
"name": "CVE-2017-11429",
"value": "CVE-2017-11429",
"url": "https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2017-11429"
}
],
"links": [
{
"url": "https://github.com/Clever/saml2/commit/3546cb61fd541f219abda364c5b919633609ef3d#diff-af730f9f738de1c9ad87596df3f6de84R279"
},
{
"url": "https://github.com/Clever/saml2/issues/127"
},
{
"url": "https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/475445"
}
]
}
],
"remediations": [
{
"fixes": [
{
"id": "5d681b13-e8fa-4668-957e-8d88f932ddc7",
}
],
"summary": "Upgrade saml2-js",
"diff": "ZGlmZiAtLWdpdCBhL...OR0d1ZUc2THh3UT09Cg==" // some content is omitted for brevity
}
]
}
I was able to fix the problem, the issue was an invalid json format.
Had to do alot of trial and error but I was able to create a working template for a dependency scanning report.
{
"version": "3.0.0",
"vulnerabilities": [
{
"id": "dfa1f7f3d56db6e1c3451a232de42f153e0335611de6f0344443d84e448ee2cf",
"category": "dddda",
"name": "dddda",
"message": "ddda",
"description": "dddda lack of validation in `index.js`.",
"cve": "dada",
"severity": "Critical",
"solution": "Upgrade to version 2.0.5 or above.",
"scanner": {
"id": "lalal",
"name": "Code_Analyzer"
},
"location": {
"file": "yarn.lock",
"dependency": {
"iid": 447,
"package": {
"name": "copy-props"
},
"version": "2.0.4"
}
},
"identifiers": [
{
"type": "dada",
"name": "dada-e9e12690-2e4d-4251-bef0-7357ddc05881",
"value": "e9e57890-5e4d-4832-bef2-7337ddc05889",
"url": "https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/security-products/gemnasium-db/-/blob/master/npm/copy-props/CVE-2219-28503.yml"
},
{
"type": "cve",
"name": "CVE-2237-28503",
"value": "CVE-2237-28503",
"url": "https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2237-28503"
}
],
"links": [
{
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2237-28503"
}
]
}
],
"remediations": [],
"dependency_files": [
{
"path": "yarn.lock",
"package_manager": "yarn",
"dependencies": [
{
"iid": 447,
"dependency_path": [
{
"iid": 708
},
{
"iid": 707
}
],
"package": {
"name": "copy-props"
},
"version": "2.0.4"
}
]
}
],
"scan": {
"scanner": {
"id": "lalal",
"name": "Code_Analyzer",
"url": "https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/security-products/analyzers/gemnasium",
"vendor": {
"name": "lalal"
},
"version": "2.29.5"
},
"type": "dependency_scanning",
"start_time": "2021-05-03T06:47:29",
"end_time": "2021-05-03T06:47:30",
"status": "success"
}
}
Related
I am migrating an Azure devops organization to another organization,
I ran into a problem where i can not create a pipeline which created in the classic way (NOT A YAML).
This is the JSON
{
"name": "PP_NAME",
"folder": "",
"configuration": {
"designerJson": {
"options": [
{
"enabled": false,
"definition": {
"id": "DEF_ID"
},
"inputs": {
"branchFilters": "[\"+refs/heads/*\"]",
"additionalFields": "{}"
}
},
{
"enabled": false,
"definition": {
"id": "DEF_ID"
},
"inputs": {
"workItemType": "Task",
"assignToRequestor": "true",
"additionalFields": "{}"
}
}
],
"variables": {
"system.debug": {
"value": "false",
"allowOverride": true
}
},
"tags": [],
"process": {
"phases": [
{
"name": "Agent job 1",
"refName": "Job_1",
"condition": "succeeded()",
"target": {
"executionOptions": {
"type": 0
},
"allowScriptsAuthAccessOption": false,
"type": 1
},
"jobAuthorizationScope": "project"
}
],
"target": {
"agentSpecification": {
"identifier": "windows-2019"
}
},
"type": 1
},
"quality": "definition",
"path": "\\",
"repository": {
"id": "REPOSITORY_ID",
"name": "test 1",
"type": "TfsGit"
}
},
"path": "\\",
"type": "designerJson"
}
}
The output :
{
"$id": "1",
"innerException": null,
"message": "This API does not support creating pipelines of configuration type DesignerJson.",
"typeName": "Microsoft.Azure.Pipelines.WebApi.UnsupportedConfigurationTypeException, Microsoft.Azure.Pipelines.WebApi",
"typeKey": "UnsupportedConfigurationTypeException",
"errorCode": 0,
"eventId": 3000
}
According the the AZDO documentation, it is possible to create a pipeline with the classic way.
Thanks !
To create a classic pipeline, you can use this REST API Definitions - Create.
If you are not sure about the request body, you can use REST API Definitions - Get to get the definition of a classic pipeline as a reference.
My colleagues and I have been working to fix a reported issue on our Amazon Alexa CBT Test regarding the value “DeepQuery=true”.
Our code has been modified, so that every state change is reported automatically and all the used interfaces have the properties “proactivelyReported” and “retrievable” set to true.
As has been suggested by the WWA-Support we used the Smart Home Debugger of the Developer Console to validate the ReportEvents (e.g. Discovery or ChangeReport) and we checked the state of our device on the “View Device State” page (both pages are referenced on: https://developer.amazon.com/en-US/docs/alexa/smarthome/debug-your-smart-home-skill.html).
For debugging purposes we scaled our device capabilities down to just the PowerController. The AddOrUpdateReport of Alexa.Discovery looks to our eyes now exactly as expected/documented. Same goes for the ChangeReport, which we proactively send right after the AddOrUpdateReport (Two sample-Reports for both are provided at the end).
Unfortunately we are still faced with the issue, that “DeepQuery=true” on the “View Device State” page.
If we set the interface property “retrievable” to false, “DeepQuery=false”, but the Alexa-App does not retain the current state of the device. In this configuration the Alexa-App can only be used to send commands, which unfortunately will lead to other test cases to fail.
Does anyone know how to solve this issue?
How can we set “proactivelyReported” and “retrievable” to true and have “DeepQuery=false”?
Any help would be greatly appreciated and I will gladly provide more informations if needed.
Sample AddOrUpdateReport from Smart Home Debugger
{
"header": {
"namespace": "SkillDebugger",
"name": "CaptureDebuggingInfo",
"messageId": "05b030fb-6393-4ae0-80d0-47fc27876f0e"
},
"payload": {
"skillId": "amzn1.ask.skill.055ca62d-3cf8-4f51-a683-9a98b36f4637",
"timestamp": "2021-09-09T13:28:21.629Z",
"dialogRequestId": null,
"skillRequestId": null,
"type": "SmartHomeAddOrUpdateReportSuccess",
"content": {
"addOrUpdateReport": {
"event": {
"header": {
"namespace": "Alexa.Discovery",
"name": "AddOrUpdateReport",
"messageId": "2458b969-7c3e-47e2-ab0b-6e13a999be76",
"payloadVersion": "3"
},
"payload": {
"endpoints": [
{
"manufacturerName": "Our Company Name",
"description": "Our Product Name",
"endpointId": "device--cb12b420-1171-11ec-81f3-cb34e87ea438",
"friendlyName": "Lampe 1",
"capabilities": [
{
"type": "AlexaInterface",
"version": "3",
"interface": "Alexa.PowerController",
"properties": {
"supported": [
{
"name": "powerState"
}
],
"proactivelyReported": true,
"retrievable": true
}
},
{
"type": "AlexaInterface",
"interface": "Alexa",
"version": "3"
}
],
"displayCategories": [
"LIGHT"
],
"connections": [],
"relationships": {},
"cookie": {}
}
],
"scope": null
}
}
}
}
}
}
Sample ChangeReport from Smart Home Debugger
{
"header": {
"namespace": "SkillDebugger",
"name": "CaptureDebuggingInfo",
"messageId": "194a96a1-6747-46ba-8751-5c9ef715fd34"
},
"payload": {
"skillId": "amzn1.ask.skill.055ca62d-3cf8-4f51-a683-9a98b36f4637",
"timestamp": "2021-09-09T13:28:23.227Z",
"dialogRequestId": null,
"skillRequestId": null,
"type": "SmartHomeChangeReportSuccess",
"content": {
"changeReport": {
"event": {
"header": {
"namespace": "Alexa",
"name": "ChangeReport",
"messageId": "8972e386-9622-40e6-85e7-1a7d81c79c8a",
"payloadVersion": "3"
},
"endpoint": {
"scope": null,
"endpointId": "device--cb12b420-1171-11ec-81f3-cb34e87ea438"
},
"payload": {
"change": {
"cause": {
"type": "APP_INTERACTION"
},
"properties": [
{
"namespace": "Alexa.PowerController",
"name": "powerState",
"value": "ON",
"timeOfSample": "2021-09-09T13:28:18.088Z",
"uncertaintyInMilliseconds": 500
}
]
}
}
},
"context": {
"properties": []
}
}
}
}
}
I am trying to make an ARM Template for a Custom Connector which needs to have enabled the use of on-premises Data Gateway. I am getting everything right except this last requirement, since I create a fully configured Custom Connector, except for the fact that the check-mark for using the on-premises Data Gateway is not active.
Any idea which setting/element I need to add change to get this done?
This is my template up to now:
{
"type": "Microsoft.Web/customApis",
"name": "[parameters('Connection_Name')]",
"apiVersion": "2016-06-01",
"location": "centralus",
"scale": null,
"properties": {
"connectionParameters": {
"authType": {
"type": "string",
"allowedValues": [
{
"value": "none"
}
],
"uiDefinition": {
"displayName": "Authentication Type",
"description": "Authentication type to connect to your API",
"tooltip": "Authentication type to connect to your API",
"constraints": {
"tabIndex": 1,
"required": "true",
"allowedValues": [
{
"text": "none",
"value": "anonymous"
}
],
"capability": [
"gateway"
]
}
}
},
"gateway": {
"type": "gatewaySetting",
"gatewaySettings": {
"dataSourceType": "CustomConnector",
"connectionDetails": []
},
"uiDefinition": {
"constraints": {
"tabIndex": 4,
"required": "true",
"capability": [
"gateway"
]
}
}
}
},
"backendService": {
"serviceUrl": "[parameters('ServiceUrl')]"
},
"apiType": "Soap",
"wsdlDefinition": {
"importMethod": "SoapPassThrough"
},
"swagger": {
"swagger": "2.0",
"info": {
"title": "SOAP pass-through",
"description": "Custom Connector for SOAP Operation",
"version": "1.0"
},
"host": "xxxxxxxxxxxxx",
"basePath": "/xxxxxxxx/xxxxxxxxxx",
"consumes": [],
"produces": [],
"paths": {
"/": {
"post": {
"responses": {
"default": {
"description": "default",
"schema": {
"type": "string",
"title": "",
"x-ms-visibility": "important"
},
"headers": {
"Content-Type": {
"description": "Content-Type",
"type": "string"
}
}
}
},
"summary": "GetOrigins",
"description": "GetOrigins",
"operationId": "GetOrigins",
"parameters": [
{
"name": "Content-Type",
"in": "header",
"required": false,
"type": "string"
},
{
"name": "body",
"in": "body",
"required": false,
"schema": {
"type": "string"
}
}
]
}
}
},
"definitions": {},
"parameters": {},
"responses": {},
"securityDefinitions": {},
"security": [],
"tags": [],
"schemes": [
"http"
]
},
"description": "[concat('Custom Connector for SOAP', parameters('Connection_Name'),' Operation')]",
"displayName": "[parameters('Connection_Name')]",
"iconUri": "/Content/retail/assets/default-connection-icon.6296199fc1d74aa45ca68e1253762025.2.svg"
},
"dependsOn": []
}
To enable the 'On-Premises Data Gateway' option, you need to add gateway to the capabilities array like so:
"properties" {
"capabilities": [
"gateway"
],
}
the On-Premises Data Gateway option is not available from ARM templates, you must to install your template and manually add the check box from the Azure portal.
Thanks.
I have created a REST API with a Swagger/OPEN API specification which I will like to consume trough a Azure API Management tenant in a Logic App.
When I download the specification it looks like this:
{
"swagger": "2.0",
"info": {
"title": "Leasing",
"version": "1.0"
},
"host": "ENDPOINT.azure-api.net",
"basePath": "/leasing",
"schemes": [
"http",
"https"
],
"securityDefinitions": {
"apiKeyHeader": {
"type": "apiKey",
"name": "Ocp-Apim-Subscription-Key",
"in": "header"
},
"apiKeyQuery": {
"type": "apiKey",
"name": "subscription-key",
"in": "query"
}
},
"security": [
{
"apiKeyHeader": []
},
{
"apiKeyQuery": []
}
],
"paths": {
"/{Brand}/groups": {
"get": {
"description": "Get a list of leasing groups on a brand",
"operationId": "GetGroups",
"parameters": [
{
"name": "Brand",
"in": "path",
"description": "Selection of possible brands",
"required": true,
"type": "string",
"enum": [
"Volkswagen",
"Audi",
"Seat",
"Skoda",
"VolkswagenErhverv",
"Porsche",
"Ducati"
]
}
],
"responses": {
"200": {
"description": "Returns a list of leasing groups",
"schema": {
"$ref": "#/definitions/GroupArray"
}
},
"400": {
"description": "If the brand is not valid",
"schema": {
"$ref": "#/definitions/Error"
}
}
},
"produces": [
"application/json"
]
}
}
},
"definitions": {
"Group": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"id": {
"format": "int32",
"type": "integer"
},
"name": {
"type": "string"
},
"description": {
"type": "string"
},
"leasingModelCount": {
"format": "int32",
"type": "integer"
},
"lowestMonthlyFee": {
"format": "int32",
"type": "integer"
}
}
},
"Error": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"code": {
"enum": [
"NotValidBrand",
"NotValidGroupId"
],
"type": "string",
"x-ms-enum": {
"name": "ErrorCode",
"modelAsString": true
}
},
"message": {
"type": "string"
}
}
},
"GroupArray": {
"type": "array",
"items": {
"$ref": "#/definitions/Group"
}
}
}
}
When I add this in a Logic App with the connector HTTP + Swagger I only get to define the {Brand} query input but not the various ways of using the Subscriptions key (header or query) as defined in SecurityDefiniations.
The whole securityDefinitions and security section are automatically generated in the Azure API Management service, but not recognized in Logic App.
See image of missing subscription key field:
What am I doing wrong?
Update
I have tried the following:
Usage of the 'Authentication' field (but this field is limited to certain types of auths flows https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/connectors/connectors-native-http#authentication)
Change the Logic App 'Http + Swagger'-action in code to add the header parameter, but this action converts the action to a simple 'Http' action and therfore loosing the automatic schema generation from Swagger.
I think you need to specify this in the Authentication-field in a JSON format. Something like:
{
"apiKeyHeader" : "your Ocp-Apim-Subscription-Key",
"apiKeyQuery" : "your subscription key"
}
Today I was trying to create a confluence addon for my company and I've try following atlassian documents.
My problem comes trying to run the express app when adding a new customContent to the atlassian-connect.json, after running npm start I get the following error.
Failed to register with host https://admin:xxx#xxx.atlassian.net/wiki (200)
{"type":"INSTALL","pingAfter":300,"status":{"done":true,"statusCode":200,"con
tentType":"application/vnd.atl.plugins.task.install.err+json","subCode":"upm.
pluginInstall.error.descriptor.not.from.marketplace","source":"https://1a0adc
8f.ngrok.io/atlassian-connect.json","name":"https://1a0adc8f.ngrok.io/atlassi
an-connect.json"},"links":{"self":"/wiki/rest/plugins/1.0/pending/b88594d3-c3
c2-4760-b687-c8d860c0a377","alternate":"/wiki/rest/plugins/1.0/tasks/b88594d3
-c3c2-4760-b687-c8d860c0a377"},"timestamp":1502272147602,"userKey":"xxx","id":"xxx"}
Add-on not registered; no compatible hosts detected
This is my atlassian-connect.json file:
{
"key": "my-add-on",
"name": "Ping Pong",
"description": "My very first add-on",
"vendor": {
"name": "Angry Nerds",
"url": "https://www.atlassian.com/angrynerds"
},
"baseUrl": "{{localBaseUrl}}",
"links": {
"self": "{{localBaseUrl}}/atlassian-connect.json",
"homepage": "{{localBaseUrl}}/atlassian-connect.json"
},
"authentication": {
"type": "jwt"
},
"lifecycle": {
"installed": "/installed"
},
"scopes": [
"READ"
],
"modules": {
"generalPages": [
{
"key": "hello-world-page-jira",
"location": "system.top.navigation.bar",
"name": {
"value": "Hello World"
},
"url": "/hello-world",
"conditions": [{
"condition": "user_is_logged_in"
}]
},
{
"key": "customersViewer",
"location": "system.header/left",
"name": {
"value": "Hello World"
},
"url": "/hello-world",
"conditions": [{
"condition": "user_is_logged_in"
}]
}
],
"customContent": [
{
"key": "customer",
"name": {
"value": "Customers"
},
"uiSupport": {
"contentViewComponent": {
"moduleKey": "customersViewer"
},
"listViewComponent": {
"moduleKey": "customerList"
},
"icons": {
"item": {
"url": "/images/customers.png"
}
}
},
"apiSupport": {
"supportedContainerTypes": ["space"]
}
}
]
}
}
Does anybody has an idea on whats going on?
The contentViewComponent can't find the generalPage it is referencing in moduleKey.
From the docs:
In the snippet above, the moduleKey “customersViewer” maps to a
generalPage module we have defined in our add-on. This generalPage is
passed the context parameters we specify, and visualizes our content
accordingly.
If you change the generalPage with the key hello-world-page-confluence to customersVieweryou be able to install and get up and running.