I'm at a loss here. I have a Node.js server built for my project and out of nowhere, I started getting this error when I try to run the server in VSCode:
Tokenization is skipped for long lines for performance reasons. The length of a long line can be configured via editor.maxTokenizationLineLength.
I had edited some of my functions in my controller before this started. I discarded all changes but the error still persists. I don't understand what has changed for this to happen. Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
My code is here if you want to take a look
https://github.com/Kevinclane/timeclock
I fixed this problem by increasing Max Tokenization Length in VSCode :
Go to File--> Preferences--> Setting
Search for Max Tokenization Length
Change the default value to 2000000
I hope this will help
Apparently, just toggling the options for breakpoints on caught and uncaught exceptions causes it to fail... Doesn't make sense, but it works now.
This is not actually an error as such. If you assign really long length string to a variable, you might see this:
However, you will be still able to use that variable.
Related
When monitoring memory using the :C XXXX option, the memory values do not show when debugging. You can monitor up to 4000 characters by using the :C option when monitoring memory:
I have ran into this problem twice now. I am using IBM Rational Developer for i Version: 9.6.0.0, with the Java JDK/JRE v8u45.
Here are the values when debugging, and my data structure definition:
dcl-ds dsSQL qualified inz;
fullStmt varchar( 9360 ) inz;
end-ds;
Once I click on the element, all I see is ``. There is nothing in the value but that, but you can clearly see that dsSQL.fullStmt is not empty. I use this option daily and 99.99% of the time it works fine. I have to restart a million times, reset RDi to start with -c and recompile the program over and over to get it to work right.
Anyone have any idea how to fix this? I would give you the 'Error Log' but it is constantly filled and nothing in there seems to point to that issue. When adding or looking at that variable during debug, no errors are thrown.
You probably want to update to the latest 9.6.0.6 release. They have fixed at least a few memory problems with the debugger between your release and the latest.
https://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg27038481
I have this error in the console, below which gives the number 8301. What does this number mean and how can I use it to troubleshoot the error?
(node:8301) DeprecationWarning: current URL string parser is
deprecated, and will be removed in a future version. To use the new
parser, pass option { useNewUrlParser: true } to MongoClient.connect.
Pleas note, I am using this as an example error to try and understand the printed number (node:8301). I don't need help with the error itself.
Please help me to understand node errors.
The number portion of (node:8301) is the node process's process id (pid). This is attached to all warnings that Node.js itself emits, or that are emitted via its process.emitWarning() utility.
(In the particular example in the question, the warning is from a user module using process.emitWarning().)
For what it's worth, NODE_DEBUG also logs pids in the logged information, although strangely not in that format.
I'm not sure if there is actually official documentation on this. There is presently a discussion to add a "Warnings" section to the official documentation: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/24987
This question was also asked to https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/25120, where I discovered and originally answered it.
try this:
MongoClient.connect("mongodb://localhost:27017/YourDB", { useNewUrlParser: true })
from here
Honestly, I’ve been working in node since 2009, and I’ve never bothered to look into the error codes unless I need my software to handle the error. Mostly, I just read the error text.
In the case of your example, the error text clearly tells me what the problem is.
I’ve found generally that the quality of error messages and codes alike varies greatly on the library you’re using.
I'm working in new application written in Siebel 8.1, issue appears when I'm trying to replay script and I can't handle that.
Replay Output:
Error -27086: Auto-correlation callback function
"flCorrelationCallbackParseWebPage" failed (rc=1) for parameter
"Siebel_Parse_Web_Page40"
web_reg_save_param("Siebel_Parse_Web_Page40",
"LB/IC=",
"RB/IC=",
"Ord=1",
"Search=Body",
"RelFrameId=1",
"AutoCorrelationFunction=flCorrelationCallbackParseWebPage",
"AutoCorrelationDll=LrwiSiebelCorrelationWrapper",
LAST);
I have done all steps for prepare record options from: http://software-qe.blogspot.se/2008/01/siebel-7x-record-and-replay-for.html
I'm using Loadrunner 11.52 (Siebel Web protocol), IE8.
We've been using the autocorrelation library for quite a few years on my team and we see this a lot. Unfortunately, it's not an easy problem to diagnose.
First I would check your test results and your VUser log to see if something happened before the autocorrelation failed. (Make sure your logging is set to parameter substitution in runtime settings).
Check your parameter files for extra spaces, commas, etc. Sometimes I've seen that error right after it rejects something about your parameter file.
Worst case scenario, your script is corrupted and you'll have to start over. We've gotten in the habit of making frequent backups of our scripts just because of this issue. Usually, we'll be able to start from our backup and continue or create a new script and paste the old code in. Autocorrelation error "magically" goes away with the same code in a new script.
If auto(magical)correlation does not work then use manual correlation.
Record twice with same data: Compare. You will find session, state and time data.
Change the credentials: Re-record. Compare. You will find credential related correlation
Change the business record but keep the same business process. Re-Record. You will find the business related correlation.
Do not expect autocorrelation to provide a magical working script. You have about a 0.0001% chance of that happening without LoadRunner script development intervenetion.
I have followed Lee Brimelow's tutorials (part 1, part 2), but somehow my project doesn't work as expected.
Currently, publishing "src/Secondary.as" to "www/assets/swf/secondary.swf" works properly, however when trying to run "src/Main.as", an error shows up:
Exception fault: TypeError: Error #1007: Instantiation attempted on a non-constructor.
at Main/init()[/Volumes/DOCUMENTS/Tests/AS3/test-workers/src/Main.as:52]
at Main()[/Volumes/DOCUMENTS/Tests/AS3/test-workers/src/Main.as:32]
If anybody has time, you can look at my code on Github and maybe see where I screwed up? Thanks a bunch!
As your error message says: the problem raised in Line 52 in your Main.init()method. What you try to do there is to create a new instance of SecondarySWF. I would say that your embedment of Secondary class into SecondarySWF doesn't work properly, so it is not available in your init-method. You should set a breakpoint at the first line of your init-method and when the debugger reaches this point check what's in SecondarySWF. I expect that there's nothing in that variable, so what your new SecondarySWF() then means actually is new null().
Because you embed your secondary.swf with a MIME-type specified the Flex compiler ignores it because it is unable to detect the actual type of data in the loaded file. I found this post on Adobe's cookbook page that explains what you have to do in addition to adding the file using [Embed]. Hope this will fit your needs.
I have problem with me51n. I have an include in EXIT_SAPLMEREQ_010 that has a bunch of codes which we use it to receive errors. The problem of mine is;
-When i run me51n with required datas(mat. number, quantity, etc.) I get some errors which also includes the error that I'm expecting on the first time, however when i terminate me51n and run it again with the same exact data, i dont get my error. I have debugged it and put a break point on my include in EXIT_SAPLMEREQ_010 and it never gets to my breakpoint on the second run. (It gets to the breakpoint on the first run but not the second one).
I dont know how but with the same material it works fine later again at the first time but still on the second time i cant get the error again.
Can anyone please help me on this?
Basically problem was the developement system from the beginning (sigh -_-). While having other errors rather than my errors, i assume my error gets stuck sometimes and never pop up because of the standard SAP procedure. So in test system (QA) me51n works perfectly when I'm just trying to have only my error.
Thanks for anyone who actually tried to help and I hope this might be useful sometime for someone in future.
Talha