Sharing data between different step files within the same scenario - cucumber

Given this simple senario
Scenario: checkout the response code after foo data request
I request foo data
Then the response code is 200
In my foo step file i write a step that make a api call :
When(/^I request foo data$/, (callback) => {
...
apiCall().then((response) => {
...
this.responseStatus = response.statusCode;
callback();
})
});
And in my common step file i want to put shared steps like :
Then(/^the response code is (\d+)$/, function (responseCode) {
assert.equal(responseCode, this.responseStatus);
});
But the problem is when i try to run it I got :
this object is not shared apparently and I got :
AssertionError [ERR_ASSERTION]: 200 == undefined
And if I move the code to the same file it work !
So how can I solve this issue with different files ?

One way we were doing this is to have a global variable that is accessible in both the files. Something like a constant which is initialized and then reassigned in your WHEN step. This can be utilized in your THEN file later.

Related

Azure Functions - run code block before function execution

I have a series of Node based HTTP Azure Functions each of which needs to undertake some checks before the function can be executed. The checks are based on the contents of some HTTP headers.
I've implemented the checks in a helper and can add that to the head of each function e.g.
if (myHelper.doChecksPass()) {
// Execute the main body of the function code
context.res.status = 200;
}
else {
context.res.status = 403;
}
Does anyone know if there is a slicker way to do this rather than duplicating the above code into each function? I'm thinking along the lines of something which runs on function execution and before the main function body which can stop the execution of the function and return the 403.
I've checked the MS docs and I can't see anything but I might just be missing it.
Thanks in advance

Restify/Node.js - POST parameters not being read from time to time

We have implemented a REST API using Restify and Node.js. There is a current issue where we have a certain set of parameters and when tested in environment1 it works properly. However, when the same set of parameters are used and tested in environment2, the API returns an error that there are missing parameters. After restarting the API, it starts working again. Nothing appears in the logs though.
Sample body parameters:
{
"records" : [
{"param1" : "param1val", "param2" : "param2val"},
{"param2" : "param2val", "param2" : "param2val"}
]
}
This is how the values are being accessed.
let data = req.body
let records = data.records
if (records == undefined) {
res.send(...)
return
}
else {
// use the values of records
}
So what happens is sometimes, the code for returning an error message that there are no parameters are triggered (although in reality the parameters are complete) from time to time. But after a while, using the same set of parameters, it proceeds successfully.
Restify version is 7.7.0. Node.js version is 10.15.3.
Has anyone encountered this before? What needs to be done to resolve this?

Node.JS: Make module runnable through require or from command line

I have a script setupDB.js that runs asynchronously and is intended to be called from command line. Recently, I added test cases to my project, some of which require a database to be set up (and thus the execution of aforementioned script).
Now, I would like to know when the script has finished doing its thing. At the moment I'm simply waiting for a few seconds after requiring setupDB.js before I start my tests, which is obviously a bad idea.
The problem with simply exporting a function with a callback parameter is that it is important that the script can be run without any overhead, meaning no command line arguments, no additional function calls etc., since it is part of a bigger build process.
Do you have any suggestions for a better approach?
I was also looking for this recently, and came across a somewhat-related question: "Node.JS: Detect if called through require or directly by command line
" which has an answer that helped me build something like the following just a few minutes ago where the export is only run if it's used as a module, and the CLI library is only required if ran as a script.
function doSomething (opts) {
}
/*
* Based on
* https://stackoverflow.com/a/46962952/7665043
*/
function isScript () {
return require.main && require.main.filename === /\((.*):\d+:\d+\)$/.exec((new Error()).stack.split('\n')[ 2 ])[ 1 ]
}
if (isScript) {
const cli = require('some CLI library')
opts = cli.parseCLISomehow()
doSomething(opts)
} else {
module.exports = {
doSomething
}
}
There may be some reason that this is not a good idea, but I am not an expert.
I have now handled it this way: I export a function that does the setup. At the beginning I check if the script has been called from command line, and if so, I simply call the function. At the same time, I can also call it directly from another module and pass a callback.
if (require.main === module) {
// Called from command line
runSetup(function (err, res) {
// do callback handling
});
}
function runSetup(callback) {
// do the setup
}
exports.runSetup = runSetup;
make-runnable npm module can help with this.

NODE fs.readFile, JSON.parse and fs.writeFile

I'm writing an app in Node and have been running into a rare but detrimental occurrence.
So I have a schedule.txt and I write to it when the user makes a change but then also read it every second and then parse it for use throughout the program.
Rarely what happens is as a user is writing to the file (asynchronously) the app (based on the timer) reads the same file and attempts to parse it and fails.
I know from a design stand-point maybe this is just bound to happen... but I'm wondering if there is a quick fix I can do now. Would using writeFileSync help my situation? (make it more 'atomic'?) I just want to make sure that the app doesn't read the file while another process is still writing to the file.
TIA!
Niko
Seems like you'd want to serialize your read/writes. If it were me, I might try having a "manager" object which encapsulates the serialization, which you'd use like:
var fileManager = require('./file-manager');
// somewhere in the program
fileManager.scheduleWrite(data, function(err){
// now the write is done
});
// somewhere else in the program
fileManager.scheduleRead(function(err, data){
// `data` contains the data
});
Then implement it using Q or a similar promises lib, like:
// in file-manager.js
var wait = Q();
module.exports = {
scheduleWrite: function(data, cb){
wait = wait.then(function(){
// write data and call cb()
});
},
scheduleRead: function(){
wait = wait.then(function(){
// read data and call cb(data)
});
}
};
The wait var will "stack up" into a serialized chain of tasks where the next one won't start until the previous one completes.

Debug a stack overflow exception with nodejs

I'm parsing a large amount of files using nodejs. In my process, I'm parsing audio files, video files and than the rest.
The function to parse files looks like this :
/**
* #param arr : array of files objects (path, ext, previous directory)
* #param cb : the callback when every object is parsed,
* objects are then throwed in a database
* #param others : the array beeing populated by matching objects
**/
var parseOthers = function(arr, cb, others) {
others = others === undefined ? [] : others;
if(arr.length == 0)
return cb(others); //should be a nextTick ?
var e = arr.shift();
//do some tests on the element and add it
others.push(e);
//Then call next tested callImediate and nextTick according
//to another stackoverflow questions with no success
return parseOthers(arr, cb, others);
});
Full code here (care it's a mess)
Now with about 3565 files (not so much) the script catch a "RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded" exception, with no trace.
What have I tried :
I've tried to debug it with node-inspector and node debug script, but it never hangs as if it was running without debugging (does debugging increase the stack ?).
I've tried with process.on('uncaughtException') to catch the exception with no success.
I've got no memory leak.
How may I found an exception trace ?
Edit 1
Increasing the --stack_size seams to work pretty well. Isn't there another way of preventing this ?
(about 1300 there)
Edit 2
According to :
$ node --v8-options | grep -B0 -A1 stack_size
The default stack size (in kBytes) is 984.
Edit 3
A few more explanations :
I'm never reading this type of files itselves
I'm working here on an array of paths, I don't parse folders recursively
I'm looking at the path and checking if it's already stored in the database
My guess is that the populated array becomes to big for nodejs, but memory looks fine and that's weird...
Most Stackoverflow situations are not easy or sometimes possible to debug. Even if you debug on the problem, you may not find the trigger.
But I can suggest you a way to share the task load easily (including the queue management):
JXcore (a multithreaded fork on Node.JS) would suit better in your case. Simply create a task pool and set a task method handling 1 file at a time. It will manage your queue 1 by 1 multithreaded.
var myTask = function ( args here )
{
logic here
}
for(var i=0;i<LIST_OF_THE_FILES;i++)
jxcore.tasks.addTask( myTask, paramshere, optional callback ...
OR in case the logic definition is out of the scope of a single method;
var myTask = function ( args here )
{
require('mytasketc.js').handleTask(args here);
}
for(var i=0;i<LIST_OF_THE_FILES;i++)
jxcore.tasks.addTask( myTask, paramshere, optional callback ...
Remarks
Every single thread has its own V8 memory limit.
The context among the threads are separated
Make sure the task method closes the file in the end
Link
You can find more on multithreaded Javascript tasks
You getting this error because of recursion. Reformat your code to do not use it, especially because this peace of code really don't need it. Here is just APPROXIMATE example, to show you how better to do it:
var parseElems = function(arr, cb) {
var result = [];
arr.forEach(function (el) {
//do some tests on the element (el)
result.push(el);
});
cb(result);
});

Resources