Is there any way through which we can get the event details in a tabular format like if I want to see what action the users performing frequently, any specific user data for the user journey etc. rather than viewing each events separately? #flurry
Means rather then viewing in Node view looking for table view
Example- add one image where we can see Events in node view
then we can convert into table format view where we can get all data in one view possible.
Related
Here's what I'd like to do but not sure how to. I have a form that's like a typical doctor/school form, where the form has 2 sections: [1] Section 1 at the top is for user (with standard fields like First Name, Last Name etc.), and [2] Section 2 at the bottom is for Admin/Office use only (with fields like Reviewed by, Approved/Not Approved etc.)
what I was able to do is to process Section 1 where I got ALL users' submission and display all their data on a webpage using a RepeaterWithCustomQuery. That's pretty basic. But in order to do what described above, I guess that I'll need to pull the submitted data and populate them back to Section 1 of the form (maybe as readonly data at this time) and then the Office/Admin staff can fill in Section 2.
I hope I made sense and hope that someone can point me to the right direction. I only use Portal Engine, no access to file system or backend.
I think I understand your issue you want to have some sort of an editor for biz form data. Similar to what you have in the admin. And the problem is that you don't have access to backend. :( Such thing is available for custom table data (there is web part), but not for biz form data. There is no ready to use web part. Here is old topic on that https://devnet.kentico.com/questions/how-to-edit-the-information-of-a-record-using-the-bizform-layout.
you want to have something like the admin page for editing form records:
/CMSModules/BizForms/Tools/BizForm_Edit_EditRecord.aspx?formID=7&formRecordID=1
but customized :(. I'd say without back end access the only options I see:
Create a new role "Biz Form Editor" (or use existing) that has rights only to edit biz
form data. So all your people who do "validation" part must have a
Kentico account with role "Biz Form Editor".
Add link above to your repeater with appropriate record id.
P.S. There are special code names for alternative forms (https://docs.kentico.com/k8/configuring-kentico/creating-alternative-forms/code-names-of-automatically-used-alternative-forms). If you create an alternative form with special name update the system will automatically load it when you edit the record.
Not sure that I understood correctly your question. But what you need is to use alternative forms. So the idea is that one form is for "registration" and the 2nd one for "validation".
So in your registration form you show only firstName, lastName etc and you don't show "validation" fields. In the validation form you show firstName, lastname etc as label and show textboxes for validation fields.
Is there any workaround to input data directly through PBI in published report? I would like the users to input comments to the graphs. It would be fantastic if the user could do that directly in PBI report, below the chart.
I can see on official PBI Ideas For Improvement page that these features are developers' dreams to be voted:
https://ideas.powerbi.com/forums/265200-power-bi-ideas/suggestions/9414921-input-fields
https://ideas.powerbi.com/forums/265200-power-bi-ideas/suggestions/13820190-power-bi-online-query-parameters?page=1&per_page=20
Maybe there is some hidden workaround to that which slips out beyond the attention of Microsoft team? Maybe there is some visual, or script in R which allows sending data anywhere where it can be stored - SQL Server, Sharepoint?
Here is very inspiring hint example of IO made in R - passing clicks coordinates done in PBI to SQL and then back to Power BI:
https://medium.com/#dr_eldersveld/r-visuals-in-power-bi-beyond-plots-74c618f2e6f3
Yes, it's entirely possible.
You can create a PowerApps (which basically allows you to connect to any (or most) data sources) and then embed the app in Power BI with PowerApps custom visual. It may take some effort but the use case is unlimited.
The following shows a simple example on how to save and show user input in PowerApps:
The TextInput1 accepts user input, the save icon1 have OnSelect set to Set(comment, TextInput1.Text) to save the text from the text input to the variable comment; and the Label1 shows the comment value.
When you edit the Power BI report on Power BI Web, add the PowerApps Custom Visual from the marketplace, and choose the app you just created, this is what will happen:
Note that this is just an example and it won't persist user input upon refresh. If you want to save the comment to show it to other users, you'll have to modify the app and connect it to a data source, create a table to store the comment, update its value with user input, etc..
I wish to create a view showing a number of fields from notes documents with replication or save conflicts. So far I have managed to create a basic view with a column for the document ID (Contract ID) then the next column states "Replication or Save Conflicts" but I don't seem to able to either get rid of the replocation or save conflcits column or add new columns to show additional fields from the document. Is there a way I can do this? I want to be able to show the view in XPages. Here is the View selection formula I am using;
SELECT #IsAvailable($Conflict)
Conflicts are not displayed good in views. here are a few alternative tips to deal with conflicts that might give you an idea or two :-)
Create a categorized column with the value of the field $ConflictItems in the view you have, then you will see which item is causing the conflict and can take action to prevent it.
When you open a conflict you can use the action menu "View Parent" to compare the parent and the conflict
Ytra ScanEZ is a great tool for finding and resolving conflicts. it is also possible to create a script that will compare the documents and present a diff list.
You can create an XPage to display your conflicts (and parents). The web is more dynamic as it allow you to layout your data in the way you want and is not restricted to the way view in Notes works. This kind of xpage can be displayed in Notes client or Web browser
Use XPages power. Get all documents from the view with your selection formula. But don't try to show any column value and get fields directly from back-end document you get from view entry entry.getDocument().
Sure, it has some performance impact, but for (hopefully) small amount of replication conflict it's nothing serious.
I want to design an infopath form in which there is a repeating table. This table gets data loaded into it on form load using a web service (to receive data). the thing is that user must be able to modify this data and send it back to the server on form submit using another web service (to submit data).
Now I need something like multiple bindings so that the control is bound to to the web service data source to receive data, and also to the form data source in order for the other web service (submit) to send the form data to the server.
I tried to do this with a single value control (not repeating value) and I managed to do that by binding the control to a form data source field and setting the default value of the field to my web service (receive) field. But I can not do that for a repeating table because each time the form loads, I get a table with one row (no matter how many rows the web service returns), filled with the data of the first row returned by the web service, and clicking add row button would result in another row with the same data of the first row.
please help me. thanks.
I found the solution myself. I have to put a repeating table on the form and bind it to a form field. With the web service data source to pull data, I add some code behind to the form load event to set value of the field (which is bound to repeating table) with the data I pulled from web service data source. The code is pretty simple and you can find a lot of threads demonstrating that.
In my case, it was a sharepoint site which I wanted to deploy the form to. There are difficulties to deploy an infopath form with code behind to a sharepoint site. "Nader" has a really useful post with an step by step procedure for doing this:
http://nader.elshehabi.com/2011/08/how-to-really-deploy-infopath-2010-forms-with-code-behind-as-a-feature/
My application has documents for Companies, and for Clients. This is a many to many relationship; a company can have any number of clients, and a client can be a client of many companies. The relationships are stored by creating a response document to the company, with a field containing the ID of the client document.
I would like to be able to show fields from the client document on the company's XPage, and I've been trying to do this with repeat controls. I created a view of all the link documents, and used that to create a repeat, filtering it with the current document ID to collect all the links that the current company has. This allows me to list all the IDs of the client documents associated with that company.
I have been trying to work out how to pass this ID to a repeat control nested within the first one, either to use it as a filter on a view of all the client documents, or to use it as the data source document ID directly. Is this possible? If not, how would I go about showing data from the client document on the company page?
When you specify a repeat control you specify the variable that contains the instance value. This variable name is visible to anything inside the repeat control. So your variable would contain the UNID of the client documents one at a time. E.g you call it ClientDocID. You put a panel inside that repeat control. That panel can have its own DominoDocument data source. The datasource can have new, display or edit as default action. You pick "display" which requires a DocumentId to be provided. Select "computed" and simply use ClientDocID as formula.
You can suppress rendering of HTML for the panel (check the properties), so it would fit e.g. inside a xp:tr.
Hope that helps