Creating a Node.js REST API using Firebase Cloud Functions, without Express? - node.js

I am working to create a serverless REST API via Firebase Cloud Functions, which seems to work well but the examples and documentation all seem to use a monolithic solution, since they use the Express framework and essentially map the root http request to the Express app, then let it handle the routing. I understand that this is because the Firebase Hosting platform does not have the ability to handle http verbs.
My expectation was that a serverless / FaaS approach would have a function for each endpoint, making for easy updates in future since there's no need to update the whole app, just that single service - i.e. a more functional approach.
What am I missing here? Why is the approach to use a single function to contain an express app? Doesn't this defeat the purpose of a serverless / Cloud Functions approach? And is there any other way of doing this?

The documentation shows how to create an endpoint without the help of an Express app, router, or middleware:
exports.date = functions.https.onRequest((req, res) => {
// ...
});
All you have to do is arrange to send a response with res.send(...) or similar.

Related

Express.js POST request returns 404 [duplicate]

Despite knowing JavaScript quite well, I'm confused what exactly these three projects in Node.js ecosystem do. Is it something like Rails' Rack? Can someone please explain?
[Update: As of its 4.0 release, Express no longer uses Connect. However, Express is still compatible with middleware written for Connect. My original answer is below.]
I'm glad you asked about this, because it's definitely a common point of confusion for folks looking at Node.js. Here's my best shot at explaining it:
Node.js itself offers an http module, whose createServer method returns an object that you can use to respond to HTTP requests. That object inherits the http.Server prototype.
Connect also offers a createServer method, which returns an object that inherits an extended version of http.Server. Connect's extensions are mainly there to make it easy to plug in middleware. That's why Connect describes itself as a "middleware framework," and is often analogized to Ruby's Rack.
Express does to Connect what Connect does to the http module: It offers a createServer method that extends Connect's Server prototype. So all of the functionality of Connect is there, plus view rendering and a handy DSL for describing routes. Ruby's Sinatra is a good analogy.
Then there are other frameworks that go even further and extend Express! Zappa, for instance, which integrates support for CoffeeScript, server-side jQuery, and testing.
Here's a concrete example of what's meant by "middleware": Out of the box, none of the above serves static files for you. But just throw in connect.static (a middleware that comes with Connect), configured to point to a directory, and your server will provide access to the files in that directory. Note that Express provides Connect's middlewares also; express.static is the same as connect.static. (Both were known as staticProvider until recently.)
My impression is that most "real" Node.js apps are being developed with Express these days; the features it adds are extremely useful, and all of the lower-level functionality is still there if you want it.
The accepted answer is really old (and now wrong). Here's the information (with source) based on the current version of Connect (3.0) / Express (4.0).
What Node.js comes with
http / https createServer which simply takes a callback(req,res) e.g.
var server = http.createServer(function (request, response) {
// respond
response.write('hello client!');
response.end();
});
server.listen(3000);
What connect adds
Middleware is basically any software that sits between your application code and some low level API. Connect extends the built-in HTTP server functionality and adds a plugin framework. The plugins act as middleware and hence connect is a middleware framework
The way it does that is pretty simple (and in fact the code is really short!). As soon as you call var connect = require('connect'); var app = connect(); you get a function app that can:
Can handle a request and return a response. This is because you basically get this function
Has a member function .use (source) to manage plugins (that comes from here because of this simple line of code).
Because of 1.) you can do the following :
var app = connect();
// Register with http
http.createServer(app)
.listen(3000);
Combine with 2.) and you get:
var connect = require('connect');
// Create a connect dispatcher
var app = connect()
// register a middleware
.use(function (req, res, next) { next(); });
// Register with http
http.createServer(app)
.listen(3000);
Connect provides a utility function to register itself with http so that you don't need to make the call to http.createServer(app). Its called listen and the code simply creates a new http server, register's connect as the callback and forwards the arguments to http.listen. From source
app.listen = function(){
var server = http.createServer(this);
return server.listen.apply(server, arguments);
};
So, you can do:
var connect = require('connect');
// Create a connect dispatcher and register with http
var app = connect()
.listen(3000);
console.log('server running on port 3000');
It's still your good old http.createServer with a plugin framework on top.
What ExpressJS adds
ExpressJS and connect are parallel projects. Connect is just a middleware framework, with a nice use function. Express does not depend on Connect (see package.json). However it does the everything that connect does i.e:
Can be registered with createServer like connect since it too is just a function that can take a req/res pair (source).
A use function to register middleware.
A utility listen function to register itself with http
In addition to what connect provides (which express duplicates), it has a bunch of more features. e.g.
Has view engine support.
Has top level verbs (get/post etc.) for its router.
Has application settings support.
The middleware is shared
The use function of ExpressJS and connect is compatible and therefore the middleware is shared. Both are middleware frameworks, express just has more than a simple middleware framework.
Which one should you use?
My opinion: you are informed enough ^based on above^ to make your own choice.
Use http.createServer if you are creating something like connect / expressjs from scratch.
Use connect if you are authoring middleware, testing protocols etc. since it is a nice abstraction on top of http.createServer
Use ExpressJS if you are authoring websites.
Most people should just use ExpressJS.
What's wrong about the accepted answer
These might have been true as some point in time, but wrong now:
that inherits an extended version of http.Server
Wrong. It doesn't extend it and as you have seen ... uses it
Express does to Connect what Connect does to the http module
Express 4.0 doesn't even depend on connect. see the current package.json dependencies section
node.js
Node.js is a javascript motor for the server side.
In addition to all the js capabilities, it includes networking capabilities (like HTTP), and access to the file system.
This is different from client-side js where the networking tasks are monopolized by the browser, and access to the file system is forbidden for security reasons.
node.js as a web server: express
Something that runs in the server, understands HTTP and can access files sounds like a web server. But it isn't one.
To make node.js behave like a web server one has to program it: handle the incoming HTTP requests and provide the appropriate responses.
This is what Express does: it's the implementation of a web server in js.
Thus, implementing a web site is like configuring Express routes, and programming the site's specific features.
Middleware and Connect
Serving pages involves a number of tasks. Many of those tasks are well known and very common, so node's Connect module (one of the many modules available to run under node) implements those tasks.
See the current impressing offering:
logger request logger with custom format support
csrf Cross-site request forgery protection
compress Gzip compression middleware
basicAuth basic http authentication
bodyParser extensible request body parser
json application/json parser
urlencoded application/x-www-form-urlencoded parser
multipart multipart/form-data parser
timeout request timeouts
cookieParser cookie parser
session session management support with bundled MemoryStore
cookieSession cookie-based session support
methodOverride faux HTTP method support
responseTime calculates response-time and exposes via X-Response-Time
staticCache memory cache layer for the static() middleware
static streaming static file server supporting Range and more
directory directory listing middleware
vhost virtual host sub-domain mapping middleware
favicon efficient favicon server (with default icon)
limit limit the bytesize of request bodies
query automatic querystring parser, populating req.query
errorHandler flexible error handler
Connect is the framework and through it you can pick the (sub)modules you need.
The Contrib Middleware page enumerates a long list of additional middlewares.
Express itself comes with the most common Connect middlewares.
What to do?
Install node.js.
Node comes with npm, the node package manager.
The command npm install -g express will download and install express globally (check the express guide).
Running express foo in a command line (not in node) will create a ready-to-run application named foo. Change to its (newly created) directory and run it with node with the command node <appname>, then open http://localhost:3000 and see.
Now you are in.
Connect offers a "higher level" APIs for common HTTP server functionality like session management, authentication, logging and more. Express is built on top of Connect with advanced (Sinatra like) functionality.
Node.js itself offers an HTTP module, whose createServer method returns an object that you can use to respond to HTTP requests. That object inherits the http.Server prototype.
Related information, especially if you are using NTVS for working with the Visual Studio IDE. The NTVS adds both NodeJS and Express tools, scaffolding, project templates to Visual Studio 2012, 2013.
Also, the verbiage that calls ExpressJS or Connect as a "WebServer" is incorrect. You can create a basic WebServer with or without them. A basic NodeJS program can also use the http module to handle http requests, Thus becoming a rudimentary web server.
middleware as the name suggests actually middleware is sit between middle.. middle of what? middle of request and response..how request,response,express server sit in express app
in this picture you can see requests are coming from client then the express server server serves those requests.. then lets dig deeper.. actually we can divide this whole express server's whole task in to small seperate tasks like in this way.
how middleware sit between request and response small chunk of server parts doing some particular task and passed request to next one.. finally doing all the tasks response has been made..
all middle ware can access request object,response object and next function of request response cycle..
this is good example for explaining middleware in express youtube video for middleware
The stupid simple answer
Connect and Express are web servers for nodejs. Unlike Apache and IIS, they can both use the same modules, referred to as "middleware".

How to make https work and add a self-signed SSL certificate when running firebase function locally?

I'm running a nest api off of a single firebase function and a lot of endpoints throughout my controllers need SSL to work due to OAuth & because they send back a https-only signed cookie.
Because of that, I need to be able to run locally served firebase functions with SSL. I already have generated & registered the certificates and have previously used it with React/Angular and standalone Node + Nest projects.
This is specifically about getting it to work with a firebase function.
Currently, in my index I have:
export const API = functions
.region("europe-west2")
.https.onRequest(nestApp);
where nestApp is
const server = express();
Now in a normal Node + Nest application all I have to do is:
app = await NestFactory.create(AppModule, {
httpsOptions: {
key: keyFile,
cert: certFile,
},
});
Adapting this to the firebase function above doesn't work as I have to pass the express instance instead. I've looked everywhere through the docs & types where the object is nested where the http options with key and cert are, but no luck.
The HttpOptions interface from #nestjs/common does indeed have these two properties but the express adapter.options() takes a request handler and not that options object.
I think what you want to do is not possible... the way you want it to do it.
The goal of running a Cloud Function locally is for code-testing purposes but Google will still manage the infrastructure behind (SSL, authentication, etc.), even on a local environment.
Instead of manage this with the Function, why not to emulate a small server? I can think of a simple NGINX as a Reverse proxy (you can use any service you want for this). This will allow you to manage the SSL certs on a more friendly way.
Think it like this: Within your workflow, you call NGINX instead of the Function directly. NGINX will call internally the Cloud Function, the function will do its job and the response would be returned to NGINX and then back to your workflow from NGINX with the https-signed ready for the next step.
Hope this is helpful! :)

Securing Nodejs express API

I am making a very basic REST API using Express 4 (express.Router). How can I secure this API in a simple way?
I do not need to authenticate individual users so most of the strategies that I have found seem like overkill. I am just trying to moderately secure the API so I am hopefully the only one using it. Not sure what strategy I can use to pass something from the client to identify myself. Thanks!
I will be accessing this API from a web page as well as mobile client (with Ionic) and hosting the app on Google Clouds App Engine.
You could use a header or a query string to authenticate. For example, setup a middleware on Express to check if the header X-TOKEN contains a string of your choice.
Here's a code which you can use to do that:
function checkAuthHeader (req, res, next) {
let token = req.headers['X-TOKEN'];
if (token && token == "RANDOM_GENERATED_STRING") {
next();
} else {
res.status(403).end('Unauthorized.')
}
}
Then you can use this function as a middleware like this (make sure you place it before declaring your routes):
app.use(checkAuthHeader)
You should be using environmental variables instead of a hard-coded string as well. I just used a hard coded one for demonstration.

I am using loopback to scaffold an application, can I still write my code as an express application instead of using some of their components?

I have used loopback to scaffold out my application but want to use some of their components, their documentation is lacking, can I just enable the functionality I want like I would using just express?
Specifically, I want to implement OAuth2
The loopback object is directly the express object (with all the loopback sweet additions of course). You can obtain this object by requiring the server.js file scaffolded in your application.
So you can do everything express does with it, like routing for instance
var app = require('server.js').
app.get('/', function (req, res) {
res.send('Hello World!');
});
Implementing OAuth2 is absolutely possible (done it myself, without using oauth loopback plugin), nothing preventing it, but it's not exactly straightforward. I would advise to spend some time getting familiar with loopback and building a few small applications first.

Sails.js: best way to package DB and surrounding API models as module

I'm new to Sails, but have used Express, and am considering Sails for my upcoming project. I particularly like that it makes the CRUD API for me and connects Socket.io automatically.
The next application I'm planning to work on has an indeterminate size; if it works well, we want to separate our CRUD/JSON API from our Web/HTTP server and load balance the Web/HTTP server. This would allow us to utilize the CRUD/JSON API in other adjacent applications, like code for statistical analysis, or external data parsers which import data, or other things which have nothing to do with Web/HTTP servicing.
In express I would consider making the API section a module then export the express.router with all the api calls like so
//appAPI.js
var routes = require('express').router();
routes.get('/user/:id', function(request, reply){
// assume db is connected database object
// and request.params.id is as expected
db.getUser(request.params.id, function(u){
reply.json(u);
});
})
module.exports = routes;
//app.js
var app = require('express')(),
api = require('appAPI');
app.use('/api', api);
Then in my application, if I want to separate the Web from the API, I can package up the appAPI.js, and associated model code, and make a small connector to redirect all routes /api/* to the ip address and port of the api server, or other possibilities.
Can I do something like this in Sails? It seems that the automated model creation and the socket.io automation would make this difficult. Alternatively, I might be able to make a module for the API with a whole sails server then embed it in the main Web/HTTP server, which has its own sails objects running, but this seems like it either would not work, break the socket.io connections, or work, but be horribly inefficient as it would have multiple instances of sails running.
Any recommendations would be helpful and I'm willing to consider alternative ways of working this. Thank you all for any help you might provide and have a wonderful day.

Resources