I am Using Sharepoint2019 On-Premise
I am looking to use separate .aspx page for authenticate users for Sharepoint2019,
I tried the Form-Based Authentication(https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/previous-versions/office/sharepoint-server-2010/ee806890(v=office.14)) and it works for authentication but the user profiles are not getting synced from our current Active Directory, so i would like the go back to the windows authentication but instead of pop-up should i would like the .aspx
I want to Use this page for Windows Authentication :-
I Do Not Want This SIgn in pop-up
can any one please guide me to accomplish this task.
One suggestion to look at would be to use AD FS and Web Application Proxy. This solution would require you to configure Kerberos Constrained Delegation for the SharePoint Web Application. In addition, the WAP server(s) need to be joined to Active Directory. Finally, on AD FS you would set up a non-claims aware relying party.
DNS for your Web Application would be pointed at the WAP server (or load balancer routing to WAP) and users would log in there using an FBA experience but still using Windows auth on the back end.
You need an external system that can pass non-Windows auth and translate it to Windows auth. AD FS + WAP is one example of doing so. Because the back end is still Windows auth, other services that leverage Windows auth will continue to work without any changes to your farm.
See here :- https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/answers/questions/153678/how-to-use-custom-login-page-aspx-as-link-fba-for.html
See https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/identity/ad-fs/operations/create-a-non-claims-aware-relying-party-trust on how to create a non-claims aware relying party.
For TLS setup, see https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/previous-versions/windows/it-pro/windows-server-2012-R2-and-2012/dn383662(v=ws.11).
it is quite tricky, as Microsoft Designed in that for the windows authentication, but any how if you can use the Form Base Authentication.
Here is the Link where Microsoft posted how to implement the Form Based Authentication.
Configure forms-based authentication for a claims-based Web application
Related
The case: A client asked for SSO to access their internal SharePoint applications externally (They will add Exchange later on), they do not care if the device is on the domain and they want the experience to be seamless, so anyone with a valid user name and password regardless of whatever device they are using can access the apps.
I have followed the tutorial on WSO2 website to use WSO2 Identity Server 5.3 (passive STS) as an identity provider for SharePoint 2016, and after some tinkering it worked.
https://wso2.com/library/tutorials/2015/05/tutorial-sso-for-microsoft-sharepoint-web-applications-with-wso2-identity-server/
Then I added another application in sharepoint, added it as a second service provider in WSO2 Identity serverand, added the second realm to the sharepoint trusted provider.
Now the 2 applications only work if I start a new session in my browser or clear cookies, after looking into it, when I open the second application in a different tab it is taking the URI of the first application I opened rather than the its own, and it fails as the realm setup in the second service provider does not match the realm for the application in SharePoint.
So here are my questions:
1- Am I doing the SSO using WSO2 incorrectly (Thus the tutorial title is misleading) , and is the passive STS federation , simply that, a federation and not the way to do the SSO in WSO2 Identity Server? If not, could you please tell me what exactly I need to do to fix my issue?
2- If the above is the wrong approach is using SAML Web SSO configuration the right answer? If so, what is the realm that I should use for the sharepoint applications, and is passive STS needed at all in this case?
I was trying to register an Application Login Module in Websphere but I don´t find any easy example in web.
There are a lot of IBM documents, but too much complex, and I can´t figure out how to register an Application Login Module.
I already have success with a System Login Module bounded to WEB_INBOUND, it works, but affects all my system. I want a Login Module to serve only my applications web, with JAAS authentication.
I´ve tried to bound a login module to existing WSLogin but it doesn´t seems to be working.
Any help ?
tks[]
You need to setup security domains to get the separation you are looking for wrt to the login configurations. The security framework uses the WEB_INBOUND login configuration to authenticate the user for all web applications irrespective of adminConsole or user applications. When you create a security domain and customize the WEB_INBOUND configuration at the server/cluster domain level, it will be used for all the user web applications deployed in those processes. You need to setup the multidomain in a cell topology and assign the domain to the server/cluster where you applications are deployed.
Once you setup the domains, the WEB_INBOUND configuration at the server/cluster domain will be used by the user applications hosted in that server/cluster while the WEB_INBOUND configuration at the admin/global domain will be used for the adminConsole application at the Deploymener Management process where it is deployed.
The application JAAS login configurations are meant to be used by the applications directly. One can create an application login configuration and programmatically use it in the application to perform direct login -
LoginContext lc = new LoginContext("myAppLoginCfg1", callBackHandler);
I asked around and this is the answer that comes from the owner of container security:
The WEB_INBOUND is a JAAS system login that is always configured by default. However, you can specify your own JAAS application login or customize the existing WEB_INBOUND system login. If you want only one application to use a different JAAS login from all your other applications, you can use a security domain that has those different security configurations. The only catch is that application server has to be in a separate server from the other apps. That way, you can map your security domain to that server.
Here's an info center article about security domains:
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/#!/SS7K4U_8.5.5/com.ibm.websphere.zseries.doc/ae/tsec_sec_domains_config.html?cp=SS7K4U_8.5.5%2F1-8-2-33-1
And one on application logins:
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/#!/SS7K4U_8.5.5/com.ibm.websphere.zseries.doc/ae/rsec_logmod.html?cp=SS7K4U_8.5.5
And system logins:
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/#!/SS7K4U_8.5.5/com.ibm.websphere.zseries.doc/ae/usec_sysjaas.html
And here is a much more practical answer that comes from the security dev lead:
So an additional question is - why would you want to do that? Do you want to do anything specific for just one app during login that you do not want for other app logins? (I would think so) You can get the app name in your custom login module and can use that to provide your own app based login requirement in your login module (or skip it) if needed.
Me: Ya, this is what I would do. You can also implement this based on what is in the request. I did one where it would request a SAML token from an STS and put it on the runas subject if I could tell that the request came from WebSeal (and not if it didn't).
If what you need to do for the 'app-specific' case requires skipping what is done in ltpaLoginModule and wsMapDefaultInboundLoginModule (that should run for the other apps), you can't really do that. However, you can modify their behavior.
Read through the task I've given a link to below. Yes, I understand it is a WS-Security task, but its about using APIs. You'll get what I'm talking about if you read closely, particularly the 3rd ("When a caller...") and 5th ("To use a..") paragraphs. The parts that you should be concerned about in the code is the WSCREDENTIAL* stuff.
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSAW57_8.5.5/com.ibm.websphere.nd.doc/ae/twbs_config_wssec_caller_no_reg.html
I have the following scenario:
1.- A web api project in Azure, that I want to secure using Azure AD (I don't mind Token, cookie, whatever, as far as it meets the entire scenario)
2.- An Azure web site in asp.net MVC, also secured by Azure AD. This website has to call the web api controller with SSO (I'm using same Azure AD in the entire scenario)
3.- Some JavaScript code running in a page in SharePoint Online, also calling the web api controller in any secure way (The Office 365 tenant is also using same Azure AD). If you don't know about SharePoint, let's say I have an SPA project where I can only use Javascript and html (no server side code).
Following some of the MS Azure AD samples and some blogs from Vittorio Bertocci I'm able to get the points 1 and 2 working fine, using OWIN and Oppen ID connect. However, seems impossible to achieve point 3. As I'm inside a page in SharePoint Online, I can only use javascript, and not any server side code. I'd like to get a valid token for the current user, that is already logged in SP, and remember that SP uses same Azure AD that web api site.
Can I call the Azure AD and get a valid token, just from client code?
I'm open to any possible solution. I can do whatever in the web api project. If you are thinking in a SharePoint app with an appPart, and the appPart calls the web api from server side code, I agree that will work, but it's an option that is not allowed at the moment :(
Many thanks.
I have similar needs. While waiting for a Microsoft sponsored solution we’re working on the following approach.
3) in Your solution (i.e. HTML page with JavaScript, hosted in SharePoint Online and running in Browser) will call Services in 1) (i.e. Web Api Service layer in Azure).
In Our case we only want to validate that the calls made from SharePoint Online (via users browser, i.e. JavaScript) originate from a correct Office 365 / SharePoint Online user in our tenant.
We are opting out of using the App Model as we only want some simple HTML / JavaScript pages in our Intranet and don’t want App Webs. The Web Api server side code is kind of our “Web Part” code behind.
Change to the solution after trying it out and having workable code:
The auth cookies are ReadOnly and cannot be used. Instead we have registered one metod in our service layer as App in SharePoint Online (via appregnew.aspx). That methods url (e.g. https://cloudservice.customer.com/api/authentication/token) is registered as App start page in the app manifest and is deployed to a site Collection.
Now we can call our App via https://customer.sharepoint.com/sites/devassets/_layouts/15/appredirect.aspx?instance_id={GUID} i a jQuery ajax call and parse the result. AppRedirect sends the correct SPAuthToken which we use in our service endpoint (i.e. App start page) to call back to SharePoint and check context.Web.CurrentUser. User email is then stored in Table Storage with a generated Token which we send back to the caller (i.e. the jQuery ajax call to app redirect).
That token is then used in all other service layer calls in order to be sure of who is calling our service layer and in some cases perform authorization in our service layer.
Note, You can use the same approach in order to store Refresh and AccessToken in your client and provide that in all calls to your service from your client and use those tokens in order to do App Calls back to SharePoint. This enables HTML UI in SharePoint host webs and server code using user context in Azure service layer.
To follow up, ADAL.js has recently been released, and the ability to use CORS with O365 APIs was recently added, enabling a scenario for script clients to communicate with services protected by Azure AD, such as your Web API.
http://www.andrewconnell.com/blog/adal-js-cors-with-o365-apis-files-sharepoint
UPDATE 2018:
This is now supported by SharePoint Online and the SPFx development model, and officially documented, for instance here
Consume enterprise APIs secured with Azure AD in SharePoint Framework
Being said that the work done meanwhile by Vittorio, Kirk, and their teams, but extending that also to Andrew that has delivered great samples, is awesome; that doesn't really fully reply the original question because one of the requirements is to don't run the component as Add-in Part.
If you try to use ADAL JS (which starts its own OAuth flow) hosting that directly in a SP page, that's not going to work, or anyway you can expect a weird behavior for the user (cause of client redirects happening on the browser).
The solution proposed by Peter Karpinski is interesting, and will work matching the requirements in the original question, but requires quite some complexity and additional management/resources.
This recent article provides an alternative solution similar to Peter's one, but requiring less 'extras' and somewhat simpler, also reusing user's SP identity.
Consuming Azure Hosted Web API from SharePoint Online using JavaScript and Office 365 identities
and doesn't either require the use of ADAL on the client side and the implementation of custom security provider / token issuer on the server side.
The identity (cookie) will be passed via properly handling CORS (documentation) on both sides.
However, as you can read in my comments to that blog, this won't work normally with IE due to its security zone implementation. You'll have to be sure you have control on IE security zones on the clients, or have an alternative solution specific for IE.
As of today AAD does not support the OAuth2 implicit flow (or OpenId Connect variants) hence you can't obtain a token from AAD using a user-agent (browser), regardless of whether you hit the wire handcrafting the protocol or using a library.
However keep an eye on future announcements, as this is an important scenario for us!
HTH
Cheers,
V.
update we now support the implicit flow on our server, and we released a library for helping you consume the new feature: http://www.cloudidentity.com/blog/2015/02/19/introducing-adal-js-v1/
Thank youi for r your patience!
The fact that you say you can use only HTML/JS let me guess you're having a SharePoint-hosted App.
Azure AD Authentication Library (ADAL) doesn't provide yet in this moment support for HTML5.
I've been looking since a while (almost one year) on how to implement something as you say; but I couldn't find any working solution, which doesn't make use also of some 'code-behind'.
I'd suggest you then to move to a Provider-hosted App, where you'll be able to have some C# code, and make use of ADAL to retrieve and reuse the OAuth token.
Also, I think is worth to look at this documentation page:
Choose patterns for developing and hosting your app for SharePoint
at section Match your hosting pattern with your development goals
thanks for your help.
Well, it's not a SP-Hosted App, but it's same scenario. It's just a SP page in SP Online, so I can only use JS code like in a SP-hosted app.
As I said in my question, I agree the Provider hosted app is likely the right (or at least, the unique) solution, but that means to build and app, deploy it, and add teh appPart manually to the page (is not easy to package in a WSP). So, this solution is quite hard, when you only want to make some AJAX calls and show some data.
However, after all that I've seen, I think we can't do anything else. I'm gonna wait some more days to see if someone know any weird workarround that could work, and if not, I'll mark your answer as valid.
Thanks again!
As a Service Provider (SP) I have written a node.js service to processes SAML2.0 Assertions. I would now like to test this code.
I am aware that I can use various cloud-based services to act as my test Identity Provider (IdP) however these require that my new, untested SP end-points be made public.
Currently I am simply POSTing a hand-crafted SAML2.0 Assertion to my SP end-point but I want a more realistic test, especially the ability to test SP initiated SSO.
Therefore I believe I need to have a local IdP running on my development machine so I can, for now, keep all my testing local and sand-boxed.
Can you recommend a way forward for me?
You actually do not need to publish your endpoints in order to be able to use a public IDP.
All communication between the SP and IDP is either done through your browser (which of course needs to be able to access both your local SP and public IDP), or your SP calls IDP (when using HTTP-Artifact profile). But in usual situations IDP never directly calls SP, which means that SP can be running locally without a publicly accessible URL.
One of the public IDPs which can be configured in this way is SSO Circle.
In case you would still like to run an IDP locally, Shibboleth is probably your easiest bet.
There is an open Idp that will reply to any AuthnRequest available for free at https://stubidp.sustainsys.com. It will allow you to set the Subject NameId you want in a simple form and then reply back to the SP. If you want to set up your own instance, the source of the stubidp is available at https://github.com/Sustainsys/Saml2.
Disclosure notice: I'm the author of the stubidp, but I won't make any money out of anyone using it, it's provided entirely as a free service.
Another option is https://github.com/mcguinness/saml-idp. It's straight-forward and quick to setup for local testing (it's a node server). I successfully used it to implement some full end-to-end SAML SSO tests using cypress.
We have a .net core app, and I basically just run node server.js on startup if running in development environment. I redirect output of the node server to our .net core web app's output, so we can see the SAML requests/responses right alongside our app's logs. Works really well.
Agree with Shibboleth - others are SimpleSAMLphp and (if you have Windows Server) then perhaps ADFS.
If you go the cloud route, Azure Active Directory is another option - albeit that it only currently supports SP Initiated.
I'm developing an ASP.NET MVC site that utilizes forms authentication for part of the application. During development, I need to be able to give external parties access to a development server hosting the site. Since I don't want to expose the site to the entire internet, I need to password protect it while still allowing forms authentication to be in use.
Mixing of Windows and forms authentication doesn't work. Is there a standard way of doing this? I would have to think this is a common scenario. The article on MSDN doesn't seem to apply to my situation: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms972958.aspx
Update: The first two answers suggest adding in standard IIS basic/digest authentication. As far as I know, this is not compatible with forms authentication because the user's identity will be set to the Windows account, not the identity used through forms authentication. I need the two to be completely independent. Any thoughts?
You could protect it in IIS, give those details to the external parties, and leave the forms auth as it is.
Disable anonomous access to force the users to login via a windows account before accessing the site.
I knew a guy who did this using Apache and a reverse proxy.
http://www.apachetutor.org/admin/reverseproxies
Well unfortunately what you're trying to do is not possible in IIS7 (integrated mode), but there is a workaround. I suggest you to read this article written by Mike Volodarsky a former program manager for IIS7 at Microsoft. Article addresses your problem and there is even a sample code you could use.