I can't figure out how to delete dialogflow cx projects. I was messing around with it, and maxed out the number of projects, and now regular dialogflow is broken. There are no agents in any of the projects, but I can't delete them.
Dialogflow CX project refers to a GCP project as stated in the documentation. In order to have multiple agents it is often more useful to create different agents within the same GCP project, as the GCP Console of the project is used to manage GCP-specific Dialogflow CX settings, as explained here.
In the following link you will find the troubleshooting steps to follow if you are having troubles deleting a GCP project.
Considering that your issue seems to have affected the Dialogflow Essentials edition you may need to open a ticket with Support to provide further insights on that matter. However, Bear in mind that Dialogflow CX product is still on its Beta release and the Support that may receive might be limited or it may change in the future.
In this link you will find a summary on how to get support for Dialogflow. In case you do not have a paid support plan with Google Cloud Platform it's advised to file the Dialogflow support form.
You can delete the prj in https://console.cloud.google.com/iam-admin/settings
screen shot
After you shutdown the prj, Google will deleted it after 30 days.
Related
I'm starting to research and learn Azure Functions. Specifically I need to learn about webooks.
This video uses a template; https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/resources/videos/create-a-web-hook-or-api-azure-function/
I have seen this in other tutorials/post on setting up an Azure Function to handle a Github webhooks.
When I create a new function I do not have any of these templates show up. I'm assuming they may need to be uploaded but I have searched and not found any information of where they may be located and how to import them.
Are these still available to use?
Thanks!
I believe that video is quite old. You can find the latest documentation which contains quite a few quickstarts and tutorials to get you started.
Also, while you can create functions from the portal, most of the development can be done locally which is usually preferred by most. Depending on your preference, you could develop using
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio
CLI (along with any editor of your choice :D)
Also, there are a couple of supported languages from which you can choose from to develop for.
I am working with a team to develop a Google Action for an Organisation called 'Rocket Chat'. Now what we want to do is that, to create one main account under that organisation, where frontend and backend will be hosted and also give access of this account to a few Developers. What will be the most efficient way of doing this?. Any ideas or suggestions on how to do that are appreciated. Thanks.
Frontend is hosted on Dialogflow and for backed we are hosting our fulfilment on Firebase. If you want more details on our setup, please visit here => https://github.com/RocketChat/google-action-rocketchat
The "correct" way to do it would be for every developer to use their own account, and share a project with all of them. This also will allow you to have more granular permissions for each developer.
In addition to having ownership of the project, you may also want to have some processes in place to mitigate potential issues. If everyone uses one project, it's possible to run into race conditions if multiple developers upload the same cloud function. The Dialogflow console also may have issues with multiple editors at one time.
For easier development, each developer may want their own separate prototyping project which gives them full control over the environment, and then have some way to integrate their changes into one master project.
I have searched high and low, but I can't find anything telling me how to enable GitHub Vulnerability alerts through their API. I conversely can't find anything saying it's not supported.
Does anyone know where I can find the API documentation if it is supported, or can someone tell me it's not? I have just completed a migration to GitHub for my origination and we have ~750 repositories so enabling them all manually is... less than ideal.
we released an API for this scenario a while back, so you can now enable or disable security alerts in bulk using that. We also published a sample which calls that API for all the repositories in an organization.
API: https://developer.github.com/v3/previews/#enable-or-disable-vulnerability-alerts-for-a-repository
Sample: https://github.com/github/enable-security-alerts-sample
#Russ looks like it's only available according to the UI. I am in the same position in needing to enable this for a very large number of repos.
Take a look at: https://github.community/t5/GitHub-API-Development-and/Security-vulnerability-alerts/td-p/15846
I got this from my companies GitHub service rep:
Enable security vulnerability via API (v3 or v4)
I've raised this and currently in conversations with the team that is responsible for
this feature to see when this could be addressed. I have to say this
is an exception to the GitHub rule of API/Platform first. I apologise
for that.
We have website/portal currently successfully running live. There was a module called Lets say "A". Which is already developed.
Client asked to add some more tremendous amount of features and updates to that module.
Now we need to give beta release of this new development to specific group of users and rest of the users will have same old application.
Can anyone suggest a better and a kind of good standard approach to give beta releases on Live Site.
Thanks
I'm creating a UWP application that will be used exclusively on rugged Win10 tablets by a group of initially 10-20. If things go well it will be expanded to 100 users. These users are employees of our company, but will be remotely located.
Currently, with the test tablets, I am pushing the packages in google drive and manually copying them to the tablets, unzipping and executing the ps file on the tablet. This is way to complicated for even a beta test group of our users.
I'm looking for short-term/long-term recommendations for deployment. Someone mentioned SCCM to me and I've read a little, but that seems like quite a major endeavor to host. I would prefer something like a "private store" concept, but I can't find anything like that.
You can create a private store for your company. The best solution is probably to use Windows Store for Business. http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/business-store
Microsoft Azure Active Directory (AD) accounts for your employees are needed if you select this solution.
An alternative way is to use HockeyApp http://hockeyapp.net to deploy your application.
According to your description, HockeyApp should meet your requirement. Via HockeyApp, you can upload and distribute builds for beta or enterprise distribution using our web UI, or our API. HockeyApp also supports build servers like Jenkins or Visual Studio Team Services. Don't forget to upload your dSYM or
mapping.txt to get readable crash reports.
With HockeySDK for UWP integrated, you can also:
Integrate our open-source SDK to:
Collect crash reports
Show update alerts for new beta builds
Add a feedback view directly into your app
For more information, please visit support.hockeyapp.net.