I have a C++ project that I'm currently building using dynamic linking to various system libraries. It's on a RHEL 7 system. I've been using devtoolset-9 to get a more modern version of g++ (the system one is 4.8.5, I think). It all works fine, but I'd like to now build a static executable that I will be able to run on a non-RHEL linux system. I've tried specifying -static-libstdc++, but it appears to still be dynamically linked, looking at the ldd output. I've read that devtoolset compilers use some link-time trickery to link in both the system libstdc++ dynamically and any new C++ functionality statically. Is this true? It doesn't work for me; if I copy the executable over to the non-RHEL system and try to run it, I get a bunch of things like this (from memory, so hopefully correct):
/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.21' not found
Is there any way to build a fully static executable using g++ from devtoolset-9? Thank you.
Related
Right now, I have a modified version of a open-source dependency library (mylib.a file) in my project and thus I have it statically linked via gcc command(s). I am getting the error that...
"statically linked applications require at runtime the shared libraries from the glibc version used for linking"
My translation: my static dependency library cannot dynamically use glibc; it must also be compiled and dynamically linked. Thus, I'm trying to compile and statically link glibc.
I've gather that they would need to be compiled, the *.a library placed in a folder within the project, the "-I//location//" added in for the include headers, and the "-L//location//" added in for the libraries themselves.
But, for the question itself...
How to you compile glibc (32-bit and 64-bit)?
Through open-source research, I've found this link and I have cloned the repo but I cannot find any documentation on how to actually compile it.
git clone git://sourceware.org/git/glibc.git
Any thoughts or suggestions are welcomed.
My translation: my static dependency library cannot dynamically use glibc; it must also be compiled and dynamically linked. Thus, I'm trying to compile and statically link glibc.
As n.m. pointed out, your translation is wrong.
You are trying to link a fully static executable, and GLIBC is warning you that such executable will not run correctly on any machine with a different version of GLIBC installed.
Instead of trying to build a fully-static executable, build it such that it uses libc.so.6 (you can still link mylib.a into such executable).
IF the reason you added -static to your link is that you have both libmylib.a and libmylib.so, and would like to link in the former instead of the latter, read this answer.
In Windows, the dynamic loader always looks for modules in the path of the loaded executable first, making it possible to have private libraries without affecting system libraries.
The dynamic loader on Linux only looks for libraries in a fixed path, in the sense that it is independent on the chosen binary. I needed GCC 5 for its overflow checked arithmetic functions, but since the C++ ABI changed between 4.9 and 5, some applications became unstable and recompiling them solved the issue. While waiting for my distro [kubuntu] to upgrade the default compiler, is it possible to have newly compiled application linking to the new runtime, while packaged application still links to the old library, either by static linkage, or something that mimics the Windows behavior?
One way of emulating it would be to create a wrapper script
#!/bin/bash
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$(dirname $(which your_file)) your_file
And after the linking step copy the affected library but it is sort of a hack.
You can use rpath.
Let's say your "new ABI" shared libraries are in /usr/local/newapi-libs.
gcc -L/usr/local/newapi-libs
-Wl,-rpath,/usr/local/newapi-libs
program.cpp -o program -lsomething`
The -rpath option of the linker is the runtime counterpart to -L. When a program compiled this way is run, the linker will first look in /usr/local/newapi-libs before searching the system library paths.
More information here and here.
You can emulate the Windows behavior of looking in the executable's directory by specifying -Wl,-rpath,.
[edit] added missing -L parameter and dashes before rpath.
I'm trying to build a portable version of gcc 4.8.2. (for only C/C++ languages) The end result is have gcc installed into a specific application directory, eg, /opt/gcc-4.8.2 so that I can copy that directory from one computer to another (all computers are either intel corei5 or corei7, running recent Linux versions, eg, Ubuntu 12, Suse 10/11, Centos 5 & 6).
So far I'm able to build gcc ok, using --prefix to have the gcc outputs placed in a single directory (which can then be later copied to the other hosts). I configured & built gcc's dependencies (gmp, mpfr, mpc, isl) to have --disable-shared, so I can be sure that the final gcc, when copied to other hosts, won't complain about missing libraries or symbols.
I have a question with cloog. I configured gcc with --with-cloog (to pick up my locally built cloog, which I built along with the other gcc dependencies). However, what I don't know, is whether I also need to copy the cloog libraries and binary to each host I copy gcc to?
Also, how can I test gcc & cloog interaction? Is there a simple C file example and/or gcc command line that can be used to test whether gcc is successfully making use of cloog?
Additionally, are there any other considerations when trying to build a gcc which I then want to run on other hosts?
It depends if cloog is installed as a shared library libcloog-isl.so.* or as a static one libcloog.a ; use
ldd $(gcc-4.8 -print-file-name=cc1)
to find out. Of course you need to install all the shared libraries dependencies. If libcloog*so appears in the output of above ldd command, it is a shared library. Otherwise a static one.
You could set the LD_LIBRARY_PATH, or add the directory containing libcloog-isl.so.* (e.g. /usr/local/lib/ or /opt/lib/ etc...) to /etc/ld.so.conf (then run ldconfig)
I am not entirely sure your gcc build can run on every platform you mentioned. There might be libc* dependencies. See this. And perhaps also binutils dependencies (notably for gcc-4.8 -flto compilations).
To test gcc just compile with optimizations (e.g. gcc-4.8 -Wall -O3) some non-trivial file.
I'm attempting to compile a relatively simple Fortran executable so that it can be passed around to other Windows users that don't have Cygwin (or something of the sort) installed, however, I'm unable to get the executable to operate as a standalone. I've tried gfortran -static file.f and gfortran -static-libgfortran file.f, however other users always encounter this error:
The program can’t start because cygwin1.dll is missing from your computer. Try reinstalling the program to fix this problem.
From what I've read online (e.g. here), the -static option should be sufficient. I have verified that running the executable from my machine (DOS prompt) does work.
I have gcc (gfortran) version 4.7.3. I should also point out this is my first attempt at compiling portable Fortran.
Update
After realizing that this isn't a gfortran-specific issue (thanks to replies here), searches led me to related posts here and here
This is partially explained in the Cygwin FAQ. The solution is to install the mingw64-i686-gcc-fortran package with its dependencies, and cross-compile your code with i686-w64-mingw32-gfortran -static.
Just package the cygwin1.dll along with your binary file (both in the same folder) then it will run just fine.
I am using Ubuntu 13.04 and installed mingw-w64 using apt-get install mingw-w64. I can compile and link a working 64-bit version of my program with the following command:
x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++ code.cpp -o app.exe
Which generates a 64-bit app.exe file.
What binary or command line flags do I use to generate a 32-bit version of app.exe?
That depends on which variant of toolchain you're currently using. Both DWARF and SEH variants (which come starting from GCC 4.8.0) are only single-target. You can see it yourself by inspecting the directory structure of their distributions, i.e. they contain only the libraries with either 64- or 32-bit addressing, but not both. On the other hand, plain old SJLJ distributions are indeed dual-target, and in order to build 32-bit target, just supply -m32 flag. If that doesn't work, then just build with i686-w64-mingw32-g++.
BONUS
By the way, the three corresponding dynamic-link libraries (DLLs) implementing each GCC exception model are
libgcc_s_dw2-1.dll (DWARF);
libgcc_s_seh-1.dll (SEH);
libgcc_s_sjlj-1.dll (SJLJ).
Hence, to find out what exception model does your current MinGW-w64 distribution exactly provide, you can either
inspect directory and file structure of MinGW-w64 installation in hope to locate one of those DLLs (typically in bin); or
build some real or test C++ code involving exception handling to force linkage with one of those DLLs and then see on which one of those DLLs does the built target depend (for example, can be seen with Dependency Walker on Windows); or
take brute force approach and compile some test code to assembly (instead of machine code) and look for presence of references like ___gxx_personality_v* (DWARF), ___gxx_personality_seh* (SEH), ___gxx_personality_sj* (SJLJ); see Obtaining current GCC exception model.