we are running a large number of kubernetes clusters in our network and each with its own prometheus-operator deployment. Every deployment has its own AlertManager deployment. We are finding it very time consuming to silence an alert across all the clusters.
Currently what we have to do is to go to individual alertManager and silence the Individual alert there.
What we are hoping to achieve is an easy way of silencing the alerts for all the cluster (ideally from a single GUI)
Don't want to use inhibit as it kills the purpose of alert.
Any one has any idea how to do that?
The most obvious way should be - by turning off the deployment of an Alertmanager per K8s cluster and using a single central Alertmanager cluster where the firing alerts would be silenced.
A concern might be the performance of that single Alertmanager if there is a very big number of K8s clusters. That requires testing.
Related
Here's the scenario: we have some applications running on a Kubernetes cluster on Azure. Currently our production cluster has one Nodepool with 3 nodes which are fairly low on resources because we still don't have that many active users/requests simultaneously.
Our backend APIs app is running on three pods, one on each node. I was told I will have need to increase resources soon (I'm thinking more memory or even replacing the VMs of the nodes with better ones).
We structured everything Kubernetes related using Terraform and I know that replacing VMs in a node is a destructive action, meaning the cluster will have to be replaces, new config and all deployments, services and etc will have to be reapplied.
I am fairly new to the Kubernetes and Terraform world, meaning I can do the basics to get an application up and running but I would like to learn what is the best practice when it comes to scaling and performance. How can I perform such increase in resources without having any downtime of our services?
I'm wondering if having an extra Nodepool would help while I replace the VM's of the other one (I might be absolutely wrong here)
If there's any link, course, tutorial you can point me to it's highly appreciated.
(Moved from comments)
In Azure, when you're performing cluster upgrade, there's a parameter called "max surge count" which is equal to 1 by default. What it means is when you update your cluster or node configuration, it will first create one extra node with the updated configuration - and only then it will safely drain and remove one of old ones. More on this here: Azure - Node Surge Upgrade
I have CPU Intensive Jobs/tasks,
Need to run them in kubernetes, below is the process of job/task
We get request in terms queue or API Call
POd should be created and process the task ( few Jobs may run in minutes, few in hours)
delete pod once task completed
This should happen in scale, if more jobs in queue, create more jobs (Max 10, 20, 30 2e should define it)
I am used KEDA, POD will be created and after Job completion it is going crashloopbback, It is default behaviour in POD life cycle, because it try to recreate pod since restart policy is set to Always. We have other options like OnFailure, Never, But I read it Kubernetes Jobs are more suitable
Which is the better option Kubernetes Pods or Jobs for above task, we should consider scaling POds and also required scale kubernetes nodes (Cloud vendors supports it) based on usage and numbers of tasks in queue.
KEDA ScaledJobs are best for such scenarios and can be triggered through Queue, Storage, etc. (the currently available scalers can be found here)
I'm running Azure AKS Cluster 1.15.11 with prometheus-operator 8.15.6 installed as a helm chart and I'm seeing some different metrics displayed by Kubernetes Dashboard compared to the ones provided by prometheus Grafana.
An application pod which is being monitored has three containers in it. Kubernetes-dashboard shows that the memory consumption for this pod is ~250MB, standard prometheus-operator dashboard is displaying almost exactly double value for the memory consumption ~500MB.
At first we thought that there might be some misconfiguration on our monitoring setup. Since prometheus-operator is installed as standard helm chart, Daemon Set for node exporter ensures that every node has exactly one exporter deployed so duplicate exporters shouldn't be the reason. However, after migrating our cluster to different node pools I've noticed that when our application is running on user node pool instead of system node pool metrics does match exactly on both tools. I know that system node pool is running CoreDNS and tunnelfront but I assume these are running as separate components also I'm aware that overall it's not the best choice to run infrastructure and applications in the same node pool.
However, I'm still wondering why running application under system node pool causes metrics by prometheus to be doubled?
I ran into a similar problem (aks v1.14.6, prometheus-operator v0.38.1) where all my values were multiplied by a factor of 3. Turns out you have to remember to remove the extra endpoints called prometheus-operator-kubelet that are created in the kube-system-namespace during install before you remove / reinstall prometheus-operator since Prometheus aggregates the metric types collected for each endpoint.
Log in to the Prometheus-pod and check the status page. There should be as many endpoints as there are nodes in the cluster, otherwise you may have a surplus of endpoints:
We are working with the preview feature for AKS Cluster Autoscale. We have it all setup with the VMSS support. However in our tests it does not scale/add nodes. We get errors that 0/2 nodes are available and no more replicas can be added. A while later i did see it add one node but a lot of replicas are still red/failed. What is the best way to go about troubleshooting this. I looked at the autoscale status. but it did not show any errors. I recall doing something similar with the Regular Kubernetes autoscale and was able to pour through some logs to find the issues. But i cant find anything in the logs about this? What logs to look at? and if you are feeling generous. What are you seeing for amount of time the cluster takes to add a node and those pod add failures to go away?
Searching logs. add replicas slower
is there a way of pausing a Dataproc cluster so I don't get billed when I am not actively running spark-shell or spark-submit jobs ? The cluster management instructions at this link: https://cloud.google.com/sdk/gcloud/reference/beta/dataproc/clusters/
only show how to destroy a cluster but I have installed spark cassandra connector API for example. Is my only alternative to just creating an image that I'll need to install every time ?
In general, the best thing to do is to distill out the steps you used to customize your cluster into some setup scripts, and then use Dataproc's initialization actions to easily automate doing the installation during cluster deployment.
This way, you can easily reproduce the customizations without requiring manual involvement if you ever want, for example, to do the same setup on multiple concurrent Dataproc clusters, or want to change machine types, or receive sub-minor-version bug fixes that Dataproc releases occasionally.
There's indeed no officially supported way of pausing a Dataproc cluster at the moment, in large part simply because being able to have reproducible cluster deployments along with several other considerations listed below means that 99% of the time it's better to use initialization-action customizations instead of pausing a cluster in-place. That said, there are possible short-term hacks, such as going into the Google Compute Engine page, selecting the instances that are part of the Dataproc cluster you want to pause, and clicking "stop" without deleting them.
The Compute Engine hourly charges and Dataproc's per-vCPU charges are only incurred when the underlying instance is running, so while you've "stopped" the instances manually, you won't incur Dataproc or Compute Engine's instance-hour charges despite Dataproc still listing the cluster as "RUNNING", albeit with warnings that you'll see if you go to the "VM Instances" tab of the Dataproc cluster summary page.
You should then be able to just click "start" from the Google Compute Engine page page to have the cluster running again, but it's important to consider the following caveats:
The cluster may occasionally fail to start up into a healthy state again; anything using local SSDs already can't be stopped and started again cleanly, but beyond that, Hadoop daemons may have failed for whatever reason to flush something important to disk if the shutdown wasn't orderly, or even user-installed settings may have broken the startup process in unknown ways.
Even when VMs are "stopped", they depend on the underlying Persistent Disks remaining, so you'll continue to incur charges for those even while "paused"; if we assume $0.04 per GB-month, and a default 500GB disk per Dataproc node, that comes out to continuing to pay ~$0.028/hour per instance; generally your data will be more accessible and also cheaper to just put in Google Cloud Storage for long term storage rather than trying to keep it long-term on the Dataproc cluster's HDFS.
If you come to depend on a manual cluster setup too much, then it'll become much more difficult to re-do if you need to size up your cluster, or change machine types, or change zones, etc. In contrast, with Dataproc's initialization actions, you can use Dataproc's cluster scaling feature to resize your cluster and automatically run the initialization actions for new workers created.
Update
Dataproc recently launched the ability to stop and start clusters: https://cloud.google.com/dataproc/docs/guides/dataproc-start-stop