Sorting by absolute value for value different of zero for one column keeping equal value of another column together - python-3.x

I have the following dataframe :
A B C
============
11 x 2
11 y 0
13 x -10
13 y 0
10 x 7
10 y 0
and i would like to sort C by absolute value for value different of 0. But as i need to keep A values together it would look like below (sorted by absolute value but with 0 in between):
A B C
============
13 x -10
13 y 0
10 x 7
10 y 0
11 x 2
11 y 0
I can't manage to obtain this with sort_values(). If i sort by C, i don't have A values together.

Step 1: get absolute values
# creating a column with the absolute values
df["abs_c"] = df["c"].abs()
Step 2: sort values on absolute values of "c"
# sorting by absolute value of "c" & reseting the index & assigning it back to df
df = df.sort_values("abs_c",ascending=False).reset_index(drop=True)
Step 3: get the order of column "a" based on the sorted values, this is achieved by using drop duplicates of pandas which keeps the first instance of the value in the column a which is sorted based on "c". This will be used in the next step
# getting the order of "a" based on sorted value of "c"
order_a = df["a"].drop_duplicates()
Step 4: based on the order of "a" and the sorted values of "c" creating a data frame
# based on the order_a creating a data frame as per the order_a which is based on the sorted values of abs "c"
sorted_df = pd.DataFrame()
for i in range(len(order_a)):
sorted_df = sorted_df.append(df[df["a"]==order_a[i]])
Step 5:Assigning the sorted df back to df
# reset index of sorted values and assigning it back to df
df = sorted_df.reset_index(drop=True)
Output
a b c abs_c
0 13 x -10 10
1 13 y 0 0
2 10 x 7 7
3 10 y 0 0
4 11 x 2 2
5 11 y 0 0
Doc reference
https://pandas.pydata.org/pandas-docs/stable/reference/api/pandas.DataFrame.sort_values.html
https://pandas.pydata.org/pandas-docs/stable/reference/api/pandas.DataFrame.drop_duplicates.html

Sorry, it doesn't turn out very nice, but I almost never use panda. I hope everything works out the way you want it.
import pandas as pd
df = pd.DataFrame({'a': [11, 11, 13, 13, 10, 10],
'b': ['x', 'y', 'x', 'y', 'x', 'y'],
'c': [2, 0, -10, 0, 7, 0]})
mask = df[df['c'] != 0]
mask['abs'] = mask['c'].abs()
mask = mask.sort_values('abs', ascending=False).reset_index()
tempNr = 0
for index, row in df.iterrows():
if row['c'] != 0:
df.loc[index] = mask.loc[tempNr].drop('abs')
tempNr = tempNr + 1
print(df)

Related

pandas listing same indexes

if a table has the same index 3 times in a row, I want it to fetch me this dataframe.
example
index var1
1 a
2 b
2 c
2 d
3 e
2 f
5 g
2 f
After the code
expected output
index var1
2 b
2 c
2 d
One option is to split data frame on the diff index, check size of each chunk and filter out chunks with sizes smaller then threshold and then recombine them:
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
diff_indices = np.flatnonzero(df['index'].diff().ne(0))
diff_indices
# array([0, 1, 4, 5, 6, 7], dtype=int32)
pd.concat([chunk for chunk in np.split(df, diff_indices) if len(chunk) >= 3])
index var1
1 2 b
2 2 c
3 2 d
Let us identify the blocks of consecutive indices using cumsum, then group and transform with count to find the size of each block then select the rows where the block size > 2
b = df['index'].diff().ne(0).cumsum()
df[b.groupby(b).transform('count') > 2]
index var1
1 2 b
2 2 c
3 2 d
You can assign consecutive rows to same value by comparing with next and cumsum. Then groupby consecutive rows and keep the group where number of rows are 3 times
m = df['index'].ne(df['index'].shift()).cumsum()
out = df.groupby(m).filter(lambda col: len(col) == 3)
print(out)
index var1
1 2 b
2 2 c
3 2 d
Here's one more solution on top of the ones above (this one is more generalizable, since it selects ALL slices that meet the given criterium):
import pandas as pd
df['diff_index'] = df['index'].diff(-1) # calcs the index diff
df = df.fillna(999) # get rid of NaNs
df['diff_index'] = df['diff_index'].astype(int) # convert the diff to int
df_selected = [] # create a list of all dfs we're going to slice
l = list(df['diff_index'])
for i in range(len(l)-1):
if l[i] == 0 and l[i+1] == 0: # if 2 consecutive 0s are found, get the slice
df_temp = df[df.index.isin([i,i+1,i+2])]
del df_temp['diff_index']
df_selected.append(df_temp) # append the slice to our list
print(df_selected) # list all identified data frames (in your example, there will be only one
[ index var1
1 2 b
2 2 c
3 2 d]

pandas expand dataframe column with tuples, into multiple columns and rows

I have a data frame where one column contains elements that are a list containing several tuples. I want to turn each tuple in to a column for each element and create a new row for each tuple. So this code shows what I mean and the solution I came up with:
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
a = pd.DataFrame(data=[['a','b',[(1,2,3),(6,7,8)]],
['c','d',[(10,20,30)]]], columns=['one','two','three'])
df2 = pd.DataFrame(columns=['one', 'two', 'A', 'B','C'])
print(a)
for index,item in a.iterrows():
for xtup in item.three:
temp = pd.Series(item)
temp['A'] = xtup[0]
temp['B'] = xtup[1]
temp['C'] = xtup[2]
temp = temp.drop('three')
df2 = df2.append(temp)
print(df2)
The output is:
one two three
0 a b [(1, 2, 3), (6, 7, 8)]
1 c d [(10, 20, 30)]
one two A B C
0 a b 1 2 3
0 a b 6 7 8
1 c d 10 20 30
Unfortunately, my solution takes 2 hours to run on 55,000 rows! Is there a more efficient way to do this?
We do explode column then explode row
a=a.explode('three')
a=pd.concat([a,pd.DataFrame(a.pop('three').tolist(),index=a.index)],axis=1)
one two 0 1 2
0 a b 1 2 3
0 a b 6 7 8
1 c d 10 20 30

Replace a special character with a new line within same row in pandas [duplicate]

I have a pandas dataframe in which one column of text strings contains comma-separated values. I want to split each CSV field and create a new row per entry (assume that CSV are clean and need only be split on ','). For example, a should become b:
In [7]: a
Out[7]:
var1 var2
0 a,b,c 1
1 d,e,f 2
In [8]: b
Out[8]:
var1 var2
0 a 1
1 b 1
2 c 1
3 d 2
4 e 2
5 f 2
So far, I have tried various simple functions, but the .apply method seems to only accept one row as return value when it is used on an axis, and I can't get .transform to work. Any suggestions would be much appreciated!
Example data:
from pandas import DataFrame
import numpy as np
a = DataFrame([{'var1': 'a,b,c', 'var2': 1},
{'var1': 'd,e,f', 'var2': 2}])
b = DataFrame([{'var1': 'a', 'var2': 1},
{'var1': 'b', 'var2': 1},
{'var1': 'c', 'var2': 1},
{'var1': 'd', 'var2': 2},
{'var1': 'e', 'var2': 2},
{'var1': 'f', 'var2': 2}])
I know this won't work because we lose DataFrame meta-data by going through numpy, but it should give you a sense of what I tried to do:
def fun(row):
letters = row['var1']
letters = letters.split(',')
out = np.array([row] * len(letters))
out['var1'] = letters
a['idx'] = range(a.shape[0])
z = a.groupby('idx')
z.transform(fun)
UPDATE 3: it makes more sense to use Series.explode() / DataFrame.explode() methods (implemented in Pandas 0.25.0 and extended in Pandas 1.3.0 to support multi-column explode) as is shown in the usage example:
for a single column:
In [1]: df = pd.DataFrame({'A': [[0, 1, 2], 'foo', [], [3, 4]],
...: 'B': 1,
...: 'C': [['a', 'b', 'c'], np.nan, [], ['d', 'e']]})
In [2]: df
Out[2]:
A B C
0 [0, 1, 2] 1 [a, b, c]
1 foo 1 NaN
2 [] 1 []
3 [3, 4] 1 [d, e]
In [3]: df.explode('A')
Out[3]:
A B C
0 0 1 [a, b, c]
0 1 1 [a, b, c]
0 2 1 [a, b, c]
1 foo 1 NaN
2 NaN 1 []
3 3 1 [d, e]
3 4 1 [d, e]
for multiple columns (for Pandas 1.3.0+):
In [4]: df.explode(['A', 'C'])
Out[4]:
A B C
0 0 1 a
0 1 1 b
0 2 1 c
1 foo 1 NaN
2 NaN 1 NaN
3 3 1 d
3 4 1 e
UPDATE 2: more generic vectorized function, which will work for multiple normal and multiple list columns
def explode(df, lst_cols, fill_value='', preserve_index=False):
# make sure `lst_cols` is list-alike
if (lst_cols is not None
and len(lst_cols) > 0
and not isinstance(lst_cols, (list, tuple, np.ndarray, pd.Series))):
lst_cols = [lst_cols]
# all columns except `lst_cols`
idx_cols = df.columns.difference(lst_cols)
# calculate lengths of lists
lens = df[lst_cols[0]].str.len()
# preserve original index values
idx = np.repeat(df.index.values, lens)
# create "exploded" DF
res = (pd.DataFrame({
col:np.repeat(df[col].values, lens)
for col in idx_cols},
index=idx)
.assign(**{col:np.concatenate(df.loc[lens>0, col].values)
for col in lst_cols}))
# append those rows that have empty lists
if (lens == 0).any():
# at least one list in cells is empty
res = (res.append(df.loc[lens==0, idx_cols], sort=False)
.fillna(fill_value))
# revert the original index order
res = res.sort_index()
# reset index if requested
if not preserve_index:
res = res.reset_index(drop=True)
return res
Demo:
Multiple list columns - all list columns must have the same # of elements in each row:
In [134]: df
Out[134]:
aaa myid num text
0 10 1 [1, 2, 3] [aa, bb, cc]
1 11 2 [] []
2 12 3 [1, 2] [cc, dd]
3 13 4 [] []
In [135]: explode(df, ['num','text'], fill_value='')
Out[135]:
aaa myid num text
0 10 1 1 aa
1 10 1 2 bb
2 10 1 3 cc
3 11 2
4 12 3 1 cc
5 12 3 2 dd
6 13 4
preserving original index values:
In [136]: explode(df, ['num','text'], fill_value='', preserve_index=True)
Out[136]:
aaa myid num text
0 10 1 1 aa
0 10 1 2 bb
0 10 1 3 cc
1 11 2
2 12 3 1 cc
2 12 3 2 dd
3 13 4
Setup:
df = pd.DataFrame({
'aaa': {0: 10, 1: 11, 2: 12, 3: 13},
'myid': {0: 1, 1: 2, 2: 3, 3: 4},
'num': {0: [1, 2, 3], 1: [], 2: [1, 2], 3: []},
'text': {0: ['aa', 'bb', 'cc'], 1: [], 2: ['cc', 'dd'], 3: []}
})
CSV column:
In [46]: df
Out[46]:
var1 var2 var3
0 a,b,c 1 XX
1 d,e,f,x,y 2 ZZ
In [47]: explode(df.assign(var1=df.var1.str.split(',')), 'var1')
Out[47]:
var1 var2 var3
0 a 1 XX
1 b 1 XX
2 c 1 XX
3 d 2 ZZ
4 e 2 ZZ
5 f 2 ZZ
6 x 2 ZZ
7 y 2 ZZ
using this little trick we can convert CSV-like column to list column:
In [48]: df.assign(var1=df.var1.str.split(','))
Out[48]:
var1 var2 var3
0 [a, b, c] 1 XX
1 [d, e, f, x, y] 2 ZZ
UPDATE: generic vectorized approach (will work also for multiple columns):
Original DF:
In [177]: df
Out[177]:
var1 var2 var3
0 a,b,c 1 XX
1 d,e,f,x,y 2 ZZ
Solution:
first let's convert CSV strings to lists:
In [178]: lst_col = 'var1'
In [179]: x = df.assign(**{lst_col:df[lst_col].str.split(',')})
In [180]: x
Out[180]:
var1 var2 var3
0 [a, b, c] 1 XX
1 [d, e, f, x, y] 2 ZZ
Now we can do this:
In [181]: pd.DataFrame({
...: col:np.repeat(x[col].values, x[lst_col].str.len())
...: for col in x.columns.difference([lst_col])
...: }).assign(**{lst_col:np.concatenate(x[lst_col].values)})[x.columns.tolist()]
...:
Out[181]:
var1 var2 var3
0 a 1 XX
1 b 1 XX
2 c 1 XX
3 d 2 ZZ
4 e 2 ZZ
5 f 2 ZZ
6 x 2 ZZ
7 y 2 ZZ
OLD answer:
Inspired by #AFinkelstein solution, i wanted to make it bit more generalized which could be applied to DF with more than two columns and as fast, well almost, as fast as AFinkelstein's solution):
In [2]: df = pd.DataFrame(
...: [{'var1': 'a,b,c', 'var2': 1, 'var3': 'XX'},
...: {'var1': 'd,e,f,x,y', 'var2': 2, 'var3': 'ZZ'}]
...: )
In [3]: df
Out[3]:
var1 var2 var3
0 a,b,c 1 XX
1 d,e,f,x,y 2 ZZ
In [4]: (df.set_index(df.columns.drop('var1',1).tolist())
...: .var1.str.split(',', expand=True)
...: .stack()
...: .reset_index()
...: .rename(columns={0:'var1'})
...: .loc[:, df.columns]
...: )
Out[4]:
var1 var2 var3
0 a 1 XX
1 b 1 XX
2 c 1 XX
3 d 2 ZZ
4 e 2 ZZ
5 f 2 ZZ
6 x 2 ZZ
7 y 2 ZZ
After painful experimentation to find something faster than the accepted answer, I got this to work. It ran around 100x faster on the dataset I tried it on.
If someone knows a way to make this more elegant, by all means please modify my code. I couldn't find a way that works without setting the other columns you want to keep as the index and then resetting the index and re-naming the columns, but I'd imagine there's something else that works.
b = DataFrame(a.var1.str.split(',').tolist(), index=a.var2).stack()
b = b.reset_index()[[0, 'var2']] # var1 variable is currently labeled 0
b.columns = ['var1', 'var2'] # renaming var1
Pandas >= 0.25
Series and DataFrame methods define a .explode() method that explodes lists into separate rows. See the docs section on Exploding a list-like column.
Since you have a list of comma separated strings, split the string on comma to get a list of elements, then call explode on that column.
df = pd.DataFrame({'var1': ['a,b,c', 'd,e,f'], 'var2': [1, 2]})
df
var1 var2
0 a,b,c 1
1 d,e,f 2
df.assign(var1=df['var1'].str.split(',')).explode('var1')
var1 var2
0 a 1
0 b 1
0 c 1
1 d 2
1 e 2
1 f 2
Note that explode only works on a single column (for now). To explode multiple columns at once, see below.
NaNs and empty lists get the treatment they deserve without you having to jump through hoops to get it right.
df = pd.DataFrame({'var1': ['d,e,f', '', np.nan], 'var2': [1, 2, 3]})
df
var1 var2
0 d,e,f 1
1 2
2 NaN 3
df['var1'].str.split(',')
0 [d, e, f]
1 []
2 NaN
df.assign(var1=df['var1'].str.split(',')).explode('var1')
var1 var2
0 d 1
0 e 1
0 f 1
1 2 # empty list entry becomes empty string after exploding
2 NaN 3 # NaN left un-touched
This is a serious advantage over ravel/repeat -based solutions (which ignore empty lists completely, and choke on NaNs).
Exploding Multiple Columns
pandas 1.3 update
df.explode works on multiple columns starting from pandas 1.3:
df = pd.DataFrame({'var1': ['a,b,c', 'd,e,f'],
'var2': ['i,j,k', 'l,m,n'],
'var3': [1, 2]})
df
var1 var2 var3
0 a,b,c i,j,k 1
1 d,e,f l,m,n 2
(df.set_index(['var3'])
.apply(lambda col: col.str.split(','))
.explode(['var1', 'var2'])
.reset_index()
.reindex(df.columns, axis=1))
var1 var2 var3
0 a i 1
1 b j 1
2 c k 1
3 d l 2
4 e m 2
5 f n 2
On older versions, you would move the explode column inside the apply which is a lot less performant:
(df.set_index(['var3'])
.apply(lambda col: col.str.split(',').explode())
.reset_index()
.reindex(df.columns, axis=1))
The idea is to set as the index, all the columns that should NOT be exploded, then explode the remaining columns via apply. This works well when the lists are equally sized.
How about something like this:
In [55]: pd.concat([Series(row['var2'], row['var1'].split(','))
for _, row in a.iterrows()]).reset_index()
Out[55]:
index 0
0 a 1
1 b 1
2 c 1
3 d 2
4 e 2
5 f 2
Then you just have to rename the columns
Here's a function I wrote for this common task. It's more efficient than the Series/stack methods. Column order and names are retained.
def tidy_split(df, column, sep='|', keep=False):
"""
Split the values of a column and expand so the new DataFrame has one split
value per row. Filters rows where the column is missing.
Params
------
df : pandas.DataFrame
dataframe with the column to split and expand
column : str
the column to split and expand
sep : str
the string used to split the column's values
keep : bool
whether to retain the presplit value as it's own row
Returns
-------
pandas.DataFrame
Returns a dataframe with the same columns as `df`.
"""
indexes = list()
new_values = list()
df = df.dropna(subset=[column])
for i, presplit in enumerate(df[column].astype(str)):
values = presplit.split(sep)
if keep and len(values) > 1:
indexes.append(i)
new_values.append(presplit)
for value in values:
indexes.append(i)
new_values.append(value)
new_df = df.iloc[indexes, :].copy()
new_df[column] = new_values
return new_df
With this function, the original question is as simple as:
tidy_split(a, 'var1', sep=',')
Similar question as: pandas: How do I split text in a column into multiple rows?
You could do:
>> a=pd.DataFrame({"var1":"a,b,c d,e,f".split(),"var2":[1,2]})
>> s = a.var1.str.split(",").apply(pd.Series, 1).stack()
>> s.index = s.index.droplevel(-1)
>> del a['var1']
>> a.join(s)
var2 var1
0 1 a
0 1 b
0 1 c
1 2 d
1 2 e
1 2 f
There is a possibility to split and explode the dataframe without changing the structure of dataframe
Split and expand data of specific columns
Input:
var1 var2
0 a,b,c 1
1 d,e,f 2
#Get the indexes which are repetative with the split
df['var1'] = df['var1'].str.split(',')
df = df.explode('var1')
Out:
var1 var2
0 a 1
0 b 1
0 c 1
1 d 2
1 e 2
1 f 2
Edit-1
Split and Expand of rows for Multiple columns
Filename RGB RGB_type
0 A [[0, 1650, 6, 39], [0, 1691, 1, 59], [50, 1402... [r, g, b]
1 B [[0, 1423, 16, 38], [0, 1445, 16, 46], [0, 141... [r, g, b]
Re indexing based on the reference column and aligning the column value information with stack
df = df.reindex(df.index.repeat(df['RGB_type'].apply(len)))
df = df.groupby('Filename').apply(lambda x:x.apply(lambda y: pd.Series(y.iloc[0])))
df.reset_index(drop=True).ffill()
Out:
Filename RGB_type Top 1 colour Top 1 frequency Top 2 colour Top 2 frequency
Filename
A 0 A r 0 1650 6 39
1 A g 0 1691 1 59
2 A b 50 1402 49 187
B 0 B r 0 1423 16 38
1 B g 0 1445 16 46
2 B b 0 1419 16 39
TL;DR
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
def explode_str(df, col, sep):
s = df[col]
i = np.arange(len(s)).repeat(s.str.count(sep) + 1)
return df.iloc[i].assign(**{col: sep.join(s).split(sep)})
def explode_list(df, col):
s = df[col]
i = np.arange(len(s)).repeat(s.str.len())
return df.iloc[i].assign(**{col: np.concatenate(s)})
Demonstration
explode_str(a, 'var1', ',')
var1 var2
0 a 1
0 b 1
0 c 1
1 d 2
1 e 2
1 f 2
Let's create a new dataframe d that has lists
d = a.assign(var1=lambda d: d.var1.str.split(','))
explode_list(d, 'var1')
var1 var2
0 a 1
0 b 1
0 c 1
1 d 2
1 e 2
1 f 2
General Comments
I'll use np.arange with repeat to produce dataframe index positions that I can use with iloc.
FAQ
Why don't I use loc?
Because the index may not be unique and using loc will return every row that matches a queried index.
Why don't you use the values attribute and slice that?
When calling values, if the entirety of the the dataframe is in one cohesive "block", Pandas will return a view of the array that is the "block". Otherwise Pandas will have to cobble together a new array. When cobbling, that array must be of a uniform dtype. Often that means returning an array with dtype that is object. By using iloc instead of slicing the values attribute, I alleviate myself from having to deal with that.
Why do you use assign?
When I use assign using the same column name that I'm exploding, I overwrite the existing column and maintain its position in the dataframe.
Why are the index values repeat?
By virtue of using iloc on repeated positions, the resulting index shows the same repeated pattern. One repeat for each element the list or string.
This can be reset with reset_index(drop=True)
For Strings
I don't want to have to split the strings prematurely. So instead I count the occurrences of the sep argument assuming that if I were to split, the length of the resulting list would be one more than the number of separators.
I then use that sep to join the strings then split.
def explode_str(df, col, sep):
s = df[col]
i = np.arange(len(s)).repeat(s.str.count(sep) + 1)
return df.iloc[i].assign(**{col: sep.join(s).split(sep)})
For Lists
Similar as for strings except I don't need to count occurrences of sep because its already split.
I use Numpy's concatenate to jam the lists together.
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
def explode_list(df, col):
s = df[col]
i = np.arange(len(s)).repeat(s.str.len())
return df.iloc[i].assign(**{col: np.concatenate(s)})
I came up with a solution for dataframes with arbitrary numbers of columns (while still only separating one column's entries at a time).
def splitDataFrameList(df,target_column,separator):
''' df = dataframe to split,
target_column = the column containing the values to split
separator = the symbol used to perform the split
returns: a dataframe with each entry for the target column separated, with each element moved into a new row.
The values in the other columns are duplicated across the newly divided rows.
'''
def splitListToRows(row,row_accumulator,target_column,separator):
split_row = row[target_column].split(separator)
for s in split_row:
new_row = row.to_dict()
new_row[target_column] = s
row_accumulator.append(new_row)
new_rows = []
df.apply(splitListToRows,axis=1,args = (new_rows,target_column,separator))
new_df = pandas.DataFrame(new_rows)
return new_df
Here is a fairly straightforward message that uses the split method from pandas str accessor and then uses NumPy to flatten each row into a single array.
The corresponding values are retrieved by repeating the non-split column the correct number of times with np.repeat.
var1 = df.var1.str.split(',', expand=True).values.ravel()
var2 = np.repeat(df.var2.values, len(var1) / len(df))
pd.DataFrame({'var1': var1,
'var2': var2})
var1 var2
0 a 1
1 b 1
2 c 1
3 d 2
4 e 2
5 f 2
I have been struggling with out-of-memory experience using various way to explode my lists so I prepared some benchmarks to help me decide which answers to upvote. I tested five scenarios with varying proportions of the list length to the number of lists. Sharing the results below:
Time: (less is better, click to view large version)
Peak memory usage: (less is better)
Conclusions:
#MaxU's answer (update 2), codename concatenate offers the best speed in almost every case, while keeping the peek memory usage low,
see #DMulligan's answer (codename stack) if you need to process lots of rows with relatively small lists and can afford increased peak memory,
the accepted #Chang's answer works well for data frames that have a few rows but very large lists.
Full details (functions and benchmarking code) are in this GitHub gist. Please note that the benchmark problem was simplified and did not include splitting of strings into the list - which most solutions performed in a similar fashion.
One-liner using split(___, expand=True) and the level and name arguments to reset_index():
>>> b = a.var1.str.split(',', expand=True).set_index(a.var2).stack().reset_index(level=0, name='var1')
>>> b
var2 var1
0 1 a
1 1 b
2 1 c
0 2 d
1 2 e
2 2 f
If you need b to look exactly like in the question, you can additionally do:
>>> b = b.reset_index(drop=True)[['var1', 'var2']]
>>> b
var1 var2
0 a 1
1 b 1
2 c 1
3 d 2
4 e 2
5 f 2
Based on the excellent #DMulligan's solution, here is a generic vectorized (no loops) function which splits a column of a dataframe into multiple rows, and merges it back to the original dataframe. It also uses a great generic change_column_order function from this answer.
def change_column_order(df, col_name, index):
cols = df.columns.tolist()
cols.remove(col_name)
cols.insert(index, col_name)
return df[cols]
def split_df(dataframe, col_name, sep):
orig_col_index = dataframe.columns.tolist().index(col_name)
orig_index_name = dataframe.index.name
orig_columns = dataframe.columns
dataframe = dataframe.reset_index() # we need a natural 0-based index for proper merge
index_col_name = (set(dataframe.columns) - set(orig_columns)).pop()
df_split = pd.DataFrame(
pd.DataFrame(dataframe[col_name].str.split(sep).tolist())
.stack().reset_index(level=1, drop=1), columns=[col_name])
df = dataframe.drop(col_name, axis=1)
df = pd.merge(df, df_split, left_index=True, right_index=True, how='inner')
df = df.set_index(index_col_name)
df.index.name = orig_index_name
# merge adds the column to the last place, so we need to move it back
return change_column_order(df, col_name, orig_col_index)
Example:
df = pd.DataFrame([['a:b', 1, 4], ['c:d', 2, 5], ['e:f:g:h', 3, 6]],
columns=['Name', 'A', 'B'], index=[10, 12, 13])
df
Name A B
10 a:b 1 4
12 c:d 2 5
13 e:f:g:h 3 6
split_df(df, 'Name', ':')
Name A B
10 a 1 4
10 b 1 4
12 c 2 5
12 d 2 5
13 e 3 6
13 f 3 6
13 g 3 6
13 h 3 6
Note that it preserves the original index and order of the columns. It also works with dataframes which have non-sequential index.
The string function split can take an option boolean argument 'expand'.
Here is a solution using this argument:
(a.var1
.str.split(",",expand=True)
.set_index(a.var2)
.stack()
.reset_index(level=1, drop=True)
.reset_index()
.rename(columns={0:"var1"}))
I do appreciate the answer of "Chang She", really, but the iterrows() function takes long time on large dataset. I faced that issue and I came to this.
# First, reset_index to make the index a column
a = a.reset_index().rename(columns={'index':'duplicated_idx'})
# Get a longer series with exploded cells to rows
series = pd.DataFrame(a['var1'].str.split('/')
.tolist(), index=a.duplicated_idx).stack()
# New df from series and merge with the old one
b = series.reset_index([0, 'duplicated_idx'])
b = b.rename(columns={0:'var1'})
# Optional & Advanced: In case, there are other columns apart from var1 & var2
b.merge(
a[a.columns.difference(['var1'])],
on='duplicated_idx')
# Optional: Delete the "duplicated_index"'s column, and reorder columns
b = b[a.columns.difference(['duplicated_idx'])]
One-liner using assign and explode:
col1 col2
0 a,b,c 1
1 d,e,f 2
df.assign(col1 = df.col1.str.split(',')).explode('col1', ignore_index=True)
Output:
col1 col2
0 a 1
1 b 1
2 c 1
3 d 2
4 e 2
5 f 2
Just used jiln's excellent answer from above, but needed to expand to split multiple columns. Thought I would share.
def splitDataFrameList(df,target_column,separator):
''' df = dataframe to split,
target_column = the column containing the values to split
separator = the symbol used to perform the split
returns: a dataframe with each entry for the target column separated, with each element moved into a new row.
The values in the other columns are duplicated across the newly divided rows.
'''
def splitListToRows(row, row_accumulator, target_columns, separator):
split_rows = []
for target_column in target_columns:
split_rows.append(row[target_column].split(separator))
# Seperate for multiple columns
for i in range(len(split_rows[0])):
new_row = row.to_dict()
for j in range(len(split_rows)):
new_row[target_columns[j]] = split_rows[j][i]
row_accumulator.append(new_row)
new_rows = []
df.apply(splitListToRows,axis=1,args = (new_rows,target_column,separator))
new_df = pd.DataFrame(new_rows)
return new_df
upgraded MaxU's answer with MultiIndex support
def explode(df, lst_cols, fill_value='', preserve_index=False):
"""
usage:
In [134]: df
Out[134]:
aaa myid num text
0 10 1 [1, 2, 3] [aa, bb, cc]
1 11 2 [] []
2 12 3 [1, 2] [cc, dd]
3 13 4 [] []
In [135]: explode(df, ['num','text'], fill_value='')
Out[135]:
aaa myid num text
0 10 1 1 aa
1 10 1 2 bb
2 10 1 3 cc
3 11 2
4 12 3 1 cc
5 12 3 2 dd
6 13 4
"""
# make sure `lst_cols` is list-alike
if (lst_cols is not None
and len(lst_cols) > 0
and not isinstance(lst_cols, (list, tuple, np.ndarray, pd.Series))):
lst_cols = [lst_cols]
# all columns except `lst_cols`
idx_cols = df.columns.difference(lst_cols)
# calculate lengths of lists
lens = df[lst_cols[0]].str.len()
# preserve original index values
idx = np.repeat(df.index.values, lens)
res = (pd.DataFrame({
col:np.repeat(df[col].values, lens)
for col in idx_cols},
index=idx)
.assign(**{col:np.concatenate(df.loc[lens>0, col].values)
for col in lst_cols}))
# append those rows that have empty lists
if (lens == 0).any():
# at least one list in cells is empty
res = (res.append(df.loc[lens==0, idx_cols], sort=False)
.fillna(fill_value))
# revert the original index order
res = res.sort_index()
# reset index if requested
if not preserve_index:
res = res.reset_index(drop=True)
# if original index is MultiIndex build the dataframe from the multiindex
# create "exploded" DF
if isinstance(df.index, pd.MultiIndex):
res = res.reindex(
index=pd.MultiIndex.from_tuples(
res.index,
names=['number', 'color']
)
)
return res
My version of the solution to add to this collection! :-)
# Original problem
from pandas import DataFrame
import numpy as np
a = DataFrame([{'var1': 'a,b,c', 'var2': 1},
{'var1': 'd,e,f', 'var2': 2}])
b = DataFrame([{'var1': 'a', 'var2': 1},
{'var1': 'b', 'var2': 1},
{'var1': 'c', 'var2': 1},
{'var1': 'd', 'var2': 2},
{'var1': 'e', 'var2': 2},
{'var1': 'f', 'var2': 2}])
### My solution
import pandas as pd
import functools
def expand_on_cols(df, fuse_cols, delim=","):
def expand_on_col(df, fuse_col):
col_order = df.columns
df_expanded = pd.DataFrame(
df.set_index([x for x in df.columns if x != fuse_col])[fuse_col]
.apply(lambda x: x.split(delim))
.explode()
).reset_index()
return df_expanded[col_order]
all_expanded = functools.reduce(expand_on_col, fuse_cols, df)
return all_expanded
assert(b.equals(expand_on_cols(a, ["var1"], delim=",")))
I have come up with the following solution to this problem:
def iter_var1(d):
for _, row in d.iterrows():
for v in row["var1"].split(","):
yield (v, row["var2"])
new_a = DataFrame.from_records([i for i in iter_var1(a)],
columns=["var1", "var2"])
Another solution that uses python copy package
import copy
new_observations = list()
def pandas_explode(df, column_to_explode):
new_observations = list()
for row in df.to_dict(orient='records'):
explode_values = row[column_to_explode]
del row[column_to_explode]
if type(explode_values) is list or type(explode_values) is tuple:
for explode_value in explode_values:
new_observation = copy.deepcopy(row)
new_observation[column_to_explode] = explode_value
new_observations.append(new_observation)
else:
new_observation = copy.deepcopy(row)
new_observation[column_to_explode] = explode_values
new_observations.append(new_observation)
return_df = pd.DataFrame(new_observations)
return return_df
df = pandas_explode(df, column_name)
There are a lot of answers here but I'm surprised no one has mentioned the built in pandas explode function. Check out the link below:
https://pandas.pydata.org/pandas-docs/stable/reference/api/pandas.DataFrame.explode.html#pandas.DataFrame.explode
For some reason I was unable to access that function, so I used the below code:
import pandas_explode
pandas_explode.patch()
df_zlp_people_cnt3 = df_zlp_people_cnt2.explode('people')
Above is a sample of my data. As you can see the people column had series of people, and I was trying to explode it. The code I have given works for list type data. So try to get your comma separated text data into list format. Also since my code uses built in functions, it is much faster than custom/apply functions.
Note: You may need to install pandas_explode with pip.
I had a similar problem, my solution was converting the dataframe to a list of dictionaries first, then do the transition. Here is the function:
import re
import pandas as pd
def separate_row(df, column_name):
ls = []
for row_dict in df.to_dict('records'):
for word in re.split(',', row_dict[column_name]):
row = row_dict.copy()
row[column_name]=word
ls.append(row)
return pd.DataFrame(ls)
Example:
>>> from pandas import DataFrame
>>> import numpy as np
>>> a = DataFrame([{'var1': 'a,b,c', 'var2': 1},
{'var1': 'd,e,f', 'var2': 2}])
>>> a
var1 var2
0 a,b,c 1
1 d,e,f 2
>>> separate_row(a, "var1")
var1 var2
0 a 1
1 b 1
2 c 1
3 d 2
4 e 2
5 f 2
You can also change the function a bit to support separating list type rows.
Upon adding few bits and pieces from all the solutions on this page, I was able to get something like this(for someone who need to use it right away).
parameters to the function are df(input dataframe) and key(column that has delimiter separated string). Just replace with your delimiter if that is different to semicolon ";".
def split_df_rows_for_semicolon_separated_key(key, df):
df=df.set_index(df.columns.drop(key,1).tolist())[key].str.split(';', expand=True).stack().reset_index().rename(columns={0:key}).loc[:, df.columns]
df=df[df[key] != '']
return df
Try:
vals = np.array(a.var1.str.split(",").values.tolist())
var = np.repeat(a.var2, vals.shape[1])
out = pd.DataFrame(np.column_stack((var, vals.ravel())), columns=a.columns)
display(out)
var1 var2
0 1 a
1 1 b
2 1 c
3 2 d
4 2 e
5 2 f
In recent version of pandas you can use split followed by explode
a.assign(var1=a['var1'].str.split(',')).explode('var1')
a
var1 var2
0 a 1
0 b 1
0 c 1
1 d 2
1 e 2
1 f 2
A short and simple way to change the format of the column using .apply() so that it can be used by .explod():
import string
import pandas as pd
from io import StringIO
file = StringIO(""" var1 var2
0 a,b,c 1
1 d,e,f 2""")
df = pd.read_csv(file, sep=r'\s\s+')
df['var1'] = df['var1'].apply(lambda x : str(x).split(','))
df.explode('var1')
Output:
var1 var2
0 a 1
0 b 1
0 c 1
1 d 2
1 e 2
1 f 2

Reorder columns in groups by number embedded in column name?

I have a very large dataframe with 1,000 columns. The first few columns occur only once, denoting a customer. The next few columns are representative of multiple encounters with the customer, with an underscore and the number encounter. Every additional encounter adds a new column, so there is NOT a fixed number of columns -- it'll grow with time.
Sample dataframe header structure excerpt:
id dob gender pro_1 pro_10 pro_11 pro_2 ... pro_9 pre_1 pre_10 ...
I'm trying to re-order the columns based on the number after the column name, so all _1 should be together, all _2 should be together, etc, like so:
id dob gender pro_1 pre_1 que_1 fre_1 gen_1 pro2 pre_2 que_2 fre_2 ...
(Note that the re-order should order the numbers correctly; the current order treats them like strings, which orders 1, 10, 11, etc. rather than 1, 2, 3)
Is this possible to do in pandas, or should I be looking at something else? Any help would be greatly appreciated! Thank you!
EDIT:
Alternatively, is it also possible to re-arrange column names based on the string part AND number part of the column names? So the output would then look similar to the original, except the numbers would be considered so that the order is more intuitive:
id dob gender pro_1 pro_2 pro_3 ... pre_1 pre_2 pre_3 ...
EDIT 2.0:
Just wanted to thank everyone for helping! While only one of the responses worked, I really appreciate the effort and learned a lot about other approaches / ways to think about this.
Here is one way you can try:
# column names copied from your example
example_cols = 'id dob gender pro_1 pro_10 pro_11 pro_2 pro_9 pre_1 pre_10'.split()
# sample DF
df = pd.DataFrame([range(len(example_cols))], columns=example_cols)
df
# id dob gender pro_1 pro_10 pro_11 pro_2 pro_9 pre_1 pre_10
#0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
# number of columns excluded from sorting
N = 3
# get a list of columns from the dataframe
cols = df.columns.tolist()
# split, create an tuple of (column_name, prefix, number) and sorted based on the 2nd and 3rd item of the tuple, then retrieved the first item.
# adjust "key = lambda x: x[2]" to group cols by numbers only
cols_new = cols[:N] + [ a[0] for a in sorted([ (c, p, int(n)) for c in cols[N:] for p,n in [c.split('_')]], key = lambda x: (x[1], x[2])) ]
# get the new dataframe based on the cols_new
df_new = df[cols_new]
# id dob gender pre_1 pre_10 pro_1 pro_2 pro_9 pro_10 pro_11
#0 0 1 2 8 9 3 6 7 4 5
Luckily there is a one liner in python that can fix this:
df = df.reindex(sorted(df.columns), axis=1)
For Example lets say you had this dataframe:
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
df = pd.DataFrame({'Name': [2, 4, 8, 0],
'ID': [2, 0, 0, 0],
'Prod3': [10, 2, 1, 8],
'Prod1': [2, 4, 8, 0],
'Prod_1': [2, 4, 8, 0],
'Pre7': [2, 0, 0, 0],
'Pre2': [10, 2, 1, 8],
'Pre_2': [10, 2, 1, 8],
'Pre_9': [10, 2, 1, 8]}
)
print(df)
Output:
Name ID Prod3 Prod1 Prod_1 Pre7 Pre2 Pre_2 Pre_9
0 2 2 10 2 2 2 10 10 10
1 4 0 2 4 4 0 2 2 2
2 8 0 1 8 8 0 1 1 1
3 0 0 8 0 0 0 8 8 8
Then used
df = df.reindex(sorted(df.columns), axis=1)
Then the dataframe will then look like:
ID Name Pre2 Pre7 Pre_2 Pre_9 Prod1 Prod3 Prod_1
0 2 2 10 2 10 10 2 10 2
1 0 4 2 0 2 2 4 2 4
2 0 8 1 0 1 1 8 1 8
3 0 0 8 0 8 8 0 8 0
As you can see, the columns without underscore will come first, followed by an ordering based on the number after the underscore. However this also sorts of the column names, so the column names that come first in the alphabet will be first.
You need to split you column on '_' then convert to int:
c = ['A_1','A_10','A_2','A_3','B_1','B_10','B_2','B_3']
df = pd.DataFrame(np.random.randint(0,100,(2,8)), columns = c)
df.reindex(sorted(df.columns, key = lambda x: int(x.split('_')[1])), axis=1)
Output:
A_1 B_1 A_2 B_2 A_3 B_3 A_10 B_10
0 68 11 59 69 37 68 76 17
1 19 37 52 54 23 93 85 3
Next case, you need human sorting:
import re
def atoi(text):
return int(text) if text.isdigit() else text
def natural_keys(text):
'''
alist.sort(key=natural_keys) sorts in human order
http://nedbatchelder.com/blog/200712/human_sorting.html
(See Toothy's implementation in the comments)
'''
return [ atoi(c) for c in re.split(r'(\d+)', text) ]
df.reindex(sorted(df.columns, key = lambda x:natural_keys(x)), axis=1)
Output:
A_1 A_2 A_3 A_10 B_1 B_2 B_3 B_10
0 68 59 37 76 11 69 68 17
1 19 52 23 85 37 54 93 3
Try this.
To re-order the columns based on the number after the column name
cols_fixed = df.columns[:3] # change index no based on your df
cols_variable = df.columns[3:] # change index no based on your df
cols_variable = sorted(cols_variable, key=lambda x : int(x.split('_')[1])) # split based on the number after '_'
cols_new = cols_fixed + cols_variable
new_df = pd.DataFrame(df[cols_new])
To re-arrange column names based on the string part AND number part of the column names
cols_fixed = df.columns[:3] # change index no based on your df
cols_variable = df.columns[3:] # change index no based on your df
cols_variable = sorted(cols_variable)
cols_new = cols_fixed + cols_variable
new_df = pd.DataFrame(df[cols_new])

Sum and collapse two rows in pandas if two values are equal (order does not matter)

I am analyzing a dataset that has an Origin ID (Column A), a Destination ID (Column B), and how many trips have happened between them (Column Count). Now I want to sum the A-B trips with the B-A trips. This sum is the total number of trips between A and B.
Here is how my data looks like (it is not necessarily ordered in the same way):
In [1]: group_station = pd.DataFrame([[1, 2, 100], [2, 1, 200], [4, 6, 5] , [6, 4, 10], [1, 4, 70]], columns=['A', 'B', 'Count'])
Out[2]:
A B Count
0 1 2 100
1 2 1 200
2 4 6 5
3 6 4 10
4 1 4 70
And I want the following output:
A B C
0 1 2 300
1 4 6 15
4 1 4 70
I have tried groupby and setting the index to both variables with no success. Right now I am doing a very inefficient double loop, that is too slow for the size of my dataset.
If it helps this is the code for the double loop (I removed some efficiency modifications to make it more clear):
# group_station is the dataframe
collapsed_group_station = np.zeros(len(group_station), 3))
for i, row in enumerate(group_station.iterrows()):
start_id = row[0][0]
end_id = row[0][1]
count = row[1][0]
for check_row in group_station.iterrows():
check_start_id = check_row[0][0]
check_end_id = check_row[0][1]
check_time = check_row[1][0]
if start_id == check_end_id and end_id == check_start_id:
new_group_station[i][0] = start_id
new_group_station[i][1] = end_id
new_group_station[i][2] = time + check_time
break
I have ideas of how to make this code more efficient, but I wanted to know if there is a way of doing it without looping.
You can using np.sort with groupby.sum()
import numpy as np; import pandas as pd
group_station[['A','B']]=np.sort(group_station[['A','B']],axis=1)
group_station.groupby(['A','B'],as_index=False).Count.sum()
Out[175]:
A B Count
0 1 2 300
1 1 4 70
2 4 6 15

Resources