I'm new to JavaScript and I'm struggling tying a couple of things together.
I need to set a global variable from within a function. The function is essentially querying a DB, getting an answer and doing a comparison to determine what variable to set.
Then, in a separate function, I need to set a value based on the value of the previous variable.
The problem I'm having is that the variables are only available within the function and I don't know how to set them to be available outside the function. I've tried to simplify the code so you can see what I'm attempting to do:
ddb.scan(scanparams, function(err, data) {
if (err) {
console.log(err);
} else {
var dbResp = data.key.value; //key is the name of the key, value is the value
if (Number(dbResp) === Number(sessionId)) { //sessionId is defined elsewhere
var result = '1';
} else {
var result = '0';
}
}
});
if result === '1' {
doThing1;
} else {
doThing2;
}
I can't move the logic for doThing into the previous function as it breaks other things. How can I expose the results of the DB query to other functions?
Related
I have this file that stores some of my environment variables.
Let's call it generalEnv.js
module.exports = {
CONSTANT_1: process.env.CONSTANT_1,
CONSTANT_2: process.env.CONSTANT_2
};
When the app initializes, I don't put the value of process.env.CONSTANT_1 in the env variables yet because I have to look into some places first if it exists(mongodb for instance). If it does not exists on mongodb, I will add a value into process.env.CONSTANT_1 and I was expecting that the value will reflect on generalEnv now.
When I tried accessing the CONSTANT_1 in another file.
Let's call it getConstantOne.js
const { CONSTANT_1 } = require('./generalEnv');
module.exports = () => {
// I was expecting that CONSTANT_1 will have a value here now
if(!CONSTANT_1) {
// do something
}
return CONSTANT_1
}
it does not reflect.. how do I update the closure of generalEnv.js for process.env.CONSTANT_1 to reflect on CONSTANT_1?
When assigning to a variable (or a value in an object/element in an array), the assignment will replace the value, not modify it. Therefore, any "copies" of that value will not be affected, and remain the same. Consider this example:
let a = 0;
let b = a;
a = 1;
What happens to b? Answer: Its value is 0.
To work around this we need some way of modifying the value instead of replacing it. Unfortunately, "primitive types" (strings/numbers/booleans etc.) cannot be modified in javascript. There are types that can be modified however, such as objects. You could solve this by wrapping your variables in an object called "env".
let env: {
CONSTANT_1: process.env.CONSTANT_1,
CONSTANT_2: process.env.CONSTANT_2
}
modules.exports = { env }
and then to modify:
env.CONSTANT_1 = "new value"
and to access:
if (!env.CONSTANT_1) { ... }
I have a JSON file of 2 discord client IDs `{
{
"premium": [
"a random string of numbers that is a client id",
"a random string of numbers that is a client id"
]
}
I have tried to access these client IDs to do things in the program using a for loop + if statement:
for(i in premium.premium){
if(premium.premium[i] === msg.author.id){
//do some stuff
}else{
//do some stuff
When the program is ran, it runs the for loop and goes to the else first and runs the code in there (not supposed to happen), then runs the code in the if twice. But there are only 2 client IDs and the for loop has ran 3 times, and the first time it runs it goes instantly to the else even though the person who sent the message has their client ID in the JSON file.
How can I fix this? Any help is greatly appreciated.
You may want to add a return statement within your for loop. Otherwise, the loop will continue running until a condition has been met, or it has nothing else to loop over. See the documentation on for loops here.
For example, here it is without return statements:
const json = {
"premium": [
"aaa-1",
"bbb-1"
]
}
for (i in json.premium) {
if (json.premium[i] === "aaa-1") {
console.log("this is aaa-1!!!!")
} else {
console.log("this is not what you're looking for-1...")
}
}
And here it is with return statements:
const json = {
"premium": [
"aaa-2",
"bbb-2"
]
}
function loopOverJson() {
for (i in json.premium) {
if (json.premium[i] === "aaa-2") {
console.log("this is aaa-2!!!!")
return
} else {
console.log("this is not what you're looking for-2...")
return
}
}
}
loopOverJson()
Note: without wrapping the above in a function, the console will show: "Syntax Error: Illegal return statement."
for(i in premium.premium){
if(premium.premium[i] === msg.author.id){
//do some stuff
} else{
//do some stuff
}
}
1) It will loop through all your premium.premium entries. If there are 3 entries it will execute three times. You could use a break statement if you want to exit the loop once a match is found.
2) You should check the type of your msg.author.id. Since you are using the strict comparison operator === it will evaluate to false if your msg.author.id is an integer since you are comparing to a string (based on your provided json).
Use implicit casting: if (premium.premium[i] == msg.author.id)
Use explicit casting: if (premium.premium[i] === String(msg.author.id))
The really fun and easy way to solve problems like this is to use the built-in Array methods like map, reduce or filter. Then you don't have to worry about your iterator values.
eg.
const doSomethingAuthorRelated = (el) => console.log(el, 'whoohoo!');
const authors = premiums
.filter((el) => el === msg.author.id)
.map(doSomethingAuthorRelated);
As John Lonowski points out in the comment link, using for ... in for JavaScript arrays is not reliable, because its designed to iterate over Object properties, so you can't be really sure what its iterating on, unless you've clearly defined the data and are working in an environment where you know no other library has mucked with the Array object.
Take this object:
x = {
"key1": "xxx",
"key2": function(){return this.key1}
}
If I do this:
y = JSON.parse( JSON.stringify(x) );
Then y will return { "key1": "xxx" }. Is there anything one could do to transfer functions via stringify? Creating an object with attached functions is possible with the "ye goode olde eval()", but whats with packing it?
json-stringify-function is a similar post to this one.
A snippet discovered via that post may be useful to anyone stumbling across this answer. It works by making use of the replacer parameter in JSON.stringify and the reviver parameter in JSON.parse.
More specifically, when a value happens to be of type function, .toString() is called on it via the replacer. When it comes time to parse, eval() is performed via the reviver when a function is present in string form.
var JSONfn;
if (!JSONfn) {
JSONfn = {};
}
(function () {
JSONfn.stringify = function(obj) {
return JSON.stringify(obj,function(key, value){
return (typeof value === 'function' ) ? value.toString() : value;
});
}
JSONfn.parse = function(str) {
return JSON.parse(str,function(key, value){
if(typeof value != 'string') return value;
return ( value.substring(0,8) == 'function') ? eval('('+value+')') : value;
});
}
}());
Code Snippet taken from Vadim Kiryukhin's JSONfn.js or see documentation at Home Page
I've had a similar requirement lately. To be clear, the output looks like JSON but in fact is just javascript.
JSON.stringify works well in most cases, but "fails" with functions.
I got it working with a few tricks:
make use of replacer (2nd parameter of JSON.stringify())
use func.toString() to get the JS code for a function
remember which functions have been stringified and replace them directly in the result
And here's how it looks like:
// our source data
const source = {
"aaa": 123,
"bbb": function (c) {
// do something
return c + 1;
}
};
// keep a list of serialized functions
const functions = [];
// json replacer - returns a placeholder for functions
const jsonReplacer = function (key, val) {
if (typeof val === 'function') {
functions.push(val.toString());
return "{func_" + (functions.length - 1) + "}";
}
return val;
};
// regex replacer - replaces placeholders with functions
const funcReplacer = function (match, id) {
return functions[id];
};
const result = JSON
.stringify(source, jsonReplacer) // generate json with placeholders
.replace(/"\{func_(\d+)\}"/g, funcReplacer); // replace placeholders with functions
// show the result
document.body.innerText = result;
body { white-space: pre-wrap; font-family: monospace; }
Important: Be careful about the placeholder format - make sure it's not too generic. If you change it, also change the regex as applicable.
Technically this is not JSON, I can also hardly imagine why would you want to do this, but try the following hack:
x.key2 = x.key2.toString();
JSON.stringify(x) //"{"key1":"xxx","key2":"function (){return this.key1}"}"
Of course the first line can be automated by iterating recursively over the object. Reverse operation is harder - function is only a string, eval will work, but you have to guess whether a given key contains a stringified function code or not.
You can't pack functions since the data they close over is not visible to any serializer.
Even Mozilla's uneval cannot pack closures properly.
Your best bet, is to use a reviver and a replacer.
https://yuilibrary.com/yui/docs/json/json-freeze-thaw.html
The reviver function passed to JSON.parse is applied to all key:value pairs in the raw parsed object from the deepest keys to the highest level. In our case, this means that the name and discovered properties will be passed through the reviver, and then the object containing those keys will be passed through.
This is what I did https://gist.github.com/Lepozepo/3275d686bc56e4fb5d11d27ef330a8ed
function stringifyWithFunctions(object) {
return JSON.stringify(object, (key, val) => {
if (typeof val === 'function') {
return `(${val})`; // make it a string, surround it by parenthesis to ensure we can revive it as an anonymous function
}
return val;
});
};
function parseWithFunctions(obj) {
return JSON.parse(obj, (k, v) => {
if (typeof v === 'string' && v.indexOf('function') >= 0) {
return eval(v);
}
return v;
});
};
The naughty but effective way would be to simply:
Function.prototype.toJSON = function() { return this.toString(); }
Though your real problem (aside from modifying the prototype of Function) would be deserialization without the use of eval.
I have come up with this solution which will take care of conversion of functions (no eval). All you have to do is put this code before you use JSON methods. Usage is exactly the same but right now it takes only one param value to convert to a JSON string, so if you pass remaning replacer and space params, they will be ignored.
void function () {
window.JSON = Object.create(JSON)
JSON.stringify = function (obj) {
return JSON.__proto__.stringify(obj, function (key, value) {
if (typeof value === 'function') {
return value.toString()
}
return value
})
}
JSON.parse = function (obj) {
return JSON.__proto__.parse(obj, function (key, value) {
if (typeof value === 'string' && value.slice(0, 8) == 'function') {
return Function('return ' + value)()
}
return value
})
}
}()
// YOUR CODE GOES BELOW HERE
x = {
"key1": "xxx",
"key2": function(){return this.key1}
}
const y = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(x))
console.log(y.key2())
It is entirely possible to create functions from string without eval()
var obj = {a:function(a,b){
return a+b;
}};
var serialized = JSON.stringify(obj, function(k,v){
//special treatment for function types
if(typeof v === "function")
return v.toString();//we save the function as string
return v;
});
/*output:
"{"a":"function (a,b){\n return a+b;\n }"}"
*/
now some magic to turn string into function with this function
var compileFunction = function(str){
//find parameters
var pstart = str.indexOf('('), pend = str.indexOf(')');
var params = str.substring(pstart+1, pend);
params = params.trim();
//find function body
var bstart = str.indexOf('{'), bend = str.lastIndexOf('}');
var str = str.substring(bstart+1, bend);
return Function(params, str);
}
now use JSON.parse with reviver
var revivedObj = JSON.parse(serialized, function(k,v){
// there is probably a better way to determ if a value is a function string
if(typeof v === "string" && v.indexOf("function") !== -1)
return compileFunction(v);
return v;
});
//output:
revivedObj.a
function anonymous(a,b
/**/) {
return a+b;
}
revivedObj.a(1,2)
3
To my knowledge, there are no serialization libraries that persist functions - in any language. Serialization is what one does to preserve data. Compilation is what one does to preserve functions.
It seems that people landing here are dealing with structures that would be valid JSON if not for the fact that they contain functions. So how do we handle stringifying these structures?
I ran into the problem while writing a script to modify RequireJS configurations. This is how I did it. First, there's a bit of code earlier that makes sure that the placeholder used internally (">>>F<<<") does not show up as a value in the RequireJS configuration. Very unlikely to happen but better safe than sorry. The input configuration is read as a JavaScript Object, which may contain arrays, atomic values, other Objects and functions. It would be straightforwardly stringifiable as JSON if functions were not present. This configuration is the config object in the code that follows:
// Holds functions we encounter.
var functions = [];
var placeholder = ">>>F<<<";
// This handler just records a function object in `functions` and returns the
// placeholder as the value to insert into the JSON structure.
function handler(key, value) {
if (value instanceof Function) {
functions.push(value);
return placeholder;
}
return value;
}
// We stringify, using our custom handler.
var pre = JSON.stringify(config, handler, 4);
// Then we replace the placeholders in order they were encountered, with
// the functions we've recorded.
var post = pre.replace(new RegExp('"' + placeholder + '"', 'g'),
functions.shift.bind(functions));
The post variable contains the final value. This code relies on the fact that the order in which handler is called is the same as the order of the various pieces of data in the final JSON. I've checked the ECMAScript 5th edition, which defines the stringification algorithm and cannot find a case where there would be an ordering problem. If this algorithm were to change in a future edition the fix would be to use unique placholders for function and use these to refer back to the functions which would be stored in an associative array mapping unique placeholders to functions.
Is it possible to log variable name (not value) in JavaScript?
var max_value = 4;
console.log(max_value); // should log "max_value" as a string
UPDATE: I need a testing function that should be able to log any variable name (passed as an argument) as a string, not just this one variable.
There is a solution that can help you. I grabbed this function from this stackoverflow answer, which is able to get the name of the function parameters:
var STRIP_COMMENTS = /((\/\/.*$)|(\/\*[\s\S]*?\*\/))/mg;
var ARGUMENT_NAMES = /([^\s,]+)/g;
function getParamNames(func) {
var fnStr = func.toString().replace(STRIP_COMMENTS, '');
var result = fnStr.slice(fnStr.indexOf('(')+1, fnStr.indexOf(')')).match(ARGUMENT_NAMES);
if(result === null)
result = [];
return result;
}
then all you need to do now, is to use the name of your variable as a parameter of an anonymous function and pass all the function as argument of the getParamNames :
variablesNames = getParamNames(function (max_value, min_value) {});
This will return an array like this :
result => ["max_value", "min_value"];
Let's make it practical, first change the name of the getParamNames function to something easy and small like this :
function __ (func) {
// code here ...
}
second thing, instead of returning an array, just return the first element of the array, change this :
return result;
to this :
return result.shift();
now, you can get the name of your variable like this :
__(function( max_value ){});
When I query my database with a function passed in the "$where" clause in nodejs, it always return me all documents in the db.
For example, if I do
var stream = timetables.find({$where: function() { return false; }}).stream();
it return me all the documents.
Instead, if I do
var stream = timetables.find({$where: 'function() { return false; }'}).stream();
the function is really executed, and this code doesn't return any document.
The problem is that if I convert in string my function the context's bindinds are removed, and I need them for more complex query. For example:
var n = 1;
var f = function() { return this.number == n; }
var stream = timetables.find({$where: f.toString()}).stream();
// error: n is not defined
Is this a normal behaviour? How can I solve my problem?
Please excuse me for my poor english!
First off, keep in mind that the $where operator should almost never be used for the reasons explained here (credit goes to #WiredPrairie).
Back to your issue, the approach you'd like to take won't work even in the mongodb shell (which explicitly allows naked js functions with the $where operator). The javascript code provided to the $where operator is executed on the mongo server and won't have access to the enclosing environment (the "context bindings").
> db.test.insert({a: 42})
> db.test.find({a: 42})
{ "_id" : ObjectId("5150433c73f604984a7dff91"), "a" : 42 }
> db.test.find({$where: function() { return this.a == 42 }}) // works
{ "_id" : ObjectId("5150433c73f604984a7dff91"), "a" : 42 }
> var local_var = 42
> db.test.find({$where: function() { return this.a == local_var }})
error: {
"$err" : "error on invocation of $where function:\nJS Error: ReferenceError: local_var is not defined nofile_b:1",
"code" : 10071
}
Moreover it looks like that the node.js native mongo driver behaves differently from the shell in that it doesn't automatically serialize a js function you provide in the query object and instead it likely drops the clause altogether. This will leave you with the equivalent of timetables.find({}) which will return all the documents in the collection.
This one is works for me , Just try to store a query as a string in one variable then concat your variable in query string,
var local_var = 42
var query = "{$where: function() { return this.a == "+local_var+"}}"
db.test.find(query)
Store your query into a varibale and use that variable at your find query. It works..... :D
The context will always be that of the mongo database, since the function is executed there. There is no way to share the context between the two instances. You have to rethink the way you query and come up with a different strategy.
You can use a wrapper to pass basic JSON objects, ie. (pardon coffee-script):
# That's the main wrapper.
wrap = (f, args...) ->
"function() { return (#{f}).apply(this, #{JSON.stringify(args)}) }"
# Example 1
where1 = (flag) ->
#myattr == 'foo' or flag
# Example 2 with different arguments
where2 = (foo, options = {}) ->
if foo == options.bar or #_id % 2 == 0
true
else
false
db.collection('coll1').count $where: wrap(where1, true), (err, count) ->
console.log err, count
db.collection('coll1').count $where: wrap(where2, true, bar: true), (err, count) ->
console.log err, count
Your functions are going to be passed as something like:
function () {
return (function (flag) {
return this.myattr === 'foo' || flag;
}).apply(this, [true])
}
...and example 2:
function () {
return (
function (foo, options) {
if (options == null) {
options = {};
}
if (foo === options.bar || this._id % 2 === 0) {
return true;
} else {
return false;
}
}
).apply(this, [ true, { "bar": true } ])
}
This is how it is supposed to be. The drivers don't translate the client code into the mongo function javascript code.
I'm assuming you are using Mongoose to query your database.
If you take a look at the actual Query object implementation, you'll find that only strings are valid arguments for the where prototype.
When using the where clause, you should use it along with the standard operators such as gt, lt that operates on in the path created by the where function.
Remember that Mongoose querying, as in Mongo, is by example, you may want to reconsider your query specification in a more descriptive fashion.