I just start the module worcloud in Python 3.7, and I'm using the next cxode to generate wordclouds from a dictionary and I'm trying to use differents masks, but this works for some images: in two cases works with images of 831x816 and 1000x808. This has to be with the size of the image? Or is because the images is kind a blurry? Or what is it?
I paste my code:
from PIL import Image
our_mask = np.array(Image.open('twitter.png'))
twitter_cloud = WordCloud(background_color = 'white', mask = our_mask)
twitter_cloud.generate_from_frequencies(frequencies)
twitter_cloud.to_file("twitter_cloud.jpg")
plt.imshow(twitter_cloud)
plt.axis('off')
plt.show()
How can i fix this?
I had a similar problem with a black-and-white image I used. What fixed it for me was when I cropped the image more closely to the black drawing so there was no unnecessary bulk white area on the edges.
Some images should be adjusted for the process. Note only white point values for image is mask_out (other values are mask_in). The problem is that some of images are not suitable for masking. The reason is that the color's np.array somewhat mismatches. To solve this, following can be done:
1.Creating mask object: (Please try with your own image as I couldn't upload:)
import numpy as np;
import pandas as pd;
from PIL import Image;
from wordcloud import WordCloud
mask = np.array(Image.open("filepath/picture.png"))
print(mask)
If the output values for white np.array is 255, then it is okay. But if it is 0 or probably other value, we have to change this to 255.
2.In the case of other values, the code for changing the values:
2-1. Create function for transforming (here our value = 0)
def transform_zeros(val):
if val == 0:
return 255
else:
return val
2-2. Creating the same shaped np.array:
maskable_image = np.ndarray((mask.shape[0],mask.shape[1]), np.int32)
2-3. Transformation:
for i in range(len(mask)):
maskable_image[i] = list(map(transform_zeros, mask[i]))
3.Checking:
print(maskable_image)
Then you can use this array for your mask.
mask = maskable_image
All this is copied and interpreted from this link, so check it if you find my attempted explanation unclear, as I just provided solution but don't understand that much about color arrays of image and its transformation.
Related
I am using pyautogui.locateOnScreen() function to locate elements in chrome and get their x,y coordinates and click them. But at some point I need to take a screenshot of a part of the screen and search for the object I want in this screenshot. Then I get coordinates of it. Is it possible to do it with pyautogui?
My example code:
coord_one = pyautogui.locateOnScreen("first_image.png",confidence=0.95)
scshoot = pyautogui.screenshot(region=coord_one)
coord_two = # search second image in scshoot and if it can be detected get coordinates of it.
If it is not possible with pyautogui, can you advice the easiest-smartest way?
Thanks in advance.
I don't believe there is a built-in direct way to do what you need but the python-opencv library does the job.
The following code sample assumes you have an screen capture you just took "capture.png" and you want to find "logo.png" in that capture, which you know is an subsection of "capture.png".
Minimal example
"""Get bounding box of cropped image from original image."""
import cv2 as cv
import numpy as np
img_rgb = cv.imread(r'res/original.png')
# the cropped image, expected to be smaller
target_img = cv.imread(r'res/crop.png')
_, w, h = target_img.shape[::-1]
res = cv.matchTemplate(img_rgb,target_img,cv.TM_CCOEFF_NORMED)
# with the method used, the date in res are top left pixel coords
min_val, max_val, min_loc, max_loc = cv.minMaxLoc(res)
top_left = max_loc
# if we add to it the width and height of the target, then we get the bbox.
bottom_right = (top_left[0] + w, top_left[1] + h)
cv.rectangle(img_rgb,top_left, bottom_right, 255, 2)
cv.imshow('', img_rgb)
MatchTemplate
From the docs, MatchTemplate "simply slides the template image over the input image (as in 2D convolution) and compares the template and patch of input image under the template image." Under the hood, this offers methods such as square difference to compare the images represented as arrays.
See more
For a more in-depth explanation, check the opencv docs as the code is entirely based off their example.
I'm working on a project related to road recognition from a standard Google Map view. Some navigation features will be added to the project later on.
I already extracted all the white pixels (representing road on the map) according to the RGB criteria. Also, I stored all the white pixel (roads) coordinates (2D) in one list named "all_roads". Now I want to extract each road in terms of the pixel coordinates and place them into different lists (one road in one list), but I'm lacking ideas.
I'd like to use Dijkstra's algorithm to calculate the shortest path between two points, but I need to create "nodes" on each road intersection. That's why I'd like to store each road in the corresponding list for further processing.
I hope someone could provide some ideas and methods. Thank you!
Note: The RGB criteria ("if" statements in "threshold" method) seems unnecessary for the chosen map screenshot, but it becomes useful in some other map screenshot with other road colours other than white. (NOT the point of the question anyway but I hope to avoid unnecessary confusion)
# Import numpy to enable numpy array
import numpy as np
# Import time to handle time-related task
import time
# Import mean to calculate the averages of the pixals
from statistics import mean
# Import cv2 to display the image
import cv2 as cv2
def threshold(imageArray):
"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
Purpose: Display a given image with road in white according to pixel RGBs
Argument(s): A matrix generated from a given image.
Return: A matrix of the same size but only displays white and black.
"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
newAr = imageArray
for eachRow in newAr:
for eachPix in eachRow:
if eachPix[0] == 253 and eachPix[1] == 242:
eachPix[0] = 255
eachPix[1] = 255
eachPix[2] = 255
else:
pass
return newAr
# Import the image
g1 = cv2.imread("1.png")
# fix the output image with resolution of 800 * 600
g1 = cv2.resize(g1,(800,600))
# Apply threshold method to the imported image
g2 = threshold(g1)
index = np.where(g2 == [(255,255,255)])
# x coordinate of the white pixels (roads)
print(index[1])
# y coordinate of the white pixels (roads)
print(index[0])
# Storing the 2D coordinates of white pixels (roads) in a list
all_roads = []
for i in range(len(index[0]))[0::3]:
all_roads.append([index[1][i], index[0][i]])
#Display the modified image
cv2.imshow('g2', g2)
cv2.waitKey(0)
cv2.destroyAllWindows()
I am currently working on a program that requires me to read DICOM files and display them correctly. After extracting the pixel array from the DICOM file, I ran it through both the imshow function from matplotlib and cv2. To my surprise they both yield vastly different images. One has color while the other has no, and one shows more detail than the other. Im confused as to why this is happening. I found Difference between plt.show and cv2.imshow? and tried converting the pixels to BRG instead of RGB what cv2 uses but this changes nothing. I am wondering why it is that these 2 frameworks show the same pixel buffer so differently. below is my code and an image to show the outcomes
import cv2
import os
import pydicom
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
inputdir = 'datasets/dicom/98890234/20030505/CT/CT2/'
outdir = 'datasets/dicom/pngs/'
test_list = [ f for f in os.listdir(inputdir)]
for f in test_list[:1]: # remove "[:10]" to convert all images
ds = pydicom.dcmread(inputdir + f)
img = np.array(ds.pixel_array, dtype = np.uint8) # get image array
rows,cols = img.shape
cannyImg = cv2.Canny(img, cols, rows)
cv2.imshow('thing',cv2.cvtColor(img, cv2.COLOR_BRG2RBG))
cv2.imshow('thingCanny', cannyImg)
plt.imshow(ds.pixel_array)
plt.show()
cv2.waitKey()
Using the cmap parameter with imshow() might solve the issue. Try this:
plt.imshow(arr, cmap='gray', vmin=0, vmax=255)
Refer to the docs for more info.
Not an answer but too long for a comment. I think the root cause of your problems is in the initialization of the array already:
img = np.array(ds.pixel_array, dtype = np.uint8)
uint8 is presumably not what you have in the DICOM file. First because it looks like a CT image which is usually stored with 10+ bpp and second because the artifacts you are facing look very familiar to me. These kind of artifacts (dense bones displayed in black, gradient effects) usually occur if >8 bit pixeldata is interpreted as 8bit.
BTW: To me, both renderings look obviously incorrect.
Sorry for not being a python expert and just being able to tell what is wrong but unable to tell how to get it right.
I'm Marius, a maths student in the first year.
We have recieved a team-assignment where we have to implement a fourier transformation and we chose to try to encode the transformation of an image to a JPEG image.
to simplify the problem for ourselves, we chose to do it only for pictures that are greyscaled.
This is my code so far:
from PIL import Image
import numpy as np
import sympy as sp
#
#ALLEMAAL INFORMATIE GEEN BEREKENINGEN
img = Image.open('mario.png')
img = img.convert('L') # convert to monochrome picture
img.show() #opens the picture
pixels = list(img.getdata())
print(pixels) #to see if we got the pixel numeric values correct
grootte = list(img.size)
print(len(pixels)) #to check if the amount of pixels is correct.
kolommen, rijen = img.size
print("het aantal kolommen is",kolommen,"het aantal rijen is",rijen)
#tot hier allemaal informatie
pixelMatrix = []
while pixels != []:
pixelMatrix.append(pixels[:kolommen])
pixels = pixels[kolommen:]
print(pixelMatrix)
pixelMatrix = np.array(pixelMatrix)
print(pixelMatrix.shape)
Now the problem forms itself in the last 3 lines. I want to try to convert the matrix of values back into an Image with the matrix 'pixelMatrix' as it's value.
I've tried many things, but this seems to be the most obvious way:
im2 = Image.new('L',(kolommen,rijen))
im2.putdata(pixels)
im2.show()
When I use this, it just gives me a black image of the correct dimensions.
Any ideas on how to get back the original picture, starting from the values in my matrix pixelMatrix?
Post Scriptum: We still have to implement the transformation itself, but that would be useless unless we are sure we can convert a matrix back into a greyscaled image.
I am reading an image from SimpleITK but I get these results in vtk any help?
I am not sure where things are going wrong here.
Please see image here.
####
CODE
def sitk2vtk(img):
size = list(img.GetSize())
origin = list(img.GetOrigin())
spacing = list(img.GetSpacing())
sitktype = img.GetPixelID()
vtktype = pixelmap[sitktype]
ncomp = img.GetNumberOfComponentsPerPixel()
# there doesn't seem to be a way to specify the image orientation in VTK
# convert the SimpleITK image to a numpy array
i2 = sitk.GetArrayFromImage(img)
#import pylab
#i2 = reshape(i2, size)
i2_string = i2.tostring()
# send the numpy array to VTK with a vtkImageImport object
dataImporter = vtk.vtkImageImport()
dataImporter.CopyImportVoidPointer( i2_string, len(i2_string) )
dataImporter.SetDataScalarType(vtktype)
dataImporter.SetNumberOfScalarComponents(ncomp)
# VTK expects 3-dimensional parameters
if len(size) == 2:
size.append(1)
if len(origin) == 2:
origin.append(0.0)
if len(spacing) == 2:
spacing.append(spacing[0])
# Set the new VTK image's parameters
#
dataImporter.SetDataExtent (0, size[0]-1, 0, size[1]-1, 0, size[2]-1)
dataImporter.SetWholeExtent(0, size[0]-1, 0, size[1]-1, 0, size[2]-1)
dataImporter.SetDataOrigin(origin)
dataImporter.SetDataSpacing(spacing)
dataImporter.Update()
vtk_image = dataImporter.GetOutput()
return vtk_image
###
END CODE
You are ignoring two things:
There is an order change when you perform GetArrayFromImage:
The order of index and dimensions need careful attention during conversion. Quote from SimpleITK Notebooks at http://insightsoftwareconsortium.github.io/SimpleITK-Notebooks/01_Image_Basics.html:
ITK's Image class does not have a bracket operator. It has a GetPixel which takes an ITK Index object as an argument, which is an array ordered as (x,y,z). This is the convention that SimpleITK's Image class uses for the GetPixel method as well.
While in numpy, an array is indexed in the opposite order (z,y,x).
There is a change of coordinates between ITK and VTK image representations. Historically, in computer graphics there is a tendency to align the camera in such a way that the positive Y axis is pointing down. This results in a change of coordinates between ITK and VTK images.