I am using JMeter to generate load for Azure Event Hub to do performance testing. I want to have constant load in Event Hub( at the time of message ingestion). I tried follwoing options.
Constant Throughput Timer
Number of active threads(users) -100 and ramp up time - 20 seconds.
I am not getting constant load in Event Hub. Getting too much spikes in Event hub. Please suggest a way to get constant load in Event hub via JMeter.
Regards,
Amit
JMeter is capable of creating a constant load pattern, just make sure to follow JMeter Best Practices and recommendations from 9 Easy Solutions for a JMeter Load Test “Out of Memory” Failure article, the essential points are:
Run JMeter in non-GUI mode
Ensure that JMeter has enough headroom to operate in terms of CPU, RAM, network and disk IO, etc. This can be done using JMeter PerfMon Plugin
It might also be the case your application and/or middleware configuration is not appropriate for high constant load, check out i.e. Concurrent, High Throughput Performance Testing with JMeter where the guy initially had load pattern like this:
and after tuning his application and JMeter he got to the following result:
Related
I've write a video streaming server with NodeJS recently.
I wanna to check the performance of streaming with a virtualizing scenario
for example I can run a thousand curl command to fetch a video and check cpu usage of the running nodejs process. but I don't know how to run curl parallel for virtualizing what happened when 1000 users stream my videos.
help me if you have another solution for this. I don't know how to check the performance of my server for many users.
You can kick off 1000 simultaneous curl commands using i.e. GNU parallel however I don't think it's the best way to do a proper load test because you won't have any performance metrics which can be analysed and correlated
Also sending 1000 requests is a good example of a spike test while "classic" load test would be:
Starting with 1 thread (virtual user)
Gradually increasing the load up to 1000 (or whatever is the anticipated number of users of your application)
Holding the load for a certain amount of time
Gradually decreasing the load to 0
This way you will be able to correlate the increasing load with increasing throughput (number of requests per second), response time, error rate, see whether application gets back to normal when the load decreases, are there memory leaks, etc.
So I would recommend going for a dedicated load testing tool which provides possibility to define flexible workload scenarios and outputs nice tables and charts allowing you to perform the test results analysis
I do a stress test to determine the maximum number of TPS(Transaction per second), Hits per second of a server by making HTTP requests through JMeter.
When I run script in Jmeter with different clients (tested on the same server, same script), I find that the number of tps(or hits per second) that the server can handle is different.
Assume that server can handle maximum of around 500 TPS when run script in client 1, 400 TPS when run script in client 2.
I am very confused with the following issues:
Why is there such a difference between two clients?
What affects TPS, hits per second ?
Although when doing stress test, I found that the server could only handle maximum of around 500 TPS, is there any way to increase the server's performance, increase the max number of tps that the server can handle?
Thanks in advance especially if anyone who can solve this problem for me !!
If you run the same JMeter test from different machines and get different results it might be the case JMeter cannot send requests fast enough
JMeter is a normal Java application and it's default configuration is good for tests development and/or debugging, however you need to do some tuning when it comes to load test execution.
First of all make sure to follow JMeter Best Practices
Then you need to ensure that JMeter properly utilizes operating system resources, you might want to increase JVM Heap size and play with Garbage Collector configuration in order to:
allow JMeter to use not less than 30 and not more than 80% of total avaiable heap space
GC shouldn't happen too often as it "pauses" the JVM execution
JMeter must not overload the underlying operating system, it should have enough headroom to operate in terms of CPU, RAM, etc. so it worth checking the OS health, it can be done using JMeter PerfMon Plugin
And last but not the least, if you run into the limits of the machine you can consider running JMeter in Distributed Mode so both client1 and client2 will run the same test providing cumulative 800 TPS or even more (given your server can handle such a load)
#Dimitri T, Thank you very much for your help !!!
I have performed some performance tests on WSO2 APIM on both WebServices (WSDL) and Gateway interfaces. Everything went good on the gateway one, however I am facing an odd behavior when using the WebServices one.
Basically I created a test that add, change password and delete a user and run a test plan using 64 threads. At the very beggining my throughput increases a lot up until reach all 64 threads (throughput peak was 1600 req/seg). However, after that the throughput start to decrease with no reason.
All 64 threads are still active and running, and the machine hosting the wso2am reduce CPU usage. It seems that APIM is given up of handling the request even though it has threads and processors for that.
The picture below shows the vmstat result for processor (user, system and idle) and the context switch and interruptions. It is possible to cpu/context switch follows the throughput.
And the next picture illustrate the jmeter test result after at the end (after decrease throughput).
Basically what I need is a clue on what may be the reason for such behavior. I have already tried to increase the pool of threads on both wso2am and tomcat, however it has no effect. It is like the requests were not arriving at all. Even though jmeter is full of power and had already send a bigger throughput before.
I would bet that a simple configuration on tomcat or wso2 is the answer for that. Any help is appreciate.
Thanks and Regards
It may be due to JMeter not being able to send the requests fast enough, try the following steps:
Upgrade JMeter to the latest version (3.1 as of now), you can get the most recent JMeter distribution from JMeter download page
Run your test in command-line non-GUI mode. JMeter GUI can be used for tests development and/or debugging only, it is not designed for running load tests.
Remove (or disable) all the listeners during test execution. Later on you can open JMeter GUI, add the listener of your choice, load .jtl results file and perform analysis or create an HTML Reporting Dashboard out of results file
See 9 Easy Solutions for a JMeter Load Test “Out of Memory” Failure article for above points explained in details and few more tips on configuring JMeter for maximum performance and throughput
I am new to jmeter and have a couple of doubt about web application performance testing.
Is it necessary to load all embedded resource in jmeter for performance testing ?
I have written a Jmeter script that exercise all REST apis. Is this enough to find the application performance at the server side ?
How Ramp up time affects the Performance test ?
For how much time the test needs to be executed, to get an accurate performance report ?
Load Generation configuration - Generating load from machines attached to application cluster / from different LAN ?
Kindly find my view on the questions below:
I believe that load test needs to be as much realistic as possible so representing real browser behavior is a must. Real browsers download embedded resources like scripts, images and styles, moreover, they use a concurrent thread pool of 2 - 8 threads to do this in parallel. So you need to configure JMeter similarly. However real browsers download these assets only once, on subsequent requests they return embedded resources from cache. So make sure that you configure JMeter to:
download embedded resources
use concurrent pool for it
add HTTP Cache Manager to your test plan
It should be enough from functional point of view as usually static content is being served separately. However see point 1, if you have possibility to simulate real user behavior - go for it
It is better to have reasonable ramp-up and ramp-down periods so the load could increment gradually so both server and load generator sides won't experience peak stress loads (unless it is your test case). See the bit on ramp-up from JMeter documentation
Ramp-up needs to be long enough to avoid too large a work-load at the start of a test, and short enough that the last threads start running before the first ones finish (unless one wants that to happen).
Start with Ramp-up = number of threads and adjust up or down as needed.
By default, the thread group is configured to loop once through its elements.
Usually peak load follows general Pareto principle, during "peak" periods application served 80% of requests during 1-2 hours time frame and remaining 20% of requests were more or less equally distributed between remaining 20 hours in a day. So it should be enough to test your application providing anticipated peak load for a couple of hours. Again if time allows I would recommend to go for Soak testing to see if there are any memory leaks and for Stress testing to determine application load boundaries and whether it recovers from stress load or not
Theoretically application shouldn't care regarding requests source (unless it uses different logic to handle requests from i.e. different geo regions). One thing is obvious: don't run load generator and application under test on the same machine. If one JMeter instance cannot create enough load to implement test scenario - go for distributed testing
I'd like to add some more perspective:
Question 1 & 2:
The Pareto principle can be applied here also - meaning, that it takes a lot of effort to properly simulate reality, downloading all resources used by a browser to render a page and to give the proper 'weights' to different URLs, simulating user behaviour accurately. This is where many load tests fail, because simulating reality accurately is very, very hard. As the previous response mentions, most static content is often served via CDNs or similar anyway, and what you really want to test is usually your own system's capability to handle traffic.
Considering the above, I would say that if you spend 20% of effort setting up a load test that tests your REST API, you will get 80% of the results you want. If you on the other hand go for a completely realistic test, you will spend another 80% of effort for only 20% more results. The effect of this is that in many cases it is better to go for the simpler test, that does not simulate reality accurately. It gives you the most return on your invested time.
Question 3: Agree fully with previous response here. Ramp up slowly, unless your specific use case sees very sudden traffic peaks (like if you're an online auction service or ticket sales or similar). Can also be a good idea to configure your test so it spends some time on a "plateau" after ramping up to peak load, and not just stopping the load test once you reach the peak.
Question 4: I would say you need to run the load test long enough to produce stable, statistically significant results. This can be 5 minutes or 5 hours depending on your scenario, but half an hour is probably a good minimum time to aim for in mostly all cases. The test duration should not be dependent on how long your site tends to experience peak load in real life though - not unless you're doing some kind of soak test.
Question 5: Traffic origin is sometimes worth thinking about, as different source locations lead to different network delay between (simulated) clients and server, which affects transaction rates. If you run a load test with 1,000 VUs on a system located in New York, and generate the traffic from Australia, you will not get a lot of transactions per second due to the high network delay. If you run the same test using a load generator in New York instead, your transaction rate will be a lot higher because the network delay is so much lower. Of course, you can always add more concurrent clients/VUs/connections and get the same transaction rate on a high-delay network link that you would on a low-delay link, but at the cost of forcing the server to keep a lot more (TCP) connection state, using more file descriptors and buffer memory. I.e. might not be a very realistic scenario.
The JMeter manual says
Your hardware's capabilities will limit the number of threads you can effectively run with JMeter. It will also depend on how fast your server is (a faster server makes JMeter work harder since it returns request quicker). The more JMeter works, the less accurate its timing information may become.
The question I want to ask is How many threads can I run from a single desktop machine and still get accurate enough results? However, I realize that's going to depend on what we define modern hardware as, or how fast my application/site is, etc.
So, the better (but harder to answer) question is, how to I profile JMeter to know when I've gone beyond the thread/user count that it's reasonable for a single machine to handle? Accurate deterministic methods are preferred, but anecdotal/rules-of-thumb are welcome.
I first suggest you follow best-practices for building JMeter test plans and running them:
http://www.ubik-ingenierie.com/blog/jmeter_performance_tuning_tips/
http://jmeter.apache.org/usermanual/best-practices.html
Then once your test plan is built, baseline it on the JMeter machine:
Monitor CPU (don't exceed 50%), swap (ensure no swap in/out at all)
Check GC for no long pauses
And don't forget issues which make Test wrong can come from lot of factors:
Networks issue between injector and application
TCP stack issues on JMeter injector
Components between the Injector and Application (Firewall, Load Balancer ...)