Excel count and sort rows satisfying multiple criteria across columns - excel

I have a table that resembles something like the following:
+----+------+------+--+------+------+
| A | B | C | D| E | F |
+----+------+------+--+------+------+
| T1 | | TRUE | | | |
| T2 | TRUE | | | | |
| T3 | | TRUE | | TRUE | |
| T4 | TRUE | TRUE | | | |
| T5 | | | | | TRUE |
+----+------+------+--+------+------+
I want to rearrange rows according to the decreasing number of multiple activities each T supports i.e. more TRUE values a T has across columns, it comes at the top along with the count of TRUEs for each row.
How can I achieve that?

Related

excel cubset function to get 2 columns set

I am trying to use the cubset function to get a set of 2 columns. The data table is something like bellow:
TABLE
+--------+-------+-------+
| CLIENT | PRODA | PRODB |
+--------+-------+-------+
| 1 | A | X |
| 1 | A | Y |
| 1 | B | X |
| 2 | A | Y |
| 2 | B | X |
| 2 | C | Y |
+--------+-------+-------+
The code I running returns only 1 column set
=CUBSET("ThisWorkbookDataModel";"[TABLE].[CLIENT].&[1]*[TABLE].[PRODA].children";"result set")
The code I am trying to perform, I need to return both related columns PROD AND PRODB
=CUBSET("ThisWorkbookDataModel";"[TABLE].[CLIENT].&[1]*[TABLE].[PRODA].[PRODB].children";"result set")
result set
+-------+-------+
| PRODA | PRODB |
+-------+-------+
| A | X |
| A | Y |
| B | X |
+-------+-------+
So what is the correct way to write the code to retrieve both related columns ?
Appreciate any help

Pivot, dynamic data source

I have a pivot chart which currently has the data source referring to my table.
Every week I run my code and a new row of data is appended to the bottom of my table.
The pivot does pick up this new data every week as it refers to the table, however, I want to take one less week each week So I have a years worth of data. So I want to include around rows.
Is there anyway to adjust my table to only include the years worth of rows?
Here is my sample data:
+----------+------------------+-----------------+
| week | stack | overflow |
+----------+------------------+-----------------+
| 12/20/17 | -142,335,432.00 | -41,641,109.88 |
| 12/27/17 | -105,428,220.20 | -47,448,990.63 |
| 1/3/18 | -88,520,154.56 | -24,858,774.97 |
| 1/10/18 | -42,033,431.10 | 14,573,779.35 |
| 1/17/18 | -66,101,748.16 | -8,670,735.22 |
| 1/24/18 | -75,871,649.12 | -18,000,154.21 |
| 1/31/18 | -77,027,686.63 | -11,784,198.64 |
| 2/7/18 | -96,720,126.71 | -52,219,288.98 |
| 2/14/18 | -119,118,554.60 | -34,743,350.28 |
| 2/21/18 | -116,529,554.70 | -20,774,072.93 |
| 2/28/18 | -86,871,998.53 | -25,993,521.20 |
| 3/7/18 | -90,351,387.27 | -21,259,727.05 |
| 3/14/18 | -77,968,076.28 | -51,609,924.29 |
| 3/21/18 | -120,805,352.60 | -40,338,490.97 |
| 3/28/18 | -92,247,583.62 | -14,525,648.04 |
| 4/4/18 | -70,821,451.36 | -35,866,864.46 |
| 4/11/18 | -82,694,486.66 | -59,009,729.82 |
| 4/18/18 | -79,034,094.39 | -64,231,312.42 |
| 4/25/18 | -63,415,815.16 | -28,612,265.37 |
| 5/2/18 | -80,372,191.96 | -53,375,611.61 |
| 5/9/18 | -72,619,415.73 | -50,642,469.19 |
| 5/16/18 | -109,654,240.70 | -45,762,784.43 |
| 5/23/18 | -100,407,366.50 | -39,577,966.11 |
| 5/30/18 | -105,794,095.80 | -65,071,199.59 |
| 6/6/18 | -83,630,201.98 | -60,981,969.88 |
| 6/13/18 | -104,644,821.50 | -63,754,760.71 |
| 6/20/18 | -75,229,424.33 | -55,803,681.24 |
| 6/27/18 | -65,237,135.62 | -54,693,832.65 |
| 7/4/18 | -60,025,672.33 | -44,367,918.60 |
| 7/11/18 | -30,172,175.09 | -28,392,163.28 |
| 7/18/18 | -20,687,864.39 | 24,300,285.63 |
| 7/25/18 | -40,476,447.03 | 4,850,881.09 |
| 8/1/18 | -31,211,625.05 | -67,887,918.30 |
| 8/8/18 | -29,736,938.87 | -32,905,703.80 |
| 8/15/18 | -74,934,647.91 | -65,611,884.73 |
| 8/22/18 | -25,220,747.20 | -7,019,746.86 |
| 8/29/18 | -24,608,552.13 | -8,065,633.97 |
| 9/5/18 | -30,119,599.95 | -26,225,633.08 |
| 9/12/18 | -29,836,379.12 | -10,045,560.95 |
| 9/19/18 | -61,281,567.61 | -58,427,878.27 |
| 9/26/18 | -47,418,209.59 | -33,451,409.22 |
| 10/3/18 | -41,321,336.46 | -25,112,764.44 |
| 10/10/18 | -1,241,932.51 | 21,814,274.35 |
| 10/17/18 | -19,791,273.66 | -12,199,449.75 |
| 10/24/18 | -20,501,406.84 | 1,225,387.11 |
| 10/31/18 | -64,116,464.30 | -5,308,628.21 |
| 11/7/18 | -83,657,672.02 | -19,922,992.91 |
| 11/14/18 | -112,704,007.53 | -32,939,535.69 |
| 11/21/18 | -71,969,954.54 | -51,335,709.79 |
| 11/28/18 | -79,668,484.56 | -67,887,918.30 |
| 12/5/18 | -44,134,343.99 | -32,905,703.80 |
| 12/12/18 | -71,700,079.84 | -65,611,884.73 |
| 12/19/18 | -82,238,011.30 | -74,725,620.20 |
| 12/26/18 | -59,385,932.41 | -54,947,256.94 |
| 1/2/19 | -42,717,830.26 | -31,110,199.14 |
| 1/9/19 | -11,029,444.63 | 7,309,440.90 |
+----------+------------------+-----------------+

Changing the source range for the pivot will be tricky as Excel does not allow non-contiguous cells to be used in pivot tables. Instead you can create the pivot by selecting entire column to account for all future entries.
Then the pivot can be manipulated to show a changing range as shown in the code below.
Hope that works for you.
EDIT
The code is updated below to include 50(can be changed) from the bottom.
Sub MovingPivot()
Dim ws As Worksheet
Dim dtTop As Date
Dim i As Integer, n As Long
Const NumWeeks = 50 'Change this to set weeks range
Set ws = ActiveSheet 'Set reference to your worksheet here
'reset the pivot filters
ws.PivotTables("Table1").PivotFields("Date").ClearAllFilters
'remove blank values
ws.PivotTables("Table1").PivotFields("Date").PivotItems("(blank)").Visible = False
'find the date entry in 50 places from bottom.
i = 0
For n = ws.PivotTables("Table1").RowRange.Count To 1 Step -1
If i = NumWeeks Then
dtTop = ws.PivotTables("Table1").RowRange.Cells(n).Value
Exit For
End If
i = i + 1
Next n
ws.PivotTables("Table1").PivotFields("Date").PivotFilters.Add2 Type:=xlAfterOrEqualTo, Value1:=Format(dtTop, "dd-mmm-yyyy")
End Sub

If you want to continue using a Pivot Chart, you can use the time line slicer to include/exclude data. You'll need to adjust the time line or filter manually after the data has refreshed. Or write VBA to set the filters.
A non-vba version that does not require slicers can also be achieved with a standard chart (not a pivot chart). Create named ranges with Offset functions that grab just the rows of data that you are interested in, then plug these range names into the standard chart. When new data is added to the table, the named ranges that feed the standard chart will also be updated.
If you need a step by step, take a look at https://peltiertech.com/Excel/Charts/DynamicLast12.html

Calculating frequecy (Min/Max/Average) of order placement in Excel

I need to analyze Weekly order frequencies over last 1 year period to find out what is the min/max/average frequencies of orders for each product.
whether it is new or old,system should calculate the first occurrence of the order in the year as the starting week of the order. Min order frequency is difference between successive ordering weeks. If the first order is in wk 3 and the second order is in wk6, implies the order frequency is 3 weeks (=>6-3). Orders can be at any week in the past 52 weeks. Average order frequency = (52 - First order week) / no of weeks that have orders.
Attaching the excel for better understanding the issue.
Original image
+---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+----------------+-------------------------+-----+-----------------------------------+--+
| Product | wk1 | wk2 | wk3 | wk4 | wk5 | wk6 | wk7 | wk8 | wk9 | wk10 | wk11 | wk12 | wk13 | wk14 | wk15 | wk16 | wk17 | wk18 | wk19 | wk20 | wk21 | wk22 | wk23 | wk24 | wk25 | wk26 | wk27 | wk28 | wk29 | wk30 | wk31 | wk32 | wk33 | wk34 | wk35 | wk36 | wk37 | wk38 | wk39 | wk40 | wk41 | wk42 | wk43 | wk44 | wk45 | wk46 | wk47 | wk48 | wk49 | wk50 | wk51 | wk52 | Order start wk | Order frequency (Weeks) | | | |
+---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+----------------+-------------------------+-----+-----------------------------------+--+
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Min | Max | Average | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (End wk - Start week)/No of times | |
| SKU 1 | | | | | | | | | y | | y | | y | | y | | y | | y | | y | | y | y | | | y | | y | | y | | y | | | | | | y | | y | | y | | y | | y | | y | | y | | 9 | 1 | 6 | 2.15 | |
| SKU 2 | | | | | | | y | | | | | | y | | | | | | y | | | | | | y | | | | | | y | | | | | | y | | | | | | y | | | | | | y | | | | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7.29 | |
| SKU 3 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | y | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | y | | | | | | | | y | | | | | | | | y | | | | | | 15 | 8 | 15 | 9.25 | |
+---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+----------------+-------------------------+-----+-----------------------------------+--+

So as mentioned #Barry Houdini solves the problem of finding the longest sequence of zeroes separated by ones elegantly here
You only have to change it slightly to check for repeated blank cells separated by 'y'. The only thing is that you don't want to include cells before the first 'y', and (although this isn't clear) may not want to include blank cells after the last 'y'.
The formula for MIN becomes
=MIN(IF((ROW(A$1:INDEX(A:A,COUNTA(B4:BA4)+1))>1)*(ROW(A$1:INDEX(A:A,COUNTA(B4:BA4)+1))<COUNTA(B4:BA4)+1),FREQUENCY(IF(B4:BA4="",COLUMN(B4:BA4)),IF(B4:BA4="y",COLUMN(B4:BA4)))))+1
and the formula for MAX becomes (the same)
=MAX(IF((ROW(A$1:INDEX(A:A,COUNTA(B4:BA4)+1))>1)*(ROW(A$1:INDEX(A:A,COUNTA(B4:BA4)+1))<COUNTA(B4:BA4)+1),FREQUENCY(IF(B4:BA4="",COLUMN(B4:BA4)),IF(B4:BA4="y",COLUMN(B4:BA4)))))+1
where you need to add 1 to make the results agree with the question because #Barry's formula counts numbers of blanks but OP wants interval between two successive y's. An array of ny+1 elements is generated where ny is the number of y's. This is because the FREQUENCY function returns an array with n+1 elements where n is the number of cut points (bins_array in documentation and because the column numbers of cells containing y are used as cut points so there are ny of them.
These are both array formulas and need to be entered with CtrlShiftEnter
The formula for the average is just
=(COLUMNS(B4:BA4)-MATCH("y",B4:BA4,0))/COUNTA(B4:BA4)

Excel - consolidate with OR operation

I have in a sheet a table like so:
+------+---------+
| Name | Boolean |
+------+---------+
| A | true |
| B | true |
| B | false |
| C | false |
| C | false |
| A | false |
+------+---------+
But in another sheet I need to consolidate it by having a column with unique name and another with the OR of all column Boolean matching the unique name.
Like so:
+------+---------+
| Name | Boolean |
+------+---------+
| A | true |
| B | true |
| C | false |
+------+---------+
I tried Consolidate (no OR operation) and also Index/Match combo, and I couldn't make it work with array-formulas.
I more or less succeed with an Pivot table, but the result wasn't much satisfactory.
There's a simple way to do this that I can't see?

Maybe try:
=COUNTIFS(Sheet1!A:A,A2,Sheet1!B:B,TRUE)>0

Excel if statement to display if anything is in the row

I don't really know how to search for this question or an appropriate title, so I hope that this will make sense.
I'm trying to construct an Excel spreadsheet to keep track of functions of a software that are currently have tests made for them. The spreadsheet looks something like below where A-F are placeholders for the tests and 1-5 are placeholders for functions.
| | A | B | C | D | E | F |
|:-:|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | X | | | | | X |
| 2 | | | | | | |
| 3 | | X | | | | |
| 4 | | | X | | | |
| 5 | | | | X | X | |
I would like to have another column at the end that would do something like this:
| | A | B | C | D | E | F | Tested? |
|:-:|---|---|---|---|---|---|---------|
| 1 | X | | | | | X | Yes |
| 2 | | | | | | | No |
| 3 | | X | | | | | Yes |
| 4 | | | X | | | | Yes |
| 5 | | | | X | X | | Yes |
where the final column is an if statement that will display a conditional string base on if there are any entries in the row. I know that Excel's IF statements work something like this =IF(A1=10,"YES","NO") but I can't think how I would construct an IF statement that would print YES or NO based on whether there are any entries at all in the row.
EDIT: To add a little more detail. I've thought about constructing an IF statement like this: =IF(SUM(C3:AI3)>0, "YES", "NO") and this works essentially if I use 1s or 0s instead of X or O but I'd rather use the latter. Or really I'd just rather use strings instead of integers.

You can use following formula:
=IF(COUNTA(A1:F1)>0,"Yes","No")

You're looking for the ISBLANK function.
Your solution should be something like this:
=IF(ISBLANK(A1:F1), "Yes","No")

Resources