I was sent a "trial project" by a company looking to hire. It's a simple project but uses Amplify and AWS. The CTO told me I need to have a certain version of Node (10.18.1 or 10.19.0) and that I should run yarn install and everything will be good to go. So I completely uninstalled Node, installed NVM and the version of node I'm supposed to use. Then I opened the project and ran yarn install.
When I open the project in browser I am apparently a module, ./aws-exports, among other files that seem to be related to Amplify and AWS. I've noticed that most of these files are in the gitignore. But again, the CTO told me that I shouldn't have to do any setup.
I've tried installing with Npm instead. Using different versions of node. All sorts of silly little fixes and I'm just totally lost.
The file ./aws-exports will be created after the initialisation of Amplify
(https://aws-amplify.github.io/docs/cli-toolchain/quickstart?sdk=js#the-init-process)
It is in .gitignore because it contains configurations information of the AWS account, which you have configured in your terminal.
Does the project have a README? If so, read that. If not, don't work there.
Google the missing package name. If you find nothing, it is likely a private package.
A quick Google search gets me this: https://bit.dev/bondz/react-epic-spinners/orbit-spinner
And this: https://docs.bit.dev/docs/installing-components#configuring-bit-registry
Use Google.
Related
I'm trying to write an npm package that will be published and used as a framework in other projects. The problem is -- I can't figure out a solid workflow for working on it at the same time as working on projects that depend on it.
I know this seems super basic and that npm link solves the issue, but this is a bigger one than just being able to import one local package from another.
I have my framework package scaffolded out; let's call it gumby, It exports a function that does console.log('hello from gumby'). That's all that matters for right now.
Now I'm ready to create a project that will use gumby. Let's call this one client. I set that up too and npm link gumby so client can import from it, etc. OK cool, it's working as expected.
So now it's time to publish gumby. I run npm publish and it goes out to npm as version 0.0.1.
At this point, how do I get the published, npm-hosted version of gumby into the package.json for client? I mean, I could just delete the symlinked copy from my node_modules and then yarn add gumby, but what if I want to go back and work on it locally again? And then run it against the npm version again? And then work on it some more? And then...
You get the point, I imagine. There's no obvious way to switch between the npm copy of a package that you're working on, and the local one. There's the additional problem of how to do that without messing with your package.json too much, e.g. what if I accidentally commit to it version control with some weird file:// dependency path. Any suggestions would be much appreciated.
For local development, having the package symlinked is definitely the way to go, the idea of constantly publishing / re-installing the package sounds like a total pain.
The real issue sounds more like you’re concerned about committing a dev configuration to prod - you could address that problem with something as simple as a pre-commit hook on your VCS e.g. block if it detects any local file references in the package.json.
I am looking for a way to deploy a node js app to multiple machines locally.
Is there some way to create a batch file to zip, or installer file, that will put my node js application and all its dependencies, and possibly get node js too easily on multiple machines by sending one or more files to install?
Also, is there some way to provide updates if the code is updated to all these machines?
Basically, I want to be able to install my node js package/application on multiple locations locally without having to publish my work to npm. Any ideas? cant seem to find anything out there except for putting node js on a web server, or publishing to npm?
This is quite vast. Without using advanced tools these two could work :
git pull origin master
npm install
or a solution with rsync
node js application and all its dependencies
Run an npm install where you're developing your application. Then, just tarball the whole thing, including the node_modules directory. When you deploy your tarball to another machine, be sure to run npm rebuild so that any binary dependencies are built for the platform you just deployed to. If you do your initial npm install on the same platform type, you can usually skip the rebuild step.
Also, is there some way to provide updates if the code is updated to all these machines?
There are an infinite number of ways, and what you pick depends on your needs. You could check-in your whole project including node_modules to version control and just have a Bash script regularly pull from a branch and bounce things as necessary for your specific needs. Beware though that node_modules tends to be huge... it's usually left out of version control. Perhaps stick to the tarball on a server and pull that as necessary.
and possibly get node js too
Keep that separate. You don't need to deploy Node.js every time you deploy your application.
I want to build my Node.JS application in a Azure Website.
There will be an usage of different NPM packages via my packages.json file.
My problem is that I often receive error messages which are related to missing NPM files.
Normally I put my files via FTP or edit them per VS Studio 15 Azure plugin directly on the server. This may be the reason why NPM isn't triggering as Microsoft intended it.
I would prefer a way in which I can just run commands with elevated privileges to have full control over NPM by myself.
Which ways are possible to avaid these problems?
If you're publishing your nodeJS application 'manually' via FTP there are little concerns about that.
First of All, 'manually' means manually.
Git
If you use continuous deployment via Git the final deployment step is to call npm install in your current application folder, this will install all the packages listed in package.json file.
The node_modules folder is excluded by default in .gitignore file, so all packages are downloaded by the server
Web deployment
If you're using web deployment from visual studio or command line, all the files contained by your solution are copied to Hosting environment including node_modules folder , because of this the deployment would take a long time to finish due the huge amount of dependencies and files that the folder contains.
Even worst: this scenario could take you to the same scenario you're facing right now.
FTP deployment
You're copying everything yourself. So the same thing occurs in Web Deployment is happen in FTP deployment method.
--
The thing is that when you copy all those node_modules folder contents you're assuming that those dependencies remains the same in the target enviroment, most of the cases that's true, but not always.
Some dependencies are platform dependent so maybe in you're dev environment a dependency works ok in x86 architectures but what if your target machine or website (or some mix between them) is x64 (real case I already suffer it).
Other related issues could happen. May be your direct dependencies doesn't have the problem but the linked dependencies to them could have it.
So always is strongly recommended to run npm install in your target environment and avoid to copy the dependencies directly from your dev environment.
In that way you need to copy on your target environment the folder structure excluding node_modules folder. And then when files are copied you need to run npm install on the server.
To achieve that you could go to
yoursitename.scm.azurewebsites.net
There you can goto "Debug Console" Tab, then goto this directory D:\home\site\wwwroot> and run
npm install
After that the packages and dependencies are downloaded for the server/website architecture.
Hope this helps.
Azure tweak the Kudu output settings, in local Kudu implementations looks the output is normalized.
A workaround -non perfect- could be this
npm install --dd
Or even more detailed
npm install --ddd
The most related answer from Microsoft itself is this
Using Node.js Modules with Azure applications
Regarding control via a console with elevated privileges there is the way of using the Kudu console. But the error output is quite weird. It's kind of putting blindly commands in the console without much feedback.
Maybe this is a way to go. But I didn't tried this yet.
Regarding deployment it looks like that Azure wants you to prefer Continuous Deployment.
The suggested way is this here.
I've encountered something in node.js that'd I'd like to submit a patch for. I've also located a Github issue in which somebody also complained about the same annoyance. The issue has been tagged saying that patches are welcome. So, I'd like to try to supply a patch.
But, what's the best way to do this? I've forked the main node repository, and I've located the spots in the C++ code that an adjustment could be made. Before I make these changes though, I am trying to figure out how to test these changes of mine. I've got the official node package installed globally. I'm on Windows. How can I test this modified version of node?
You can install node-gyp to build the addon manually (npm install node-gyp -g). Then just change to the addon's root directory and simply do node-gyp rebuild after you make changes.
After further investigation, the vcbuild.bat produces project files that can simply be opened up with Visual Studio. So, code editing and debugging can all easily be done within VS. Awesome!
I've been using Node.js and npm for a few weeks with great success and have started to question the best practice for installing local modules. I understand the Global vs Local argument, however, my question has more to do with where to place a local install. Let's say that I have a project located at ~/ProjectA/ which is version controlled and worked on by multiple developers. When initially playing with Node.js and npm I wasn't aware of the default local installation paths and just simply installed the necessary modules in a default terminal which resulted in a installation path of ~/node_modules. What this ended up doing is requiring all the other developers working on the project to install the modules on their own machines in order to run the application. Having seen where some of the developers ran npm install I'm still really surprised that it worked on their machines at all (I guess it relates to how Node.js and require() looks for modules), but needless to say, it worked.
Now that the project is getting past the "toying around" stage, I would like to setup the project folder correctly. So, my question is, should the modules be installed at ~/ProjectA/node_modules and therefore be part of the version controlled project files, or should it continue to be located at a developer-machine specific location...or does it not really matter at all?
I'm just looking for a little "best-practice" guidance on this one and what others do when setting up your projects.
I think that the "best practice" here is to keep the dependencies within the project folder.
Almostly all Node projects I've seen so far (I'm a Node developer has about 8 months now) do that.
You don't need to version control the dependencies. That's how I manage my Node projects:
Keep the versions locked in the package.json file, so everyone gets the same working version, or use the npm shrinkwrap command in your project root.
Add the node_modules folder to your VCS ignore file (I use git, so mine is .gitignore)
Be happy, you're done!